AT&T Inc. 5.625% Global Notes d
AT&T Inc. 5.625% Global Notes d TBC Peers
See (TBC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBC | $24.97 | -0.68% | 179.8B | N/A | N/A | +4.22% |
| TMUS | $239.28 | -0.92% | 271.7B | 23.53 | $10.17 | +1.28% |
| VZA | $25.55 | -0.43% | 241.3B | 3.27 | $7.82 | N/A |
| TBB | $21.91 | +0.26% | 197.3B | 4.28 | $5.12 | +6.11% |
| T | $27.39 | -0.40% | 197.1B | 16.80 | $1.63 | +4.06% |
| VZ | $43.33 | +0.46% | 182.7B | 10.32 | $4.20 | +6.24% |
| T-PA | $19.90 | +0.25% | 143.2B | 8.37 | $2.38 | +4.06% |
| T-PC | $18.86 | +0.11% | 135.7B | 7.93 | $2.38 | +4.06% |
| CMCSA | $34.28 | -1.01% | 127.7B | 8.44 | $4.06 | +3.68% |
| AMOV | $20.75 | -1.10% | 65.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TBC vs TMUS Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, TMUS has a market cap of 271.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TMUS trades at $239.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMUS's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TMUS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TMUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs VZA Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while VZA trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to VZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs TBB Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 197.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TBB trades at $21.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 4.28. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs T Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, T has a market cap of 197.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while T trades at $27.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas T's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs VZ Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 182.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while VZ trades at $43.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to VZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs T-PA Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 143.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while T-PA trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs T-PC Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 135.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while T-PC trades at $18.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs CMCSA Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 127.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CMCSA trades at $34.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs AMOV Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while AMOV trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs CHTR Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 54.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CHTR trades at $395.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs AMX Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 53B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while AMX trades at $17.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 36.08. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to AMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs CHT Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, CHT has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CHT trades at $43.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHT's P/E ratio is 27.12. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to CHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs TEF Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TEF trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -52.80. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs ORAN Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while ORAN trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs VOD Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while VOD trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VOD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to VOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs TU Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TU trades at $16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs BCE Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while BCE trades at $21.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 69.39. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to BCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs TLK Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TLK trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs VIV Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while VIV trades at $9.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to VIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs SJR Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while SJR trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to SJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs RCI Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while RCI trades at $26.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to RCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs LBRDP Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while LBRDP trades at $24.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is 4.46. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs LBRDK Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while LBRDK trades at $93.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs LBRDA Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while LBRDA trades at $92.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs KT Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while KT trades at $19.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to KT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs MBT Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while MBT trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MBT's ROE of -7.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to MBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs FYBR Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while FYBR trades at $36.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -23.38. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to FYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs TIMB Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TIMB trades at $17.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs CTDD Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CTDD trades at $18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs SKM Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while SKM trades at $20.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to SKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs TIGO Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TIGO trades at $36.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs UZD Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while UZD trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UZD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to UZD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs UZF Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while UZF trades at $22.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UZF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to UZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs TKC Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TKC trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs UZE Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while UZE trades at $22.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UZE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to UZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs USM Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while USM trades at $61.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -134.48. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to USM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs PHI Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while PHI trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to PHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs LBYKV Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to LBYKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs CTBB Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CTBB trades at $18.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTBB's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs LUMN Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, LUMN has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while LUMN trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUMN's P/E ratio is -12.19. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LUMN's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to LUMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs TDS-PV Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TDS-PV trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs TDS-PU Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TDS-PU trades at $19.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC and TDS-PU have similar daily volatility (1.41).
TBC vs TDS Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TDS trades at $34.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is -32.54. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs SNRE Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while SNRE trades at $51.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -12.59. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs LBTYK Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while LBTYK trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -15.92. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs LBTYB Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while LBTYB trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -15.45. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs LBTYA Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while LBTYA trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -15.45. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs DISH Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while DISH trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DISH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to DISH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs TEO Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TEO trades at $10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is 92.18. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TEO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs IRDM Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while IRDM trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs GSAT Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while GSAT trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -30.18. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs CCOI Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CCOI trades at $47.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -11.90. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CCOI's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs IHS Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while IHS trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is -41.81. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IHS's ROE of +3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to IHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs ASTSW Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs IDT Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while IDT trades at $62.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to IDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs RADI Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while RADI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to RADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs GOGO Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while GOGO trades at $10.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is -268.00. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GOGO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs ATUS Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while ATUS trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -7.08. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs LILAK Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while LILAK trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs LILA Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while LILA trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LILA's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to LILA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs CABO Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, CABO has a market cap of 831.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CABO trades at $147.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CABO's P/E ratio is -41.04. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CABO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to CABO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs SHEN Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 681.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while SHEN trades at $12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -17.74. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs RBBN Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, RBBN has a market cap of 617.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while RBBN trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBBN's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RBBN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to RBBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs CNSL Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CNSL trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs ATEX Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 500.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while ATEX trades at $26.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is -16.64. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATEX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs OOMA Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, OOMA has a market cap of 372.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while OOMA trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OOMA's P/E ratio is -51.92. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OOMA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to OOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs WOW Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 367.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while WOW trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to WOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs HCHC Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while HCHC trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCHC's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs ATNI Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 219.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while ATNI trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is -6.31. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATNI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs RDCM Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 214.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while RDCM trades at $13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 25.21. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs TV Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 213.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TV trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs FNGR Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, FNGR has a market cap of 169.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while FNGR trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNGR's P/E ratio is -29.60. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FNGR's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to FNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs CXDO Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 155.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CXDO trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 66.88. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs VEON Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 151.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while VEON trades at $53.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to VEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs MTSL Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while MTSL trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs SIFY Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 60.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while SIFY trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is -38.69. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs TDI Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, TDI has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TDI trades at $32.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDI's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs KORE Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while KORE trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KORE's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to KORE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs PCLA Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, PCLA has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while PCLA trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCLA's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PCLA's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to PCLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs ANTE Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, ANTE has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while ANTE trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANTE's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANTE's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to ANTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs MIMO Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, MIMO has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while MIMO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIMO's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MIMO's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to MIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs UCL Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, UCL has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while UCL trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UCL's P/E ratio is -9.10. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to UCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs QTEKW Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, QTEKW has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while QTEKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTEKW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QTEKW's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to QTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs QTEK Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, QTEK has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while QTEK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTEK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QTEK's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to QTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs COMSP Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, COMSP has a market cap of 513. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while COMSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COMSP's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to COMSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs COMSW Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, COMSW has a market cap of 257. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while COMSW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COMSW's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to COMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs LORL Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, LORL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while LORL trades at $41.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LORL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to LORL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs LBYAV Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, LBYAV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while LBYAV trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBYAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBYAV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to LBYAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs STRY Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, STRY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while STRY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STRY's ROE of +6.74%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to STRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs ALSK Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, ALSK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while ALSK trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALSK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALSK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to ALSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs OIBR-C Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, OIBR-C has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while OIBR-C trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OIBR-C's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OIBR-C's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to OIBR-C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs PTNR Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, PTNR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while PTNR trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PTNR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to PTNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs UZA Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, UZA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while UZA trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UZA's P/E ratio is 72.43. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UZA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to UZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs GTT Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, GTT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while GTT trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GTT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to GTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs TDA Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, TDA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TDA trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDA's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs CBB Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, CBB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CBB trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CBB's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to CBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs TIGOR Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, TIGOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TIGOR trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIGOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIGOR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TIGOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.
TBC vs MIMO-WT Comparison
TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.8B. In comparison, MIMO-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while MIMO-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIMO-WT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MIMO-WT's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to MIMO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.