Heads UP Ventures Limited (HEADSUP.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HEADSUP.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEADSUP.NS | ₹7.12 | -0.28% | 157M | 3.74 | ₹1.90 | N/A |
| TRENT.NS | ₹4,210.40 | -0.32% | 1.5T | 85.58 | ₹48.58 | +0.12% |
| TRENT.BO | ₹4,210.60 | -0.47% | 1.5T | 90.08 | ₹46.15 | +0.12% |
| ABLBL.NS | ₹99.08 | -1.09% | 120.5B | 70.38 | ₹1.41 | N/A |
| MANYAVAR.BO | ₹402.85 | -1.27% | 97B | 25.82 | ₹15.47 | +2.00% |
| MANYAVAR.NS | ₹402.95 | -1.32% | 97B | 25.85 | ₹15.44 | +2.00% |
| V2RETAIL.NS | ₹240.32 | +4.47% | 89.1B | 53.34 | ₹4.58 | N/A |
| V2RETAIL.BO | ₹239.85 | +4.35% | 89.1B | 53.46 | ₹4.57 | N/A |
| STYLEBAAZA.NS | ₹326.80 | -3.48% | 24.2B | 51.78 | ₹6.26 | N/A |
| GOCOLORS.BO | ₹335.30 | +5.81% | 17.1B | 24.72 | ₹13.15 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HEADSUP.NS vs TRENT.NS Comparison June 2026
HEADSUP.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEADSUP.NS stands at 157M. In comparison, TRENT.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, HEADSUP.NS is priced at ₹7.12, while TRENT.NS trades at ₹4,210.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEADSUP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.74, whereas TRENT.NS's P/E ratio is 85.58. In terms of profitability, HEADSUP.NS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TRENT.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HEADSUP.NS is more volatile compared to TRENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEADSUP.NS.Check TRENT.NS's competition here
HEADSUP.NS vs TRENT.BO Comparison June 2026
HEADSUP.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEADSUP.NS stands at 157M. In comparison, TRENT.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, HEADSUP.NS is priced at ₹7.12, while TRENT.BO trades at ₹4,210.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEADSUP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.74, whereas TRENT.BO's P/E ratio is 90.08. In terms of profitability, HEADSUP.NS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TRENT.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HEADSUP.NS is more volatile compared to TRENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEADSUP.NS.Check TRENT.BO's competition here
HEADSUP.NS vs ABLBL.NS Comparison June 2026
HEADSUP.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEADSUP.NS stands at 157M. In comparison, ABLBL.NS has a market cap of 120.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HEADSUP.NS is priced at ₹7.12, while ABLBL.NS trades at ₹99.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEADSUP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.74, whereas ABLBL.NS's P/E ratio is 70.38. In terms of profitability, HEADSUP.NS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ABLBL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HEADSUP.NS is more volatile compared to ABLBL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEADSUP.NS.Check ABLBL.NS's competition here
HEADSUP.NS vs MANYAVAR.BO Comparison June 2026
HEADSUP.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEADSUP.NS stands at 157M. In comparison, MANYAVAR.BO has a market cap of 97B. Regarding current trading prices, HEADSUP.NS is priced at ₹7.12, while MANYAVAR.BO trades at ₹402.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEADSUP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.74, whereas MANYAVAR.BO's P/E ratio is 25.82. In terms of profitability, HEADSUP.NS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MANYAVAR.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HEADSUP.NS is more volatile compared to MANYAVAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEADSUP.NS.Check MANYAVAR.BO's competition here
HEADSUP.NS vs MANYAVAR.NS Comparison June 2026
HEADSUP.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEADSUP.NS stands at 157M. In comparison, MANYAVAR.NS has a market cap of 97B. Regarding current trading prices, HEADSUP.NS is priced at ₹7.12, while MANYAVAR.NS trades at ₹402.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEADSUP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.74, whereas MANYAVAR.NS's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, HEADSUP.NS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MANYAVAR.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HEADSUP.NS is more volatile compared to MANYAVAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEADSUP.NS.Check MANYAVAR.NS's competition here
HEADSUP.NS vs V2RETAIL.NS Comparison June 2026
HEADSUP.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEADSUP.NS stands at 157M. In comparison, V2RETAIL.NS has a market cap of 89.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HEADSUP.NS is priced at ₹7.12, while V2RETAIL.NS trades at ₹240.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEADSUP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.74, whereas V2RETAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 53.34. In terms of profitability, HEADSUP.NS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to V2RETAIL.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HEADSUP.NS is more volatile compared to V2RETAIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEADSUP.NS.Check V2RETAIL.NS's competition here
HEADSUP.NS vs V2RETAIL.BO Comparison June 2026
HEADSUP.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEADSUP.NS stands at 157M. In comparison, V2RETAIL.BO has a market cap of 89.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HEADSUP.NS is priced at ₹7.12, while V2RETAIL.BO trades at ₹239.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEADSUP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.74, whereas V2RETAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 53.46. In terms of profitability, HEADSUP.NS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to V2RETAIL.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HEADSUP.NS is more volatile compared to V2RETAIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEADSUP.NS.Check V2RETAIL.BO's competition here
HEADSUP.NS vs STYLEBAAZA.NS Comparison June 2026
HEADSUP.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEADSUP.NS stands at 157M. In comparison, STYLEBAAZA.NS has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HEADSUP.NS is priced at ₹7.12, while STYLEBAAZA.NS trades at ₹326.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEADSUP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.74, whereas STYLEBAAZA.NS's P/E ratio is 51.78. In terms of profitability, HEADSUP.NS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to STYLEBAAZA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HEADSUP.NS is less volatile compared to STYLEBAAZA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEADSUP.NS.Check STYLEBAAZA.NS's competition here
HEADSUP.NS vs GOCOLORS.BO Comparison June 2026
HEADSUP.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEADSUP.NS stands at 157M. In comparison, GOCOLORS.BO has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HEADSUP.NS is priced at ₹7.12, while GOCOLORS.BO trades at ₹335.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEADSUP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.74, whereas GOCOLORS.BO's P/E ratio is 24.72. In terms of profitability, HEADSUP.NS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GOCOLORS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HEADSUP.NS is less volatile compared to GOCOLORS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEADSUP.NS.Check GOCOLORS.BO's competition here
HEADSUP.NS vs GOCOLORS.NS Comparison June 2026
HEADSUP.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEADSUP.NS stands at 157M. In comparison, GOCOLORS.NS has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HEADSUP.NS is priced at ₹7.12, while GOCOLORS.NS trades at ₹336.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEADSUP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.74, whereas GOCOLORS.NS's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, HEADSUP.NS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GOCOLORS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HEADSUP.NS is less volatile compared to GOCOLORS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEADSUP.NS.Check GOCOLORS.NS's competition here
HEADSUP.NS vs KALAMANDIR.NS Comparison June 2026
HEADSUP.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEADSUP.NS stands at 157M. In comparison, KALAMANDIR.NS has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HEADSUP.NS is priced at ₹7.12, while KALAMANDIR.NS trades at ₹107.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEADSUP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.74, whereas KALAMANDIR.NS's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, HEADSUP.NS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KALAMANDIR.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HEADSUP.NS is more volatile compared to KALAMANDIR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEADSUP.NS.Check KALAMANDIR.NS's competition here
HEADSUP.NS vs KALAMANDIR.BO Comparison June 2026
HEADSUP.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEADSUP.NS stands at 157M. In comparison, KALAMANDIR.BO has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HEADSUP.NS is priced at ₹7.12, while KALAMANDIR.BO trades at ₹106.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEADSUP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.74, whereas KALAMANDIR.BO's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, HEADSUP.NS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KALAMANDIR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HEADSUP.NS is more volatile compared to KALAMANDIR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEADSUP.NS.Check KALAMANDIR.BO's competition here
HEADSUP.NS vs MUFTI.NS Comparison June 2026
HEADSUP.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEADSUP.NS stands at 157M. In comparison, MUFTI.NS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HEADSUP.NS is priced at ₹7.12, while MUFTI.NS trades at ₹89.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEADSUP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.74, whereas MUFTI.NS's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, HEADSUP.NS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MUFTI.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HEADSUP.NS is less volatile compared to MUFTI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEADSUP.NS.Check MUFTI.NS's competition here
HEADSUP.NS vs SSDL.NS Comparison June 2026
HEADSUP.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEADSUP.NS stands at 157M. In comparison, SSDL.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HEADSUP.NS is priced at ₹7.12, while SSDL.NS trades at ₹59.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEADSUP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.74, whereas SSDL.NS's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, HEADSUP.NS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SSDL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HEADSUP.NS is more volatile compared to SSDL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEADSUP.NS.Check SSDL.NS's competition here
HEADSUP.NS vs GTNTEX.NS Comparison June 2026
HEADSUP.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEADSUP.NS stands at 157M. In comparison, GTNTEX.NS has a market cap of 227M. Regarding current trading prices, HEADSUP.NS is priced at ₹7.12, while GTNTEX.NS trades at ₹19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEADSUP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.74, whereas GTNTEX.NS's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, HEADSUP.NS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GTNTEX.NS's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HEADSUP.NS is more volatile compared to GTNTEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEADSUP.NS.Check GTNTEX.NS's competition here
HEADSUP.NS vs HEADSUP.BO Comparison June 2026
HEADSUP.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEADSUP.NS stands at 157M. In comparison, HEADSUP.BO has a market cap of 155M. Regarding current trading prices, HEADSUP.NS is priced at ₹7.12, while HEADSUP.BO trades at ₹8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEADSUP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.74, whereas HEADSUP.BO's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, HEADSUP.NS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HEADSUP.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HEADSUP.NS is more volatile compared to HEADSUP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEADSUP.NS.Check HEADSUP.BO's competition here
HEADSUP.NS vs SUULD.NS Comparison June 2026
HEADSUP.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEADSUP.NS stands at 157M. In comparison, SUULD.NS has a market cap of 105.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HEADSUP.NS is priced at ₹7.12, while SUULD.NS trades at ₹1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEADSUP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.74, whereas SUULD.NS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HEADSUP.NS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SUULD.NS's ROE of -3.73%. Regarding short-term risk, HEADSUP.NS is less volatile compared to SUULD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEADSUP.NS.Check SUULD.NS's competition here
HEADSUP.NS vs MAFIA.BO Comparison June 2026
HEADSUP.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEADSUP.NS stands at 157M. In comparison, MAFIA.BO has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HEADSUP.NS is priced at ₹7.12, while MAFIA.BO trades at ₹6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEADSUP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.74, whereas MAFIA.BO's P/E ratio is 3.52. In terms of profitability, HEADSUP.NS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MAFIA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HEADSUP.NS is less volatile compared to MAFIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEADSUP.NS.Check MAFIA.BO's competition here
HEADSUP.NS vs TMRVL.NS Comparison June 2026
HEADSUP.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEADSUP.NS stands at 157M. In comparison, TMRVL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HEADSUP.NS is priced at ₹7.12, while TMRVL.NS trades at ₹14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEADSUP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.74, whereas TMRVL.NS's P/E ratio is -5.82. In terms of profitability, HEADSUP.NS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TMRVL.NS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HEADSUP.NS is less volatile compared to TMRVL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEADSUP.NS.Check TMRVL.NS's competition here