AT&T Inc.
AT&T Inc. T-PA Peers
See (T-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T-PA | $20.12 | +0.95% | 144.6B | 8.46 | $2.38 | +3.97% |
| TMUS | $235.44 | +1.97% | 262.8B | 22.62 | $10.23 | +1.43% |
| VZA | $25.55 | -0.43% | 241.3B | 3.27 | $7.82 | N/A |
| T | $28.05 | +0.47% | 201.7B | 17.20 | $1.63 | +3.97% |
| TBB | $22.47 | +0.00% | 199.4B | 4.39 | $5.12 | +5.94% |
| TBC | $24.97 | -0.68% | 179.8B | N/A | N/A | +5.63% |
| VZ | $42.25 | +0.31% | 177.6B | 10.03 | $4.20 | +6.43% |
| T-PC | $19.10 | +0.63% | 137.4B | 8.04 | $2.38 | +3.97% |
| CMCSA | $35.42 | +1.68% | 131.1B | 8.67 | $4.06 | +3.59% |
| AMOV | $20.75 | -1.10% | 65.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
T-PA vs TMUS Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, TMUS has a market cap of 262.8B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while TMUS trades at $235.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas TMUS's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TMUS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to TMUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs VZA Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.3B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while VZA trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to VZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs T Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, T has a market cap of 201.7B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while T trades at $28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas T's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs TBB Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 199.4B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while TBB trades at $22.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 4.39. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to TBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs TBC Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, TBC has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while TBC trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas TBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TBC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to TBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs VZ Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 177.6B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while VZ trades at $42.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to VZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs T-PC Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 137.4B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while T-PC trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs CMCSA Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 131.1B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while CMCSA trades at $35.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs AMOV Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while AMOV trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs CHTR Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while CHTR trades at $399.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs AMX Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 53.7B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while AMX trades at $17.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 36.58. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to AMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs CHT Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, CHT has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while CHT trades at $46.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas CHT's P/E ratio is 28.85. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is more volatile compared to CHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs ORAN Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while ORAN trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs TEF Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while TEF trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -51.90. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to TEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs VOD Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while VOD trades at $10.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VOD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to VOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs TU Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while TU trades at $15.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to TU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs BCE Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while BCE trades at $21.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 70.52. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to BCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs VIV Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while VIV trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to VIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs TLK Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while TLK trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is more volatile compared to TLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs RCI Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while RCI trades at $29.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to RCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs SJR Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while SJR trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to SJR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs LBRDK Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while LBRDK trades at $95.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs LBRDA Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while LBRDA trades at $95.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs LBRDP Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while LBRDP trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is more volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs KT Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while KT trades at $20.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to KT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs TIMB Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while TIMB trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs MBT Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while MBT trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MBT's ROE of -7.48%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to MBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs FYBR Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while FYBR trades at $36.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -23.28. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is more volatile compared to FYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs SKM Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while SKM trades at $23.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to SKM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs CTDD Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while CTDD trades at $18.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs TIGO Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while TIGO trades at $36.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs UZF Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while UZF trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UZF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to UZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs USM Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while USM trades at $63.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -135.83. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to USM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs UZD Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while UZD trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UZD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to UZD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs UZE Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while UZE trades at $20.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UZE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to UZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs TKC Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while TKC trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to TKC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs PHI Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while PHI trades at $21.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to PHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs LUMN Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, LUMN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while LUMN trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas LUMN's P/E ratio is -13.58. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LUMN's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to LUMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs LBYKV Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is more volatile compared to LBYKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs CTBB Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while CTBB trades at $17.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTBB's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs SNRE Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while SNRE trades at $55.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -13.45. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs TDS Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while TDS trades at $35.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is -33.29. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to TDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs TDS-PU Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while TDS-PU trades at $19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs TDS-PV Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while TDS-PV trades at $17.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs LBTYB Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while LBTYB trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -15.40. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is more volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs LBTYA Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while LBTYA trades at $9.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -15.85. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs LBTYK Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while LBTYK trades at $10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -16.27. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs IRDM Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while IRDM trades at $29.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 28.10. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs VEON Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while VEON trades at $45.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to VEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs DISH Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while DISH trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DISH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to DISH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs GSAT Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while GSAT trades at $23.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -37.76. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs TEO Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while TEO trades at $8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is 87.75. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TEO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to TEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs CCOI Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while CCOI trades at $48.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -12.07. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CCOI's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs GOGO Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while GOGO trades at $14.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is -364.50. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GOGO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs IHS Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while IHS trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is -42.08. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IHS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to IHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs ASTSW Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs IDT Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while IDT trades at $67.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to IDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs RADI Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while RADI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is more volatile compared to RADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs LILAK Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while LILAK trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs LILA Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while LILA trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LILA's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to LILA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs ATUS Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 993.9M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while ATUS trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -6.44. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs SHEN Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 769.6M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while SHEN trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -20.04. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs CABO Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, CABO has a market cap of 726.2M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while CABO trades at $133.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas CABO's P/E ratio is -35.74. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CABO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to CABO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs RBBN Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, RBBN has a market cap of 711.5M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while RBBN trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas RBBN's P/E ratio is -14.39. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RBBN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to RBBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs CNSL Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.7M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while CNSL trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is more volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs ATEX Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 492.5M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while ATEX trades at $26.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is -43.18. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATEX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs WOW Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 347M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while WOW trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to WOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs OOMA Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, OOMA has a market cap of 342.9M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while OOMA trades at $12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas OOMA's P/E ratio is -65.39. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OOMA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to OOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs HCHC Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while HCHC trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HCHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs TV Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 256.9M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while TV trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to TV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs ATNI Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 245M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while ATNI trades at $16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is -7.03. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATNI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs RDCM Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 214.8M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while RDCM trades at $13.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 25.28. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs CXDO Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 173M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while CXDO trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 74.50. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs FNGR Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, FNGR has a market cap of 118.6M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while FNGR trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas FNGR's P/E ratio is -22.89. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FNGR's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to FNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs MTSL Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while MTSL trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs SIFY Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while SIFY trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is -5.51. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs TDI Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, TDI has a market cap of 57M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while TDI trades at $33.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas TDI's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is more volatile compared to TDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs KORE Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 39.5M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while KORE trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KORE's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to KORE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs PCLA Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, PCLA has a market cap of 38.2M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while PCLA trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas PCLA's P/E ratio is -10.85. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCLA's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to PCLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs IQST Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, IQST has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while IQST trades at $10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas IQST's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IQST's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to IQST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs ANTE Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, ANTE has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while ANTE trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas ANTE's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANTE's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to ANTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs MIMO Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, MIMO has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while MIMO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas MIMO's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MIMO's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to MIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs UCL Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, UCL has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while UCL trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas UCL's P/E ratio is -9.55. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UCL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to UCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs QTEK Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, QTEK has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while QTEK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas QTEK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QTEK's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is more volatile compared to QTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs QTEKW Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, QTEKW has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while QTEKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas QTEKW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QTEKW's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to QTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs COMSP Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, COMSP has a market cap of 513. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while COMSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas COMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COMSP's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is more volatile compared to COMSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs COMSW Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, COMSW has a market cap of 257. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while COMSW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas COMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COMSW's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is more volatile compared to COMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs LBYAV Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, LBYAV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while LBYAV trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas LBYAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBYAV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is more volatile compared to LBYAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs OIBR-C Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, OIBR-C has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while OIBR-C trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas OIBR-C's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OIBR-C's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to OIBR-C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs STRY Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, STRY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while STRY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas STRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STRY's ROE of +6.74%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is more volatile compared to STRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs ALSK Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, ALSK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while ALSK trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas ALSK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALSK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is more volatile compared to ALSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs MIMO-WT Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, MIMO-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while MIMO-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas MIMO-WT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MIMO-WT's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to MIMO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs GTT Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, GTT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while GTT trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas GTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to GTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs LORL Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, LORL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while LORL trades at $41.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas LORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LORL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to LORL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs TIGOR Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, TIGOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while TIGOR trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas TIGOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TIGOR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to TIGOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs PTNR Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, PTNR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while PTNR trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas PTNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTNR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is less volatile compared to PTNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs TDA Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, TDA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while TDA trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas TDA's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is more volatile compared to TDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs CBB Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, CBB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while CBB trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas CBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBB's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is more volatile compared to CBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.
T-PA vs UZA Comparison
T-PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, T-PA stands at 144.6B. In comparison, UZA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, T-PA is priced at $20.12, while UZA trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
T-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.46, whereas UZA's P/E ratio is 72.43. In terms of profitability, T-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UZA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, T-PA is more volatile compared to UZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for T-PA.