AT&T Inc.
AT&T Inc. T-PC Peers
See (T-PC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T-PC | $19.02 | +0.05% | 136.86B | 8.00 | $2.38 | +4.10% |
| TMUS | $240.32 | -1.43% | 272.87B | 23.45 | $10.25 | +1.28% |
| VZA | $25.55 | -0.43% | 241.26B | 3.27 | $7.82 | N/A |
| TBB | $22.56 | +0.03% | 200.39B | 4.41 | $5.12 | +5.89% |
| T | $27.01 | -2.98% | 194.35B | 16.57 | $1.63 | +4.10% |
| VZ | $43.01 | -1.38% | 181.34B | 10.24 | $4.20 | +6.28% |
| TBC | $24.97 | -0.68% | 179.83B | N/A | N/A | +4.22% |
| T-PA | $20.03 | +0.06% | 144.14B | 8.43 | $2.38 | +4.10% |
| CMCSA | $34.72 | +1.37% | 129.31B | 8.55 | $4.06 | +3.64% |
| AMOV | $20.75 | -1.10% | 65.61B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
T-PC vs TMUS Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, TMUS has a market cap of 272.87B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while TMUS trades at $240.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas TMUS's P/E ratio is 23.45. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TMUS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to TMUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs VZA Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.26B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while VZA trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to VZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs TBB Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 200.39B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while TBB trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to TBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs T Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, T has a market cap of 194.35B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while T trades at $27.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas T's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs VZ Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 181.34B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while VZ trades at $43.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to VZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs TBC Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, TBC has a market cap of 179.83B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while TBC trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas TBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TBC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to TBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs T-PA Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 144.14B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while T-PA trades at $20.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs CMCSA Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 129.31B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while CMCSA trades at $34.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs AMOV Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.61B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while AMOV trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is more volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs CHTR Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 56.49B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while CHTR trades at $402.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs AMX Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 51.75B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while AMX trades at $16.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 30.20. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to AMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs CHT Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, CHT has a market cap of 33.61B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while CHT trades at $43.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas CHT's P/E ratio is 26.42. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to CHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs ORAN Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.64B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while ORAN trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC and ORAN have similar daily volatility (0.94).
T-PC vs TEF Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 27.31B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while TEF trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -69.14. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to TEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs TU Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 24.17B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while TU trades at $15.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 33.25. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to TU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs VOD Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 23.29B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while VOD trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VOD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to VOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs BCE Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 20.79B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while BCE trades at $22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 173.46. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to BCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs TLK Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 15.96B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while TLK trades at $16.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to TLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs VIV Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 15.52B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while VIV trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to VIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs SJR Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.94B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while SJR trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is more volatile compared to SJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs RCI Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 14.19B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while RCI trades at $25.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to RCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs LBRDP Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 13.38B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while LBRDP trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is 4.51. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs LBRDK Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 13.36B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while LBRDK trades at $93.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs LBRDA Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 13.34B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while LBRDA trades at $92.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs KT Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 9.44B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while KT trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to KT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs MBT Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.28B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while MBT trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MBT's ROE of -6.61%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to MBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs FYBR Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.15B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while FYBR trades at $36.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -23.43. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is more volatile compared to FYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs SKM Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 8.71B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while SKM trades at $22.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to SKM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs TIMB Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 8.16B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while TIMB trades at $16.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs CTDD Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 7.60B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while CTDD trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is more volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs TIGO Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 5.93B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while TIGO trades at $34.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 23.28. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs TKC Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 5.51B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while TKC trades at $6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to TKC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs UZD Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 5.39B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while UZD trades at $23.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UZD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is more volatile compared to UZD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs UZF Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 5.38B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while UZF trades at $21.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UZF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is more volatile compared to UZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs UZE Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 5.38B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while UZE trades at $21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UZE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is more volatile compared to UZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs PHI Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 5.15B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while PHI trades at $23.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to PHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs USM Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 5.11B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while USM trades at $60.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -130.61. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to USM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs CTBB Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4.54B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while CTBB trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTBB's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is more volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs LUMN Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, LUMN has a market cap of 4.52B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while LUMN trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas LUMN's P/E ratio is -13.78. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LUMN's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to LUMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs LBYKV Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.23B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is more volatile compared to LBYKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs TDS-PU Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 3.72B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while TDS-PU trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 23.87. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs TDS-PV Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 3.70B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while TDS-PV trades at $18.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs SNRE Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 3.67B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while SNRE trades at $53.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is more volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs TDS Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 3.62B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while TDS trades at $33.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is -32.16. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to TDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs LBTYB Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 3.25B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while LBTYB trades at $9.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -15.13. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is more volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs LBTYA Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 3.23B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while LBTYA trades at $9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -14.89. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs LBTYK Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 3.22B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while LBTYK trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -15.24. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs DISH Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.08B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while DISH trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DISH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to DISH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs TEO Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while TEO trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TEO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to TEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs IRDM Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while IRDM trades at $26.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 25.70. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs CCOI Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 2.49B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while CCOI trades at $50.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -11.81. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CCOI's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs GSAT Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 2.41B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while GSAT trades at $19.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -32.29. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs IHS Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while IHS trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IHS's ROE of +3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to IHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs ASTSW Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs GOGO Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while GOGO trades at $12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is 123.60. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GOGO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs RADI Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while RADI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is more volatile compared to RADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs IDT Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while IDT trades at $57.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to IDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs ATUS Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while ATUS trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -12.25. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs CABO Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, CABO has a market cap of 968.31M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while CABO trades at $172.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas CABO's P/E ratio is -47.66. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CABO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to CABO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs LILA Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 906.82M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while LILA trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LILA's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to LILA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs LILAK Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 898.84M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while LILAK trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs SHEN Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 621.63M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while SHEN trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -19.27. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs RBBN Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, RBBN has a market cap of 603.78M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while RBBN trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas RBBN's P/E ratio is -12.21. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RBBN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to RBBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs CNSL Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.69M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while CNSL trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is more volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs ATEX Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 539.20M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while ATEX trades at $29.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is -17.91. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATEX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs WOW Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 378.66M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while WOW trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to WOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs OOMA Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, OOMA has a market cap of 369.18M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while OOMA trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas OOMA's P/E ratio is -51.52. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OOMA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to OOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs SIFY Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 349.55M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while SIFY trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is 242.00. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs HCHC Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.35M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while HCHC trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HCHC's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs ATNI Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 232.66M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while ATNI trades at $15.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is -6.68. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATNI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs FNGR Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, FNGR has a market cap of 201.14M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while FNGR trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas FNGR's P/E ratio is -35.20. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FNGR's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to FNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs RDCM Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 198.44M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while RDCM trades at $12.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 28.79. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs TV Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 195.00M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while TV trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to TV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs CXDO Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 168.96M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while CXDO trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 97.00. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs VEON Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 140.39M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while VEON trades at $49.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to VEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs MTSL Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 91.96M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while MTSL trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs TDI Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, TDI has a market cap of 53.36M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while TDI trades at $31.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas TDI's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is more volatile compared to TDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs KORE Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 38.95M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while KORE trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KORE's ROE of +2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to KORE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs ANTE Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, ANTE has a market cap of 12.86M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while ANTE trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas ANTE's P/E ratio is 0.26. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANTE's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to ANTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs PCLA Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, PCLA has a market cap of 11.11M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while PCLA trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas PCLA's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCLA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to PCLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs MIMO Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, MIMO has a market cap of 8.43M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while MIMO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas MIMO's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MIMO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to MIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs UCL Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, UCL has a market cap of 4.97M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while UCL trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas UCL's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to UCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs QTEK Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, QTEK has a market cap of 4.89M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while QTEK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas QTEK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QTEK's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is more volatile compared to QTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs QTEKW Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, QTEKW has a market cap of 4.89M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while QTEKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas QTEKW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QTEKW's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is less volatile compared to QTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs COMSP Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, COMSP has a market cap of 513.00. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while COMSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas COMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COMSP's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is more volatile compared to COMSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.
T-PC vs COMSW Comparison
T-PC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PC stands at 136.86B. In comparison, COMSW has a market cap of 257.00. Regarding current trading prices, T-PC is priced at $19.02, while COMSW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PC currently has a P/E ratio of 8.00, whereas COMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COMSW's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PC is more volatile compared to COMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PC.