Tapestry, Inc.
Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TPR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPR | $152.30 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 60.88 | $2.58 | +0.96% |
| SIG | $95.07 | +0.00% | 4B | 29.50 | $3.32 | +1.31% |
| REAL | $11.16 | +0.00% | 3.2B | -11.00 | -$1.01 | N/A |
| CPRI | $21.35 | +0.00% | 2.6B | -2.26 | -$9.78 | N/A |
| MYTE | $7.64 | -2.55% | 1B | -16.61 | -$0.46 | N/A |
| LUXE | $9.77 | +0.00% | 946.2M | 1.70 | $5.74 | N/A |
| MOV | $24.93 | +0.00% | 404.3M | 26.31 | $0.98 | +5.46% |
| ELA | $12.99 | +0.00% | 347.1M | 34.28 | $0.39 | N/A |
| FOSL | $4.32 | +0.00% | 263.3M | -3.68 | -$1.27 | N/A |
| TOPW | $10.33 | +1.57% | 256.8M | -1033.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TPR vs SIG Comparison February 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 32.1B. In comparison, SIG has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $152.30, while SIG trades at $95.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.88, whereas SIG's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.63%, compared to SIG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to SIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check SIG's competition here
TPR vs REAL Comparison February 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 32.1B. In comparison, REAL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $152.30, while REAL trades at $11.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.88, whereas REAL's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.63%, compared to REAL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to REAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check REAL's competition here
TPR vs CPRI Comparison February 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 32.1B. In comparison, CPRI has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $152.30, while CPRI trades at $21.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.88, whereas CPRI's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CPRI's ROE of -2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to CPRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check CPRI's competition here
TPR vs MYTE Comparison February 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 32.1B. In comparison, MYTE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $152.30, while MYTE trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.88, whereas MYTE's P/E ratio is -16.61. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.63%, compared to MYTE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to MYTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check MYTE's competition here
TPR vs LUXE Comparison February 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 32.1B. In comparison, LUXE has a market cap of 946.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $152.30, while LUXE trades at $9.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.88, whereas LUXE's P/E ratio is 1.70. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.63%, compared to LUXE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to LUXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check LUXE's competition here
TPR vs MOV Comparison February 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 32.1B. In comparison, MOV has a market cap of 404.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $152.30, while MOV trades at $24.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.88, whereas MOV's P/E ratio is 26.31. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.63%, compared to MOV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to MOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check MOV's competition here
TPR vs ELA Comparison February 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 32.1B. In comparison, ELA has a market cap of 347.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $152.30, while ELA trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.88, whereas ELA's P/E ratio is 34.28. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ELA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to ELA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check ELA's competition here
TPR vs FOSL Comparison February 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 32.1B. In comparison, FOSL has a market cap of 263.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $152.30, while FOSL trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.88, whereas FOSL's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.63%, compared to FOSL's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to FOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check FOSL's competition here
TPR vs TOPW Comparison February 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 32.1B. In comparison, TOPW has a market cap of 256.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $152.30, while TOPW trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.88, whereas TOPW's P/E ratio is -1033.00. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.63%, compared to TOPW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to TOPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check TOPW's competition here
TPR vs LANV Comparison February 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 32.1B. In comparison, LANV has a market cap of 187.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $152.30, while LANV trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.88, whereas LANV's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.63%, compared to LANV's ROE of +4.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to LANV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check LANV's competition here
TPR vs BRLT Comparison February 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 32.1B. In comparison, BRLT has a market cap of 102.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $152.30, while BRLT trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.88, whereas BRLT's P/E ratio is -53.33. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.63%, compared to BRLT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to BRLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check BRLT's competition here
TPR vs FOSLL Comparison February 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 32.1B. In comparison, FOSLL has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $152.30, while FOSLL trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.88, whereas FOSLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.63%, compared to FOSLL's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is more volatile compared to FOSLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check FOSLL's competition here
TPR vs BGI Comparison February 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 32.1B. In comparison, BGI has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $152.30, while BGI trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.88, whereas BGI's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.63%, compared to BGI's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to BGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check BGI's competition here
TPR vs FMFC Comparison February 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 32.1B. In comparison, FMFC has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $152.30, while FMFC trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.88, whereas FMFC's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.63%, compared to FMFC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to FMFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check FMFC's competition here
TPR vs CTHR Comparison February 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 32.1B. In comparison, CTHR has a market cap of 623.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $152.30, while CTHR trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.88, whereas CTHR's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CTHR's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to CTHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check CTHR's competition here
TPR vs JEWL Comparison February 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 32.1B. In comparison, JEWL has a market cap of 3.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $152.30, while JEWL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.88, whereas JEWL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.63%, compared to JEWL's ROE of +27.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is more volatile compared to JEWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check JEWL's competition here