KEI Industries Limited (KEI.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KEI.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KEI.BO | ₹5,249.95 | -0.88% | 510.1B | 59.14 | ₹90.23 | +0.08% |
| CGPOWER.BO | ₹930.55 | -0.75% | 1.5T | 121.81 | ₹7.70 | +0.14% |
| CGPOWER.NS | ₹931.25 | -0.71% | 1.5T | 121.48 | ₹7.72 | +0.14% |
| POLYCAB.NS | ₹9,618.00 | -1.02% | 1.5T | 54.71 | ₹177.29 | +0.36% |
| POLYCAB.BO | ₹9,613.65 | -1.08% | 1.5T | 54.69 | ₹177.30 | +0.36% |
| HAVELLS.BO | ₹1,148.85 | -1.45% | 721.8B | 48.64 | ₹23.66 | +0.87% |
| HAVELLS.NS | ₹1,147.50 | -1.62% | 721.7B | 42.71 | ₹26.94 | +0.87% |
| APARINDS.NS | ₹13,367.00 | -2.49% | 557.5B | 57.27 | ₹242.33 | +0.37% |
| APARINDS.BO | ₹13,370.65 | -2.50% | 557.1B | 57.22 | ₹242.38 | +0.37% |
| KEI.NS | ₹5,245.50 | -0.95% | 510.1B | 55.72 | ₹95.76 | +0.08% |
Stock Comparison
KEI.BO vs CGPOWER.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, CGPOWER.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while CGPOWER.BO trades at ₹930.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas CGPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 121.81. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CGPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to CGPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check CGPOWER.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs CGPOWER.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, CGPOWER.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while CGPOWER.NS trades at ₹931.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas CGPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 121.48. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CGPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to CGPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check CGPOWER.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs POLYCAB.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, POLYCAB.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while POLYCAB.NS trades at ₹9,618.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas POLYCAB.NS's P/E ratio is 54.71. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to POLYCAB.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to POLYCAB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check POLYCAB.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs POLYCAB.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, POLYCAB.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while POLYCAB.BO trades at ₹9,613.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas POLYCAB.BO's P/E ratio is 54.69. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to POLYCAB.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to POLYCAB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check POLYCAB.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs HAVELLS.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, HAVELLS.BO has a market cap of 721.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while HAVELLS.BO trades at ₹1,148.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas HAVELLS.BO's P/E ratio is 48.64. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HAVELLS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to HAVELLS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HAVELLS.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs HAVELLS.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, HAVELLS.NS has a market cap of 721.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while HAVELLS.NS trades at ₹1,147.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas HAVELLS.NS's P/E ratio is 42.71. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HAVELLS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to HAVELLS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HAVELLS.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs APARINDS.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, APARINDS.NS has a market cap of 557.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while APARINDS.NS trades at ₹13,367.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas APARINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 57.27. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APARINDS.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to APARINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check APARINDS.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs APARINDS.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, APARINDS.BO has a market cap of 557.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while APARINDS.BO trades at ₹13,370.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas APARINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 57.22. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APARINDS.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to APARINDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check APARINDS.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs KEI.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, KEI.NS has a market cap of 510.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while KEI.NS trades at ₹5,245.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas KEI.NS's P/E ratio is 55.72. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KEI.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to KEI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check KEI.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs HONAUT.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, HONAUT.NS has a market cap of 306.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while HONAUT.NS trades at ₹35,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas HONAUT.NS's P/E ratio is 58.50. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HONAUT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to HONAUT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HONAUT.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs HONAUT.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, HONAUT.BO has a market cap of 306.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while HONAUT.BO trades at ₹35,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas HONAUT.BO's P/E ratio is 58.34. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HONAUT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to HONAUT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HONAUT.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs SCHNEIDER.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, SCHNEIDER.BO has a market cap of 280.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while SCHNEIDER.BO trades at ₹1,142.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas SCHNEIDER.BO's P/E ratio is 132.31. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCHNEIDER.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to SCHNEIDER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check SCHNEIDER.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs SCHNEIDER.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, SCHNEIDER.NS has a market cap of 280.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while SCHNEIDER.NS trades at ₹1,151.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas SCHNEIDER.NS's P/E ratio is 132.15. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCHNEIDER.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to SCHNEIDER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check SCHNEIDER.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs RRKABEL.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, RRKABEL.NS has a market cap of 251.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while RRKABEL.NS trades at ₹2,204.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas RRKABEL.NS's P/E ratio is 51.05. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RRKABEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to RRKABEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check RRKABEL.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs RRKABEL.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, RRKABEL.BO has a market cap of 251.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while RRKABEL.BO trades at ₹2,195.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas RRKABEL.BO's P/E ratio is 51.02. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RRKABEL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to RRKABEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check RRKABEL.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs HBLENGINE.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, HBLENGINE.NS has a market cap of 220.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while HBLENGINE.NS trades at ₹781.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas HBLENGINE.NS's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HBLENGINE.NS's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to HBLENGINE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HBLENGINE.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs HBLENGINE.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, HBLENGINE.BO has a market cap of 220.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while HBLENGINE.BO trades at ₹778.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas HBLENGINE.BO's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HBLENGINE.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to HBLENGINE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HBLENGINE.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs FINCABLES.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, FINCABLES.NS has a market cap of 161.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while FINCABLES.NS trades at ₹1,046.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas FINCABLES.NS's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FINCABLES.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to FINCABLES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check FINCABLES.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs FINCABLES.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, FINCABLES.BO has a market cap of 161.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while FINCABLES.BO trades at ₹1,045.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas FINCABLES.BO's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FINCABLES.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to FINCABLES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check FINCABLES.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs ARE&M.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, ARE&M.NS has a market cap of 155.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while ARE&M.NS trades at ₹838.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas ARE&M.NS's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ARE&M.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to ARE&M.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check ARE&M.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs ARE&M.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, ARE&M.BO has a market cap of 155.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while ARE&M.BO trades at ₹836.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas ARE&M.BO's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ARE&M.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to ARE&M.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check ARE&M.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs GRAPHITE.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, GRAPHITE.BO has a market cap of 137.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while GRAPHITE.BO trades at ₹689.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas GRAPHITE.BO's P/E ratio is 57.30. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRAPHITE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to GRAPHITE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check GRAPHITE.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs GRAPHITE.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, GRAPHITE.NS has a market cap of 137.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while GRAPHITE.NS trades at ₹691.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas GRAPHITE.NS's P/E ratio is 78.55. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRAPHITE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to GRAPHITE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check GRAPHITE.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs HBLPOWER.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, HBLPOWER.NS has a market cap of 136.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while HBLPOWER.NS trades at ₹492.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas HBLPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 41.92. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HBLPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to HBLPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HBLPOWER.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs HBLPOWER.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, HBLPOWER.BO has a market cap of 136.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while HBLPOWER.BO trades at ₹492.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas HBLPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HBLPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to HBLPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HBLPOWER.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs VGUARD.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, VGUARD.NS has a market cap of 135.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while VGUARD.NS trades at ₹306.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas VGUARD.NS's P/E ratio is 44.22. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VGUARD.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to VGUARD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check VGUARD.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs VGUARD.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, VGUARD.BO has a market cap of 135.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while VGUARD.BO trades at ₹305.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas VGUARD.BO's P/E ratio is 44.27. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VGUARD.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to VGUARD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check VGUARD.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs TRIL.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, TRIL.BO has a market cap of 112B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while TRIL.BO trades at ₹745.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas TRIL.BO's P/E ratio is 133.44. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRIL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to TRIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check TRIL.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs TRIL.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, TRIL.NS has a market cap of 111.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while TRIL.NS trades at ₹745.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas TRIL.NS's P/E ratio is 134.05. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRIL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to TRIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check TRIL.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs HEG.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, HEG.NS has a market cap of 104.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while HEG.NS trades at ₹527.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas HEG.NS's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HEG.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to HEG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HEG.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs HEG.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, HEG.BO has a market cap of 104B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while HEG.BO trades at ₹527.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas HEG.BO's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HEG.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to HEG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HEG.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs AMARAJABAT.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, AMARAJABAT.NS has a market cap of 103.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while AMARAJABAT.NS trades at ₹604.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas AMARAJABAT.NS's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AMARAJABAT.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to AMARAJABAT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check AMARAJABAT.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs VOLTAMP.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, VOLTAMP.NS has a market cap of 100B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while VOLTAMP.NS trades at ₹9,915.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas VOLTAMP.NS's P/E ratio is 32.72. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VOLTAMP.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to VOLTAMP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check VOLTAMP.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs VOLTAMP.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, VOLTAMP.BO has a market cap of 99.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while VOLTAMP.BO trades at ₹9,676.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas VOLTAMP.BO's P/E ratio is 32.61. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VOLTAMP.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to VOLTAMP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check VOLTAMP.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs TARIL.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, TARIL.NS has a market cap of 96.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while TARIL.NS trades at ₹318.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas TARIL.NS's P/E ratio is 36.41. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TARIL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to TARIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check TARIL.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs GENUSPOWER.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, GENUSPOWER.NS has a market cap of 85.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while GENUSPOWER.NS trades at ₹306.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas GENUSPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GENUSPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to GENUSPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check GENUSPOWER.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs GENUSPOWER.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, GENUSPOWER.BO has a market cap of 85.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while GENUSPOWER.BO trades at ₹305.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas GENUSPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GENUSPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to GENUSPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check GENUSPOWER.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs QPOWER.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, QPOWER.NS has a market cap of 83B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while QPOWER.NS trades at ₹1,125.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas QPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 68.63. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to QPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to QPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check QPOWER.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs PRECWIRE.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, PRECWIRE.NS has a market cap of 76.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while PRECWIRE.NS trades at ₹410.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas PRECWIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 48.72. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRECWIRE.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to PRECWIRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check PRECWIRE.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs PRECWIRE.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, PRECWIRE.BO has a market cap of 76.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while PRECWIRE.BO trades at ₹410.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas PRECWIRE.BO's P/E ratio is 67.23. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRECWIRE.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to PRECWIRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check PRECWIRE.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs QPOWER.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, QPOWER.BO has a market cap of 70.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while QPOWER.BO trades at ₹909.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas QPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 58.02. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to QPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to QPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check QPOWER.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs SHILCTECH.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, SHILCTECH.BO has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while SHILCTECH.BO trades at ₹3,991.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas SHILCTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 29.41. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHILCTECH.BO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to SHILCTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check SHILCTECH.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs UNIVCABLES.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, UNIVCABLES.NS has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while UNIVCABLES.NS trades at ₹1,227.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas UNIVCABLES.NS's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UNIVCABLES.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to UNIVCABLES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check UNIVCABLES.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs UNIVCABLES.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, UNIVCABLES.BO has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while UNIVCABLES.BO trades at ₹1,237.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas UNIVCABLES.BO's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UNIVCABLES.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to UNIVCABLES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check UNIVCABLES.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs HIRECT.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, HIRECT.BO has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while HIRECT.BO trades at ₹1,106.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas HIRECT.BO's P/E ratio is 40.89. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HIRECT.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to HIRECT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HIRECT.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs HIRECT.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, HIRECT.NS has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while HIRECT.NS trades at ₹1,113.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas HIRECT.NS's P/E ratio is 82.73. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HIRECT.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to HIRECT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HIRECT.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs VMARCIND.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, VMARCIND.NS has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while VMARCIND.NS trades at ₹1,447.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas VMARCIND.NS's P/E ratio is 61.19. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VMARCIND.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to VMARCIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check VMARCIND.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs RAMRAT.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, RAMRAT.NS has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while RAMRAT.NS trades at ₹386.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas RAMRAT.NS's P/E ratio is 34.10. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RAMRAT.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to RAMRAT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check RAMRAT.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs RAMRAT.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, RAMRAT.BO has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while RAMRAT.BO trades at ₹386.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas RAMRAT.BO's P/E ratio is 34.03. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RAMRAT.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to RAMRAT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check RAMRAT.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs BBL.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, BBL.NS has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while BBL.NS trades at ₹2,807.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas BBL.NS's P/E ratio is 26.76. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BBL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to BBL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check BBL.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs BBL.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, BBL.BO has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while BBL.BO trades at ₹2,782.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas BBL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.84. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BBL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to BBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check BBL.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs INDOTECH.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, INDOTECH.BO has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while INDOTECH.BO trades at ₹2,620.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas INDOTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 30.54. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INDOTECH.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to INDOTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check INDOTECH.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs INDOTECH.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, INDOTECH.NS has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while INDOTECH.NS trades at ₹2,630.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas INDOTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 30.41. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INDOTECH.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to INDOTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check INDOTECH.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs SPECTRUM.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, SPECTRUM.NS has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while SPECTRUM.NS trades at ₹1,711.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas SPECTRUM.NS's P/E ratio is 70.40. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPECTRUM.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to SPECTRUM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check SPECTRUM.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs EVEREADY.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, EVEREADY.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while EVEREADY.BO trades at ₹327.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas EVEREADY.BO's P/E ratio is 52.77. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EVEREADY.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to EVEREADY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check EVEREADY.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs EVEREADY.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, EVEREADY.NS has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while EVEREADY.NS trades at ₹328.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas EVEREADY.NS's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EVEREADY.NS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to EVEREADY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check EVEREADY.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs SERVOTECH.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, SERVOTECH.NS has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while SERVOTECH.NS trades at ₹102.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas SERVOTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 71.90. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SERVOTECH.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to SERVOTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check SERVOTECH.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs HPL.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, HPL.BO has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while HPL.BO trades at ₹352.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas HPL.BO's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HPL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to HPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HPL.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs HPL.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, HPL.NS has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while HPL.NS trades at ₹354.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas HPL.NS's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HPL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to HPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HPL.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs MARSONS.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, MARSONS.BO has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while MARSONS.BO trades at ₹125.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas MARSONS.BO's P/E ratio is 47.97. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MARSONS.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to MARSONS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check MARSONS.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs EXICOM.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, EXICOM.BO has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while EXICOM.BO trades at ₹132.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas EXICOM.BO's P/E ratio is -6.59. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EXICOM.BO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to EXICOM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check EXICOM.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs EXICOM.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, EXICOM.NS has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while EXICOM.NS trades at ₹132.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas EXICOM.NS's P/E ratio is -6.57. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EXICOM.NS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to EXICOM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check EXICOM.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs MODINSU.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, MODINSU.BO has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while MODINSU.BO trades at ₹366.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas MODINSU.BO's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MODINSU.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to MODINSU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check MODINSU.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs DYCL.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, DYCL.BO has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while DYCL.BO trades at ₹317.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas DYCL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DYCL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to DYCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check DYCL.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs DYCL.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, DYCL.NS has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while DYCL.NS trades at ₹319.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas DYCL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DYCL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to DYCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check DYCL.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs MODISONLTD.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, MODISONLTD.NS has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while MODISONLTD.NS trades at ₹344.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas MODISONLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MODISONLTD.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to MODISONLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check MODISONLTD.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs MODISONLTD.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, MODISONLTD.BO has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while MODISONLTD.BO trades at ₹344.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas MODISONLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MODISONLTD.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to MODISONLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check MODISONLTD.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs SALZERELEC.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, SALZERELEC.BO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while SALZERELEC.BO trades at ₹621.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas SALZERELEC.BO's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SALZERELEC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to SALZERELEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check SALZERELEC.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs SALZERELEC.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, SALZERELEC.NS has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while SALZERELEC.NS trades at ₹622.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas SALZERELEC.NS's P/E ratio is 20.67. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SALZERELEC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to SALZERELEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check SALZERELEC.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs DPEL.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, DPEL.NS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while DPEL.NS trades at ₹490.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas DPEL.NS's P/E ratio is 108.87. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DPEL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to DPEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check DPEL.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs MEIL.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, MEIL.NS has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while MEIL.NS trades at ₹318.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas MEIL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MEIL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to MEIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check MEIL.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs HUIL.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, HUIL.BO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while HUIL.BO trades at ₹1,234.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas HUIL.BO's P/E ratio is -32.83. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HUIL.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to HUIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HUIL.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs PROSTARM.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, PROSTARM.NS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while PROSTARM.NS trades at ₹140.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas PROSTARM.NS's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PROSTARM.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to PROSTARM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check PROSTARM.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs SALZER.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, SALZER.BO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while SALZER.BO trades at ₹444.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas SALZER.BO's P/E ratio is 32.64. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SALZER.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to SALZER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check SALZER.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs SUPREMEPWR.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, SUPREMEPWR.NS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while SUPREMEPWR.NS trades at ₹255.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas SUPREMEPWR.NS's P/E ratio is 29.37. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUPREMEPWR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to SUPREMEPWR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check SUPREMEPWR.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs ELIN.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, ELIN.NS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while ELIN.NS trades at ₹109.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas ELIN.NS's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ELIN.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to ELIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check ELIN.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs ELIN.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, ELIN.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while ELIN.BO trades at ₹110.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas ELIN.BO's P/E ratio is 23.41. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ELIN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to ELIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check ELIN.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs S&SPOWER.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, S&SPOWER.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while S&SPOWER.NS trades at ₹409.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas S&SPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 48.57. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to S&SPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to S&SPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check S&SPOWER.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs WSI.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, WSI.NS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while WSI.NS trades at ₹68.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas WSI.NS's P/E ratio is 206.52. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WSI.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to WSI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check WSI.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs HIGHENE.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, HIGHENE.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while HIGHENE.BO trades at ₹500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas HIGHENE.BO's P/E ratio is 29.13. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HIGHENE.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to HIGHENE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HIGHENE.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs SAAKSHI.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, SAAKSHI.NS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while SAAKSHI.NS trades at ₹240.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas SAAKSHI.NS's P/E ratio is 92.56. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SAAKSHI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to SAAKSHI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check SAAKSHI.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs DENORA.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, DENORA.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while DENORA.BO trades at ₹761.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas DENORA.BO's P/E ratio is 45.42. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DENORA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to DENORA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check DENORA.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs AEPL.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, AEPL.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while AEPL.BO trades at ₹16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas AEPL.BO's P/E ratio is 42.63. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AEPL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to AEPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check AEPL.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs DENORA.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, DENORA.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while DENORA.NS trades at ₹761.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas DENORA.NS's P/E ratio is 44.92. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DENORA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to DENORA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check DENORA.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs SHERA.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, SHERA.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while SHERA.NS trades at ₹163.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas SHERA.NS's P/E ratio is 20.28. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHERA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to SHERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check SHERA.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs COSPOWER.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, COSPOWER.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while COSPOWER.BO trades at ₹2,002.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas COSPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 25.99. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COSPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to COSPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check COSPOWER.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs DLTNCBL.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, DLTNCBL.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while DLTNCBL.BO trades at ₹410.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas DLTNCBL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DLTNCBL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to DLTNCBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check DLTNCBL.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs WSIND.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, WSIND.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while WSIND.BO trades at ₹131.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas WSIND.BO's P/E ratio is -6.02. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WSIND.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to WSIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check WSIND.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs RMC.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, RMC.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while RMC.BO trades at ₹287.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas RMC.BO's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RMC.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to RMC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check RMC.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs CORDSCABLE.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, CORDSCABLE.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while CORDSCABLE.NS trades at ₹221.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas CORDSCABLE.NS's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CORDSCABLE.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to CORDSCABLE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check CORDSCABLE.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs CORDSCABLE.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, CORDSCABLE.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while CORDSCABLE.BO trades at ₹222.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas CORDSCABLE.BO's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CORDSCABLE.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to CORDSCABLE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check CORDSCABLE.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs VETO.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, VETO.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while VETO.NS trades at ₹145.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas VETO.NS's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VETO.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to VETO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check VETO.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs VETO.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, VETO.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while VETO.BO trades at ₹144.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas VETO.BO's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VETO.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to VETO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check VETO.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs NIPPOBATRY.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, NIPPOBATRY.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while NIPPOBATRY.BO trades at ₹361.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas NIPPOBATRY.BO's P/E ratio is -10.28. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NIPPOBATRY.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to NIPPOBATRY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check NIPPOBATRY.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs NIPPOBATRY.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, NIPPOBATRY.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while NIPPOBATRY.NS trades at ₹356.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas NIPPOBATRY.NS's P/E ratio is -10.24. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NIPPOBATRY.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to NIPPOBATRY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check NIPPOBATRY.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs KAYCEEI.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, KAYCEEI.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while KAYCEEI.BO trades at ₹810.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas KAYCEEI.BO's P/E ratio is 59.09. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KAYCEEI.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to KAYCEEI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check KAYCEEI.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs DEL.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, DEL.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while DEL.BO trades at ₹178.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas DEL.BO's P/E ratio is 119.46. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DEL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to DEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check DEL.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs APLAB.BO Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, APLAB.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while APLAB.BO trades at ₹102.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas APLAB.BO's P/E ratio is 59.20. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APLAB.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to APLAB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check APLAB.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs GEEKAYWIRE.NS Comparison June 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 510.1B. In comparison, GEEKAYWIRE.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹5,249.95, while GEEKAYWIRE.NS trades at ₹23.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.14, whereas GEEKAYWIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GEEKAYWIRE.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to GEEKAYWIRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check GEEKAYWIRE.NS's competition here