ESAB India Limited (ESABINDIA.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ESABINDIA.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESABINDIA.NS | ₹5,834.50 | +0.31% | 89.8B | 51.50 | ₹113.30 | +1.58% |
| ABB.NS | ₹6,950.50 | +1.30% | 1.5T | 95.82 | ₹72.54 | +0.57% |
| POLYCAB.NS | ₹9,548.50 | -0.90% | 1.4T | 53.87 | ₹177.24 | +0.49% |
| POLYCAB.BO | ₹9,543.60 | -0.93% | 1.4T | 53.04 | ₹179.93 | +0.49% |
| CGPOWER.BO | ₹893.10 | -6.87% | 1.4T | 115.84 | ₹7.71 | +0.15% |
| CGPOWER.NS | ₹892.55 | -6.97% | 1.4T | 115.32 | ₹7.74 | +0.15% |
| POWERINDIA.NS | ₹31,040.00 | -8.10% | 1.4T | 134.58 | ₹230.64 | +0.02% |
| POWERINDIA.BO | ₹31,019.05 | -8.16% | 1.4T | 142.71 | ₹217.35 | +0.02% |
| HAVELLS.NS | ₹1,181.10 | -0.47% | 740.9B | 43.68 | ₹27.04 | +0.85% |
| HAVELLS.BO | ₹1,180.75 | -0.51% | 740.5B | 43.85 | ₹26.93 | +0.85% |
Stock Comparison
ESABINDIA.NS vs ABB.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, ABB.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while ABB.NS trades at ₹6,950.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas ABB.NS's P/E ratio is 95.82. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ABB.NS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to ABB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check ABB.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs POLYCAB.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, POLYCAB.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while POLYCAB.NS trades at ₹9,548.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas POLYCAB.NS's P/E ratio is 53.87. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to POLYCAB.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to POLYCAB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check POLYCAB.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs POLYCAB.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, POLYCAB.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while POLYCAB.BO trades at ₹9,543.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas POLYCAB.BO's P/E ratio is 53.04. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to POLYCAB.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to POLYCAB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check POLYCAB.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs CGPOWER.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, CGPOWER.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while CGPOWER.BO trades at ₹893.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas CGPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 115.84. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CGPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to CGPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check CGPOWER.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs CGPOWER.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, CGPOWER.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while CGPOWER.NS trades at ₹892.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas CGPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 115.32. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CGPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to CGPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check CGPOWER.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs POWERINDIA.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, POWERINDIA.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while POWERINDIA.NS trades at ₹31,040.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas POWERINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 134.58. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to POWERINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to POWERINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check POWERINDIA.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs POWERINDIA.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, POWERINDIA.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while POWERINDIA.BO trades at ₹31,019.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas POWERINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 142.71. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to POWERINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to POWERINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check POWERINDIA.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs HAVELLS.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, HAVELLS.NS has a market cap of 740.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while HAVELLS.NS trades at ₹1,181.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas HAVELLS.NS's P/E ratio is 43.68. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to HAVELLS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to HAVELLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check HAVELLS.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs HAVELLS.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, HAVELLS.BO has a market cap of 740.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while HAVELLS.BO trades at ₹1,180.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas HAVELLS.BO's P/E ratio is 43.85. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to HAVELLS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to HAVELLS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check HAVELLS.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs APARINDS.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, APARINDS.BO has a market cap of 569.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while APARINDS.BO trades at ₹14,174.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas APARINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 56.63. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to APARINDS.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to APARINDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check APARINDS.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs APARINDS.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, APARINDS.NS has a market cap of 569.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while APARINDS.NS trades at ₹14,174.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas APARINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 55.99. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to APARINDS.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to APARINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check APARINDS.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs KEI.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, KEI.NS has a market cap of 503.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while KEI.NS trades at ₹5,270.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas KEI.NS's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to KEI.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to KEI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check KEI.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs KEI.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, KEI.BO has a market cap of 503.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while KEI.BO trades at ₹5,267.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas KEI.BO's P/E ratio is 54.84. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to KEI.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to KEI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check KEI.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs SCHNEIDER.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, SCHNEIDER.NS has a market cap of 354.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while SCHNEIDER.NS trades at ₹1,481.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas SCHNEIDER.NS's P/E ratio is 169.71. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SCHNEIDER.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to SCHNEIDER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check SCHNEIDER.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs SCHNEIDER.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, SCHNEIDER.BO has a market cap of 354.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while SCHNEIDER.BO trades at ₹1,481.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas SCHNEIDER.BO's P/E ratio is 172.08. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SCHNEIDER.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to SCHNEIDER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check SCHNEIDER.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs HONAUT.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, HONAUT.BO has a market cap of 349.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while HONAUT.BO trades at ₹39,540.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas HONAUT.BO's P/E ratio is 64.98. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to HONAUT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to HONAUT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check HONAUT.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs HONAUT.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, HONAUT.NS has a market cap of 349.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while HONAUT.NS trades at ₹39,515.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas HONAUT.NS's P/E ratio is 62.12. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to HONAUT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to HONAUT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check HONAUT.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs RRKABEL.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, RRKABEL.NS has a market cap of 265B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while RRKABEL.NS trades at ₹2,343.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas RRKABEL.NS's P/E ratio is 53.75. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to RRKABEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to RRKABEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check RRKABEL.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs RRKABEL.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, RRKABEL.BO has a market cap of 264.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while RRKABEL.BO trades at ₹2,341.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas RRKABEL.BO's P/E ratio is 52.96. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to RRKABEL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to RRKABEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check RRKABEL.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs HBLENGINE.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, HBLENGINE.NS has a market cap of 226.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while HBLENGINE.NS trades at ₹816.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas HBLENGINE.NS's P/E ratio is 35.43. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to HBLENGINE.NS's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to HBLENGINE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check HBLENGINE.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs HBLENGINE.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, HBLENGINE.BO has a market cap of 226.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while HBLENGINE.BO trades at ₹816.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas HBLENGINE.BO's P/E ratio is 35.43. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to HBLENGINE.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to HBLENGINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check HBLENGINE.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs FINCABLES.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, FINCABLES.NS has a market cap of 168.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while FINCABLES.NS trades at ₹1,100.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas FINCABLES.NS's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to FINCABLES.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to FINCABLES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check FINCABLES.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs FINCABLES.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, FINCABLES.BO has a market cap of 168B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while FINCABLES.BO trades at ₹1,100.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas FINCABLES.BO's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to FINCABLES.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to FINCABLES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check FINCABLES.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs ARE&M.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, ARE&M.BO has a market cap of 156.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while ARE&M.BO trades at ₹856.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas ARE&M.BO's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ARE&M.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to ARE&M.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check ARE&M.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs ARE&M.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, ARE&M.NS has a market cap of 156.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while ARE&M.NS trades at ₹855.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas ARE&M.NS's P/E ratio is 20.46. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ARE&M.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to ARE&M.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check ARE&M.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs HBLPOWER.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, HBLPOWER.BO has a market cap of 136.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while HBLPOWER.BO trades at ₹492.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas HBLPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to HBLPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to HBLPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check HBLPOWER.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs HBLPOWER.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, HBLPOWER.NS has a market cap of 136.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while HBLPOWER.NS trades at ₹492.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas HBLPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 41.92. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to HBLPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to HBLPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check HBLPOWER.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs VGUARD.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, VGUARD.BO has a market cap of 132.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while VGUARD.BO trades at ₹303.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas VGUARD.BO's P/E ratio is 40.12. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to VGUARD.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to VGUARD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check VGUARD.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs VGUARD.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, VGUARD.NS has a market cap of 132.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while VGUARD.NS trades at ₹302.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas VGUARD.NS's P/E ratio is 39.86. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to VGUARD.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to VGUARD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check VGUARD.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs GRAPHITE.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, GRAPHITE.NS has a market cap of 122.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while GRAPHITE.NS trades at ₹627.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas GRAPHITE.NS's P/E ratio is 64.23. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to GRAPHITE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to GRAPHITE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check GRAPHITE.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs GRAPHITE.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, GRAPHITE.BO has a market cap of 120.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while GRAPHITE.BO trades at ₹627.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas GRAPHITE.BO's P/E ratio is 64.20. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to GRAPHITE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to GRAPHITE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check GRAPHITE.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs TRIL.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, TRIL.BO has a market cap of 112B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while TRIL.BO trades at ₹745.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas TRIL.BO's P/E ratio is 133.44. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to TRIL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to TRIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check TRIL.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs TRIL.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, TRIL.NS has a market cap of 111.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while TRIL.NS trades at ₹745.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas TRIL.NS's P/E ratio is 134.05. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to TRIL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to TRIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check TRIL.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs DIACABS.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, DIACABS.NS has a market cap of 104.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while DIACABS.NS trades at ₹198.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas DIACABS.NS's P/E ratio is 66.52. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to DIACABS.NS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to DIACABS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check DIACABS.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs DIACABS.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, DIACABS.BO has a market cap of 104.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while DIACABS.BO trades at ₹198.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas DIACABS.BO's P/E ratio is -198.55. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to DIACABS.BO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to DIACABS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check DIACABS.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs AMARAJABAT.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, AMARAJABAT.NS has a market cap of 103.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while AMARAJABAT.NS trades at ₹604.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas AMARAJABAT.NS's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to AMARAJABAT.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to AMARAJABAT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check AMARAJABAT.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs HEG.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, HEG.NS has a market cap of 101.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while HEG.NS trades at ₹526.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas HEG.NS's P/E ratio is 32.27. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to HEG.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to HEG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check HEG.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs TARIL.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, TARIL.NS has a market cap of 101.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while TARIL.NS trades at ₹336.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas TARIL.NS's P/E ratio is 32.26. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to TARIL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to TARIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check TARIL.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs VOLTAMP.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, VOLTAMP.NS has a market cap of 98.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while VOLTAMP.NS trades at ₹9,702.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas VOLTAMP.NS's P/E ratio is 63.63. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to VOLTAMP.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to VOLTAMP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check VOLTAMP.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs VOLTAMP.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, VOLTAMP.BO has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while VOLTAMP.BO trades at ₹9,696.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas VOLTAMP.BO's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to VOLTAMP.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to VOLTAMP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check VOLTAMP.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs ESABINDIA.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, ESABINDIA.BO has a market cap of 89.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while ESABINDIA.BO trades at ₹5,817.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas ESABINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 51.35. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ESABINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to ESABINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check ESABINDIA.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs GENUSPOWER.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, GENUSPOWER.BO has a market cap of 89.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while GENUSPOWER.BO trades at ₹322.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas GENUSPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to GENUSPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to GENUSPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check GENUSPOWER.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs GENUSPOWER.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, GENUSPOWER.NS has a market cap of 88.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while GENUSPOWER.NS trades at ₹321.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas GENUSPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to GENUSPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to GENUSPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check GENUSPOWER.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs QPOWER.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, QPOWER.NS has a market cap of 87.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while QPOWER.NS trades at ₹1,132.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas QPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 120.31. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to QPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to QPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check QPOWER.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs PRECWIRE.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, PRECWIRE.NS has a market cap of 73.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while PRECWIRE.NS trades at ₹400.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas PRECWIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 46.65. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to PRECWIRE.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to PRECWIRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check PRECWIRE.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs PRECWIRE.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, PRECWIRE.BO has a market cap of 73.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while PRECWIRE.BO trades at ₹399.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas PRECWIRE.BO's P/E ratio is 46.51. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to PRECWIRE.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to PRECWIRE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check PRECWIRE.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs QPOWER.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, QPOWER.BO has a market cap of 70.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while QPOWER.BO trades at ₹909.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas QPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 180.85. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to QPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to QPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check QPOWER.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs SHILCTECH.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, SHILCTECH.BO has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while SHILCTECH.BO trades at ₹4,408.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas SHILCTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 49.30. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SHILCTECH.BO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to SHILCTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check SHILCTECH.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs UNIVCABLES.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, UNIVCABLES.BO has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while UNIVCABLES.BO trades at ₹1,171.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas UNIVCABLES.BO's P/E ratio is 24.92. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to UNIVCABLES.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to UNIVCABLES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check UNIVCABLES.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs UNIVCABLES.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, UNIVCABLES.NS has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while UNIVCABLES.NS trades at ₹1,170.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas UNIVCABLES.NS's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to UNIVCABLES.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to UNIVCABLES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check UNIVCABLES.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs VMARCIND.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, VMARCIND.NS has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while VMARCIND.NS trades at ₹1,546.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas VMARCIND.NS's P/E ratio is 62.50. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to VMARCIND.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to VMARCIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check VMARCIND.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs HIRECT.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, HIRECT.BO has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while HIRECT.BO trades at ₹1,093.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas HIRECT.BO's P/E ratio is 83.38. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to HIRECT.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to HIRECT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check HIRECT.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs HIRECT.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, HIRECT.NS has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while HIRECT.NS trades at ₹1,092.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas HIRECT.NS's P/E ratio is 51.79. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to HIRECT.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to HIRECT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check HIRECT.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs MARINE.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, MARINE.NS has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while MARINE.NS trades at ₹280.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas MARINE.NS's P/E ratio is 66.90. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to MARINE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to MARINE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check MARINE.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs RAMRAT.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, RAMRAT.NS has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while RAMRAT.NS trades at ₹395.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas RAMRAT.NS's P/E ratio is 34.52. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to RAMRAT.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to RAMRAT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check RAMRAT.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs RAMRAT.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, RAMRAT.BO has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while RAMRAT.BO trades at ₹395.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas RAMRAT.BO's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to RAMRAT.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to RAMRAT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check RAMRAT.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs INDOTECH.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, INDOTECH.NS has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while INDOTECH.NS trades at ₹3,136.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas INDOTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 35.91. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to INDOTECH.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to INDOTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check INDOTECH.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs INDOTECH.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, INDOTECH.BO has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while INDOTECH.BO trades at ₹3,126.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas INDOTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 35.79. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to INDOTECH.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to INDOTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check INDOTECH.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs BBL.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, BBL.NS has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while BBL.NS trades at ₹2,718.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas BBL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to BBL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to BBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check BBL.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs BBL.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, BBL.BO has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while BBL.BO trades at ₹2,720.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas BBL.BO's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to BBL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to BBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check BBL.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs SPECTRUM.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, SPECTRUM.NS has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while SPECTRUM.NS trades at ₹1,853.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas SPECTRUM.NS's P/E ratio is 73.34. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SPECTRUM.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to SPECTRUM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check SPECTRUM.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs EVEREADY.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, EVEREADY.BO has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while EVEREADY.BO trades at ₹368.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas EVEREADY.BO's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to EVEREADY.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to EVEREADY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check EVEREADY.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs EVEREADY.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, EVEREADY.NS has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while EVEREADY.NS trades at ₹367.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas EVEREADY.NS's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to EVEREADY.NS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to EVEREADY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check EVEREADY.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs MODINSU.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, MODINSU.BO has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while MODINSU.BO trades at ₹551.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas MODINSU.BO's P/E ratio is 134.52. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to MODINSU.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to MODINSU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check MODINSU.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs RISHABH.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, RISHABH.BO has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while RISHABH.BO trades at ₹650.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas RISHABH.BO's P/E ratio is 328.66. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to RISHABH.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to RISHABH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check RISHABH.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs EXICOM.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, EXICOM.BO has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while EXICOM.BO trades at ₹178.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas EXICOM.BO's P/E ratio is -8.76. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to EXICOM.BO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to EXICOM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check EXICOM.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs EXICOM.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, EXICOM.NS has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while EXICOM.NS trades at ₹178.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas EXICOM.NS's P/E ratio is -8.74. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to EXICOM.NS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to EXICOM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check EXICOM.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs HPL.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, HPL.NS has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while HPL.NS trades at ₹356.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas HPL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to HPL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to HPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check HPL.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs HPL.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, HPL.BO has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while HPL.BO trades at ₹356.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas HPL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to HPL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to HPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check HPL.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs SERVOTECH.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, SERVOTECH.NS has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while SERVOTECH.NS trades at ₹101.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas SERVOTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 63.41. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SERVOTECH.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to SERVOTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check SERVOTECH.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs MARSONS.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, MARSONS.BO has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while MARSONS.BO trades at ₹113.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas MARSONS.BO's P/E ratio is 290.08. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to MARSONS.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to MARSONS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check MARSONS.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs DYCL.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, DYCL.NS has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while DYCL.NS trades at ₹362.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas DYCL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.82. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to DYCL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to DYCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check DYCL.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs DYCL.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, DYCL.BO has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while DYCL.BO trades at ₹362.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas DYCL.BO's P/E ratio is 105.99. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to DYCL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to DYCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check DYCL.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs IKIO.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, IKIO.BO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while IKIO.BO trades at ₹204.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas IKIO.BO's P/E ratio is 41.63. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to IKIO.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to IKIO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check IKIO.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs IKIO.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, IKIO.NS has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while IKIO.NS trades at ₹202.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas IKIO.NS's P/E ratio is 41.14. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to IKIO.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to IKIO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check IKIO.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs SALZERELEC.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, SALZERELEC.NS has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while SALZERELEC.NS trades at ₹633.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas SALZERELEC.NS's P/E ratio is 24.03. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SALZERELEC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to SALZERELEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check SALZERELEC.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs SALZERELEC.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, SALZERELEC.BO has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while SALZERELEC.BO trades at ₹632.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas SALZERELEC.BO's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SALZERELEC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to SALZERELEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check SALZERELEC.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs DPEL.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, DPEL.NS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while DPEL.NS trades at ₹515.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas DPEL.NS's P/E ratio is 113.82. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to DPEL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to DPEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check DPEL.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs MODISONLTD.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, MODISONLTD.BO has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while MODISONLTD.BO trades at ₹300.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas MODISONLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to MODISONLTD.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to MODISONLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check MODISONLTD.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs MODISONLTD.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, MODISONLTD.NS has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while MODISONLTD.NS trades at ₹299.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas MODISONLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to MODISONLTD.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to MODISONLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check MODISONLTD.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs HUIL.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, HUIL.BO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while HUIL.BO trades at ₹1,272.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas HUIL.BO's P/E ratio is -34.16. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to HUIL.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to HUIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check HUIL.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs MEIL.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, MEIL.NS has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while MEIL.NS trades at ₹306.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas MEIL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to MEIL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to MEIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check MEIL.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs PROSTARM.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, PROSTARM.NS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while PROSTARM.NS trades at ₹135.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas PROSTARM.NS's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to PROSTARM.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to PROSTARM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check PROSTARM.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs SALZER.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, SALZER.BO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while SALZER.BO trades at ₹444.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas SALZER.BO's P/E ratio is 32.64. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SALZER.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to SALZER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check SALZER.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs SUPREMEPWR.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, SUPREMEPWR.NS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while SUPREMEPWR.NS trades at ₹236.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas SUPREMEPWR.NS's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SUPREMEPWR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to SUPREMEPWR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check SUPREMEPWR.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs SAAKSHI.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, SAAKSHI.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while SAAKSHI.NS trades at ₹294.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas SAAKSHI.NS's P/E ratio is 110.66. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SAAKSHI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to SAAKSHI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check SAAKSHI.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs HIGHENE.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, HIGHENE.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while HIGHENE.BO trades at ₹560.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas HIGHENE.BO's P/E ratio is 43.66. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to HIGHENE.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to HIGHENE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check HIGHENE.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs ELIN.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, ELIN.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while ELIN.BO trades at ₹100.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas ELIN.BO's P/E ratio is 21.72. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ELIN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to ELIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check ELIN.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs ELIN.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, ELIN.NS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while ELIN.NS trades at ₹100.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas ELIN.NS's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ELIN.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to ELIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check ELIN.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs DENORA.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, DENORA.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while DENORA.BO trades at ₹874.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas DENORA.BO's P/E ratio is 51.29. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to DENORA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to DENORA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check DENORA.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs DENORA.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, DENORA.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while DENORA.NS trades at ₹879.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas DENORA.NS's P/E ratio is 51.56. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to DENORA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to DENORA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check DENORA.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs S&SPOWER.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, S&SPOWER.NS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while S&SPOWER.NS trades at ₹354.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas S&SPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 4827.80. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to S&SPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to S&SPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check S&SPOWER.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs WSI.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, WSI.NS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while WSI.NS trades at ₹66.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas WSI.NS's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to WSI.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to WSI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check WSI.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs AEPL.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, AEPL.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while AEPL.BO trades at ₹17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas AEPL.BO's P/E ratio is 82.51. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to AEPL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to AEPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check AEPL.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs SHERA.NS Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, SHERA.NS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while SHERA.NS trades at ₹149.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas SHERA.NS's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SHERA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to SHERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check SHERA.NS's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs DLTNCBL.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, DLTNCBL.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while DLTNCBL.BO trades at ₹421.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas DLTNCBL.BO's P/E ratio is 43.51. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to DLTNCBL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to DLTNCBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check DLTNCBL.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs COSPOWER.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, COSPOWER.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while COSPOWER.BO trades at ₹1,897.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas COSPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 24.72. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to COSPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to COSPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check COSPOWER.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs WSIND.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, WSIND.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while WSIND.BO trades at ₹131.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas WSIND.BO's P/E ratio is -6.02. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to WSIND.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to WSIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check WSIND.BO's competition here
ESABINDIA.NS vs RMC.BO Comparison July 2026
ESABINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESABINDIA.NS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, RMC.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESABINDIA.NS is priced at ₹5,834.50, while RMC.BO trades at ₹304.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESABINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 51.50, whereas RMC.BO's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, ESABINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to RMC.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ESABINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to RMC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESABINDIA.NS.Check RMC.BO's competition here