Synalloy Corporation

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, MT has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while MT trades at $66.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas MT's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is more volatile compared to MT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check MT's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, NUE has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while NUE trades at $178.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas NUE's P/E ratio is 23.76. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NUE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is more volatile compared to NUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check NUE's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, STLD has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while STLD trades at $196.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas STLD's P/E ratio is 24.53. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to STLD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is more volatile compared to STLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check STLD's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, PKX has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while PKX trades at $67.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas PKX's P/E ratio is 47.66. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PKX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is more volatile compared to PKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check PKX's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, RS has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while RS trades at $322.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas RS's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is more volatile compared to RS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check RS's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, X has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while X trades at $54.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas X's P/E ratio is 148.22. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to X's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is more volatile compared to X. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check X's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, TX has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while TX trades at $43.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas TX's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is more volatile compared to TX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check TX's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, CMC has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while CMC trades at $75.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas CMC's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CMC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is more volatile compared to CMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check CMC's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, GGB has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while GGB trades at $4.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas GGB's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GGB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is more volatile compared to GGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check GGB's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, CLF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while CLF trades at $10.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas CLF's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CLF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is less volatile compared to CLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check CLF's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, SIM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while SIM trades at $32.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas SIM's P/E ratio is 25.98. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SIM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is more volatile compared to SIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check SIM's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, WS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while WS trades at $43.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas WS's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is more volatile compared to WS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check WS's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, SID has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while SID trades at $1.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas SID's P/E ratio is -7.59. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SID's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is less volatile compared to SID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check SID's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, SCHN has a market cap of 906.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while SCHN trades at $33.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas SCHN's P/E ratio is 87.37. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SCHN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is more volatile compared to SCHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check SCHN's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, TMST has a market cap of 895.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while TMST trades at $20.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas TMST's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TMST's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is more volatile compared to TMST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check TMST's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, RDUS has a market cap of 841.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while RDUS trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas RDUS's P/E ratio is -8.36. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RDUS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is more volatile compared to RDUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check RDUS's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, MTUS has a market cap of 729.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while MTUS trades at $17.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas MTUS's P/E ratio is -97.28. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MTUS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is less volatile compared to MTUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check MTUS's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, ZEUS has a market cap of 539M. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while ZEUS trades at $47.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas ZEUS's P/E ratio is 40.91. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ZEUS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is more volatile compared to ZEUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check ZEUS's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, ASTL has a market cap of 487.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while ASTL trades at $4.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas ASTL's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ASTL's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is less volatile compared to ASTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check ASTL's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, USAP has a market cap of 423.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while USAP trades at $44.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas USAP's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to USAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is more volatile compared to USAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check USAP's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, MSB has a market cap of 412.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while MSB trades at $31.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas MSB's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MSB's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is less volatile compared to MSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check MSB's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 160.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while ACNT trades at $17.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -53.44. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ACNT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is less volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check ACNT's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, LUD has a market cap of 143.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while LUD trades at $6.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas LUD's P/E ratio is -78.87. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LUD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is less volatile compared to LUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check LUD's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, FRD has a market cap of 131.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while FRD trades at $18.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas FRD's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FRD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is less volatile compared to FRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check FRD's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, HLP has a market cap of 75.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while HLP trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas HLP's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HLP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is less volatile compared to HLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check HLP's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, KBSX has a market cap of 50.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while KBSX trades at $1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas KBSX's P/E ratio is -7.06. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KBSX's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is less volatile compared to KBSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check KBSX's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, ASTLW has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while ASTLW trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas ASTLW's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ASTLW's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is less volatile compared to ASTLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check ASTLW's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, HUDI has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while HUDI trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas HUDI's P/E ratio is -11.60. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HUDI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is less volatile compared to HUDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check HUDI's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, ZKIN has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while ZKIN trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas ZKIN's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ZKIN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is less volatile compared to ZKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check ZKIN's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 345.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while INHD trades at $1.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is less volatile compared to INHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check INHD's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, MTL-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while MTL-P trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas MTL-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MTL-P's ROE of -85.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is less volatile compared to MTL-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check MTL-P's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, MTL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while MTL trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas MTL's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is less volatile compared to MTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check MTL's competition here

SYNL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SYNL stands at 158.8M. In comparison, OSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SYNL is priced at $15.57, while OSN trades at $5.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SYNL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.16, whereas OSN's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, SYNL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SYNL is more volatile compared to OSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYNL.Check OSN's competition here