Brilliant Earth Group, Inc.
Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. (BRLT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BRLT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRLT | $1.25 | +3.75% | 78M | -3.81 | -$0.32 | +20.49% |
| TPR | $140.87 | +1.27% | 28B | 42.22 | $3.28 | +1.12% |
| SIG | $82.33 | +1.14% | 3.2B | 11.53 | $7.08 | +1.61% |
| REAL | $9.50 | +2.48% | 2.7B | -14.60 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| CPRI | $18.70 | +1.74% | 2.2B | -1.89 | -$9.78 | N/A |
| MYTE | $7.64 | -2.55% | 1B | -16.61 | -$0.46 | N/A |
| TOPW | $38.75 | -0.21% | 962M | N/A | N/A | +38.40% |
| LUXE | $6.98 | -3.19% | 677M | 1.18 | $5.93 | N/A |
| ELA | $24.50 | +2.21% | 619.2M | 29.81 | $0.80 | N/A |
| MOV | $28.51 | +3.67% | 444.5M | 24.32 | $1.17 | +4.92% |
Stock Comparison
BRLT vs TPR Comparison May 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 78M. In comparison, TPR has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.25, while TPR trades at $140.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas TPR's P/E ratio is 42.22. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to TPR's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is more volatile compared to TPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check TPR's competition here
BRLT vs SIG Comparison May 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 78M. In comparison, SIG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.25, while SIG trades at $82.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas SIG's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to SIG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is more volatile compared to SIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check SIG's competition here
BRLT vs REAL Comparison May 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 78M. In comparison, REAL has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.25, while REAL trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas REAL's P/E ratio is -14.60. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to REAL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is less volatile compared to REAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check REAL's competition here
BRLT vs CPRI Comparison May 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 78M. In comparison, CPRI has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.25, while CPRI trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas CPRI's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to CPRI's ROE of -2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is more volatile compared to CPRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check CPRI's competition here
BRLT vs MYTE Comparison May 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 78M. In comparison, MYTE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.25, while MYTE trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas MYTE's P/E ratio is -16.61. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to MYTE's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is less volatile compared to MYTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check MYTE's competition here
BRLT vs TOPW Comparison May 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 78M. In comparison, TOPW has a market cap of 962M. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.25, while TOPW trades at $38.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas TOPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to TOPW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is more volatile compared to TOPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check TOPW's competition here
BRLT vs LUXE Comparison May 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 78M. In comparison, LUXE has a market cap of 677M. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.25, while LUXE trades at $6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas LUXE's P/E ratio is 1.18. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to LUXE's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is more volatile compared to LUXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check LUXE's competition here
BRLT vs ELA Comparison May 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 78M. In comparison, ELA has a market cap of 619.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.25, while ELA trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas ELA's P/E ratio is 29.81. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to ELA's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is more volatile compared to ELA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check ELA's competition here
BRLT vs MOV Comparison May 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 78M. In comparison, MOV has a market cap of 444.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.25, while MOV trades at $28.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas MOV's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to MOV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is more volatile compared to MOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check MOV's competition here
BRLT vs FOSL Comparison May 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 78M. In comparison, FOSL has a market cap of 245.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.25, while FOSL trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas FOSL's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to FOSL's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is more volatile compared to FOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check FOSL's competition here
BRLT vs LANV Comparison May 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 78M. In comparison, LANV has a market cap of 203.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.25, while LANV trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas LANV's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to LANV's ROE of +1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is more volatile compared to LANV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check LANV's competition here
BRLT vs FOSLL Comparison May 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 78M. In comparison, FOSLL has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.25, while FOSLL trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas FOSLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to FOSLL's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is more volatile compared to FOSLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check FOSLL's competition here
BRLT vs BGI Comparison May 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 78M. In comparison, BGI has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.25, while BGI trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas BGI's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to BGI's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is less volatile compared to BGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check BGI's competition here
BRLT vs FMFC Comparison May 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 78M. In comparison, FMFC has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.25, while FMFC trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas FMFC's P/E ratio is -37.68. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to FMFC's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is less volatile compared to FMFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check FMFC's competition here
BRLT vs CTHR Comparison May 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 78M. In comparison, CTHR has a market cap of 304.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.25, while CTHR trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas CTHR's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to CTHR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is less volatile compared to CTHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check CTHR's competition here
BRLT vs JEWL Comparison May 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 78M. In comparison, JEWL has a market cap of 19K. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.25, while JEWL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas JEWL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to JEWL's ROE of +27.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is less volatile compared to JEWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check JEWL's competition here
BRLT vs KATE Comparison May 2026
BRLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BRLT stands at 78M. In comparison, KATE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BRLT is priced at $1.25, while KATE trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BRLT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.81, whereas KATE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRLT's ROE is -0.37%, compared to KATE's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BRLT is more volatile compared to KATE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRLT.Check KATE's competition here