Telecom Argentina S.A.
Telecom Argentina S.A. (TEO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TEO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEO | $9.22 | +1.43% | 4B | 102.61 | $0.09 | +2.19% |
| TMUS | $241.01 | +1.61% | 271.2B | 22.78 | $10.58 | +1.37% |
| VZA | $25.55 | -0.43% | 241.3B | 3.27 | $7.82 | N/A |
| TBB | $23.10 | +0.35% | 198.9B | 4.51 | $5.12 | +5.79% |
| T | $27.68 | -0.25% | 197.8B | 15.81 | $1.75 | +4.01% |
| VZ | $42.95 | +0.16% | 181.1B | 9.99 | $4.30 | +6.31% |
| TBC | $24.97 | -0.68% | 179.8B | N/A | N/A | +2.82% |
| T-PA | $20.56 | +0.78% | 147B | 8.65 | $2.38 | +4.01% |
| T-PC | $19.51 | +0.57% | 139.7B | 8.22 | $2.38 | +4.01% |
| CMCSA | $32.56 | +0.12% | 119.9B | 5.40 | $6.03 | +3.91% |
Stock Comparison
TEO vs TMUS Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, TMUS has a market cap of 271.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while TMUS trades at $241.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas TMUS's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TMUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to TMUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check TMUS's competition here
TEO vs VZA Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while VZA trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to VZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check VZA's competition here
TEO vs TBB Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 198.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while TBB trades at $23.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 4.51. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to TBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check TBB's competition here
TEO vs T Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, T has a market cap of 197.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while T trades at $27.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas T's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check T's competition here
TEO vs VZ Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 181.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while VZ trades at $42.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to VZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check VZ's competition here
TEO vs TBC Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, TBC has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while TBC trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas TBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TBC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to TBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check TBC's competition here
TEO vs T-PA Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 147B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while T-PA trades at $20.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check T-PA's competition here
TEO vs T-PC Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 139.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while T-PC trades at $19.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check T-PC's competition here
TEO vs CMCSA Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 119.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while CMCSA trades at $32.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check CMCSA's competition here
TEO vs AMOV Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while AMOV trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check AMOV's competition here
TEO vs AMX Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 54.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while AMX trades at $17.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to AMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check AMX's competition here
TEO vs CHTR Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while CHTR trades at $261.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check CHTR's competition here
TEO vs CHT Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, CHT has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while CHT trades at $43.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas CHT's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to CHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check CHT's competition here
TEO vs TEF Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while TEF trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -33.03. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to TEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check TEF's competition here
TEO vs ORAN Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while ORAN trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check ORAN's competition here
TEO vs VOD Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while VOD trades at $11.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is -6.10. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VOD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to VOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check VOD's competition here
TEO vs TU Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while TU trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 33.49. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to TU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check TU's competition here
TEO vs BCE Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while BCE trades at $23.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 77.68. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to BCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check BCE's competition here
TEO vs VIV Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while VIV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to VIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check VIV's competition here
TEO vs RCI Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while RCI trades at $34.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to RCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check RCI's competition here
TEO vs TLK Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while TLK trades at $18.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to TLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check TLK's competition here
TEO vs SJR Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while SJR trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to SJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check SJR's competition here
TEO vs KT Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while KT trades at $20.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to KT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check KT's competition here
TEO vs TIMB Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while TIMB trades at $19.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check TIMB's competition here
TEO vs MBT Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while MBT trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MBT's ROE of -7.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to MBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check MBT's competition here
TEO vs FYBR Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while FYBR trades at $36.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -23.44. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to FYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check FYBR's competition here
TEO vs LBRDP Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while LBRDP trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is 4.61. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check LBRDP's competition here
TEO vs SKM Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while SKM trades at $22.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to SKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check SKM's competition here
TEO vs LBRDK Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while LBRDK trades at $59.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check LBRDK's competition here
TEO vs LBRDA Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while LBRDA trades at $59.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check LBRDA's competition here
TEO vs CTDD Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while CTDD trades at $19.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check CTDD's competition here
TEO vs TIGO Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while TIGO trades at $40.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check TIGO's competition here
TEO vs UZE Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while UZE trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UZE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to UZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check UZE's competition here
TEO vs USM Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while USM trades at $72.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -158.24. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to USM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to USM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check USM's competition here
TEO vs UZF Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while UZF trades at $22.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UZF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to UZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check UZF's competition here
TEO vs UZD Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while UZD trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UZD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to UZD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check UZD's competition here
TEO vs PHI Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while PHI trades at $23.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to PHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check PHI's competition here
TEO vs TKC Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while TKC trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to TKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check TKC's competition here
TEO vs LBYKV Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to LBYKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check LBYKV's competition here
TEO vs TDS-PV Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while TDS-PV trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO and TDS-PV have similar daily volatility (2.38).Check TDS-PV's competition here
TEO vs TDS-PU Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while TDS-PU trades at $21.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 24.39. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check TDS-PU's competition here
TEO vs TDS Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while TDS trades at $37.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is -35.74. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TDS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to TDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check TDS's competition here
TEO vs LBTYB Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while LBTYB trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -18.15. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check LBTYB's competition here
TEO vs CTBB Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while CTBB trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTBB's ROE of -9.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check CTBB's competition here
TEO vs LUMN Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, LUMN has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while LUMN trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas LUMN's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LUMN's ROE of -9.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to LUMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check LUMN's competition here
TEO vs SNRE Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while SNRE trades at $55.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -13.47. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check SNRE's competition here
TEO vs LBTYA Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while LBTYA trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -17.56. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check LBTYA's competition here
TEO vs LBTYK Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while LBTYK trades at $11.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -17.89. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check LBTYK's competition here
TEO vs VEON Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while VEON trades at $49.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to VEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check VEON's competition here
TEO vs DISH Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while DISH trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DISH's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to DISH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check DISH's competition here
TEO vs GSAT Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while GSAT trades at $24.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -39.12. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check GSAT's competition here
TEO vs IRDM Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while IRDM trades at $24.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check IRDM's competition here
TEO vs CCOI Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while CCOI trades at $45.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -11.35. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CCOI's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check CCOI's competition here
TEO vs IHS Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while IHS trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is -51.27. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IHS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to IHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check IHS's competition here
TEO vs GOGO Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while GOGO trades at $15.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is -399.00. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GOGO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check GOGO's competition here
TEO vs ASTSW Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check ASTSW's competition here
TEO vs RADI Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while RADI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to RADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check RADI's competition here
TEO vs IDT Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while IDT trades at $59.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to IDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check IDT's competition here
TEO vs LILAK Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while LILAK trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check LILAK's competition here
TEO vs LILA Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while LILA trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LILA's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to LILA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check LILA's competition here
TEO vs TV Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while TV trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to TV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check TV's competition here
TEO vs ATUS Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while ATUS trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -7.35. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check ATUS's competition here
TEO vs CABO Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, CABO has a market cap of 822.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while CABO trades at $146.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas CABO's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CABO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to CABO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check CABO's competition here
TEO vs SHEN Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 708.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while SHEN trades at $12.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -19.86. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check SHEN's competition here
TEO vs RBBN Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, RBBN has a market cap of 642.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while RBBN trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas RBBN's P/E ratio is -14.52. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RBBN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to RBBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check RBBN's competition here
TEO vs CNSL Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while CNSL trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check CNSL's competition here
TEO vs ATEX Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 414.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while ATEX trades at $22.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is -36.33. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATEX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check ATEX's competition here
TEO vs OOMA Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, OOMA has a market cap of 313.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while OOMA trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas OOMA's P/E ratio is -59.82. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OOMA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to OOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check OOMA's competition here
TEO vs HCHC Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while HCHC trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HCHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check HCHC's competition here
TEO vs WOW Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 287.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while WOW trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -4.73. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to WOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check WOW's competition here
TEO vs ATNI Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 256.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while ATNI trades at $16.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATNI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check ATNI's competition here
TEO vs RDCM Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 211.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while RDCM trades at $13.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 24.92. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check RDCM's competition here
TEO vs CXDO Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 170.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while CXDO trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 73.38. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check CXDO's competition here
TEO vs MTSL Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while MTSL trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check MTSL's competition here
TEO vs FNGR Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, FNGR has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while FNGR trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas FNGR's P/E ratio is -17.11. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FNGR's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to FNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check FNGR's competition here
TEO vs TDI Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, TDI has a market cap of 59.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while TDI trades at $34.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas TDI's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TDI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to TDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check TDI's competition here
TEO vs KORE Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while KORE trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KORE's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to KORE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check KORE's competition here
TEO vs IQST Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, IQST has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while IQST trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas IQST's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IQST's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to IQST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check IQST's competition here
TEO vs ANTE Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, ANTE has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while ANTE trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas ANTE's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ANTE's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to ANTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check ANTE's competition here
TEO vs SIFY Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while SIFY trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is -33.35. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check SIFY's competition here
TEO vs PCLA Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, PCLA has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while PCLA trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas PCLA's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PCLA's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to PCLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check PCLA's competition here
TEO vs UCL Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, UCL has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while UCL trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas UCL's P/E ratio is -13.45. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UCL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to UCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check UCL's competition here
TEO vs MIMO Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, MIMO has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while MIMO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas MIMO's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MIMO's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to MIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check MIMO's competition here
TEO vs QTEK Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, QTEK has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while QTEK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas QTEK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QTEK's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to QTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check QTEK's competition here
TEO vs QTEKW Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, QTEKW has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while QTEKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas QTEKW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QTEKW's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to QTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check QTEKW's competition here
TEO vs COMSP Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, COMSP has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while COMSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas COMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to COMSP's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to COMSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check COMSP's competition here
TEO vs COMSW Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, COMSW has a market cap of 257. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while COMSW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas COMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to COMSW's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to COMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check COMSW's competition here
TEO vs TDA Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, TDA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while TDA trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas TDA's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TDA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to TDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check TDA's competition here
TEO vs PTNR Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, PTNR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while PTNR trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas PTNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PTNR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to PTNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check PTNR's competition here
TEO vs OIBR-C Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, OIBR-C has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while OIBR-C trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas OIBR-C's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OIBR-C's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to OIBR-C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check OIBR-C's competition here
TEO vs MIMO-WT Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, MIMO-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while MIMO-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas MIMO-WT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MIMO-WT's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to MIMO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check MIMO-WT's competition here
TEO vs LORL Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, LORL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while LORL trades at $41.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas LORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LORL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to LORL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check LORL's competition here
TEO vs ALSK Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, ALSK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while ALSK trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas ALSK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALSK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to ALSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check ALSK's competition here
TEO vs LBYAV Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, LBYAV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while LBYAV trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas LBYAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LBYAV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to LBYAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check LBYAV's competition here
TEO vs STRY Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, STRY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while STRY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas STRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STRY's ROE of +6.74%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to STRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check STRY's competition here
TEO vs UZA Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, UZA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while UZA trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas UZA's P/E ratio is 72.43. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UZA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to UZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check UZA's competition here
TEO vs CBB Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, CBB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while CBB trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas CBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CBB's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is more volatile compared to CBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check CBB's competition here
TEO vs TIGOR Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, TIGOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while TIGOR trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas TIGOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TIGOR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to TIGOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check TIGOR's competition here
TEO vs GTT Comparison August 2025
TEO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEO stands at 4B. In comparison, GTT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEO is priced at $9.22, while GTT trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEO currently has a P/E ratio of 102.61, whereas GTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GTT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TEO is less volatile compared to GTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEO.Check GTT's competition here