Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Motor Corporation TOM.F Peers
See (TOM.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOM.F | €14.80 | +2.00% | 194.7B | 6.97 | €2.14 | +1.67% |
| TL0.DE | €273.50 | -2.15% | 895.6B | 181.99 | €1.53 | N/A |
| TOM.SG | €14.77 | -0.14% | 203.7B | N/A | N/A | +3.69% |
| TOM.DU | €14.68 | +0.41% | 202.5B | N/A | N/A | +3.72% |
| BY6.F | €13.41 | -3.04% | 105.2B | 7.34 | €1.86 | +0.14% |
| 2FE.DE | €417.90 | +3.47% | 74.9B | 47.72 | €8.81 | +0.62% |
| MBG.DE | €49.70 | +3.20% | 48.6B | 5.57 | €9.07 | +8.52% |
| BMW3.DE | €70.65 | +3.29% | 46.5B | 6.79 | €10.58 | +5.60% |
| VOW3.DE | €89.70 | +2.02% | 46.4B | 4.92 | €18.56 | +6.04% |
| BMW.DE | €75.74 | +3.81% | 46.1B | 7.26 | €10.58 | +5.60% |
Stock Comparison
TOM.F vs TL0.DE Comparison
TOM.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.F stands at 194.7B. In comparison, TL0.DE has a market cap of 895.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.F is priced at €14.80, while TL0.DE trades at €273.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas TL0.DE's P/E ratio is 181.99. In terms of profitability, TOM.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TL0.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.F is more volatile compared to TL0.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.F.
TOM.F vs TOM.SG Comparison
TOM.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.F stands at 194.7B. In comparison, TOM.SG has a market cap of 203.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.F is priced at €14.80, while TOM.SG trades at €14.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas TOM.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TOM.SG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.F is more volatile compared to TOM.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.F.
TOM.F vs TOM.DU Comparison
TOM.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.F stands at 194.7B. In comparison, TOM.DU has a market cap of 202.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.F is priced at €14.80, while TOM.DU trades at €14.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas TOM.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TOM.DU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.F is more volatile compared to TOM.DU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.F.
TOM.F vs BY6.F Comparison
TOM.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.F stands at 194.7B. In comparison, BY6.F has a market cap of 105.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.F is priced at €14.80, while BY6.F trades at €13.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas BY6.F's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, TOM.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BY6.F's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.F is more volatile compared to BY6.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.F.
TOM.F vs 2FE.DE Comparison
TOM.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.F stands at 194.7B. In comparison, 2FE.DE has a market cap of 74.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.F is priced at €14.80, while 2FE.DE trades at €417.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas 2FE.DE's P/E ratio is 47.72. In terms of profitability, TOM.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 2FE.DE's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.F is more volatile compared to 2FE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.F.
TOM.F vs MBG.DE Comparison
TOM.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.F stands at 194.7B. In comparison, MBG.DE has a market cap of 48.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.F is priced at €14.80, while MBG.DE trades at €49.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas MBG.DE's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, TOM.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MBG.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.F is more volatile compared to MBG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.F.
TOM.F vs BMW3.DE Comparison
TOM.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.F stands at 194.7B. In comparison, BMW3.DE has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.F is priced at €14.80, while BMW3.DE trades at €70.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas BMW3.DE's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, TOM.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BMW3.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.F is less volatile compared to BMW3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.F.
TOM.F vs VOW3.DE Comparison
TOM.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.F stands at 194.7B. In comparison, VOW3.DE has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.F is priced at €14.80, while VOW3.DE trades at €89.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas VOW3.DE's P/E ratio is 4.92. In terms of profitability, TOM.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VOW3.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.F is more volatile compared to VOW3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.F.
TOM.F vs BMW.DE Comparison
TOM.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.F stands at 194.7B. In comparison, BMW.DE has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.F is priced at €14.80, while BMW.DE trades at €75.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas BMW.DE's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, TOM.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BMW.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.F is less volatile compared to BMW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.F.
TOM.F vs VOW.DE Comparison
TOM.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.F stands at 194.7B. In comparison, VOW.DE has a market cap of 45.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.F is priced at €14.80, while VOW.DE trades at €91.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas VOW.DE's P/E ratio is 5.05. In terms of profitability, TOM.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VOW.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.F is more volatile compared to VOW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.F.
TOM.F vs 8GM.DE Comparison
TOM.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.F stands at 194.7B. In comparison, 8GM.DE has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.F is priced at €14.80, while 8GM.DE trades at €42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas 8GM.DE's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, TOM.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 8GM.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.F is more volatile compared to 8GM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.F.
TOM.F vs P911.DE Comparison
TOM.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.F stands at 194.7B. In comparison, P911.DE has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.F is priced at €14.80, while P911.DE trades at €42.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas P911.DE's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, TOM.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to P911.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.F is more volatile compared to P911.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.F.
TOM.F vs P911.HM Comparison
TOM.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.F stands at 194.7B. In comparison, P911.HM has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.F is priced at €14.80, while P911.HM trades at €42.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas P911.HM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to P911.HM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.F is more volatile compared to P911.HM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.F.
TOM.F vs FMC1.DE Comparison
TOM.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.F stands at 194.7B. In comparison, FMC1.DE has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.F is priced at €14.80, while FMC1.DE trades at €9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas FMC1.DE's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, TOM.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FMC1.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.F is more volatile compared to FMC1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.F.
TOM.F vs 8TI.DE Comparison
TOM.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.F stands at 194.7B. In comparison, 8TI.DE has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.F is priced at €14.80, while 8TI.DE trades at €8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas 8TI.DE's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, TOM.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 8TI.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.F is less volatile compared to 8TI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.F.
TOM.F vs RNL.DE Comparison
TOM.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.F stands at 194.7B. In comparison, RNL.DE has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.F is priced at €14.80, while RNL.DE trades at €39.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas RNL.DE's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, TOM.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RNL.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.F is more volatile compared to RNL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.F.
TOM.F vs PAH3.DE Comparison
TOM.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.F stands at 194.7B. In comparison, PAH3.DE has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.F is priced at €14.80, while PAH3.DE trades at €33.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas PAH3.DE's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, TOM.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PAH3.DE's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.F is more volatile compared to PAH3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.F.
TOM.F vs N3IA.F Comparison
TOM.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.F stands at 194.7B. In comparison, N3IA.F has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.F is priced at €14.80, while N3IA.F trades at €2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas N3IA.F's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, TOM.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to N3IA.F's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.F is less volatile compared to N3IA.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.F.
TOM.F vs 0O9.F Comparison
TOM.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.F stands at 194.7B. In comparison, 0O9.F has a market cap of 229.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.F is priced at €14.80, while 0O9.F trades at €2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas 0O9.F's P/E ratio is -10.78. In terms of profitability, TOM.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 0O9.F's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.F is more volatile compared to 0O9.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.F.
TOM.F vs PMAG.DE Comparison
TOM.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOM.F stands at 194.7B. In comparison, PMAG.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TOM.F is priced at €14.80, while PMAG.DE trades at €57.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 6.97, whereas PMAG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOM.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PMAG.DE's ROE of -3.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TOM.F is more volatile compared to PMAG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOM.F.