AT&T Inc. 5.625% Global Notes d

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, AXTLF has a market cap of 28.61T. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while AXTLF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXTLF's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AXTLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to AXTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TMUS has a market cap of 281.87B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TMUS trades at $248.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMUS's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TMUS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TMUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.26B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while VZA trades at $25.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to VZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, T has a market cap of 197.99B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while T trades at $27.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas T's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 197.79B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TBB trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 4.39. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 183.66B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while VZ trades at $43.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to VZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, DTEGF has a market cap of 182.35B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while DTEGF trades at $37.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTEGF's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DTEGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to DTEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, DTEGY has a market cap of 177.64B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while DTEGY trades at $36.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTEGY's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DTEGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to DTEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, CHWRF has a market cap of 175.38B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CHWRF trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHWRF's P/E ratio is 23.13. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHWRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to CHWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 143.77B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while T-PA trades at $19.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 136.07B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while T-PC trades at $18.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 128.30B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CMCSA trades at $34.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, NPPXF has a market cap of 92.28B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while NPPXF trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPPXF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NPPXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to NPPXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, CUCSY has a market cap of 88.90B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CUCSY trades at $13.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUCSY's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CUCSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to CUCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, NTTYY has a market cap of 87.92B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while NTTYY trades at $26.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTTYY's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NTTYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to NTTYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, SFTBF has a market cap of 75.95B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while SFTBF trades at $52.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFTBF's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SFTBF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to SFTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, SFTBY has a market cap of 75.86B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while SFTBY trades at $26.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFTBY's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SFTBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to SFTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, AMXVF has a market cap of 73.58B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while AMXVF trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMXVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMXVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to AMXVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, SFBQF has a market cap of 72.16B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while SFBQF trades at $1.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFBQF's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SFBQF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to SFBQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, KDDIY has a market cap of 71.46B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while KDDIY trades at $17.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KDDIY's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KDDIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to KDDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, AMOVF has a market cap of 66.57B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while AMOVF trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMOVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMOVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to AMOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.61B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while AMOV trades at $20.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, KDDIF has a market cap of 63.14B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while KDDIF trades at $15.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KDDIF's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KDDIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to KDDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, CLLNY has a market cap of 56.53B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CLLNY trades at $20.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLLNY's P/E ratio is -667.67. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLLNY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to CLLNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 55.34B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CHTR trades at $394.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, AARTY has a market cap of 55.12B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while AARTY trades at $15.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AARTY's P/E ratio is 94.19. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AARTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to AARTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 52.06B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while AMX trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 29.82. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to AMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, SNGNF has a market cap of 49.54B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while SNGNF trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNGNF's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNGNF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to SNGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, SGAPY has a market cap of 48.89B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while SGAPY trades at $29.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGAPY's P/E ratio is -493.83. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGAPY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to SGAPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, FNCTF has a market cap of 38.28B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while FNCTF trades at $14.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNCTF's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FNCTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to FNCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, SCMWY has a market cap of 34.50B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while SCMWY trades at $66.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCMWY's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SCMWY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to SCMWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, SWZCF has a market cap of 34.41B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while SWZCF trades at $664.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWZCF's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWZCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to SWZCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, CHT has a market cap of 34.28B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CHT trades at $44.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHT's P/E ratio is 29.66. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to CHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TLGPY has a market cap of 33.81B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TLGPY trades at $14.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLGPY's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TLGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TLGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TTRAF has a market cap of 31.55B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TTRAF trades at $2.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTRAF's P/E ratio is 30.67. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TTRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TTRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TEFOF has a market cap of 29.97B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TEFOF trades at $5.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEFOF's P/E ratio is -75.86. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TEFOF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TEFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.64B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while ORAN trades at $11.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 28.30B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TEF trades at $5.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -71.64. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, AVIKF has a market cap of 26.14B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while AVIKF trades at $7.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVIKF's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AVIKF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to AVIKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, AVIFY has a market cap of 25.58B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while AVIFY trades at $8.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVIFY's P/E ratio is 24.57. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AVIFY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to AVIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, CTOWY has a market cap of 25.01B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CTOWY trades at $12.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTOWY's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTOWY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to CTOWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 24.43B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while VOD trades at $9.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VOD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to VOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, VODPF has a market cap of 23.90B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while VODPF trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VODPF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VODPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to VODPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 22.86B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TU trades at $15.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 32.12. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, BTGOF has a market cap of 22.02B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while BTGOF trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTGOF's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BTGOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to BTGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TELNY has a market cap of 20.87B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TELNY trades at $15.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TELNY's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TELNY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TELNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TELNF has a market cap of 20.52B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TELNF trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TELNF's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TELNF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TELNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 19.71B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while BCE trades at $21.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 164.50. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to BCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, BCEPF has a market cap of 19.68B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while BCEPF trades at $12.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCEPF's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCEPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to BCEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, KKPNY has a market cap of 18.29B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while KKPNY trades at $4.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKPNY's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KKPNY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to KKPNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, KKPNF has a market cap of 18.07B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while KKPNF trades at $4.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKPNF's P/E ratio is 20.22. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KKPNF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to KKPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, AVIVF has a market cap of 17.46B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while AVIVF trades at $5.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVIVF's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AVIVF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to AVIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 16.04B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TLK trades at $16.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 15.64B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while VIV trades at $9.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to VIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, HLTOY has a market cap of 15.62B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while HLTOY trades at $9.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLTOY's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLTOY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to HLTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.94B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while SJR trades at $30.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to SJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TLSNF has a market cap of 14.86B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TLSNF trades at $3.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLSNF's P/E ratio is 29.08. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TLSNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TLSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TLSNY has a market cap of 14.75B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TLSNY trades at $7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLSNY's P/E ratio is 28.85. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TLSNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TLSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, SJRWF has a market cap of 14.71B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while SJRWF trades at $30.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SJRWF's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SJRWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to SJRWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, ELMUY has a market cap of 14.58B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while ELMUY trades at $22.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELMUY's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELMUY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to ELMUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, VDMCY has a market cap of 14.54B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while VDMCY trades at $7.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDMCY's P/E ratio is 18.77. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VDMCY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to VDMCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, RCIAF has a market cap of 14.19B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while RCIAF trades at $28.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCIAF's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RCIAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to RCIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 14.00B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while RCI trades at $25.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to RCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TLKMF has a market cap of 13.87B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TLKMF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLKMF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TLKMF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TLKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 13.14B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while LBRDA trades at $90.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 13.11B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while LBRDK trades at $91.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, LBRDB has a market cap of 12.79B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while LBRDB trades at $85.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRDB's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBRDB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to LBRDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 12.76B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while LBRDP trades at $24.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is 4.46. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TCPFF has a market cap of 12.44B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TCPFF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCPFF's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TCPFF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TCPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, HKTTY has a market cap of 12.08B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while HKTTY trades at $15.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKTTY's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HKTTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to HKTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, BCPPF has a market cap of 11.98B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while BCPPF trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to BCPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TELDY has a market cap of 11.90B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TELDY trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TELDY's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TELDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TELDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, MTNOY has a market cap of 11.86B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while MTNOY trades at $6.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTNOY's P/E ratio is -23.45. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTNOY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to MTNOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, BGAOY has a market cap of 11.61B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while BGAOY trades at $1.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGAOY's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BGAOY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to BGAOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, VODAF has a market cap of 11.12B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while VODAF trades at $5.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VODAF's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VODAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to VODAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, BECEF has a market cap of 10.67B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while BECEF trades at $11.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BECEF's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BECEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to BECEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, MTNOF has a market cap of 10.48B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while MTNOF trades at $5.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTNOF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTNOF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to MTNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, FRTAY has a market cap of 10.32B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while FRTAY trades at $21.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRTAY's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FRTAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to FRTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TLTZY has a market cap of 10.13B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TLTZY trades at $7.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLTZY's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TLTZY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TLTZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 9.88B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while KT trades at $20.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 30.93. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to KT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.28B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while MBT trades at $5.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MBT's ROE of -6.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to MBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, BCEXF has a market cap of 9.22B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while BCEXF trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCEXF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCEXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to BCEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TLTZF has a market cap of 9.19B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TLTZF trades at $13.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLTZF's P/E ratio is 23.17. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TLTZF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TLTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.14B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while FYBR trades at $36.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -28.11. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to FYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, DIGBF has a market cap of 8.80B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while DIGBF trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIGBF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DIGBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to DIGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TIAIY has a market cap of 8.73B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TIAIY trades at $4.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIAIY's P/E ratio is -13.06. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIAIY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TIAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 8.71B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while SKM trades at $22.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to SKM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TIAOF has a market cap of 8.65B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TIAOF trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIAOF's P/E ratio is -13.09. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIAOF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TIAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TIAJF has a market cap of 8.59B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TIAJF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIAJF's P/E ratio is -14.67. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIAJF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TIAJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, ELMUF has a market cap of 8.01B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while ELMUF trades at $49.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELMUF's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELMUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to ELMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 7.88B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TIMB trades at $16.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, SHNUF has a market cap of 7.66B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while SHNUF trades at $2.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHNUF's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHNUF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to SHNUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 7.64B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CTDD trades at $17.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, HKTTF has a market cap of 7.58B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while HKTTF trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKTTF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HKTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to HKTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, SOBKY has a market cap of 7.26B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while SOBKY trades at $15.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOBKY's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SOBKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to SOBKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TELDF has a market cap of 7.02B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TELDF trades at $2.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TELDF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TELDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TELDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, MYTEF has a market cap of 6.29B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while MYTEF trades at $1.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYTEF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MYTEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to MYTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, HLTOF has a market cap of 6.27B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while HLTOF trades at $15.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLTOF's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLTOF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to HLTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, QBCRF has a market cap of 6.24B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while QBCRF trades at $27.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBCRF's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QBCRF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to QBCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, QBCAF has a market cap of 6.17B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while QBCAF trades at $26.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBCAF's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QBCAF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to QBCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 5.76B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TIGO trades at $33.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, MAXSF has a market cap of 5.56B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while MAXSF trades at $0.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAXSF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAXSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to MAXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 5.36B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while UZE trades at $22.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UZE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to UZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 5.35B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while UZD trades at $23.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UZD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to UZD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 5.35B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while UZF trades at $22.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UZF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to UZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, PCCWY has a market cap of 5.20B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while PCCWY trades at $6.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCCWY's P/E ratio is -130.80. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PCCWY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to PCCWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, PCWLF has a market cap of 5.14B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while PCWLF trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCWLF's P/E ratio is -66.48. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PCWLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to PCWLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TKAGY has a market cap of 5.07B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TKAGY trades at $15.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKAGY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TKAGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TKAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 5.06B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while PHI trades at $23.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to PHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 4.99B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TKC trades at $5.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 4.96B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while USM trades at $58.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -126.80. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to USM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, GTMEY has a market cap of 4.92B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while GTMEY trades at $32.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTMEY's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GTMEY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to GTMEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, PHTCF has a market cap of 4.86B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while PHTCF trades at $22.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHTCF's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PHTCF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to PHTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, AAFRF has a market cap of 4.83B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while AAFRF trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAFRF's P/E ratio is 66.00. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AAFRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to AAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, FRTAF has a market cap of 4.72B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while FRTAF trades at $39.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRTAF's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FRTAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to FRTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TRKNY has a market cap of 4.64B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TRKNY trades at $2.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRKNY's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRKNY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TRKNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, BZQIF has a market cap of 4.54B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while BZQIF trades at $1.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZQIF's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BZQIF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to BZQIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, LUMN has a market cap of 4.35B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while LUMN trades at $4.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUMN's P/E ratio is -13.27. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LUMN's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to LUMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.23B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to LBYKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TCMFF has a market cap of 4.22B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TCMFF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCMFF's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TCMFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TCMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4.12B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CTBB trades at $17.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTBB's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, BZQIY has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while BZQIY trades at $6.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZQIY's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BZQIY's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to BZQIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TFAOF has a market cap of 3.73B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TFAOF trades at $12.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TFAOF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TFAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TFAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, UDIRF has a market cap of 3.72B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while UDIRF trades at $21.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UDIRF's P/E ratio is -67.19. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UDIRF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to UDIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 3.69B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while SNRE trades at $53.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -8.90. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 3.61B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TDS-PV trades at $18.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 3.61B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TDS-PU trades at $20.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, IIJIF has a market cap of 3.58B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while IIJIF trades at $20.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIJIF's P/E ratio is 24.99. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IIJIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to IIJIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, AXXTF has a market cap of 3.55B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while AXXTF trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXXTF's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AXXTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to AXXTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 3.40B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TDS trades at $31.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is -30.22. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 3.38B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while LBTYA trades at $9.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is 1.99. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 3.34B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while LBTYK trades at $9.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, IIJIY has a market cap of 3.29B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while IIJIY trades at $37.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIJIY's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IIJIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to IIJIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 3.29B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while LBTYB trades at $9.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is 1.97. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, MICCF has a market cap of 3.16B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while MICCF trades at $18.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MICCF's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MICCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to MICCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, PTITF has a market cap of 3.13B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while PTITF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTITF's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PTITF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to PTITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.08B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while DISH trades at $5.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DISH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to DISH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, CUCSF has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CUCSF trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUCSF's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CUCSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to CUCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 2.90B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TEO trades at $9.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TEO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TACYY has a market cap of 2.90B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TACYY trades at $6.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TACYY's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TACYY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TACYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TRKNF has a market cap of 2.80B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TRKNF trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRKNF's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRKNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TRKNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 2.79B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while IRDM trades at $25.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 2.76B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CCOI trades at $56.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -13.09. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CCOI's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TLGHY has a market cap of 2.73B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TLGHY trades at $11.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLGHY's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TLGHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TLGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, PTTWF has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while PTTWF trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTTWF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PTTWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to PTTWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, GMOYF has a market cap of 2.58B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while GMOYF trades at $24.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMOYF's P/E ratio is 28.56. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GMOYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to GMOYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 2.52B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while GSAT trades at $19.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -33.71. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, CLCMF has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CLCMF trades at $2.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLCMF's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLCMF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to CLCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, BGAOF has a market cap of 2.39B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while BGAOF trades at $7.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGAOF's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BGAOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to BGAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, PTXKY has a market cap of 2.39B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while PTXKY trades at $2.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTXKY's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PTXKY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to PTXKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, CHRUF has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CHRUF trades at $5.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHRUF's P/E ratio is -540.00. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to CHRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, SPKKY has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while SPKKY trades at $6.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPKKY's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPKKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to SPKKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, NZTCF has a market cap of 2.17B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while NZTCF trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NZTCF's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NZTCF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to NZTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, JSFCF has a market cap of 2.12B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while JSFCF trades at $4.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSFCF's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JSFCF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to JSFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, CHRYY has a market cap of 2.10B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CHRYY trades at $24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHRYY's P/E ratio is -400.00. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHRYY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to CHRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, CGEAF has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CGEAF trades at $48.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGEAF's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CGEAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to CGEAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, ZONNF has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while ZONNF trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZONNF's P/E ratio is 6.55. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZONNF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to ZONNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, SRHBY has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while SRHBY trades at $9.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRHBY's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRHBY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to SRHBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while IHS trades at $4.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IHS's ROE of +3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to IHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TLGHF has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TLGHF trades at $14.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLGHF's P/E ratio is 1.38. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TLGHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TLGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, SMNUF has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while SMNUF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMNUF's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMNUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to SMNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, HTWSF has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while HTWSF trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTWSF's P/E ratio is 50.17. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HTWSF's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to HTWSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, IQST has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while IQST trades at $7.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQST's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IQST's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to IQST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, SRHBF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while SRHBF trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRHBF's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRHBF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to SRHBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while RADI trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to RADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, JASUF has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while JASUF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JASUF's P/E ratio is 2.07. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JASUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to JASUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, OKCTF has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while OKCTF trades at $27.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OKCTF's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OKCTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to OKCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while IDT trades at $52.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to IDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, GAMCF has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while GAMCF trades at $13.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAMCF's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GAMCF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to GAMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, MBISF has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while MBISF trades at $17.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBISF's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MBISF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to MBISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while ATUS trades at $2.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, CELJF has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CELJF trades at $6.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CELJF's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CELJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to CELJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while LILA trades at $5.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LILA's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to LILA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while LILAK trades at $5.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, CABO has a market cap of 986.22M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CABO trades at $175.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CABO's P/E ratio is -48.55. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CABO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to CABO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 985.13M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while GOGO trades at $7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is 75.00. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GOGO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, CVHSY has a market cap of 921.21M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CVHSY trades at $5.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVHSY's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CVHSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to CVHSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, MYTAY has a market cap of 875.51M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while MYTAY trades at $24.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYTAY's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MYTAY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to MYTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, GRPFF has a market cap of 835.63M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while GRPFF trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRPFF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRPFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to GRPFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, LMGHF has a market cap of 630.10M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while LMGHF trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMGHF's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LMGHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to LMGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 621.63M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while SHEN trades at $11.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -19.27. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TLKGY has a market cap of 612.94M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TLKGY trades at $4.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLKGY's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TLKGY's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TLKGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TIIAY has a market cap of 601.72M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TIIAY trades at $3.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIIAY's P/E ratio is -11.62. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIIAY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TIIAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, HKBNF has a market cap of 593.05M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while HKBNF trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKBNF's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HKBNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to HKBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, HTCTF has a market cap of 578.29M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while HTCTF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTCTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HTCTF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to HTCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TUALF has a market cap of 566.13M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TUALF trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUALF's P/E ratio is -29.51. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TUALF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TUALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, HUTCY has a market cap of 559.02M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while HUTCY trades at $1.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUTCY's P/E ratio is -87.00. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HUTCY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to HUTCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, RBBN has a market cap of 557.88M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while RBBN trades at $3.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBBN's P/E ratio is -10.19. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RBBN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to RBBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.69M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CNSL trades at $4.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 548.31M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while ATEX trades at $29.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is -18.21. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATEX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, ROSYY has a market cap of 540.67M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while ROSYY trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROSYY's P/E ratio is 1.33. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ROSYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to ROSYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, CGECF has a market cap of 435.66M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CGECF trades at $45.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGECF's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CGECF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to CGECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 367.52M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while WOW trades at $4.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -6.03. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to WOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 349.55M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while SIFY trades at $4.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is 242.00. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, OOMA has a market cap of 347.13M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while OOMA trades at $12.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OOMA's P/E ratio is -48.44. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OOMA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to OOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, BCOMF has a market cap of 341.65M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while BCOMF trades at $3.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCOMF's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCOMF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to BCOMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.35M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while HCHC trades at $3.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCHC's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 245.29M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while ATNI trades at $16.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is -7.68. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATNI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, LICT has a market cap of 235.05M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while LICT trades at $12,250.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LICT's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LICT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to LICT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, ASEJF has a market cap of 204.29M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while ASEJF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASEJF's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASEJF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to ASEJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, FNGR has a market cap of 190.28M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while FNGR trades at $3.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNGR's P/E ratio is -33.30. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FNGR's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to FNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 189.15M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while RDCM trades at $11.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 183.68M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TV trades at $1.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 147.04M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CXDO trades at $5.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 87.83. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 126.42M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while VEON trades at $44.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to VEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 91.96M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while MTSL trades at $3.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, FSGHF has a market cap of 68.74M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while FSGHF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSGHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FSGHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to FSGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TDI has a market cap of 53.31M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TDI trades at $31.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDI's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TOWTF has a market cap of 51.76M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TOWTF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOWTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TOWTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TOWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, NUVR has a market cap of 51.26M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while NUVR trades at $9.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUVR's P/E ratio is -11.51. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NUVR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to NUVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 44.10M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while KORE trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KORE's ROE of +2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to KORE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, VPLM has a market cap of 30.58M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while VPLM trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VPLM's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VPLM's ROE of -4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to VPLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TRAGF has a market cap of 19.64M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TRAGF trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRAGF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRAGF's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TRAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TAPP has a market cap of 17.26M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TAPP trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TAPP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, PCLA has a market cap of 14.36M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while PCLA trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCLA's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PCLA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to PCLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, LLEIF has a market cap of 13.58M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while LLEIF trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LLEIF's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LLEIF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to LLEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, IRIDQ has a market cap of 13.42M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while IRIDQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IRIDQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IRIDQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to IRIDQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, KTEL has a market cap of 13.06M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while KTEL trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KTEL's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KTEL's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to KTEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, OIBZQ has a market cap of 12.88M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while OIBZQ trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OIBZQ's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OIBZQ's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to OIBZQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, ANTE has a market cap of 11.73M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while ANTE trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANTE's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANTE's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to ANTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, IGLDF has a market cap of 10.25M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while IGLDF trades at $1.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGLDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IGLDF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to IGLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, PTEL has a market cap of 8.60M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while PTEL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTEL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PTEL's ROE of +108.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to PTEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, MIMO has a market cap of 8.43M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while MIMO trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIMO's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MIMO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to MIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, SPMMF has a market cap of 7.18M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while SPMMF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPMMF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPMMF's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to SPMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TGRP has a market cap of 6.44M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TGRP trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TGRP's ROE of +7.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TGRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TLLYF has a market cap of 5.76M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TLLYF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLLYF's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TLLYF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TLLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, RDAR has a market cap of 5.73M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while RDAR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RDAR's ROE of +2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to RDAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, FULO has a market cap of 5.72M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while FULO trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FULO's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FULO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to FULO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, QTEK has a market cap of 4.89M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while QTEK trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTEK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QTEK's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to QTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, QTEKW has a market cap of 4.89M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while QTEKW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTEKW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QTEKW's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to QTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, UCL has a market cap of 4.18M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while UCL trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UCL's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to UCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, SGRB has a market cap of 3.78M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while SGRB trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGRB's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGRB's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to SGRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, UCCPF has a market cap of 3.55M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while UCCPF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UCCPF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UCCPF's ROE of -5.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to UCCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, IMTO has a market cap of 2.58M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while IMTO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMTO's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IMTO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to IMTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, HMMR has a market cap of 2.21M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while HMMR trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMMR's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HMMR's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to HMMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, CPROF has a market cap of 1.94M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CPROF trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPROF's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CPROF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to CPROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, WWRL has a market cap of 1.79M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while WWRL trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WWRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WWRL's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to WWRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, DTGI has a market cap of 1.66M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while DTGI trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTGI's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DTGI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to DTGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, USSHF has a market cap of 1.30M. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while USSHF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USSHF's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USSHF's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to USSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, NWTT has a market cap of 906167.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while NWTT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NWTT's ROE of +4.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to NWTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, ARTM has a market cap of 798963.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while ARTM trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARTM's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARTM's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to ARTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, QBAN has a market cap of 718819.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while QBAN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBAN's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QBAN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to QBAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, FRTN has a market cap of 681600.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while FRTN trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRTN's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FRTN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to FRTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, ACCR has a market cap of 663300.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while ACCR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACCR's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to ACCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, ABWN has a market cap of 486269.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while ABWN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABWN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABWN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to ABWN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, SITOQ has a market cap of 260081.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while SITOQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SITOQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SITOQ's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to SITOQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TLLEQ has a market cap of 226654.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TLLEQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLLEQ's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TLLEQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TLLEQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, AFFU has a market cap of 186550.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while AFFU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFFU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AFFU's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to AFFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, MDGC has a market cap of 149596.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while MDGC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDGC's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MDGC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to MDGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, AXLX has a market cap of 114505.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while AXLX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXLX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AXLX's ROE of +13.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to AXLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, ALVRQ has a market cap of 87064.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while ALVRQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALVRQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALVRQ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to ALVRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, PHRZF has a market cap of 82182.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while PHRZF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHRZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PHRZF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to PHRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, OIBRQ has a market cap of 78041.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while OIBRQ trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OIBRQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OIBRQ's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to OIBRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, STRYQ has a market cap of 50133.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while STRYQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRYQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STRYQ's ROE of +6.74%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to STRYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, MIMOQ has a market cap of 44783.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while MIMOQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIMOQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MIMOQ's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to MIMOQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TMXLF has a market cap of 30816.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TMXLF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMXLF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TMXLF's ROE of +8.67%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TMXLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, BZTG has a market cap of 30000.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while BZTG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BZTG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to BZTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, NTLK has a market cap of 29994.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while NTLK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTLK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NTLK's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to NTLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, CWTC has a market cap of 29906.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CWTC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWTC's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CWTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to CWTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, STCO has a market cap of 21686.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while STCO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STCO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STCO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to STCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, UVCL has a market cap of 19925.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while UVCL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UVCL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UVCL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to UVCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, CWIR has a market cap of 19542.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CWIR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWIR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CWIR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to CWIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, QNXC has a market cap of 19505.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while QNXC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QNXC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QNXC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to QNXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TVCE has a market cap of 15618.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TVCE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TVCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TVCE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TVCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, CELX has a market cap of 14478.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CELX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CELX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CELX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to CELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, GZIC has a market cap of 13396.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while GZIC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GZIC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GZIC's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to GZIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, NPNTQ has a market cap of 13345.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while NPNTQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPNTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NPNTQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to NPNTQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, UAMA has a market cap of 11457.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while UAMA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UAMA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UAMA's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to UAMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, WWII has a market cap of 10296.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while WWII trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WWII's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WWII's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to WWII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, FRMB has a market cap of 9462.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while FRMB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FRMB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to FRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, WOWI has a market cap of 5404.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while WOWI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOWI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WOWI's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to WOWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, CVST has a market cap of 5347.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CVST trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CVST's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to CVST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, VSRV has a market cap of 4834.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while VSRV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSRV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VSRV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to VSRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TWER has a market cap of 3940.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TWER trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWER's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TWER's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TWER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, QOWI has a market cap of 3200.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while QOWI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QOWI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QOWI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to QOWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, COMS has a market cap of 2695.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while COMS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COMS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COMS's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to COMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, AVNE has a market cap of 2348.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while AVNE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVNE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AVNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to AVNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, VIZG has a market cap of 2309.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while VIZG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIZG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VIZG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to VIZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, WQNI has a market cap of 2207.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while WQNI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WQNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WQNI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to WQNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, VSTCQ has a market cap of 2097.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while VSTCQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSTCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VSTCQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to VSTCQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, FUIG has a market cap of 1787.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while FUIG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUIG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FUIG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to FUIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, ASGXF has a market cap of 685.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while ASGXF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASGXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASGXF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to ASGXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, COMSP has a market cap of 513.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while COMSP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COMSP's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to COMSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, SPDE has a market cap of 416.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while SPDE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPDE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPDE's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to SPDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, IPKL has a market cap of 365.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while IPKL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IPKL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to IPKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, COMSW has a market cap of 257.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while COMSW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COMSW's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to COMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, AQIS has a market cap of 180.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while AQIS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AQIS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AQIS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to AQIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TLFX has a market cap of 98.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TLFX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TLFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TLFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, ALMY has a market cap of 53.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while ALMY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALMY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALMY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to ALMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, SNLM has a market cap of 31.00. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while SNLM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNLM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNLM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to SNLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TIGOR comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TIGOR trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIGOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIGOR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TIGOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TLSYY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TLSYY trades at $12.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLSYY's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TLSYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to TLSYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, LORL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while LORL trades at $41.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LORL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to LORL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, ALSK comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while ALSK trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALSK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALSK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to ALSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, MIMO-WT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while MIMO-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIMO-WT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MIMO-WT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to MIMO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, WFWRF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while WFWRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WFWRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WFWRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to WFWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, UZA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while UZA trades at $25.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UZA's P/E ratio is 72.43. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UZA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to UZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, INVT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while INVT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INVT's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INVT's ROE of -11.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to INVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, CBB comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while CBB trades at $15.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CBB's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to CBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, STRY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while STRY trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STRY's ROE of +6.74%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to STRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, AVSA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while AVSA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AVSA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to AVSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, LBYAV comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while LBYAV trades at $10.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBYAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBYAV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to LBYAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, OIBR-C comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while OIBR-C trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OIBR-C's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OIBR-C's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to OIBR-C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, TDA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while TDA trades at $25.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDA's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is more volatile compared to TDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, PTNR comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while PTNR trades at $6.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PTNR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to PTNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.

TBC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TBC stands at 179.83B. In comparison, GTT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TBC is priced at $24.97, while GTT trades at $2.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TBC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBC's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GTT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TBC is less volatile compared to GTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBC.