TravelCenters of America LLC SR NT
TravelCenters of America LLC SR NT (TANNL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TANNL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TANNL | $25.01 | +0.04% | 989.3M | 34.88 | $0.72 | N/A |
| JPM | $298.34 | -3.15% | 846.3B | 15.54 | $20.01 | +1.87% |
| JPM-PD | $25.00 | -0.11% | 805.2B | 1.86 | $13.48 | +1.87% |
| JPM-PC | $25.16 | +0.04% | 793.5B | 1.86 | $13.48 | +1.87% |
| BAC-PL | $1,251.06 | -0.40% | 471.6B | 356.87 | $3.51 | +2.04% |
| BAC | $51.33 | -2.74% | 387.5B | 13.93 | $3.81 | +2.04% |
| BAC-PK | $25.10 | -0.12% | 355.6B | 7.15 | $3.51 | +2.04% |
| BAC-PB | $25.20 | +0.01% | 352.3B | 7.18 | $3.51 | +2.04% |
| BAC-PE | $20.51 | -0.24% | 339.6B | 5.84 | $3.51 | +2.04% |
| BML-PL | $19.75 | -0.50% | 337.2B | 5.66 | $3.51 | +2.04% |
Stock Comparison
TANNL vs JPM Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, JPM has a market cap of 846.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while JPM trades at $298.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas JPM's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JPM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to JPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check JPM's competition here
TANNL vs JPM-PD Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, JPM-PD has a market cap of 805.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while JPM-PD trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas JPM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.86. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JPM-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to JPM-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check JPM-PD's competition here
TANNL vs JPM-PC Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, JPM-PC has a market cap of 793.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while JPM-PC trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas JPM-PC's P/E ratio is 1.86. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JPM-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is more volatile compared to JPM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check JPM-PC's competition here
TANNL vs BAC-PL Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, BAC-PL has a market cap of 471.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while BAC-PL trades at $1,251.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas BAC-PL's P/E ratio is 356.87. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to BAC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check BAC-PL's competition here
TANNL vs BAC Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, BAC has a market cap of 387.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while BAC trades at $51.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas BAC's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to BAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check BAC's competition here
TANNL vs BAC-PK Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, BAC-PK has a market cap of 355.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while BAC-PK trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas BAC-PK's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to BAC-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check BAC-PK's competition here
TANNL vs BAC-PB Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, BAC-PB has a market cap of 352.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while BAC-PB trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas BAC-PB's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to BAC-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check BAC-PB's competition here
TANNL vs BAC-PE Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, BAC-PE has a market cap of 339.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while BAC-PE trades at $20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas BAC-PE's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to BAC-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check BAC-PE's competition here
TANNL vs BML-PL Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, BML-PL has a market cap of 337.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while BML-PL trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas BML-PL's P/E ratio is 5.66. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BML-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to BML-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check BML-PL's competition here
TANNL vs BML-PJ Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, BML-PJ has a market cap of 335.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while BML-PJ trades at $20.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas BML-PJ's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BML-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to BML-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check BML-PJ's competition here
TANNL vs BML-PG Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, BML-PG has a market cap of 331.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while BML-PG trades at $19.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas BML-PG's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BML-PG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to BML-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check BML-PG's competition here
TANNL vs BML-PH Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, BML-PH has a market cap of 330.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while BML-PH trades at $19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas BML-PH's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BML-PH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is more volatile compared to BML-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check BML-PH's competition here
TANNL vs HSBC Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, HSBC has a market cap of 303B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while HSBC trades at $87.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas HSBC's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HSBC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to HSBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check HSBC's competition here
TANNL vs WFC Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, WFC has a market cap of 278.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while WFC trades at $84.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas WFC's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to WFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check WFC's competition here
TANNL vs WFC-PL Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, WFC-PL has a market cap of 256.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while WFC-PL trades at $1,252.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas WFC-PL's P/E ratio is 260.04. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WFC-PL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to WFC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check WFC-PL's competition here
TANNL vs RY Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, RY has a market cap of 242.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while RY trades at $170.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas RY's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to RY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check RY's competition here
TANNL vs MUFG Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, MUFG has a market cap of 219.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while MUFG trades at $19.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas MUFG's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MUFG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to MUFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check MUFG's competition here
TANNL vs C Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, C has a market cap of 207.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while C trades at $110.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas C's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to C's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check C's competition here
TANNL vs WFC-PY Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, WFC-PY has a market cap of 203.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while WFC-PY trades at $24.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas WFC-PY's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WFC-PY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to WFC-PY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check WFC-PY's competition here
TANNL vs WFC-PQ Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, WFC-PQ has a market cap of 200.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while WFC-PQ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas WFC-PQ's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WFC-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is more volatile compared to WFC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check WFC-PQ's competition here
TANNL vs SAN Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, SAN has a market cap of 188B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while SAN trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas SAN's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SAN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to SAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check SAN's competition here
TANNL vs WFC-PR Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, WFC-PR has a market cap of 184.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while WFC-PR trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas WFC-PR's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WFC-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is more volatile compared to WFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check WFC-PR's competition here
TANNL vs BAC-PM Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, BAC-PM has a market cap of 167.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while BAC-PM trades at $23.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas BAC-PM's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to BAC-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check BAC-PM's competition here
TANNL vs TD Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, TD has a market cap of 163.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while TD trades at $96.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas TD's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to TD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check TD's competition here
TANNL vs BAC-PN Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, BAC-PN has a market cap of 156.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while BAC-PN trades at $21.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas BAC-PN's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to BAC-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check BAC-PN's competition here
TANNL vs BAC-PS Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, BAC-PS has a market cap of 144.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while BAC-PS trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas BAC-PS's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to BAC-PS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check BAC-PS's competition here
TANNL vs BBVA Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, BBVA has a market cap of 134.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while BBVA trades at $23.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas BBVA's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BBVA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to BBVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check BBVA's competition here
TANNL vs UBS Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, UBS has a market cap of 134.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while UBS trades at $41.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas UBS's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UBS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to UBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check UBS's competition here
TANNL vs BAC-PO Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, BAC-PO has a market cap of 132.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while BAC-PO trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas BAC-PO's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to BAC-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check BAC-PO's competition here
TANNL vs BAC-PQ Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, BAC-PQ has a market cap of 128.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while BAC-PQ trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas BAC-PQ's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PQ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to BAC-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check BAC-PQ's competition here
TANNL vs BAC-PP Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, BAC-PP has a market cap of 125.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while BAC-PP trades at $17.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas BAC-PP's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAC-PP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to BAC-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check BAC-PP's competition here
TANNL vs WFC-PC Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, WFC-PC has a market cap of 124.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while WFC-PC trades at $18.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas WFC-PC's P/E ratio is 59.35. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WFC-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to WFC-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check WFC-PC's competition here
TANNL vs C-PJ Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, C-PJ has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while C-PJ trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas C-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to C-PJ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to C-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check C-PJ's competition here
TANNL vs BMO Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, BMO has a market cap of 104.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while BMO trades at $143.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas BMO's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BMO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to BMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check BMO's competition here
TANNL vs RY-PT Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, RY-PT has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while RY-PT trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas RY-PT's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RY-PT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is more volatile compared to RY-PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check RY-PT's competition here
TANNL vs BNS Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, BNS has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while BNS trades at $76.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas BNS's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BNS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to BNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check BNS's competition here
TANNL vs CM Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, CM has a market cap of 92.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while CM trades at $98.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas CM's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to CM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check CM's competition here
TANNL vs BCS Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, BCS has a market cap of 90B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while BCS trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas BCS's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BCS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to BCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check BCS's competition here
TANNL vs SMFG Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, SMFG has a market cap of 89.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while SMFG trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas SMFG's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SMFG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to SMFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check SMFG's competition here
TANNL vs ING Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, ING has a market cap of 87.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while ING trades at $29.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas ING's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ING's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to ING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check ING's competition here
TANNL vs NU Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, NU has a market cap of 84.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while NU trades at $16.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas NU's P/E ratio is 33.72. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NU's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to NU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check NU's competition here
TANNL vs WFC-PZ Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, WFC-PZ has a market cap of 64.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while WFC-PZ trades at $20.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas WFC-PZ's P/E ratio is 4.17. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WFC-PZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to WFC-PZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check WFC-PZ's competition here
TANNL vs WFC-PA Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, WFC-PA has a market cap of 63.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while WFC-PA trades at $19.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas WFC-PA's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WFC-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to WFC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check WFC-PA's competition here
TANNL vs WFC-PD Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, WFC-PD has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while WFC-PD trades at $18.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas WFC-PD's P/E ratio is 3.75. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WFC-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to WFC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check WFC-PD's competition here
TANNL vs JPM-PJ Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, JPM-PJ has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while JPM-PJ trades at $20.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas JPM-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JPM-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to JPM-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check JPM-PJ's competition here
TANNL vs JPM-PL Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, JPM-PL has a market cap of 53.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while JPM-PL trades at $19.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas JPM-PL's P/E ratio is 1.48. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JPM-PL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to JPM-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check JPM-PL's competition here
TANNL vs JPM-PK Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, JPM-PK has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while JPM-PK trades at $19.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas JPM-PK's P/E ratio is 1.45. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JPM-PK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to JPM-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check JPM-PK's competition here
TANNL vs JPM-PM Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, JPM-PM has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while JPM-PM trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas JPM-PM's P/E ratio is 1.37. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JPM-PM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to JPM-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check JPM-PM's competition here
TANNL vs C-PK Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, C-PK has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while C-PK trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas C-PK's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to C-PK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is more volatile compared to C-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check C-PK's competition here
TANNL vs NWG Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, NWG has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while NWG trades at $16.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas NWG's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NWG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to NWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check NWG's competition here
TANNL vs EWBC Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, EWBC has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while EWBC trades at $115.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas EWBC's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EWBC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to EWBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check EWBC's competition here
TANNL vs CS Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, CS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while CS trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas CS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to CS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check CS's competition here
TANNL vs NTB Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, NTB has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while NTB trades at $51.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas NTB's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NTB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to NTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check NTB's competition here
TANNL vs FRC-PL Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, FRC-PL has a market cap of 312.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while FRC-PL trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas FRC-PL's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FRC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to FRC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check FRC-PL's competition here
TANNL vs WBK Comparison February 2026
TANNL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNL stands at 989.3M. In comparison, WBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TANNL is priced at $25.01, while WBK trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNL currently has a P/E ratio of 34.88, whereas WBK's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, TANNL's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WBK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNL is less volatile compared to WBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNL.Check WBK's competition here