Fossil Group, Inc. 7% Senior Notes due 2026
Fossil Group, Inc. 7% Senior Notes due 2026 (FOSLL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FOSLL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOSLL | $17.01 | +0.18% | 74.9M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TPR | $142.74 | -1.59% | 29.2B | 55.55 | $2.57 | +1.08% |
| SIG | $85.70 | -3.74% | 3.5B | 12.10 | $7.08 | +1.53% |
| REAL | $11.77 | -1.01% | 3.4B | -16.81 | -$0.70 | N/A |
| CPRI | $19.63 | +0.62% | 2.3B | -2.01 | -$9.78 | N/A |
| MYTE | $7.64 | -2.55% | 1B | -16.61 | -$0.46 | N/A |
| TOPW | $38.19 | +0.87% | 951.3M | N/A | N/A | +36.58% |
| LUXE | $9.00 | +0.00% | 875.9M | 1.59 | $5.67 | N/A |
| ELA | $17.80 | +1.08% | 463.4M | 31.88 | $0.56 | N/A |
| MOV | $27.45 | +0.77% | 428.9M | 23.47 | $1.17 | +5.10% |
Stock Comparison
FOSLL vs TPR Comparison May 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, TPR has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while TPR trades at $142.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPR's P/E ratio is 55.55. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to TPR's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to TPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check TPR's competition here
FOSLL vs SIG Comparison May 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, SIG has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while SIG trades at $85.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIG's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SIG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to SIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check SIG's competition here
FOSLL vs REAL Comparison May 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, REAL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while REAL trades at $11.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REAL's P/E ratio is -16.81. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to REAL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to REAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check REAL's competition here
FOSLL vs CPRI Comparison May 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, CPRI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while CPRI trades at $19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPRI's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to CPRI's ROE of -2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to CPRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check CPRI's competition here
FOSLL vs MYTE Comparison May 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, MYTE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while MYTE trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYTE's P/E ratio is -16.61. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to MYTE's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to MYTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check MYTE's competition here
FOSLL vs TOPW Comparison May 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, TOPW has a market cap of 951.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while TOPW trades at $38.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to TOPW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to TOPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check TOPW's competition here
FOSLL vs LUXE Comparison May 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, LUXE has a market cap of 875.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while LUXE trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUXE's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to LUXE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to LUXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check LUXE's competition here
FOSLL vs ELA Comparison May 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, ELA has a market cap of 463.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while ELA trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELA's P/E ratio is 31.88. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ELA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to ELA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check ELA's competition here
FOSLL vs MOV Comparison May 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, MOV has a market cap of 428.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while MOV trades at $27.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOV's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to MOV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to MOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check MOV's competition here
FOSLL vs FOSL Comparison May 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, FOSL has a market cap of 252.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while FOSL trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOSL's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to FOSL's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to FOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check FOSL's competition here
FOSLL vs LANV Comparison May 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, LANV has a market cap of 185.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while LANV trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LANV's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to LANV's ROE of +2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to LANV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check LANV's competition here
FOSLL vs BRLT Comparison May 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, BRLT has a market cap of 98.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while BRLT trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRLT's P/E ratio is -6.16. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to BRLT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to BRLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check BRLT's competition here
FOSLL vs BGI Comparison May 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, BGI has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while BGI trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGI's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to BGI's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to BGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check BGI's competition here
FOSLL vs FMFC Comparison May 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, FMFC has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while FMFC trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMFC's P/E ratio is -37.15. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to FMFC's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to FMFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check FMFC's competition here
FOSLL vs CTHR Comparison May 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, CTHR has a market cap of 304.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while CTHR trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTHR's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to CTHR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to CTHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check CTHR's competition here
FOSLL vs JEWL Comparison May 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, JEWL has a market cap of 19K. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while JEWL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JEWL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to JEWL's ROE of +27.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to JEWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check JEWL's competition here
FOSLL vs KATE Comparison May 2026
FOSLL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSLL stands at 74.9M. In comparison, KATE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FOSLL is priced at $17.01, while KATE trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSLL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KATE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOSLL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to KATE's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSLL is less volatile compared to KATE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSLL.Check KATE's competition here