Heads UP Ventures Limited (TMRVL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TMRVL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMRVL.NS | ₹14.15 | +0.00% | 0 | -5.82 | -₹2.43 | N/A |
| TRENT.BO | ₹4,230.60 | -0.42% | 1.5T | 91.67 | ₹46.15 | +0.12% |
| TRENT.NS | ₹4,224.00 | -0.58% | 1.5T | 87.22 | ₹48.43 | +0.12% |
| ABLBL.NS | ₹100.17 | -1.79% | 121.7B | 71.04 | ₹1.41 | N/A |
| MANYAVAR.NS | ₹408.35 | -1.86% | 99.2B | 26.45 | ₹15.44 | +1.96% |
| MANYAVAR.BO | ₹408.05 | -2.06% | 99.1B | 26.38 | ₹15.47 | +1.96% |
| V2RETAIL.NS | ₹230.03 | -2.55% | 83.9B | 53.50 | ₹4.30 | N/A |
| V2RETAIL.BO | ₹229.85 | -2.63% | 83.8B | 53.45 | ₹4.30 | N/A |
| STYLEBAAZA.NS | ₹338.60 | +0.28% | 25.3B | 53.83 | ₹6.29 | N/A |
| GOCOLORS.BO | ₹316.90 | -5.66% | 16.7B | 24.10 | ₹13.15 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TMRVL.NS vs TRENT.BO Comparison June 2026
TMRVL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRVL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, TRENT.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, TMRVL.NS is priced at ₹14.15, while TRENT.BO trades at ₹4,230.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRVL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.82, whereas TRENT.BO's P/E ratio is 91.67. In terms of profitability, TMRVL.NS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TRENT.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRVL.NS is more volatile compared to TRENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRVL.NS.Check TRENT.BO's competition here
TMRVL.NS vs TRENT.NS Comparison June 2026
TMRVL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRVL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, TRENT.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, TMRVL.NS is priced at ₹14.15, while TRENT.NS trades at ₹4,224.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRVL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.82, whereas TRENT.NS's P/E ratio is 87.22. In terms of profitability, TMRVL.NS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TRENT.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRVL.NS is more volatile compared to TRENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRVL.NS.Check TRENT.NS's competition here
TMRVL.NS vs ABLBL.NS Comparison June 2026
TMRVL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRVL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, ABLBL.NS has a market cap of 121.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRVL.NS is priced at ₹14.15, while ABLBL.NS trades at ₹100.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRVL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.82, whereas ABLBL.NS's P/E ratio is 71.04. In terms of profitability, TMRVL.NS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ABLBL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRVL.NS is more volatile compared to ABLBL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRVL.NS.Check ABLBL.NS's competition here
TMRVL.NS vs MANYAVAR.NS Comparison June 2026
TMRVL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRVL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, MANYAVAR.NS has a market cap of 99.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRVL.NS is priced at ₹14.15, while MANYAVAR.NS trades at ₹408.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRVL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.82, whereas MANYAVAR.NS's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, TMRVL.NS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MANYAVAR.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRVL.NS is more volatile compared to MANYAVAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRVL.NS.Check MANYAVAR.NS's competition here
TMRVL.NS vs MANYAVAR.BO Comparison June 2026
TMRVL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRVL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, MANYAVAR.BO has a market cap of 99.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRVL.NS is priced at ₹14.15, while MANYAVAR.BO trades at ₹408.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRVL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.82, whereas MANYAVAR.BO's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, TMRVL.NS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MANYAVAR.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRVL.NS is more volatile compared to MANYAVAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRVL.NS.Check MANYAVAR.BO's competition here
TMRVL.NS vs V2RETAIL.NS Comparison June 2026
TMRVL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRVL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, V2RETAIL.NS has a market cap of 83.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRVL.NS is priced at ₹14.15, while V2RETAIL.NS trades at ₹230.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRVL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.82, whereas V2RETAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 53.50. In terms of profitability, TMRVL.NS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to V2RETAIL.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRVL.NS is more volatile compared to V2RETAIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRVL.NS.Check V2RETAIL.NS's competition here
TMRVL.NS vs V2RETAIL.BO Comparison June 2026
TMRVL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRVL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, V2RETAIL.BO has a market cap of 83.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRVL.NS is priced at ₹14.15, while V2RETAIL.BO trades at ₹229.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRVL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.82, whereas V2RETAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 53.45. In terms of profitability, TMRVL.NS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to V2RETAIL.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRVL.NS is more volatile compared to V2RETAIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRVL.NS.Check V2RETAIL.BO's competition here
TMRVL.NS vs STYLEBAAZA.NS Comparison June 2026
TMRVL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRVL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, STYLEBAAZA.NS has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRVL.NS is priced at ₹14.15, while STYLEBAAZA.NS trades at ₹338.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRVL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.82, whereas STYLEBAAZA.NS's P/E ratio is 53.83. In terms of profitability, TMRVL.NS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to STYLEBAAZA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRVL.NS is more volatile compared to STYLEBAAZA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRVL.NS.Check STYLEBAAZA.NS's competition here
TMRVL.NS vs GOCOLORS.BO Comparison June 2026
TMRVL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRVL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, GOCOLORS.BO has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRVL.NS is priced at ₹14.15, while GOCOLORS.BO trades at ₹316.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRVL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.82, whereas GOCOLORS.BO's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, TMRVL.NS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GOCOLORS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRVL.NS is more volatile compared to GOCOLORS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRVL.NS.Check GOCOLORS.BO's competition here
TMRVL.NS vs GOCOLORS.NS Comparison June 2026
TMRVL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRVL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, GOCOLORS.NS has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRVL.NS is priced at ₹14.15, while GOCOLORS.NS trades at ₹315.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRVL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.82, whereas GOCOLORS.NS's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, TMRVL.NS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GOCOLORS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRVL.NS is more volatile compared to GOCOLORS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRVL.NS.Check GOCOLORS.NS's competition here
TMRVL.NS vs KALAMANDIR.BO Comparison June 2026
TMRVL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRVL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, KALAMANDIR.BO has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRVL.NS is priced at ₹14.15, while KALAMANDIR.BO trades at ₹109.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRVL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.82, whereas KALAMANDIR.BO's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, TMRVL.NS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to KALAMANDIR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRVL.NS is more volatile compared to KALAMANDIR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRVL.NS.Check KALAMANDIR.BO's competition here
TMRVL.NS vs KALAMANDIR.NS Comparison June 2026
TMRVL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRVL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, KALAMANDIR.NS has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRVL.NS is priced at ₹14.15, while KALAMANDIR.NS trades at ₹109.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRVL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.82, whereas KALAMANDIR.NS's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, TMRVL.NS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to KALAMANDIR.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRVL.NS is more volatile compared to KALAMANDIR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRVL.NS.Check KALAMANDIR.NS's competition here
TMRVL.NS vs MUFTI.NS Comparison June 2026
TMRVL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRVL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, MUFTI.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRVL.NS is priced at ₹14.15, while MUFTI.NS trades at ₹85.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRVL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.82, whereas MUFTI.NS's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, TMRVL.NS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MUFTI.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRVL.NS is more volatile compared to MUFTI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRVL.NS.Check MUFTI.NS's competition here
TMRVL.NS vs SSDL.NS Comparison June 2026
TMRVL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRVL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, SSDL.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMRVL.NS is priced at ₹14.15, while SSDL.NS trades at ₹61.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRVL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.82, whereas SSDL.NS's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, TMRVL.NS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SSDL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRVL.NS is more volatile compared to SSDL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRVL.NS.Check SSDL.NS's competition here
TMRVL.NS vs GTNTEX.NS Comparison June 2026
TMRVL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRVL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, GTNTEX.NS has a market cap of 227M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRVL.NS is priced at ₹14.15, while GTNTEX.NS trades at ₹19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRVL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.82, whereas GTNTEX.NS's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, TMRVL.NS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GTNTEX.NS's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRVL.NS is more volatile compared to GTNTEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRVL.NS.Check GTNTEX.NS's competition here
TMRVL.NS vs HEADSUP.BO Comparison June 2026
TMRVL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRVL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, HEADSUP.BO has a market cap of 161.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRVL.NS is priced at ₹14.15, while HEADSUP.BO trades at ₹7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRVL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.82, whereas HEADSUP.BO's P/E ratio is 3.84. In terms of profitability, TMRVL.NS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to HEADSUP.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRVL.NS is more volatile compared to HEADSUP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRVL.NS.Check HEADSUP.BO's competition here
TMRVL.NS vs HEADSUP.NS Comparison June 2026
TMRVL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRVL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, HEADSUP.NS has a market cap of 157.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRVL.NS is priced at ₹14.15, while HEADSUP.NS trades at ₹7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRVL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.82, whereas HEADSUP.NS's P/E ratio is 3.76. In terms of profitability, TMRVL.NS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to HEADSUP.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRVL.NS is more volatile compared to HEADSUP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRVL.NS.Check HEADSUP.NS's competition here
TMRVL.NS vs SUULD.NS Comparison June 2026
TMRVL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRVL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, SUULD.NS has a market cap of 105.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRVL.NS is priced at ₹14.15, while SUULD.NS trades at ₹1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRVL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.82, whereas SUULD.NS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TMRVL.NS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SUULD.NS's ROE of -3.73%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRVL.NS is more volatile compared to SUULD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRVL.NS.Check SUULD.NS's competition here
TMRVL.NS vs MAFIA.BO Comparison June 2026
TMRVL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMRVL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, MAFIA.BO has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMRVL.NS is priced at ₹14.15, while MAFIA.BO trades at ₹6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMRVL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -5.82, whereas MAFIA.BO's P/E ratio is 3.52. In terms of profitability, TMRVL.NS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MAFIA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMRVL.NS is less volatile compared to MAFIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMRVL.NS.Check MAFIA.BO's competition here