Aditya Birla Lifestyle Brands Ltd. (ABLBL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ABLBL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABLBL.NS | ₹100.80 | +1.74% | 119.3B | 69.66 | ₹1.41 | N/A |
| TRENT.BO | ₹2,837.30 | -32.62% | 1.5T | 92.27 | ₹46.15 | +0.12% |
| TRENT.NS | ₹2,837.60 | -32.60% | 1.5T | 88.30 | ₹48.22 | +0.12% |
| MANYAVAR.BO | ₹400.20 | -0.66% | 96.9B | 25.78 | ₹15.47 | +2.01% |
| MANYAVAR.NS | ₹400.15 | -0.69% | 96.8B | 25.81 | ₹15.44 | +2.01% |
| V2RETAIL.BO | ₹256.10 | +6.78% | 89.6B | 53.79 | ₹4.57 | N/A |
| V2RETAIL.NS | ₹256.40 | +6.69% | 89.6B | 53.64 | ₹4.58 | N/A |
| STYLEBAAZA.NS | ₹337.80 | +3.37% | 24.5B | 52.45 | ₹6.27 | N/A |
| GOCOLORS.BO | ₹403.35 | +20.30% | 19.8B | 28.67 | ₹13.16 | N/A |
| GOCOLORS.NS | ₹401.65 | +19.52% | 19.8B | 28.62 | ₹13.16 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ABLBL.NS vs TRENT.BO Comparison June 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, TRENT.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹100.80, while TRENT.BO trades at ₹2,837.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 69.66, whereas TRENT.BO's P/E ratio is 92.27. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TRENT.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is more volatile compared to TRENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check TRENT.BO's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs TRENT.NS Comparison June 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, TRENT.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹100.80, while TRENT.NS trades at ₹2,837.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 69.66, whereas TRENT.NS's P/E ratio is 88.30. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TRENT.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is more volatile compared to TRENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check TRENT.NS's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs MANYAVAR.BO Comparison June 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, MANYAVAR.BO has a market cap of 96.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹100.80, while MANYAVAR.BO trades at ₹400.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 69.66, whereas MANYAVAR.BO's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MANYAVAR.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is more volatile compared to MANYAVAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check MANYAVAR.BO's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs MANYAVAR.NS Comparison June 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, MANYAVAR.NS has a market cap of 96.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹100.80, while MANYAVAR.NS trades at ₹400.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 69.66, whereas MANYAVAR.NS's P/E ratio is 25.81. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MANYAVAR.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is more volatile compared to MANYAVAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check MANYAVAR.NS's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs V2RETAIL.BO Comparison June 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, V2RETAIL.BO has a market cap of 89.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹100.80, while V2RETAIL.BO trades at ₹256.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 69.66, whereas V2RETAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 53.79. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to V2RETAIL.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is less volatile compared to V2RETAIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check V2RETAIL.BO's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs V2RETAIL.NS Comparison June 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, V2RETAIL.NS has a market cap of 89.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹100.80, while V2RETAIL.NS trades at ₹256.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 69.66, whereas V2RETAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 53.64. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to V2RETAIL.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is less volatile compared to V2RETAIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check V2RETAIL.NS's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs STYLEBAAZA.NS Comparison June 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, STYLEBAAZA.NS has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹100.80, while STYLEBAAZA.NS trades at ₹337.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 69.66, whereas STYLEBAAZA.NS's P/E ratio is 52.45. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STYLEBAAZA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is more volatile compared to STYLEBAAZA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check STYLEBAAZA.NS's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs GOCOLORS.BO Comparison June 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, GOCOLORS.BO has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹100.80, while GOCOLORS.BO trades at ₹403.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 69.66, whereas GOCOLORS.BO's P/E ratio is 28.67. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GOCOLORS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is less volatile compared to GOCOLORS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check GOCOLORS.BO's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs GOCOLORS.NS Comparison June 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, GOCOLORS.NS has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹100.80, while GOCOLORS.NS trades at ₹401.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 69.66, whereas GOCOLORS.NS's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GOCOLORS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is less volatile compared to GOCOLORS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check GOCOLORS.NS's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs KALAMANDIR.BO Comparison June 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, KALAMANDIR.BO has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹100.80, while KALAMANDIR.BO trades at ₹105.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 69.66, whereas KALAMANDIR.BO's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KALAMANDIR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is more volatile compared to KALAMANDIR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check KALAMANDIR.BO's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs KALAMANDIR.NS Comparison June 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, KALAMANDIR.NS has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹100.80, while KALAMANDIR.NS trades at ₹105.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 69.66, whereas KALAMANDIR.NS's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KALAMANDIR.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is more volatile compared to KALAMANDIR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check KALAMANDIR.NS's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs MUFTI.NS Comparison June 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, MUFTI.NS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹100.80, while MUFTI.NS trades at ₹87.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 69.66, whereas MUFTI.NS's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MUFTI.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is more volatile compared to MUFTI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check MUFTI.NS's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs SSDL.NS Comparison June 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, SSDL.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹100.80, while SSDL.NS trades at ₹58.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 69.66, whereas SSDL.NS's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SSDL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is more volatile compared to SSDL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check SSDL.NS's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs GTNTEX.NS Comparison June 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, GTNTEX.NS has a market cap of 227M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹100.80, while GTNTEX.NS trades at ₹19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 69.66, whereas GTNTEX.NS's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GTNTEX.NS's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is more volatile compared to GTNTEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check GTNTEX.NS's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs HEADSUP.NS Comparison June 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, HEADSUP.NS has a market cap of 159.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹100.80, while HEADSUP.NS trades at ₹7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 69.66, whereas HEADSUP.NS's P/E ratio is 3.81. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HEADSUP.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is less volatile compared to HEADSUP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check HEADSUP.NS's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs HEADSUP.BO Comparison June 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, HEADSUP.BO has a market cap of 157M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹100.80, while HEADSUP.BO trades at ₹7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 69.66, whereas HEADSUP.BO's P/E ratio is 3.74. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HEADSUP.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is less volatile compared to HEADSUP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check HEADSUP.BO's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs SUULD.NS Comparison June 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, SUULD.NS has a market cap of 105.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹100.80, while SUULD.NS trades at ₹1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 69.66, whereas SUULD.NS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUULD.NS's ROE of -3.73%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is less volatile compared to SUULD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check SUULD.NS's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs MAFIA.BO Comparison June 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, MAFIA.BO has a market cap of 26.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹100.80, while MAFIA.BO trades at ₹6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 69.66, whereas MAFIA.BO's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MAFIA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is more volatile compared to MAFIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check MAFIA.BO's competition here
ABLBL.NS vs TMRVL.NS Comparison June 2026
ABLBL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABLBL.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, TMRVL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ABLBL.NS is priced at ₹100.80, while TMRVL.NS trades at ₹14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABLBL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 69.66, whereas TMRVL.NS's P/E ratio is -5.82. In terms of profitability, ABLBL.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TMRVL.NS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ABLBL.NS is less volatile compared to TMRVL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABLBL.NS.Check TMRVL.NS's competition here