T-Mobile US, Inc.
T-Mobile US, Inc. TMUS Peers
See (TMUS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMUS | $229.82 | +1.25% | 260.9B | 22.47 | $10.23 | +1.43% |
| VZA | $25.55 | -0.43% | 241.3B | 3.27 | $7.82 | N/A |
| T | $28.28 | +0.28% | 203.5B | 17.35 | $1.63 | +3.93% |
| TBB | $22.53 | +0.54% | 199.7B | 4.40 | $5.12 | +5.94% |
| TBC | $24.97 | -0.68% | 179.8B | N/A | N/A | +5.63% |
| VZ | $42.65 | +0.68% | 179.8B | 10.15 | $4.20 | +6.33% |
| T-PA | $19.97 | +0.82% | 143.7B | 8.40 | $2.38 | +3.93% |
| T-PC | $19.02 | +0.82% | 136.9B | 8.00 | $2.38 | +3.93% |
| CMCSA | $35.22 | +1.82% | 131.2B | 8.67 | $4.06 | +3.58% |
| AMOV | $20.75 | -1.10% | 65.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TMUS vs VZA Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while VZA trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to VZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs T Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, T has a market cap of 203.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while T trades at $28.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas T's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs TBB Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 199.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while TBB trades at $22.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 4.40. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to TBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs TBC Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, TBC has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while TBC trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas TBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TBC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to TBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs VZ Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while VZ trades at $42.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to VZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs T-PA Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 143.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while T-PA trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs T-PC Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 136.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while T-PC trades at $19.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs CMCSA Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 131.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while CMCSA trades at $35.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs AMOV Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while AMOV trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs CHTR Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 55.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while CHTR trades at $403.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs AMX Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while AMX trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 35.93. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to AMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs CHT Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, CHT has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while CHT trades at $46.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas CHT's P/E ratio is 28.51. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to CHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs TEF Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while TEF trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -52.60. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to TEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs ORAN Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while ORAN trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs VOD Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while VOD trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VOD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to VOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs TU Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while TU trades at $16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 27.61. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to TU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs BCE Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while BCE trades at $21.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 70.90. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to BCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs VIV Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while VIV trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to VIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs RCI Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while RCI trades at $29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to RCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs TLK Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while TLK trades at $16.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to TLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs SJR Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while SJR trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to SJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs LBRDK Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while LBRDK trades at $95.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs LBRDA Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while LBRDA trades at $95.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs LBRDP Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while LBRDP trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs KT Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while KT trades at $20.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 21.99. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to KT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs TIMB Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while TIMB trades at $19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs MBT Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while MBT trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MBT's ROE of -7.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to MBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs FYBR Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while FYBR trades at $36.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -23.30. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to FYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs SKM Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while SKM trades at $23.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to SKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs CTDD Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while CTDD trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CTDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs TIGO Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while TIGO trades at $36.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs USM Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while USM trades at $63.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -137.87. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to USM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to USM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs UZD Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while UZD trades at $23.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UZD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to UZD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs UZF Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while UZF trades at $20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UZF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to UZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs TKC Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while TKC trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to TKC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs UZE Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while UZE trades at $20.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UZE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to UZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs PHI Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while PHI trades at $21.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to PHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs LUMN Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, LUMN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while LUMN trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas LUMN's P/E ratio is -13.41. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LUMN's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to LUMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs LBYKV Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to LBYKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs CTBB Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while CTBB trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CTBB's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs TDS Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while TDS trades at $35.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is -33.90. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TDS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to TDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs LBTYB Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while LBTYB trades at $10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -16.76. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs SNRE Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while SNRE trades at $54.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -13.30. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs TDS-PU Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while TDS-PU trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs TDS-PV Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while TDS-PV trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs LBTYA Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while LBTYA trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -16.10. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs LBTYK Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while LBTYK trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -16.54. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs IRDM Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while IRDM trades at $28.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 27.55. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs DISH Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while DISH trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DISH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to DISH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs GSAT Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while GSAT trades at $23.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -38.35. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs VEON Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while VEON trades at $41.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to VEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs TEO Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while TEO trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is 92.00. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TEO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to TEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs CCOI Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while CCOI trades at $49.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -12.30. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CCOI's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs IHS Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while IHS trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is -44.32. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IHS's ROE of +3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to IHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs GOGO Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while GOGO trades at $14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is -359.50. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GOGO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs ASTSW Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs IDT Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while IDT trades at $66.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to IDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs RADI Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while RADI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to RADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs LILAK Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while LILAK trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs LILA Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while LILA trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LILA's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to LILA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs ATUS Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while ATUS trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -6.53. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs SHEN Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 782.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while SHEN trades at $14.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -20.37. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs CABO Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, CABO has a market cap of 750M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while CABO trades at $133.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas CABO's P/E ratio is -36.91. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CABO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to CABO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs RBBN Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, RBBN has a market cap of 713.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while RBBN trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas RBBN's P/E ratio is -14.43. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RBBN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to RBBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs CNSL Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while CNSL trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs ATEX Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 534.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while ATEX trades at $28.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is -17.77. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATEX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs WOW Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 357.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while WOW trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -5.89. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to WOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs OOMA Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, OOMA has a market cap of 346.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while OOMA trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas OOMA's P/E ratio is -66.05. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OOMA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to OOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs HCHC Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while HCHC trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HCHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs TV Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 267.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while TV trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to TV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs ATNI Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 249.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while ATNI trades at $16.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is -7.15. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATNI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs RDCM Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 210.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while RDCM trades at $13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 24.79. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs CXDO Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 167.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while CXDO trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 72.25. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs FNGR Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, FNGR has a market cap of 120.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while FNGR trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas FNGR's P/E ratio is -23.33. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FNGR's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to FNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs MTSL Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while MTSL trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs TDI Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, TDI has a market cap of 57.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while TDI trades at $33.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas TDI's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TDI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to TDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs SIFY Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 51.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while SIFY trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is -4.84. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs KORE Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while KORE trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KORE's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to KORE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs IQST Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, IQST has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while IQST trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas IQST's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IQST's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to IQST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs PCLA Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, PCLA has a market cap of 32M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while PCLA trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas PCLA's P/E ratio is -9.08. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PCLA's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to PCLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs ANTE Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, ANTE has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while ANTE trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas ANTE's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ANTE's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to ANTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs MIMO Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, MIMO has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while MIMO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas MIMO's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MIMO's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to MIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs UCL Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, UCL has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while UCL trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas UCL's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to UCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs QTEK Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, QTEK has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while QTEK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas QTEK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to QTEK's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to QTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs QTEKW Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, QTEKW has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while QTEKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas QTEKW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to QTEKW's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to QTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs COMSP Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, COMSP has a market cap of 513. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while COMSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas COMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to COMSP's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to COMSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs COMSW Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, COMSW has a market cap of 257. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while COMSW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas COMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to COMSW's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to COMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs MIMO-WT Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, MIMO-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while MIMO-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas MIMO-WT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MIMO-WT's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to MIMO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs LORL Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, LORL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while LORL trades at $41.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas LORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LORL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to LORL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs OIBR-C Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, OIBR-C has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while OIBR-C trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas OIBR-C's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OIBR-C's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to OIBR-C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs LBYAV Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, LBYAV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while LBYAV trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas LBYAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LBYAV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to LBYAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs CBB Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, CBB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while CBB trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas CBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CBB's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to CBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs TIGOR Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, TIGOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while TIGOR trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas TIGOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TIGOR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to TIGOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs PTNR Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, PTNR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while PTNR trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas PTNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PTNR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to PTNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs UZA Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, UZA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while UZA trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas UZA's P/E ratio is 72.43. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UZA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to UZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs GTT Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, GTT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while GTT trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas GTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GTT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is less volatile compared to GTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs TDA Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, TDA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while TDA trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas TDA's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TDA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to TDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs ALSK Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, ALSK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while ALSK trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas ALSK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALSK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to ALSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.
TMUS vs STRY Comparison
TMUS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMUS stands at 260.9B. In comparison, STRY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMUS is priced at $229.82, while STRY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.47, whereas STRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMUS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STRY's ROE of +6.74%. Regarding short-term risk, TMUS is more volatile compared to STRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMUS.