Baazar Style Retail Ltd. (STYLEBAAZA.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (STYLEBAAZA.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STYLEBAAZA.NS | ₹328.85 | +1.45% | 24.4B | 52.20 | ₹6.26 | N/A |
| TRENT.BO | ₹4,258.10 | +2.43% | 1.5T | 91.24 | ₹46.15 | +0.12% |
| TRENT.NS | ₹4,257.60 | +2.41% | 1.5T | 86.67 | ₹48.58 | +0.12% |
| ABLBL.NS | ₹98.22 | -1.02% | 120.3B | 70.27 | ₹1.41 | N/A |
| MANYAVAR.NS | ₹398.50 | -0.14% | 97.9B | 26.10 | ₹15.44 | +1.99% |
| MANYAVAR.BO | ₹398.85 | -0.14% | 97.9B | 26.04 | ₹15.47 | +1.99% |
| V2RETAIL.NS | ₹245.65 | +0.55% | 87.6B | 52.47 | ₹4.58 | N/A |
| V2RETAIL.BO | ₹245.80 | +0.61% | 87.5B | 52.48 | ₹4.57 | N/A |
| GOCOLORS.NS | ₹376.70 | +15.91% | 17.7B | 25.52 | ₹13.17 | N/A |
| GOCOLORS.BO | ₹377.30 | +16.07% | 17.6B | 25.50 | ₹13.15 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
STYLEBAAZA.NS vs TRENT.BO Comparison June 2026
STYLEBAAZA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STYLEBAAZA.NS stands at 24.4B. In comparison, TRENT.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, STYLEBAAZA.NS is priced at ₹328.85, while TRENT.BO trades at ₹4,258.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STYLEBAAZA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 52.20, whereas TRENT.BO's P/E ratio is 91.24. In terms of profitability, STYLEBAAZA.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRENT.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, STYLEBAAZA.NS is more volatile compared to TRENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STYLEBAAZA.NS.Check TRENT.BO's competition here
STYLEBAAZA.NS vs TRENT.NS Comparison June 2026
STYLEBAAZA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STYLEBAAZA.NS stands at 24.4B. In comparison, TRENT.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, STYLEBAAZA.NS is priced at ₹328.85, while TRENT.NS trades at ₹4,257.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STYLEBAAZA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 52.20, whereas TRENT.NS's P/E ratio is 86.67. In terms of profitability, STYLEBAAZA.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRENT.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, STYLEBAAZA.NS is more volatile compared to TRENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STYLEBAAZA.NS.Check TRENT.NS's competition here
STYLEBAAZA.NS vs ABLBL.NS Comparison June 2026
STYLEBAAZA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STYLEBAAZA.NS stands at 24.4B. In comparison, ABLBL.NS has a market cap of 120.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STYLEBAAZA.NS is priced at ₹328.85, while ABLBL.NS trades at ₹98.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STYLEBAAZA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 52.20, whereas ABLBL.NS's P/E ratio is 70.27. In terms of profitability, STYLEBAAZA.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABLBL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, STYLEBAAZA.NS is less volatile compared to ABLBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STYLEBAAZA.NS.Check ABLBL.NS's competition here
STYLEBAAZA.NS vs MANYAVAR.NS Comparison June 2026
STYLEBAAZA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STYLEBAAZA.NS stands at 24.4B. In comparison, MANYAVAR.NS has a market cap of 97.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STYLEBAAZA.NS is priced at ₹328.85, while MANYAVAR.NS trades at ₹398.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STYLEBAAZA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 52.20, whereas MANYAVAR.NS's P/E ratio is 26.10. In terms of profitability, STYLEBAAZA.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MANYAVAR.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, STYLEBAAZA.NS is less volatile compared to MANYAVAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STYLEBAAZA.NS.Check MANYAVAR.NS's competition here
STYLEBAAZA.NS vs MANYAVAR.BO Comparison June 2026
STYLEBAAZA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STYLEBAAZA.NS stands at 24.4B. In comparison, MANYAVAR.BO has a market cap of 97.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STYLEBAAZA.NS is priced at ₹328.85, while MANYAVAR.BO trades at ₹398.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STYLEBAAZA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 52.20, whereas MANYAVAR.BO's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, STYLEBAAZA.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MANYAVAR.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, STYLEBAAZA.NS is less volatile compared to MANYAVAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STYLEBAAZA.NS.Check MANYAVAR.BO's competition here
STYLEBAAZA.NS vs V2RETAIL.NS Comparison June 2026
STYLEBAAZA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STYLEBAAZA.NS stands at 24.4B. In comparison, V2RETAIL.NS has a market cap of 87.6B. Regarding current trading prices, STYLEBAAZA.NS is priced at ₹328.85, while V2RETAIL.NS trades at ₹245.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STYLEBAAZA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 52.20, whereas V2RETAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 52.47. In terms of profitability, STYLEBAAZA.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to V2RETAIL.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, STYLEBAAZA.NS is less volatile compared to V2RETAIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STYLEBAAZA.NS.Check V2RETAIL.NS's competition here
STYLEBAAZA.NS vs V2RETAIL.BO Comparison June 2026
STYLEBAAZA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STYLEBAAZA.NS stands at 24.4B. In comparison, V2RETAIL.BO has a market cap of 87.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STYLEBAAZA.NS is priced at ₹328.85, while V2RETAIL.BO trades at ₹245.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STYLEBAAZA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 52.20, whereas V2RETAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 52.48. In terms of profitability, STYLEBAAZA.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to V2RETAIL.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, STYLEBAAZA.NS is less volatile compared to V2RETAIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STYLEBAAZA.NS.Check V2RETAIL.BO's competition here
STYLEBAAZA.NS vs GOCOLORS.NS Comparison June 2026
STYLEBAAZA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STYLEBAAZA.NS stands at 24.4B. In comparison, GOCOLORS.NS has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STYLEBAAZA.NS is priced at ₹328.85, while GOCOLORS.NS trades at ₹376.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STYLEBAAZA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 52.20, whereas GOCOLORS.NS's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, STYLEBAAZA.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GOCOLORS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STYLEBAAZA.NS is less volatile compared to GOCOLORS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STYLEBAAZA.NS.Check GOCOLORS.NS's competition here
STYLEBAAZA.NS vs GOCOLORS.BO Comparison June 2026
STYLEBAAZA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STYLEBAAZA.NS stands at 24.4B. In comparison, GOCOLORS.BO has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, STYLEBAAZA.NS is priced at ₹328.85, while GOCOLORS.BO trades at ₹377.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STYLEBAAZA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 52.20, whereas GOCOLORS.BO's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, STYLEBAAZA.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GOCOLORS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STYLEBAAZA.NS is less volatile compared to GOCOLORS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STYLEBAAZA.NS.Check GOCOLORS.BO's competition here
STYLEBAAZA.NS vs KALAMANDIR.NS Comparison June 2026
STYLEBAAZA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STYLEBAAZA.NS stands at 24.4B. In comparison, KALAMANDIR.NS has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, STYLEBAAZA.NS is priced at ₹328.85, while KALAMANDIR.NS trades at ₹105.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STYLEBAAZA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 52.20, whereas KALAMANDIR.NS's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, STYLEBAAZA.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KALAMANDIR.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, STYLEBAAZA.NS is less volatile compared to KALAMANDIR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STYLEBAAZA.NS.Check KALAMANDIR.NS's competition here
STYLEBAAZA.NS vs KALAMANDIR.BO Comparison June 2026
STYLEBAAZA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STYLEBAAZA.NS stands at 24.4B. In comparison, KALAMANDIR.BO has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STYLEBAAZA.NS is priced at ₹328.85, while KALAMANDIR.BO trades at ₹105.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STYLEBAAZA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 52.20, whereas KALAMANDIR.BO's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, STYLEBAAZA.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KALAMANDIR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, STYLEBAAZA.NS is less volatile compared to KALAMANDIR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STYLEBAAZA.NS.Check KALAMANDIR.BO's competition here
STYLEBAAZA.NS vs MUFTI.NS Comparison June 2026
STYLEBAAZA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STYLEBAAZA.NS stands at 24.4B. In comparison, MUFTI.NS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, STYLEBAAZA.NS is priced at ₹328.85, while MUFTI.NS trades at ₹89.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STYLEBAAZA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 52.20, whereas MUFTI.NS's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, STYLEBAAZA.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MUFTI.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STYLEBAAZA.NS is less volatile compared to MUFTI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STYLEBAAZA.NS.Check MUFTI.NS's competition here
STYLEBAAZA.NS vs SSDL.NS Comparison June 2026
STYLEBAAZA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STYLEBAAZA.NS stands at 24.4B. In comparison, SSDL.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STYLEBAAZA.NS is priced at ₹328.85, while SSDL.NS trades at ₹58.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STYLEBAAZA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 52.20, whereas SSDL.NS's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, STYLEBAAZA.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SSDL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, STYLEBAAZA.NS is less volatile compared to SSDL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STYLEBAAZA.NS.Check SSDL.NS's competition here
STYLEBAAZA.NS vs GTNTEX.NS Comparison June 2026
STYLEBAAZA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STYLEBAAZA.NS stands at 24.4B. In comparison, GTNTEX.NS has a market cap of 227M. Regarding current trading prices, STYLEBAAZA.NS is priced at ₹328.85, while GTNTEX.NS trades at ₹19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STYLEBAAZA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 52.20, whereas GTNTEX.NS's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, STYLEBAAZA.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTNTEX.NS's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, STYLEBAAZA.NS is more volatile compared to GTNTEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STYLEBAAZA.NS.Check GTNTEX.NS's competition here
STYLEBAAZA.NS vs HEADSUP.BO Comparison June 2026
STYLEBAAZA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STYLEBAAZA.NS stands at 24.4B. In comparison, HEADSUP.BO has a market cap of 185.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STYLEBAAZA.NS is priced at ₹328.85, while HEADSUP.BO trades at ₹7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STYLEBAAZA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 52.20, whereas HEADSUP.BO's P/E ratio is 4.43. In terms of profitability, STYLEBAAZA.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HEADSUP.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STYLEBAAZA.NS is less volatile compared to HEADSUP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STYLEBAAZA.NS.Check HEADSUP.BO's competition here
STYLEBAAZA.NS vs HEADSUP.NS Comparison June 2026
STYLEBAAZA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STYLEBAAZA.NS stands at 24.4B. In comparison, HEADSUP.NS has a market cap of 157.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STYLEBAAZA.NS is priced at ₹328.85, while HEADSUP.NS trades at ₹7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STYLEBAAZA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 52.20, whereas HEADSUP.NS's P/E ratio is 3.75. In terms of profitability, STYLEBAAZA.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HEADSUP.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STYLEBAAZA.NS is less volatile compared to HEADSUP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STYLEBAAZA.NS.Check HEADSUP.NS's competition here
STYLEBAAZA.NS vs SUULD.NS Comparison June 2026
STYLEBAAZA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STYLEBAAZA.NS stands at 24.4B. In comparison, SUULD.NS has a market cap of 105.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STYLEBAAZA.NS is priced at ₹328.85, while SUULD.NS trades at ₹1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STYLEBAAZA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 52.20, whereas SUULD.NS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, STYLEBAAZA.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUULD.NS's ROE of -3.73%. Regarding short-term risk, STYLEBAAZA.NS is less volatile compared to SUULD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STYLEBAAZA.NS.Check SUULD.NS's competition here
STYLEBAAZA.NS vs MAFIA.BO Comparison June 2026
STYLEBAAZA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STYLEBAAZA.NS stands at 24.4B. In comparison, MAFIA.BO has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STYLEBAAZA.NS is priced at ₹328.85, while MAFIA.BO trades at ₹6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STYLEBAAZA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 52.20, whereas MAFIA.BO's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, STYLEBAAZA.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAFIA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STYLEBAAZA.NS is less volatile compared to MAFIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STYLEBAAZA.NS.Check MAFIA.BO's competition here
STYLEBAAZA.NS vs TMRVL.NS Comparison June 2026
STYLEBAAZA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STYLEBAAZA.NS stands at 24.4B. In comparison, TMRVL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STYLEBAAZA.NS is priced at ₹328.85, while TMRVL.NS trades at ₹14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STYLEBAAZA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 52.20, whereas TMRVL.NS's P/E ratio is -5.82. In terms of profitability, STYLEBAAZA.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TMRVL.NS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, STYLEBAAZA.NS is less volatile compared to TMRVL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STYLEBAAZA.NS.Check TMRVL.NS's competition here