Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for TKLF
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for TKLF
Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd. (TKLF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TKLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TKLF | $2.33 | +1.30% | 982K | 2.11 | $1.10 | +4.15% |
| PG | $142.77 | -0.24% | 333.5B | 21.11 | $6.76 | +2.97% |
| UL | $56.03 | +1.05% | 122.4B | 18.67 | $3.00 | +4.14% |
| CL | $84.53 | -0.72% | 67.7B | 32.13 | $2.63 | +2.45% |
| KVUE | $17.30 | +0.93% | 33.1B | 22.76 | $0.76 | +4.80% |
| KMB | $96.99 | +0.89% | 32.2B | 19.96 | $4.86 | +5.23% |
| EL | $70.91 | +2.59% | 25.6B | -139.02 | -$0.51 | +1.97% |
| CHD | $93.13 | +0.30% | 22.1B | 30.84 | $3.02 | +1.28% |
| SGI | $74.37 | +2.02% | 15.6B | 40.41 | $1.84 | +0.84% |
| CLX | $104.89 | +3.71% | 12.8B | 17.17 | $6.11 | +4.72% |
Stock Comparison
TKLF vs PG Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, PG has a market cap of 333.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while PG trades at $142.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas PG's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PG's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is more volatile compared to PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check PG's competition here
TKLF vs UL Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, UL has a market cap of 122.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while UL trades at $56.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas UL's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is more volatile compared to UL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check UL's competition here
TKLF vs CL Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, CL has a market cap of 67.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while CL trades at $84.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas CL's P/E ratio is 32.13. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CL's ROE of +4.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is more volatile compared to CL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check CL's competition here
TKLF vs KVUE Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, KVUE has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while KVUE trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas KVUE's P/E ratio is 22.76. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KVUE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is more volatile compared to KVUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check KVUE's competition here
TKLF vs KMB Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, KMB has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while KMB trades at $96.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas KMB's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KMB's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is more volatile compared to KMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check KMB's competition here
TKLF vs EL Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, EL has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while EL trades at $70.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas EL's P/E ratio is -139.02. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is less volatile compared to EL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check EL's competition here
TKLF vs CHD Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, CHD has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while CHD trades at $93.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas CHD's P/E ratio is 30.84. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is more volatile compared to CHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check CHD's competition here
TKLF vs SGI Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while SGI trades at $74.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 40.41. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is more volatile compared to SGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check SGI's competition here
TKLF vs CLX Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, CLX has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while CLX trades at $104.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas CLX's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CLX's ROE of +15.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is less volatile compared to CLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check CLX's competition here
TKLF vs NTCO Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, NTCO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while NTCO trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas NTCO's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NTCO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is more volatile compared to NTCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check NTCO's competition here
TKLF vs ELF Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, ELF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while ELF trades at $63.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas ELF's P/E ratio is 35.71. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ELF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is less volatile compared to ELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check ELF's competition here
TKLF vs IPAR Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, IPAR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while IPAR trades at $90.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas IPAR's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IPAR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is less volatile compared to IPAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check IPAR's competition here
TKLF vs COTY Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, COTY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while COTY trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas COTY's P/E ratio is -3.49. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to COTY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is less volatile compared to COTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check COTY's competition here
TKLF vs SPB Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, SPB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while SPB trades at $76.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas SPB's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SPB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is less volatile compared to SPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check SPB's competition here
TKLF vs NWL Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, NWL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while NWL trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas NWL's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NWL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is less volatile compared to NWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check NWL's competition here
TKLF vs EPC Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, EPC has a market cap of 996M. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while EPC trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas EPC's P/E ratio is 193.82. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EPC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is less volatile compared to EPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check EPC's competition here
TKLF vs NUS Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, NUS has a market cap of 361.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while NUS trades at $7.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas NUS's P/E ratio is 2.36. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is more volatile compared to NUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check NUS's competition here
TKLF vs HELE Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, HELE has a market cap of 359.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while HELE trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas HELE's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HELE's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is less volatile compared to HELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check HELE's competition here
TKLF vs EWCZ Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, EWCZ has a market cap of 319M. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while EWCZ trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas EWCZ's P/E ratio is 29.25. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EWCZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is more volatile compared to EWCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check EWCZ's competition here
TKLF vs PTNM Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, PTNM has a market cap of 207.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while PTNM trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas PTNM's P/E ratio is 346.33. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PTNM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is more volatile compared to PTNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check PTNM's competition here
TKLF vs ACU Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, ACU has a market cap of 168.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while ACU trades at $44.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas ACU's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ACU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is more volatile compared to ACU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check ACU's competition here
TKLF vs SKIN Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, SKIN has a market cap of 114M. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while SKIN trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas SKIN's P/E ratio is -5.58. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SKIN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is less volatile compared to SKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check SKIN's competition here
TKLF vs SLSN Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, SLSN has a market cap of 99.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while SLSN trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas SLSN's P/E ratio is 70.50. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SLSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is less volatile compared to SLSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check SLSN's competition here
TKLF vs GROV Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, GROV has a market cap of 55.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while GROV trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas GROV's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GROV's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is less volatile compared to GROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check GROV's competition here
TKLF vs AXIL Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, AXIL has a market cap of 48.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while AXIL trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas AXIL's P/E ratio is 41.76. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AXIL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is more volatile compared to AXIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check AXIL's competition here
TKLF vs UG Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, UG has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while UG trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas UG's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is more volatile compared to UG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check UG's competition here
TKLF vs DSY Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, DSY has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while DSY trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas DSY's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DSY's ROE of +14.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is less volatile compared to DSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check DSY's competition here
TKLF vs MTEX Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, MTEX has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while MTEX trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas MTEX's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MTEX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is less volatile compared to MTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check MTEX's competition here
TKLF vs RAY Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while RAY trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is less volatile compared to RAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check RAY's competition here
TKLF vs PHH Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, PHH has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while PHH trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas PHH's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PHH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is less volatile compared to PHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check PHH's competition here
TKLF vs BRSH Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, BRSH has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while BRSH trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas BRSH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BRSH's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is less volatile compared to BRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check BRSH's competition here
TKLF vs TANH Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, TANH has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while TANH trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas TANH's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TANH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is less volatile compared to TANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check TANH's competition here
TKLF vs NXTS Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, NXTS has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while NXTS trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas NXTS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NXTS's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is less volatile compared to NXTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check NXTS's competition here
TKLF vs DSYWW Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, DSYWW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while DSYWW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas DSYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DSYWW's ROE of +14.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is less volatile compared to DSYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check DSYWW's competition here
TKLF vs BRSHW Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, BRSHW has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while BRSHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas BRSHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BRSHW's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is less volatile compared to BRSHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check BRSHW's competition here
TKLF vs GROV-WT Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, GROV-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while GROV-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas GROV-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GROV-WT's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is more volatile compared to GROV-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check GROV-WT's competition here
TKLF vs REV Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, REV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while REV trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas REV's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to REV's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is less volatile compared to REV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check REV's competition here
TKLF vs SUMR Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, SUMR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while SUMR trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas SUMR's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SUMR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is more volatile compared to SUMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check SUMR's competition here
TKLF vs RDEN Comparison April 2026
TKLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKLF stands at 982K. In comparison, RDEN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TKLF is priced at $2.33, while RDEN trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.11, whereas RDEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKLF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RDEN's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TKLF is more volatile compared to RDEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKLF.Check RDEN's competition here