Tapestry, Inc.
Tapestry, Inc. TPR Peers
See (TPR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPR | $78.94 | -0.35% | 16.4B | 20.77 | $3.80 | +2.22% |
| SIG | $77.78 | +3.98% | 3.2B | 88.39 | $0.88 | +1.54% |
| CPRI | $17.00 | +0.27% | 2B | -1.70 | -$10.00 | N/A |
| MYTE | $7.64 | -2.55% | 1B | -16.61 | -$0.46 | N/A |
| LANV | $2.01 | -0.50% | 280.9M | -1.32 | -$1.52 | N/A |
| TOPW | $10.33 | +1.57% | 256.8M | -1033.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| MOV | $15.64 | +1.13% | 246.7M | 20.04 | $0.78 | +9.01% |
| REAL | $5.71 | +2.51% | 161.4M | -5.29 | -$1.08 | N/A |
| ELA | $5.64 | +0.18% | 146.6M | 19.45 | $0.29 | N/A |
| BRLT | $1.41 | -0.35% | 140M | -141.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TPR vs SIG Comparison
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 16.4B. In comparison, SIG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $78.94, while SIG trades at $77.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas SIG's P/E ratio is 88.39. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SIG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to SIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.
TPR vs CPRI Comparison
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 16.4B. In comparison, CPRI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $78.94, while CPRI trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas CPRI's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CPRI's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is more volatile compared to CPRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.
TPR vs MYTE Comparison
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 16.4B. In comparison, MYTE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $78.94, while MYTE trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas MYTE's P/E ratio is -16.61. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MYTE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to MYTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.
TPR vs LANV Comparison
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 16.4B. In comparison, LANV has a market cap of 280.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $78.94, while LANV trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas LANV's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LANV's ROE of -3.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is more volatile compared to LANV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.
TPR vs TOPW Comparison
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 16.4B. In comparison, TOPW has a market cap of 256.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $78.94, while TOPW trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas TOPW's P/E ratio is -1033.00. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TOPW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to TOPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.
TPR vs MOV Comparison
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 16.4B. In comparison, MOV has a market cap of 246.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $78.94, while MOV trades at $15.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas MOV's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MOV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is more volatile compared to MOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.
TPR vs REAL Comparison
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 16.4B. In comparison, REAL has a market cap of 161.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $78.94, while REAL trades at $5.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas REAL's P/E ratio is -5.29. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.39%, compared to REAL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to REAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.
TPR vs ELA Comparison
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 16.4B. In comparison, ELA has a market cap of 146.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $78.94, while ELA trades at $5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas ELA's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ELA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to ELA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.
TPR vs BRLT Comparison
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 16.4B. In comparison, BRLT has a market cap of 140M. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $78.94, while BRLT trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas BRLT's P/E ratio is -141.00. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BRLT's ROE of -129.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is more volatile compared to BRLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.
TPR vs FOSLL Comparison
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 16.4B. In comparison, FOSLL has a market cap of 84.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $78.94, while FOSLL trades at $16.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas FOSLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FOSLL's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is more volatile compared to FOSLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.
TPR vs FOSL Comparison
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 16.4B. In comparison, FOSL has a market cap of 78.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $78.94, while FOSL trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas FOSL's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FOSL's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to FOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.
TPR vs BGI Comparison
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 16.4B. In comparison, BGI has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $78.94, while BGI trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas BGI's P/E ratio is -3.61. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BGI's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to BGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.
TPR vs CTHR Comparison
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 16.4B. In comparison, CTHR has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $78.94, while CTHR trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas CTHR's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CTHR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is more volatile compared to CTHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.
TPR vs JEWL Comparison
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 16.4B. In comparison, JEWL has a market cap of 7.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $78.94, while JEWL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas JEWL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.39%, compared to JEWL's ROE of +29.67%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to JEWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.
TPR vs FMFC Comparison
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 16.4B. In comparison, FMFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $78.94, while FMFC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 20.77, whereas FMFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FMFC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TPR has daily volatility of 2.10 and FMFC has daily volatility of N/A.