CG Power and Industrial Solutions Limited
CG Power and Industrial Solutions Limited (CGPOWER.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CGPOWER.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGPOWER.BO | ₹873.65 | +1.66% | 1.4T | 113.02 | ₹7.73 | +0.15% |
| CGPOWER.NS | ₹873.55 | +1.68% | 1.4T | 113.01 | ₹7.73 | +0.15% |
| POLYCAB.NS | ₹9,083.00 | +0.89% | 1.4T | 51.21 | ₹177.36 | +0.39% |
| POLYCAB.BO | ₹9,079.05 | +0.84% | 1.4T | 51.19 | ₹177.36 | +0.39% |
| HAVELLS.BO | ₹1,255.50 | -1.04% | 787.5B | 53.06 | ₹23.66 | +0.80% |
| HAVELLS.NS | ₹1,255.20 | -1.08% | 787.3B | 46.64 | ₹26.91 | +0.80% |
| APARINDS.NS | ₹12,810.00 | +0.07% | 514.6B | 53.05 | ₹241.49 | +0.40% |
| APARINDS.BO | ₹12,808.00 | +0.08% | 514.5B | 53.04 | ₹241.47 | +0.40% |
| KEI.NS | ₹5,099.60 | -0.21% | 487.5B | 53.25 | ₹95.76 | +0.09% |
| KEI.BO | ₹5,096.80 | -0.13% | 487.3B | 56.49 | ₹90.23 | +0.09% |
Stock Comparison
CGPOWER.BO vs CGPOWER.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, CGPOWER.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while CGPOWER.NS trades at ₹873.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas CGPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 113.01. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CGPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to CGPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check CGPOWER.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs POLYCAB.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, POLYCAB.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while POLYCAB.NS trades at ₹9,083.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas POLYCAB.NS's P/E ratio is 51.21. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to POLYCAB.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is more volatile compared to POLYCAB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check POLYCAB.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs POLYCAB.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, POLYCAB.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while POLYCAB.BO trades at ₹9,079.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas POLYCAB.BO's P/E ratio is 51.19. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to POLYCAB.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is more volatile compared to POLYCAB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check POLYCAB.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs HAVELLS.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, HAVELLS.BO has a market cap of 787.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while HAVELLS.BO trades at ₹1,255.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas HAVELLS.BO's P/E ratio is 53.06. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HAVELLS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is more volatile compared to HAVELLS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check HAVELLS.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs HAVELLS.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, HAVELLS.NS has a market cap of 787.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while HAVELLS.NS trades at ₹1,255.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas HAVELLS.NS's P/E ratio is 46.64. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HAVELLS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is more volatile compared to HAVELLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check HAVELLS.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs APARINDS.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, APARINDS.NS has a market cap of 514.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while APARINDS.NS trades at ₹12,810.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas APARINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 53.05. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to APARINDS.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is more volatile compared to APARINDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check APARINDS.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs APARINDS.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, APARINDS.BO has a market cap of 514.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while APARINDS.BO trades at ₹12,808.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas APARINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 53.04. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to APARINDS.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is more volatile compared to APARINDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check APARINDS.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs KEI.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, KEI.NS has a market cap of 487.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while KEI.NS trades at ₹5,099.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas KEI.NS's P/E ratio is 53.25. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KEI.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is more volatile compared to KEI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check KEI.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs KEI.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, KEI.BO has a market cap of 487.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while KEI.BO trades at ₹5,096.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas KEI.BO's P/E ratio is 56.49. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KEI.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is more volatile compared to KEI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check KEI.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs SCHNEIDER.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, SCHNEIDER.BO has a market cap of 320.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while SCHNEIDER.BO trades at ₹1,342.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas SCHNEIDER.BO's P/E ratio is 125.42. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SCHNEIDER.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to SCHNEIDER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check SCHNEIDER.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs HONAUT.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, HONAUT.NS has a market cap of 266.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while HONAUT.NS trades at ₹30,170.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas HONAUT.NS's P/E ratio is 52.86. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HONAUT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is more volatile compared to HONAUT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check HONAUT.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs HONAUT.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, HONAUT.BO has a market cap of 266.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while HONAUT.BO trades at ₹30,157.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas HONAUT.BO's P/E ratio is 52.90. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HONAUT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to HONAUT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check HONAUT.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs HBLENGINE.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, HBLENGINE.BO has a market cap of 235.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while HBLENGINE.BO trades at ₹851.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas HBLENGINE.BO's P/E ratio is 29.63. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HBLENGINE.BO's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is more volatile compared to HBLENGINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check HBLENGINE.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs HBLENGINE.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, HBLENGINE.NS has a market cap of 235.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while HBLENGINE.NS trades at ₹848.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas HBLENGINE.NS's P/E ratio is 29.53. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HBLENGINE.NS's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is more volatile compared to HBLENGINE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check HBLENGINE.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs RRKABEL.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, RRKABEL.BO has a market cap of 219.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while RRKABEL.BO trades at ₹1,942.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas RRKABEL.BO's P/E ratio is 44.67. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RRKABEL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to RRKABEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check RRKABEL.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs RRKABEL.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, RRKABEL.NS has a market cap of 219.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while RRKABEL.NS trades at ₹1,942.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas RRKABEL.NS's P/E ratio is 44.66. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RRKABEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to RRKABEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check RRKABEL.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs STLTECH.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, STLTECH.BO has a market cap of 183.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while STLTECH.BO trades at ₹376.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas STLTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 327.17. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STLTECH.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to STLTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check STLTECH.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs FINCABLES.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, FINCABLES.NS has a market cap of 174.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while FINCABLES.NS trades at ₹1,141.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas FINCABLES.NS's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FINCABLES.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to FINCABLES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check FINCABLES.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs FINCABLES.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, FINCABLES.BO has a market cap of 174.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while FINCABLES.BO trades at ₹1,141.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas FINCABLES.BO's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FINCABLES.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to FINCABLES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check FINCABLES.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs ARE&M.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, ARE&M.BO has a market cap of 162.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while ARE&M.BO trades at ₹889.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas ARE&M.BO's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARE&M.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is more volatile compared to ARE&M.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check ARE&M.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs ARE&M.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, ARE&M.NS has a market cap of 162.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while ARE&M.NS trades at ₹888.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas ARE&M.NS's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARE&M.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is more volatile compared to ARE&M.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check ARE&M.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs GRAPHITE.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, GRAPHITE.NS has a market cap of 146.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while GRAPHITE.NS trades at ₹751.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas GRAPHITE.NS's P/E ratio is 44.61. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRAPHITE.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to GRAPHITE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check GRAPHITE.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs GRAPHITE.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, GRAPHITE.BO has a market cap of 146.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while GRAPHITE.BO trades at ₹751.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas GRAPHITE.BO's P/E ratio is 61.04. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRAPHITE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to GRAPHITE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check GRAPHITE.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs VGUARD.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, VGUARD.NS has a market cap of 144.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while VGUARD.NS trades at ₹331.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas VGUARD.NS's P/E ratio is 50.67. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VGUARD.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is more volatile compared to VGUARD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check VGUARD.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs VGUARD.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, VGUARD.BO has a market cap of 144.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while VGUARD.BO trades at ₹331.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas VGUARD.BO's P/E ratio is 50.74. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VGUARD.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is more volatile compared to VGUARD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check VGUARD.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs HBLPOWER.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, HBLPOWER.BO has a market cap of 136.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while HBLPOWER.BO trades at ₹492.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas HBLPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HBLPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to HBLPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check HBLPOWER.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs HBLPOWER.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, HBLPOWER.NS has a market cap of 136.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while HBLPOWER.NS trades at ₹492.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas HBLPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 41.92. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HBLPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to HBLPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check HBLPOWER.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs HEG.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, HEG.BO has a market cap of 115.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while HEG.BO trades at ₹598.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas HEG.BO's P/E ratio is 30.31. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HEG.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to HEG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check HEG.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs HEG.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, HEG.NS has a market cap of 115.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while HEG.NS trades at ₹597.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas HEG.NS's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HEG.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to HEG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check HEG.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs TRIL.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, TRIL.BO has a market cap of 112B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while TRIL.BO trades at ₹745.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas TRIL.BO's P/E ratio is 133.44. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TRIL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to TRIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check TRIL.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs TRIL.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, TRIL.NS has a market cap of 111.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while TRIL.NS trades at ₹745.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas TRIL.NS's P/E ratio is 134.05. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TRIL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to TRIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check TRIL.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs AMARAJABAT.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, AMARAJABAT.NS has a market cap of 103.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while AMARAJABAT.NS trades at ₹604.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas AMARAJABAT.NS's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AMARAJABAT.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is more volatile compared to AMARAJABAT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check AMARAJABAT.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs QPOWER.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, QPOWER.NS has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while QPOWER.NS trades at ₹1,265.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas QPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 91.39. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to QPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check QPOWER.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs TARIL.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, TARIL.NS has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while TARIL.NS trades at ₹324.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas TARIL.NS's P/E ratio is 36.93. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TARIL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to TARIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check TARIL.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs VOLTAMP.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, VOLTAMP.NS has a market cap of 96.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while VOLTAMP.NS trades at ₹9,535.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas VOLTAMP.NS's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VOLTAMP.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to VOLTAMP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check VOLTAMP.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs VOLTAMP.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, VOLTAMP.BO has a market cap of 96.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while VOLTAMP.BO trades at ₹9,532.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas VOLTAMP.BO's P/E ratio is 31.61. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VOLTAMP.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to VOLTAMP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check VOLTAMP.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs GENUSPOWER.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, GENUSPOWER.NS has a market cap of 90.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while GENUSPOWER.NS trades at ₹326.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas GENUSPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GENUSPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to GENUSPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check GENUSPOWER.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs GENUSPOWER.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, GENUSPOWER.BO has a market cap of 90.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while GENUSPOWER.BO trades at ₹326.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas GENUSPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GENUSPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to GENUSPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check GENUSPOWER.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs PRECWIRE.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, PRECWIRE.NS has a market cap of 77B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while PRECWIRE.NS trades at ₹421.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas PRECWIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 57.61. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PRECWIRE.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to PRECWIRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check PRECWIRE.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs PRECWIRE.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, PRECWIRE.BO has a market cap of 76.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while PRECWIRE.BO trades at ₹420.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas PRECWIRE.BO's P/E ratio is 67.89. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PRECWIRE.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to PRECWIRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check PRECWIRE.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs QPOWER.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, QPOWER.BO has a market cap of 70.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while QPOWER.BO trades at ₹909.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas QPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 65.68. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to QPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check QPOWER.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs SHILCTECH.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, SHILCTECH.BO has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while SHILCTECH.BO trades at ₹4,308.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas SHILCTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 26.65. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SHILCTECH.BO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to SHILCTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check SHILCTECH.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs RAMRAT.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, RAMRAT.BO has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while RAMRAT.BO trades at ₹445.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas RAMRAT.BO's P/E ratio is 48.41. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RAMRAT.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to RAMRAT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check RAMRAT.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs RAMRAT.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, RAMRAT.NS has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while RAMRAT.NS trades at ₹444.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas RAMRAT.NS's P/E ratio is 48.13. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RAMRAT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to RAMRAT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check RAMRAT.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs UNIVCABLES.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, UNIVCABLES.BO has a market cap of 39.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while UNIVCABLES.BO trades at ₹1,143.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas UNIVCABLES.BO's P/E ratio is 25.21. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UNIVCABLES.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to UNIVCABLES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check UNIVCABLES.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs UNIVCABLES.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, UNIVCABLES.NS has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while UNIVCABLES.NS trades at ₹1,139.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas UNIVCABLES.NS's P/E ratio is 25.10. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UNIVCABLES.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to UNIVCABLES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check UNIVCABLES.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs HIRECT.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, HIRECT.BO has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while HIRECT.BO trades at ₹935.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas HIRECT.BO's P/E ratio is 33.80. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HIRECT.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is more volatile compared to HIRECT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check HIRECT.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs HIRECT.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, HIRECT.NS has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while HIRECT.NS trades at ₹935.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas HIRECT.NS's P/E ratio is 63.92. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HIRECT.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to HIRECT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check HIRECT.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs BBL.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, BBL.NS has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while BBL.NS trades at ₹2,793.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas BBL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BBL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to BBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check BBL.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs BBL.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, BBL.BO has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while BBL.BO trades at ₹2,781.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas BBL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BBL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to BBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check BBL.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs INDOTECH.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, INDOTECH.NS has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while INDOTECH.NS trades at ₹2,835.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas INDOTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INDOTECH.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to INDOTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check INDOTECH.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs INDOTECH.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, INDOTECH.BO has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while INDOTECH.BO trades at ₹2,830.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas INDOTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INDOTECH.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to INDOTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check INDOTECH.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs MARSONS.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, MARSONS.BO has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while MARSONS.BO trades at ₹160.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas MARSONS.BO's P/E ratio is 84.21. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MARSONS.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to MARSONS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check MARSONS.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs HPL.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, HPL.BO has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while HPL.BO trades at ₹388.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas HPL.BO's P/E ratio is 25.70. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HPL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to HPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check HPL.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs HPL.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, HPL.NS has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while HPL.NS trades at ₹387.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas HPL.NS's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HPL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to HPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check HPL.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs VMARCIND.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, VMARCIND.NS has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while VMARCIND.NS trades at ₹1,019.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas VMARCIND.NS's P/E ratio is 41.19. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VMARCIND.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to VMARCIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check VMARCIND.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs EVEREADY.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, EVEREADY.BO has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while EVEREADY.BO trades at ₹331.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas EVEREADY.BO's P/E ratio is 52.51. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EVEREADY.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to EVEREADY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check EVEREADY.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs EVEREADY.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, EVEREADY.NS has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while EVEREADY.NS trades at ₹331.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas EVEREADY.NS's P/E ratio is 59.77. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EVEREADY.NS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is more volatile compared to EVEREADY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check EVEREADY.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs SERVOTECH.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, SERVOTECH.NS has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while SERVOTECH.NS trades at ₹95.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas SERVOTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 76.04. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SERVOTECH.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to SERVOTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check SERVOTECH.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs DYCL.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, DYCL.NS has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while DYCL.NS trades at ₹421.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas DYCL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DYCL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is more volatile compared to DYCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check DYCL.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs DYCL.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, DYCL.BO has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while DYCL.BO trades at ₹421.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas DYCL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DYCL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to DYCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check DYCL.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs SPECTRUM.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, SPECTRUM.NS has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while SPECTRUM.NS trades at ₹1,252.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas SPECTRUM.NS's P/E ratio is 49.82. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SPECTRUM.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to SPECTRUM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check SPECTRUM.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs MODINSU.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, MODINSU.BO has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while MODINSU.BO trades at ₹376.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas MODINSU.BO's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MODINSU.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to MODINSU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check MODINSU.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs EXICOM.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, EXICOM.BO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while EXICOM.BO trades at ₹119.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas EXICOM.BO's P/E ratio is -5.57. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EXICOM.BO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to EXICOM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check EXICOM.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs EXICOM.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, EXICOM.NS has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while EXICOM.NS trades at ₹119.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas EXICOM.NS's P/E ratio is -5.57. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EXICOM.NS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to EXICOM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check EXICOM.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs SALZERELEC.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, SALZERELEC.NS has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while SALZERELEC.NS trades at ₹734.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas SALZERELEC.NS's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SALZERELEC.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to SALZERELEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check SALZERELEC.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs SALZERELEC.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, SALZERELEC.BO has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while SALZERELEC.BO trades at ₹733.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas SALZERELEC.BO's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SALZERELEC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to SALZERELEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check SALZERELEC.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs DPEL.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, DPEL.NS has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while DPEL.NS trades at ₹520.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas DPEL.NS's P/E ratio is 114.89. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DPEL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to DPEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check DPEL.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs PROSTARM.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, PROSTARM.NS has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while PROSTARM.NS trades at ₹168.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas PROSTARM.NS's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PROSTARM.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to PROSTARM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check PROSTARM.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs MEIL.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, MEIL.NS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while MEIL.NS trades at ₹341.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas MEIL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MEIL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to MEIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check MEIL.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs HUIL.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, HUIL.BO has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while HUIL.BO trades at ₹1,175.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas HUIL.BO's P/E ratio is -31.55. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HUIL.BO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is more volatile compared to HUIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check HUIL.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs SALZER.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, SALZER.BO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while SALZER.BO trades at ₹444.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas SALZER.BO's P/E ratio is 32.64. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SALZER.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to SALZER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check SALZER.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs ELIN.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, ELIN.BO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while ELIN.BO trades at ₹131.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas ELIN.BO's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ELIN.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to ELIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check ELIN.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs ELIN.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, ELIN.NS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while ELIN.NS trades at ₹131.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas ELIN.NS's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ELIN.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to ELIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check ELIN.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs SUPREMEPWR.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, SUPREMEPWR.NS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while SUPREMEPWR.NS trades at ₹252.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas SUPREMEPWR.NS's P/E ratio is 30.28. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SUPREMEPWR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is more volatile compared to SUPREMEPWR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check SUPREMEPWR.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs HIGHENE.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, HIGHENE.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while HIGHENE.BO trades at ₹641.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas HIGHENE.BO's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HIGHENE.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is more volatile compared to HIGHENE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check HIGHENE.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs MODISONLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, MODISONLTD.NS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while MODISONLTD.NS trades at ₹166.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas MODISONLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MODISONLTD.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is more volatile compared to MODISONLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check MODISONLTD.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs MODISONLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, MODISONLTD.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while MODISONLTD.BO trades at ₹165.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas MODISONLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MODISONLTD.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is more volatile compared to MODISONLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check MODISONLTD.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs S&SPOWER.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, S&SPOWER.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while S&SPOWER.NS trades at ₹396.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas S&SPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 60.87. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to S&SPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is more volatile compared to S&SPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check S&SPOWER.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs SAAKSHI.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, SAAKSHI.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while SAAKSHI.NS trades at ₹269.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas SAAKSHI.NS's P/E ratio is 101.15. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SAAKSHI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to SAAKSHI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check SAAKSHI.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs RMC.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, RMC.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while RMC.BO trades at ₹449.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas RMC.BO's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RMC.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to RMC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check RMC.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs WSI.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, WSI.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while WSI.NS trades at ₹72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas WSI.NS's P/E ratio is -153.19. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WSI.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to WSI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check WSI.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs AEPL.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, AEPL.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while AEPL.BO trades at ₹17.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas AEPL.BO's P/E ratio is 46.68. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AEPL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is more volatile compared to AEPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check AEPL.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs DENORA.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, DENORA.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while DENORA.BO trades at ₹758.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas DENORA.BO's P/E ratio is 30.93. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DENORA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to DENORA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check DENORA.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs DENORA.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, DENORA.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while DENORA.NS trades at ₹757.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas DENORA.NS's P/E ratio is 30.76. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DENORA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to DENORA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check DENORA.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs DLTNCBL.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, DLTNCBL.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while DLTNCBL.BO trades at ₹455.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas DLTNCBL.BO's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DLTNCBL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to DLTNCBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check DLTNCBL.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs SHERA.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, SHERA.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while SHERA.NS trades at ₹156.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas SHERA.NS's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SHERA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to SHERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check SHERA.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs WSIND.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, WSIND.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while WSIND.BO trades at ₹131.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas WSIND.BO's P/E ratio is -6.02. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WSIND.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to WSIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check WSIND.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs NIPPOBATRY.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, NIPPOBATRY.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while NIPPOBATRY.BO trades at ₹441.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas NIPPOBATRY.BO's P/E ratio is -58.83. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NIPPOBATRY.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to NIPPOBATRY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check NIPPOBATRY.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs NIPPOBATRY.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, NIPPOBATRY.NS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while NIPPOBATRY.NS trades at ₹440.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas NIPPOBATRY.NS's P/E ratio is -60.85. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NIPPOBATRY.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to NIPPOBATRY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check NIPPOBATRY.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs GEEKAYWIRE.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, GEEKAYWIRE.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while GEEKAYWIRE.NS trades at ₹27.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas GEEKAYWIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GEEKAYWIRE.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to GEEKAYWIRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check GEEKAYWIRE.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs APLAB.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, APLAB.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while APLAB.BO trades at ₹113.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas APLAB.BO's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to APLAB.BO's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to APLAB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check APLAB.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs KAYCEEI.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, KAYCEEI.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while KAYCEEI.BO trades at ₹900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas KAYCEEI.BO's P/E ratio is 52.14. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KAYCEEI.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to KAYCEEI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check KAYCEEI.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs CORDSCABLE.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, CORDSCABLE.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while CORDSCABLE.BO trades at ₹217.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas CORDSCABLE.BO's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CORDSCABLE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to CORDSCABLE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check CORDSCABLE.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs CORDSCABLE.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, CORDSCABLE.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while CORDSCABLE.NS trades at ₹217.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas CORDSCABLE.NS's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CORDSCABLE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to CORDSCABLE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check CORDSCABLE.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs PLAZACABLE.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, PLAZACABLE.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while PLAZACABLE.BO trades at ₹60.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas PLAZACABLE.BO's P/E ratio is 50.52. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PLAZACABLE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to PLAZACABLE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check PLAZACABLE.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs PLAZACABLE.NS Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, PLAZACABLE.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while PLAZACABLE.NS trades at ₹60.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas PLAZACABLE.NS's P/E ratio is 50.46. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PLAZACABLE.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to PLAZACABLE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check PLAZACABLE.NS's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs DEL.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, DEL.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while DEL.BO trades at ₹177.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas DEL.BO's P/E ratio is 62.99. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DEL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is less volatile compared to DEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check DEL.BO's competition here
CGPOWER.BO vs PANCARBON.BO Comparison May 2026
CGPOWER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGPOWER.BO stands at 1.4T. In comparison, PANCARBON.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGPOWER.BO is priced at ₹873.65, while PANCARBON.BO trades at ₹486.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGPOWER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 113.02, whereas PANCARBON.BO's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, CGPOWER.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PANCARBON.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGPOWER.BO is more volatile compared to PANCARBON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGPOWER.BO.Check PANCARBON.BO's competition here