Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TPR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPR | $149.39 | -1.06% | 30.2B | 45.54 | $3.28 | +1.07% |
| SIG | $88.03 | -0.78% | 3.5B | 12.45 | $7.08 | +1.48% |
| REAL | $11.31 | +2.17% | 3.3B | -17.95 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| CPRI | $20.76 | -1.42% | 2.4B | 31.95 | $0.65 | N/A |
| MYTE | $7.64 | -2.55% | 1B | -16.61 | -$0.46 | N/A |
| LUXE | $7.96 | +4.87% | 772.1M | 1.35 | $5.88 | N/A |
| ELA | $25.92 | -3.86% | 680.2M | 32.75 | $0.80 | N/A |
| MOV | $37.10 | -0.11% | 585.3M | 26.32 | $1.41 | +2.99% |
| FOSL | $4.41 | +2.80% | 260.6M | -3.90 | -$1.13 | N/A |
| LANV | $1.49 | -2.61% | 161.4M | -0.62 | -$2.23 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TPR vs SIG Comparison June 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 30.2B. In comparison, SIG has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $149.39, while SIG trades at $88.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.54, whereas SIG's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +1.06%, compared to SIG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to SIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check SIG's competition here
TPR vs REAL Comparison June 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 30.2B. In comparison, REAL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $149.39, while REAL trades at $11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.54, whereas REAL's P/E ratio is -17.95. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +1.06%, compared to REAL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to REAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check REAL's competition here
TPR vs CPRI Comparison June 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 30.2B. In comparison, CPRI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $149.39, while CPRI trades at $20.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.54, whereas CPRI's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +1.06%, compared to CPRI's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to CPRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check CPRI's competition here
TPR vs MYTE Comparison June 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 30.2B. In comparison, MYTE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $149.39, while MYTE trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.54, whereas MYTE's P/E ratio is -16.61. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +1.06%, compared to MYTE's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to MYTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check MYTE's competition here
TPR vs LUXE Comparison June 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 30.2B. In comparison, LUXE has a market cap of 772.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $149.39, while LUXE trades at $7.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.54, whereas LUXE's P/E ratio is 1.35. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +1.06%, compared to LUXE's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to LUXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check LUXE's competition here
TPR vs ELA Comparison June 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 30.2B. In comparison, ELA has a market cap of 680.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $149.39, while ELA trades at $25.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.54, whereas ELA's P/E ratio is 32.75. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +1.06%, compared to ELA's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to ELA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check ELA's competition here
TPR vs MOV Comparison June 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 30.2B. In comparison, MOV has a market cap of 585.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $149.39, while MOV trades at $37.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.54, whereas MOV's P/E ratio is 26.32. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +1.06%, compared to MOV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is more volatile compared to MOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check MOV's competition here
TPR vs FOSL Comparison June 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 30.2B. In comparison, FOSL has a market cap of 260.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $149.39, while FOSL trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.54, whereas FOSL's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +1.06%, compared to FOSL's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to FOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check FOSL's competition here
TPR vs LANV Comparison June 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 30.2B. In comparison, LANV has a market cap of 161.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $149.39, while LANV trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.54, whereas LANV's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +1.06%, compared to LANV's ROE of +1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to LANV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check LANV's competition here
TPR vs FOSLL Comparison June 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 30.2B. In comparison, FOSLL has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $149.39, while FOSLL trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.54, whereas FOSLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +1.06%, compared to FOSLL's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is more volatile compared to FOSLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check FOSLL's competition here
TPR vs BRLT Comparison June 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 30.2B. In comparison, BRLT has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $149.39, while BRLT trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.54, whereas BRLT's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +1.06%, compared to BRLT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to BRLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check BRLT's competition here
TPR vs BGI Comparison June 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 30.2B. In comparison, BGI has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $149.39, while BGI trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.54, whereas BGI's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +1.06%, compared to BGI's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to BGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check BGI's competition here
TPR vs FMFC Comparison June 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 30.2B. In comparison, FMFC has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $149.39, while FMFC trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.54, whereas FMFC's P/E ratio is -34.02. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +1.06%, compared to FMFC's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is less volatile compared to FMFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check FMFC's competition here
TPR vs KATE Comparison June 2026
TPR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TPR stands at 30.2B. In comparison, KATE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TPR is priced at $149.39, while KATE trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TPR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.54, whereas KATE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TPR's ROE is +1.06%, compared to KATE's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TPR is more volatile compared to KATE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TPR.Check KATE's competition here