Tesla, Inc.
Tesla, Inc. (TL0.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TL0.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TL0.DE | €345.85 | +0.04% | 1.3T | 371.88 | €0.93 | N/A |
| TOM.F | €18.50 | +0.82% | 243.3B | 12.05 | €1.55 | +2.95% |
| TOM.SG | €18.50 | +0.85% | 241.1B | N/A | N/A | +3.06% |
| TOM.DU | €18.45 | +0.89% | 240.4B | N/A | N/A | +3.07% |
| TOM.MU | €18.34 | -0.73% | 239B | N/A | N/A | +3.09% |
| BY6.F | €11.65 | +7.82% | 109.8B | 64.69 | €0.18 | +1.35% |
| 8GM.DE | €63.15 | -0.60% | 57.1B | 22.24 | €2.84 | +0.86% |
| MBG.DE | €53.75 | -2.01% | 51.5B | 8.29 | €6.48 | +8.00% |
| 2FE.DE | €288.80 | -0.28% | 51.2B | 32.27 | €8.95 | +1.03% |
| BMW3.DE | €78.95 | -3.07% | 48.4B | 6.94 | €11.38 | +5.44% |
Stock Comparison
TL0.DE vs TOM.F Comparison March 2026
TL0.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TL0.DE stands at 1.3T. In comparison, TOM.F has a market cap of 243.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TL0.DE is priced at €345.85, while TOM.F trades at €18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TL0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 371.88, whereas TOM.F's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, TL0.DE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TOM.F's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TL0.DE is less volatile compared to TOM.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TL0.DE.Check TOM.F's competition here
TL0.DE vs TOM.SG Comparison March 2026
TL0.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TL0.DE stands at 1.3T. In comparison, TOM.SG has a market cap of 241.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TL0.DE is priced at €345.85, while TOM.SG trades at €18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TL0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 371.88, whereas TOM.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TL0.DE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TOM.SG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TL0.DE is more volatile compared to TOM.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TL0.DE.Check TOM.SG's competition here
TL0.DE vs TOM.DU Comparison March 2026
TL0.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TL0.DE stands at 1.3T. In comparison, TOM.DU has a market cap of 240.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TL0.DE is priced at €345.85, while TOM.DU trades at €18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TL0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 371.88, whereas TOM.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TL0.DE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TOM.DU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TL0.DE is more volatile compared to TOM.DU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TL0.DE.Check TOM.DU's competition here
TL0.DE vs TOM.MU Comparison March 2026
TL0.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TL0.DE stands at 1.3T. In comparison, TOM.MU has a market cap of 239B. Regarding current trading prices, TL0.DE is priced at €345.85, while TOM.MU trades at €18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TL0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 371.88, whereas TOM.MU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TL0.DE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TOM.MU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TL0.DE is more volatile compared to TOM.MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TL0.DE.Check TOM.MU's competition here
TL0.DE vs BY6.F Comparison March 2026
TL0.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TL0.DE stands at 1.3T. In comparison, BY6.F has a market cap of 109.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TL0.DE is priced at €345.85, while BY6.F trades at €11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TL0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 371.88, whereas BY6.F's P/E ratio is 64.69. In terms of profitability, TL0.DE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BY6.F's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TL0.DE is less volatile compared to BY6.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TL0.DE.Check BY6.F's competition here
TL0.DE vs 8GM.DE Comparison March 2026
TL0.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TL0.DE stands at 1.3T. In comparison, 8GM.DE has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TL0.DE is priced at €345.85, while 8GM.DE trades at €63.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TL0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 371.88, whereas 8GM.DE's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, TL0.DE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8GM.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TL0.DE is more volatile compared to 8GM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TL0.DE.Check 8GM.DE's competition here
TL0.DE vs MBG.DE Comparison March 2026
TL0.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TL0.DE stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MBG.DE has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TL0.DE is priced at €345.85, while MBG.DE trades at €53.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TL0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 371.88, whereas MBG.DE's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, TL0.DE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MBG.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TL0.DE is more volatile compared to MBG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TL0.DE.Check MBG.DE's competition here
TL0.DE vs 2FE.DE Comparison March 2026
TL0.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TL0.DE stands at 1.3T. In comparison, 2FE.DE has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TL0.DE is priced at €345.85, while 2FE.DE trades at €288.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TL0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 371.88, whereas 2FE.DE's P/E ratio is 32.27. In terms of profitability, TL0.DE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2FE.DE's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TL0.DE is more volatile compared to 2FE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TL0.DE.Check 2FE.DE's competition here
TL0.DE vs BMW3.DE Comparison March 2026
TL0.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TL0.DE stands at 1.3T. In comparison, BMW3.DE has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TL0.DE is priced at €345.85, while BMW3.DE trades at €78.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TL0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 371.88, whereas BMW3.DE's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, TL0.DE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BMW3.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TL0.DE is less volatile compared to BMW3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TL0.DE.Check BMW3.DE's competition here
TL0.DE vs BMW.DE Comparison March 2026
TL0.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TL0.DE stands at 1.3T. In comparison, BMW.DE has a market cap of 48.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TL0.DE is priced at €345.85, while BMW.DE trades at €79.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TL0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 371.88, whereas BMW.DE's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, TL0.DE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BMW.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TL0.DE is less volatile compared to BMW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TL0.DE.Check BMW.DE's competition here
TL0.DE vs VOW.DE Comparison March 2026
TL0.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TL0.DE stands at 1.3T. In comparison, VOW.DE has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TL0.DE is priced at €345.85, while VOW.DE trades at €89.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TL0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 371.88, whereas VOW.DE's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, TL0.DE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VOW.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TL0.DE is more volatile compared to VOW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TL0.DE.Check VOW.DE's competition here
TL0.DE vs VOW3.DE Comparison March 2026
TL0.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TL0.DE stands at 1.3T. In comparison, VOW3.DE has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TL0.DE is priced at €345.85, while VOW3.DE trades at €88.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TL0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 371.88, whereas VOW3.DE's P/E ratio is 6.57. In terms of profitability, TL0.DE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VOW3.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TL0.DE is more volatile compared to VOW3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TL0.DE.Check VOW3.DE's competition here
TL0.DE vs FMC1.DE Comparison March 2026
TL0.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TL0.DE stands at 1.3T. In comparison, FMC1.DE has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TL0.DE is priced at €345.85, while FMC1.DE trades at €10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TL0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 371.88, whereas FMC1.DE's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, TL0.DE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FMC1.DE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TL0.DE is more volatile compared to FMC1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TL0.DE.Check FMC1.DE's competition here
TL0.DE vs P911.HM Comparison March 2026
TL0.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TL0.DE stands at 1.3T. In comparison, P911.HM has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TL0.DE is priced at €345.85, while P911.HM trades at €36.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TL0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 371.88, whereas P911.HM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TL0.DE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to P911.HM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TL0.DE is more volatile compared to P911.HM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TL0.DE.Check P911.HM's competition here
TL0.DE vs P911.DE Comparison March 2026
TL0.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TL0.DE stands at 1.3T. In comparison, P911.DE has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TL0.DE is priced at €345.85, while P911.DE trades at €36.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TL0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 371.88, whereas P911.DE's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, TL0.DE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to P911.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TL0.DE is more volatile compared to P911.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TL0.DE.Check P911.DE's competition here
TL0.DE vs 8TI.DE Comparison March 2026
TL0.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TL0.DE stands at 1.3T. In comparison, 8TI.DE has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TL0.DE is priced at €345.85, while 8TI.DE trades at €5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TL0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 371.88, whereas 8TI.DE's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, TL0.DE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8TI.DE's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TL0.DE is less volatile compared to 8TI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TL0.DE.Check 8TI.DE's competition here
TL0.DE vs N3IA.F Comparison March 2026
TL0.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TL0.DE stands at 1.3T. In comparison, N3IA.F has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TL0.DE is priced at €345.85, while N3IA.F trades at €5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TL0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 371.88, whereas N3IA.F's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, TL0.DE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to N3IA.F's ROE of -9.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TL0.DE is less volatile compared to N3IA.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TL0.DE.Check N3IA.F's competition here
TL0.DE vs PAH3.DE Comparison March 2026
TL0.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TL0.DE stands at 1.3T. In comparison, PAH3.DE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TL0.DE is priced at €345.85, while PAH3.DE trades at €31.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TL0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 371.88, whereas PAH3.DE's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, TL0.DE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAH3.DE's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TL0.DE is more volatile compared to PAH3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TL0.DE.Check PAH3.DE's competition here
TL0.DE vs RNL.DE Comparison March 2026
TL0.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TL0.DE stands at 1.3T. In comparison, RNL.DE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TL0.DE is priced at €345.85, while RNL.DE trades at €28.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TL0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 371.88, whereas RNL.DE's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, TL0.DE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RNL.DE's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TL0.DE is more volatile compared to RNL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TL0.DE.Check RNL.DE's competition here
TL0.DE vs 0O9.F Comparison March 2026
TL0.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TL0.DE stands at 1.3T. In comparison, 0O9.F has a market cap of 194.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TL0.DE is priced at €345.85, while 0O9.F trades at €2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TL0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 371.88, whereas 0O9.F's P/E ratio is -69.75. In terms of profitability, TL0.DE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0O9.F's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TL0.DE is less volatile compared to 0O9.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TL0.DE.Check 0O9.F's competition here
TL0.DE vs PMAG.DE Comparison March 2026
TL0.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TL0.DE stands at 1.3T. In comparison, PMAG.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TL0.DE is priced at €345.85, while PMAG.DE trades at €57.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TL0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 371.88, whereas PMAG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TL0.DE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PMAG.DE's ROE of +4.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TL0.DE is more volatile compared to PMAG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TL0.DE.Check PMAG.DE's competition here