Tantech Holdings Ltd

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, PG has a market cap of 369.59B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while PG trades at $157.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas PG's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PG's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, LRLCF has a market cap of 230.95B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while LRLCF trades at $432.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas LRLCF's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LRLCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to LRLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, LRLCY has a market cap of 230.24B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while LRLCY trades at $86.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas LRLCY's P/E ratio is 31.92. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LRLCY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to LRLCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, UL has a market cap of 156.41B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while UL trades at $62.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas UL's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to UL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, UNLYF has a market cap of 152.76B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while UNLYF trades at $61.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas UNLYF's P/E ratio is 23.58. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UNLYF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to UNLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, CL has a market cap of 72.78B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while CL trades at $89.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas CL's P/E ratio is 25.44. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CL's ROE of +10.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to CL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, KVUE has a market cap of 46.93B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while KVUE trades at $24.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas KVUE's P/E ratio is 45.30. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KVUE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to KVUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, RBGPF has a market cap of 44.50B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while RBGPF trades at $65.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas RBGPF's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RBGPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to RBGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, RBGLY has a market cap of 44.42B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while RBGLY trades at $13.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas RBGLY's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RBGLY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to RBGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, KMB has a market cap of 44.15B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while KMB trades at $133.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas KMB's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KMB's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to KMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, HELKF has a market cap of 31.49B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while HELKF trades at $72.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas HELKF's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HELKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to HELKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, BDRFF has a market cap of 30.91B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while BDRFF trades at $138.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas BDRFF's P/E ratio is 30.23. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BDRFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to BDRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, HENOY has a market cap of 30.79B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while HENOY trades at $19.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas HENOY's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HENOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to HENOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, HENKY has a market cap of 30.52B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while HENKY trades at $17.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas HENKY's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HENKY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to HENKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, BDRFY has a market cap of 30.36B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while BDRFY trades at $27.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas BDRFY's P/E ratio is 29.51. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BDRFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to BDRFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, HENOF has a market cap of 30.25B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while HENOF trades at $77.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas HENOF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HENOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to HENOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, CHD has a market cap of 22.55B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while CHD trades at $91.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas CHD's P/E ratio is 39.30. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to CHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, EL has a market cap of 21.94B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while EL trades at $60.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas EL's P/E ratio is -25.20. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EL's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to EL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, KAOOY has a market cap of 20.41B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while KAOOY trades at $8.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas KAOOY's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KAOOY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to KAOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, KAOCF has a market cap of 20.05B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while KAOCF trades at $43.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas KAOCF's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KAOCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to KAOCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, ETTYF has a market cap of 19.29B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while ETTYF trades at $27.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas ETTYF's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ETTYF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to ETTYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, CLX has a market cap of 16.61B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while CLX trades at $134.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas CLX's P/E ratio is 24.19. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CLX's ROE of +7.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to CLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, UNICY has a market cap of 15.32B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while UNICY trades at $4.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas UNICY's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UNICY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to UNICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, UNCHF has a market cap of 14.71B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while UNCHF trades at $8.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas UNCHF's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UNCHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to UNCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 13.07B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while SGI trades at $62.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 29.02. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to SGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, HIMS has a market cap of 11.20B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while HIMS trades at $51.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas HIMS's P/E ratio is 76.44. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HIMS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to HIMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, SSDOY has a market cap of 6.69B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while SSDOY trades at $16.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas SSDOY's P/E ratio is -88.13. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SSDOY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to SSDOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, LCCTF has a market cap of 6.56B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while LCCTF trades at $4.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas LCCTF's P/E ratio is 63.57. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LCCTF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to LCCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, SSDOF has a market cap of 5.99B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while SSDOF trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas SSDOF's P/E ratio is -78.95. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SSDOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to SSDOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, KCDMF has a market cap of 5.46B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while KCDMF trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas KCDMF's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KCDMF's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to KCDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, LIOPY has a market cap of 5.42B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while LIOPY trades at $19.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas LIOPY's P/E ratio is 26.49. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LIOPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to LIOPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, KCDMY has a market cap of 5.39B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while KCDMY trades at $9.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas KCDMY's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KCDMY's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to KCDMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, BICEY has a market cap of 5.29B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while BICEY trades at $32.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas BICEY's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BICEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to BICEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, RPHCF has a market cap of 4.58B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while RPHCF trades at $20.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas RPHCF's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RPHCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to RPHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, NTCO has a market cap of 4.55B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while NTCO trades at $6.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas NTCO's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NTCO's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to NTCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, COTY has a market cap of 4.06B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while COTY trades at $4.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas COTY's P/E ratio is -9.91. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to COTY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to COTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, NTCOY has a market cap of 3.85B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while NTCOY trades at $5.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas NTCOY's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NTCOY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to NTCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, IPAR has a market cap of 3.82B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while IPAR trades at $118.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas IPAR's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IPAR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to IPAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, UNLRF has a market cap of 3.81B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while UNLRF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas UNLRF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UNLRF's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to UNLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, ELF has a market cap of 3.78B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while ELF trades at $66.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas ELF's P/E ratio is 40.11. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to ELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, UNLRY has a market cap of 3.66B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while UNLRY trades at $1.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas UNLRY's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UNLRY's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to UNLRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, VDAHF has a market cap of 3.57B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while VDAHF trades at $2.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas VDAHF's P/E ratio is 99.00. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VDAHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to VDAHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, HEGIY has a market cap of 3.28B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while HEGIY trades at $14.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas HEGIY's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HEGIY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to HEGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, HEGIF has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while HEGIF trades at $2.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas HEGIF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HEGIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to HEGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, VDAHY has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while VDAHY trades at $21.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas VDAHY's P/E ratio is 108.35. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VDAHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to VDAHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, KBYPF has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while KBYPF trades at $37.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas KBYPF's P/E ratio is 42.06. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KBYPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to KBYPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, BICEF has a market cap of 2.64B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while BICEF trades at $64.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas BICEF's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BICEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to BICEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, KOSCF has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while KOSCF trades at $45.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas KOSCF's P/E ratio is 48.92. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KOSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to KOSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, LIOPF has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while LIOPF trades at $9.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas LIOPF's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LIOPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to LIOPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, FACYF has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while FACYF trades at $17.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas FACYF's P/E ratio is 34.22. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FACYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to FACYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, KSRYY has a market cap of 2.29B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while KSRYY trades at $8.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas KSRYY's P/E ratio is 44.67. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KSRYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to KSRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, PORBF has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while PORBF trades at $9.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas PORBF's P/E ratio is 45.23. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PORBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to PORBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, NWL has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while NWL trades at $5.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas NWL's P/E ratio is -8.85. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NWL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to NWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, MIOFF has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while MIOFF trades at $52.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas MIOFF's P/E ratio is 40.46. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MIOFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to MIOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, SPB has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while SPB trades at $61.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas SPB's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SPB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to SPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, BLUMY has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while BLUMY trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas BLUMY's P/E ratio is -66.00. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BLUMY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to BLUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, ONXYY has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while ONXYY trades at $4.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas ONXYY's P/E ratio is 32.86. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ONXYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to ONXYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, PGENY has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while PGENY trades at $3.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas PGENY's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PGENY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to PGENY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, PIGEF has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while PIGEF trades at $11.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas PIGEF's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PIGEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to PIGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, OLVI has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while OLVI trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas OLVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OLVI's ROE of -3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to OLVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, EPC has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while EPC trades at $27.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas EPC's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EPC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to EPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, SRTSF has a market cap of 890.67M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while SRTSF trades at $13.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas SRTSF's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SRTSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to SRTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, DUNIY has a market cap of 691.83M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while DUNIY trades at $29.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas DUNIY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DUNIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to DUNIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, ONXXF has a market cap of 671.40M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while ONXXF trades at $8.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas ONXXF's P/E ratio is 29.57. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ONXXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to ONXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, HELE has a market cap of 625.88M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while HELE trades at $27.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas HELE's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HELE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to HELE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, MDOMF has a market cap of 530.36M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while MDOMF trades at $11.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas MDOMF's P/E ratio is 130.56. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MDOMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to MDOMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, WPNTF has a market cap of 500.88M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while WPNTF trades at $6.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas WPNTF's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WPNTF's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to WPNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, YAMNF has a market cap of 464.93M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while YAMNF trades at $8.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas YAMNF's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to YAMNF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to YAMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, PZCUY has a market cap of 445.99M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while PZCUY trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas PZCUY's P/E ratio is -35.50. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PZCUY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to PZCUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, PHH has a market cap of 393.37M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while PHH trades at $14.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas PHH's P/E ratio is 745.75. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PHH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to PHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, NUS has a market cap of 338.45M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while NUS trades at $6.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas NUS's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NUS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to NUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, MCBRF has a market cap of 220.25M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while MCBRF trades at $1.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas MCBRF's P/E ratio is 4.23. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MCBRF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to MCBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, EWCZ has a market cap of 197.46M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while EWCZ trades at $3.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas EWCZ's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EWCZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to EWCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, UNHLF has a market cap of 196.39M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while UNHLF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas UNHLF's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UNHLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to UNHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, ACU has a market cap of 141.38M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while ACU trades at $37.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas ACU's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to ACU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, KITAF has a market cap of 130.66M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while KITAF trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas KITAF's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KITAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to KITAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, NBBTF has a market cap of 116.12M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while NBBTF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas NBBTF's P/E ratio is -5.80. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NBBTF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to NBBTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, SKIN has a market cap of 107.70M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while SKIN trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas SKIN's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SKIN's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to SKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, RVIV has a market cap of 79.03M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while RVIV trades at $13.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas RVIV's P/E ratio is 64.29. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RVIV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to RVIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, KPTSF has a market cap of 60.64M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while KPTSF trades at $6.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas KPTSF's P/E ratio is 35.69. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KPTSF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to KPTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, GROV has a market cap of 47.50M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while GROV trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas GROV's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GROV's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to GROV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, UG has a market cap of 36.98M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while UG trades at $8.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas UG's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UG's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to UG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, PRFUF has a market cap of 26.66M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while PRFUF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas PRFUF's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PRFUF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to PRFUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, MTEX has a market cap of 21.01M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while MTEX trades at $11.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas MTEX's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTEX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to MTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 20.08M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while RAY trades at $1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to RAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, DQWS has a market cap of 17.75M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while DQWS trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas DQWS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DQWS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to DQWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, SNBH has a market cap of 9.75M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while SNBH trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas SNBH's P/E ratio is -4.23. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SNBH's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to SNBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, BRSH has a market cap of 8.68M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while BRSH trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas BRSH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BRSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to BRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, DSY has a market cap of 7.20M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while DSY trades at $1.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas DSY's P/E ratio is 144.00. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to DSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, PURE has a market cap of 6.90M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while PURE trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas PURE's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PURE's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to PURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, MIMNF has a market cap of 6.81M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while MIMNF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas MIMNF's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MIMNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to MIMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, CAWW has a market cap of 5.95M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while CAWW trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas CAWW's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CAWW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to CAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, ZOONF has a market cap of 5.33M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while ZOONF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas ZOONF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZOONF's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to ZOONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, MAVBF has a market cap of 4.81M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while MAVBF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas MAVBF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MAVBF's ROE of -2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to MAVBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, FDOGF has a market cap of 4.20M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while FDOGF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas FDOGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FDOGF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to FDOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, REVRQ has a market cap of 3.80M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while REVRQ trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas REVRQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to REVRQ's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to REVRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, SPCO has a market cap of 3.24M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while SPCO trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas SPCO's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SPCO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to SPCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, SKVI has a market cap of 2.84M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while SKVI trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas SKVI's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SKVI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to SKVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, NUVI has a market cap of 2.15M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while NUVI trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas NUVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NUVI's ROE of +9.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to NUVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, ZRVT has a market cap of 1.95M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while ZRVT trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas ZRVT's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZRVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to ZRVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, TKLF has a market cap of 1.60M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while TKLF trades at $3.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas TKLF's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TKLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to TKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, CLGOF has a market cap of 1.25M. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while CLGOF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas CLGOF's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CLGOF's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to CLGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, SLGD has a market cap of 812885.00. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while SLGD trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas SLGD's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLGD's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to SLGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, PYCT has a market cap of 553705.00. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while PYCT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas PYCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PYCT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to PYCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, PHLI has a market cap of 438307.00. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while PHLI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas PHLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PHLI's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to PHLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, WNBD has a market cap of 349998.00. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while WNBD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas WNBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WNBD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to WNBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, NASO has a market cap of 340384.00. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while NASO trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas NASO's P/E ratio is -39.55. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NASO's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to NASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, HRSR has a market cap of 185621.00. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while HRSR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas HRSR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HRSR's ROE of +65.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to HRSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, TVOG has a market cap of 105898.00. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while TVOG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas TVOG's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TVOG's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to TVOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, EESO has a market cap of 72920.00. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while EESO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas EESO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EESO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to EESO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, EOSS has a market cap of 60478.00. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while EOSS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas EOSS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EOSS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to EOSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, BRSHF has a market cap of 46880.00. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while BRSHF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas BRSHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BRSHF's ROE of +14.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to BRSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, QNTA has a market cap of 40659.00. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while QNTA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas QNTA's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QNTA's ROE of +2.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to QNTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, SYHO has a market cap of 39592.00. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while SYHO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas SYHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SYHO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to SYHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, GRBG has a market cap of 38971.00. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while GRBG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas GRBG's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GRBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to GRBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, JOEY has a market cap of 28244.00. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while JOEY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas JOEY's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JOEY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to JOEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, SNST has a market cap of 26592.00. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while SNST trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas SNST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SNST's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to SNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, INBI has a market cap of 18146.00. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while INBI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas INBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INBI's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to INBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, HPTN has a market cap of 17808.00. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while HPTN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas HPTN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HPTN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to HPTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, GYSN has a market cap of 13983.00. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while GYSN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas GYSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GYSN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to GYSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, KPOC has a market cap of 13743.00. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while KPOC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas KPOC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KPOC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to KPOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, NUUU has a market cap of 11776.00. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while NUUU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas NUUU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NUUU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to NUUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, EMPO has a market cap of 6279.00. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while EMPO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas EMPO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EMPO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to EMPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, BRSHW has a market cap of 6147.00. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while BRSHW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas BRSHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BRSHW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to BRSHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, BEUT has a market cap of 3192.00. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while BEUT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas BEUT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BEUT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to BEUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, NCDP has a market cap of 1848.00. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while NCDP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas NCDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NCDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to NCDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, MDAV has a market cap of 1424.00. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while MDAV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas MDAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MDAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to MDAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, PCGR has a market cap of 785.00. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while PCGR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas PCGR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PCGR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to PCGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, RBCL has a market cap of 221.00. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while RBCL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas RBCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RBCL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to RBCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, SOYO has a market cap of 62.00. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while SOYO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas SOYO's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOYO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to SOYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, SUMR comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while SUMR trades at $11.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas SUMR's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SUMR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to SUMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, REV comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while REV trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas REV's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to REV's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to REV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, BMXC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while BMXC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas BMXC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BMXC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is less volatile compared to BMXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, BWXXF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while BWXXF trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas BWXXF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BWXXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TANH is more volatile compared to BWXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANH.

TANH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TANH stands at 2.52M. In comparison, SLSN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TANH is priced at $2.12, while SLSN trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TANH currently has a P/E ratio of 0.05, whereas SLSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLSN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TANH has daily volatility of 2.84 and SLSN has daily volatility of N/A.