Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. (BRLT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BRLT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRLT | $1.13 | +0.00% | 71.6M | -3.50 | -$0.32 | +22.22% |
| TPR | $150.03 | -0.64% | 30.2B | 45.54 | $3.28 | +1.07% |
| SIG | $90.48 | +1.98% | 3.5B | 12.45 | $7.08 | +1.48% |
| REAL | $11.48 | +3.70% | 3.3B | -17.95 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| CPRI | $20.65 | -1.95% | 2.4B | 31.95 | $0.65 | N/A |
| MYTE | $7.64 | -2.55% | 1B | -16.61 | -$0.46 | N/A |
| LUXE | $7.91 | +4.22% | 772.1M | 1.35 | $5.88 | N/A |
| ELA | $26.56 | -1.48% | 680.2M | 32.75 | $0.80 | N/A |
| MOV | $37.23 | +0.24% | 585.3M | 26.32 | $1.41 | +2.99% |
| FOSL | $4.36 | +1.52% | 260.6M | -3.90 | -$1.13 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BRLT vs TPR Comparison June 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 71.6M. In comparison, TPR has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.13, while TPR trades at $150.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas TPR's P/E ratio is 45.54. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to TPR's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is less volatile compared to TPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check TPR's competition here
BRLT vs SIG Comparison June 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 71.6M. In comparison, SIG has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.13, while SIG trades at $90.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas SIG's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to SIG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is less volatile compared to SIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check SIG's competition here
BRLT vs REAL Comparison June 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 71.6M. In comparison, REAL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.13, while REAL trades at $11.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas REAL's P/E ratio is -17.95. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to REAL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is less volatile compared to REAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check REAL's competition here
BRLT vs CPRI Comparison June 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 71.6M. In comparison, CPRI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.13, while CPRI trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas CPRI's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to CPRI's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is less volatile compared to CPRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check CPRI's competition here
BRLT vs MYTE Comparison June 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 71.6M. In comparison, MYTE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.13, while MYTE trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas MYTE's P/E ratio is -16.61. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to MYTE's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is less volatile compared to MYTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check MYTE's competition here
BRLT vs LUXE Comparison June 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 71.6M. In comparison, LUXE has a market cap of 772.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.13, while LUXE trades at $7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas LUXE's P/E ratio is 1.35. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to LUXE's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is less volatile compared to LUXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check LUXE's competition here
BRLT vs ELA Comparison June 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 71.6M. In comparison, ELA has a market cap of 680.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.13, while ELA trades at $26.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas ELA's P/E ratio is 32.75. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to ELA's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is more volatile compared to ELA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check ELA's competition here
BRLT vs MOV Comparison June 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 71.6M. In comparison, MOV has a market cap of 585.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.13, while MOV trades at $37.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas MOV's P/E ratio is 26.32. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to MOV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is more volatile compared to MOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check MOV's competition here
BRLT vs FOSL Comparison June 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 71.6M. In comparison, FOSL has a market cap of 260.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.13, while FOSL trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas FOSL's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to FOSL's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is less volatile compared to FOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check FOSL's competition here
BRLT vs LANV Comparison June 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 71.6M. In comparison, LANV has a market cap of 161.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.13, while LANV trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas LANV's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to LANV's ROE of +1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is less volatile compared to LANV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check LANV's competition here
BRLT vs FOSLL Comparison June 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 71.6M. In comparison, FOSLL has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.13, while FOSLL trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas FOSLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to FOSLL's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is more volatile compared to FOSLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check FOSLL's competition here
BRLT vs BGI Comparison June 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 71.6M. In comparison, BGI has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.13, while BGI trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas BGI's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to BGI's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is less volatile compared to BGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check BGI's competition here
BRLT vs FMFC Comparison June 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 71.6M. In comparison, FMFC has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.13, while FMFC trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas FMFC's P/E ratio is -34.02. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to FMFC's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is less volatile compared to FMFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check FMFC's competition here
BRLT vs KATE Comparison June 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 71.6M. In comparison, KATE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.13, while KATE trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.50, whereas KATE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to KATE's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is more volatile compared to KATE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check KATE's competition here