Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged
Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TMH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMH | $58.00 | -2.25% | 4.3B | 8.86 | $6.59 | +10.78% |
| ORLY | $91.70 | -1.38% | 77.3B | 30.82 | $2.97 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,542.74 | -1.98% | 59B | 24.99 | $142.56 | N/A |
| APTV-PA | $108.66 | +0.15% | 29.4B | 92.08 | $1.18 | N/A |
| MGA | $56.36 | -0.11% | 15.5B | 18.79 | $2.93 | +3.52% |
| APTV | $71.72 | +2.35% | 15.2B | 94.00 | $0.75 | N/A |
| BWA | $51.99 | -0.95% | 10.8B | 39.50 | $1.28 | +1.22% |
| MOD | $198.00 | +3.16% | 9.9B | 103.09 | $1.83 | N/A |
| ALSN | $113.75 | +0.57% | 9.4B | 15.39 | $7.33 | +0.97% |
| ALV | $103.62 | -0.10% | 7.8B | 10.77 | $9.55 | +3.19% |
Stock Comparison
TMH vs ORLY Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 77.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while ORLY trades at $91.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check ORLY's competition here
TMH vs AZO Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 59B. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while AZO trades at $3,542.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 24.99. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check AZO's competition here
TMH vs APTV-PA Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, APTV-PA has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while APTV-PA trades at $108.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas APTV-PA's P/E ratio is 92.08. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APTV-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to APTV-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check APTV-PA's competition here
TMH vs MGA Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MGA has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while MGA trades at $56.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas MGA's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to MGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check MGA's competition here
TMH vs APTV Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, APTV has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while APTV trades at $71.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas APTV's P/E ratio is 94.00. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APTV's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to APTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check APTV's competition here
TMH vs BWA Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BWA has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while BWA trades at $51.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas BWA's P/E ratio is 39.50. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BWA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to BWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check BWA's competition here
TMH vs MOD Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while MOD trades at $198.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 103.09. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to MOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check MOD's competition here
TMH vs ALSN Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ALSN has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while ALSN trades at $113.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas ALSN's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALSN's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to ALSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check ALSN's competition here
TMH vs ALV Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ALV has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while ALV trades at $103.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas ALV's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to ALV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check ALV's competition here
TMH vs LKQ Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, LKQ has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while LKQ trades at $29.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas LKQ's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LKQ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to LKQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check LKQ's competition here
TMH vs MBLY Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MBLY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while MBLY trades at $7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas MBLY's P/E ratio is -15.77. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MBLY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to MBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check MBLY's competition here
TMH vs LEA Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, LEA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while LEA trades at $115.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas LEA's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LEA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to LEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check LEA's competition here
TMH vs BC-PA Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BC-PA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while BC-PA trades at $74.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas BC-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BC-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to BC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check BC-PA's competition here
TMH vs GNTX Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GNTX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while GNTX trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas GNTX's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GNTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to GNTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check GNTX's competition here
TMH vs DAN Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, DAN has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while DAN trades at $32.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas DAN's P/E ratio is 71.32. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DAN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to DAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check DAN's competition here
TMH vs QS Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, QS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while QS trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas QS's P/E ratio is -8.86. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to QS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check QS's competition here
TMH vs BC-PB Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BC-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while BC-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas BC-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BC-PB's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is more volatile compared to BC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check BC-PB's competition here
TMH vs GTX Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GTX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while GTX trades at $17.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas GTX's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GTX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to GTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check GTX's competition here
TMH vs HSAI Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, HSAI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while HSAI trades at $24.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas HSAI's P/E ratio is 52.26. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HSAI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to HSAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check HSAI's competition here
TMH vs DORM Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, DORM has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while DORM trades at $105.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas DORM's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DORM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to DORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check DORM's competition here
TMH vs VC Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, VC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while VC trades at $90.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas VC's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to VC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check VC's competition here
TMH vs PHIN Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PHIN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while PHIN trades at $64.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas PHIN's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PHIN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to PHIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check PHIN's competition here
TMH vs GT Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while GT trades at $6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas GT's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to GT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check GT's competition here
TMH vs ADNT Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ADNT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while ADNT trades at $20.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas ADNT's P/E ratio is -5.39. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADNT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to ADNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check ADNT's competition here
TMH vs XPEL Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, XPEL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while XPEL trades at $38.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas XPEL's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XPEL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to XPEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check XPEL's competition here
TMH vs AXL Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AXL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while AXL trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas AXL's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AXL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to AXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check AXL's competition here
TMH vs PLOW Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 942.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while PLOW trades at $41.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check PLOW's competition here
TMH vs AEVA Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 910.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while AEVA trades at $15.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -5.95. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AEVA's ROE of +198.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check AEVA's competition here
TMH vs THRM Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, THRM has a market cap of 849.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while THRM trades at $28.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas THRM's P/E ratio is 47.15. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to THRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to THRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check THRM's competition here
TMH vs SMP Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SMP has a market cap of 806.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while SMP trades at $36.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas SMP's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to SMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check SMP's competition here
TMH vs FOXF Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FOXF has a market cap of 647.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while FOXF trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas FOXF's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FOXF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to FOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check FOXF's competition here
TMH vs GTXAP Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GTXAP has a market cap of 557.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while GTXAP trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas GTXAP's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GTXAP's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to GTXAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check GTXAP's competition here
TMH vs CPS Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CPS has a market cap of 515.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while CPS trades at $31.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas CPS's P/E ratio is -127.13. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CPS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to CPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check CPS's competition here
TMH vs MLR Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MLR has a market cap of 500.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while MLR trades at $44.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas MLR's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to MLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check MLR's competition here
TMH vs ALLG Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ALLG has a market cap of 496.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while ALLG trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas ALLG's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALLG's ROE of +4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to ALLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check ALLG's competition here
TMH vs MNRO Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MNRO has a market cap of 459.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while MNRO trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas MNRO's P/E ratio is -31.89. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MNRO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to MNRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check MNRO's competition here
TMH vs SES Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SES has a market cap of 444.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while SES trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas SES's P/E ratio is -5.59. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SES's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to SES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check SES's competition here
TMH vs ECX Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ECX has a market cap of 399.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while ECX trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas ECX's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ECX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to ECX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check ECX's competition here
TMH vs HLLY Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, HLLY has a market cap of 360M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while HLLY trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas HLLY's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HLLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to HLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check HLLY's competition here
TMH vs HYLN Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, HYLN has a market cap of 356.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while HYLN trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas HYLN's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HYLN's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to HYLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check HYLN's competition here
TMH vs STRT Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, STRT has a market cap of 309.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while STRT trades at $77.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas STRT's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STRT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to STRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check STRT's competition here
TMH vs MPAA Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MPAA has a market cap of 197.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while MPAA trades at $10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas MPAA's P/E ratio is 112.44. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MPAA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to MPAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check MPAA's competition here
TMH vs XL Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, XL has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while XL trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas XL's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to XL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check XL's competition here
TMH vs SRI Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SRI has a market cap of 162.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while SRI trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas SRI's P/E ratio is -5.03. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SRI's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to SRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check SRI's competition here
TMH vs INVZ Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, INVZ has a market cap of 144.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while INVZ trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas INVZ's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INVZ's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to INVZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check INVZ's competition here
TMH vs CAAS Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CAAS has a market cap of 128.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while CAAS trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas CAAS's P/E ratio is 3.83. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CAAS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to CAAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check CAAS's competition here
TMH vs CVGI Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CVGI has a market cap of 106.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while CVGI trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas CVGI's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CVGI's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to CVGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check CVGI's competition here
TMH vs KNDI Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, KNDI has a market cap of 80.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while KNDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas KNDI's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KNDI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to KNDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check KNDI's competition here
TMH vs SYPR Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SYPR has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while SYPR trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas SYPR's P/E ratio is -28.55. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SYPR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to SYPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check SYPR's competition here
TMH vs LIDR Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, LIDR has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while LIDR trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas LIDR's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LIDR's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to LIDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check LIDR's competition here
TMH vs GGR Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GGR has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while GGR trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas GGR's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GGR's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to GGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check GGR's competition here
TMH vs AIIO Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AIIO has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while AIIO trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas AIIO's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AIIO's ROE of -160.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to AIIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check AIIO's competition here
TMH vs WPRT Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, WPRT has a market cap of 35.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while WPRT trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas WPRT's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WPRT's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to WPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check WPRT's competition here
TMH vs NCNC Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, NCNC has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while NCNC trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas NCNC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCNC's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is more volatile compared to NCNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check NCNC's competition here
TMH vs NCNCW Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, NCNCW has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while NCNCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas NCNCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCNCW's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is more volatile compared to NCNCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check NCNCW's competition here
TMH vs ECXWW Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ECXWW has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while ECXWW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas ECXWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ECXWW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to ECXWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check ECXWW's competition here
TMH vs AMV Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while AMV trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas AMV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMV's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to AMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check AMV's competition here
TMH vs HLLY-WT Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, HLLY-WT has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while HLLY-WT trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas HLLY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HLLY-WT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is more volatile compared to HLLY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check HLLY-WT's competition here
TMH vs MKDW Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MKDW has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while MKDW trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas MKDW's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MKDW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is more volatile compared to MKDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check MKDW's competition here
TMH vs SAG Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SAG has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while SAG trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas SAG's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to SAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check SAG's competition here
TMH vs SUP Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SUP has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while SUP trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas SUP's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SUP's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to SUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check SUP's competition here
TMH vs FRSX Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FRSX has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while FRSX trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas FRSX's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FRSX's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to FRSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check FRSX's competition here
TMH vs WKSP Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, WKSP has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while WKSP trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas WKSP's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WKSP's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to WKSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check WKSP's competition here
TMH vs INEO Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, INEO has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while INEO trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas INEO's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INEO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to INEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check INEO's competition here
TMH vs UFAB Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, UFAB has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while UFAB trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas UFAB's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UFAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to UFAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check UFAB's competition here
TMH vs LIDRW Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, LIDRW has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while LIDRW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas LIDRW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LIDRW's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to LIDRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check LIDRW's competition here
TMH vs MKDWW Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MKDWW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while MKDWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas MKDWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MKDWW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to MKDWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check MKDWW's competition here
TMH vs INVZW Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, INVZW has a market cap of 977.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while INVZW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas INVZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INVZW's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is more volatile compared to INVZW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check INVZW's competition here
TMH vs CREV Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CREV has a market cap of 775.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while CREV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas CREV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CREV's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is more volatile compared to CREV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check CREV's competition here
TMH vs WKSPW Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, WKSPW has a market cap of 575.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while WKSPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas WKSPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WKSPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to WKSPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check WKSPW's competition here
TMH vs GGROW Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GGROW has a market cap of 128.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while GGROW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas GGROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GGROW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is more volatile compared to GGROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check GGROW's competition here
TMH vs HYZNW Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, HYZNW has a market cap of 16.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while HYZNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas HYZNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HYZNW's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to HYZNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check HYZNW's competition here
TMH vs CREVW Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CREVW has a market cap of 6.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while CREVW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas CREVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CREVW's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is more volatile compared to CREVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check CREVW's competition here
TMH vs RMO Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, RMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while RMO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas RMO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RMO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to RMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check RMO's competition here
TMH vs VNE Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, VNE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while VNE trades at $36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas VNE's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VNE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is more volatile compared to VNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check VNE's competition here
TMH vs HZN Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, HZN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while HZN trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas HZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HZN's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is less volatile compared to HZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check HZN's competition here
TMH vs MTOR Comparison March 2026
TMH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMH stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MTOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMH is priced at $58.00, while MTOR trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.86, whereas MTOR's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, TMH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MTOR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TMH is more volatile compared to MTOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMH.Check MTOR's competition here