Superior Industries International, Inc.
Superior Industries International, Inc. (SUP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SUP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUP | $0.32 | +6.14% | 9.6M | -0.08 | -$4.25 | N/A |
| ORLY | $94.17 | +0.00% | 78.9B | 31.48 | $2.97 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,745.49 | +0.00% | 62.4B | 26.14 | $143.42 | N/A |
| APTV-PA | $108.66 | +0.15% | 29.4B | 92.08 | $1.18 | N/A |
| MGA | $66.67 | +0.00% | 18.3B | 22.17 | $2.93 | +2.96% |
| APTV | $80.46 | +0.00% | 17.2B | 106.07 | $0.75 | N/A |
| BWA | $60.31 | +0.00% | 12.6B | 46.03 | $1.28 | +0.95% |
| MOD | $218.54 | +0.00% | 11.9B | 123.69 | $1.83 | N/A |
| ALSN | $117.78 | +0.00% | 9.9B | 14.59 | $8.15 | +0.91% |
| ALV | $123.15 | +0.00% | 9.3B | 12.89 | $9.55 | +2.52% |
Stock Comparison
SUP vs ORLY Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 78.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while ORLY trades at $94.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 31.48. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check ORLY's competition here
SUP vs AZO Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 62.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while AZO trades at $3,745.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 26.14. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check AZO's competition here
SUP vs APTV-PA Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, APTV-PA has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while APTV-PA trades at $108.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas APTV-PA's P/E ratio is 92.08. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to APTV-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to APTV-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check APTV-PA's competition here
SUP vs MGA Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, MGA has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while MGA trades at $66.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MGA's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to MGA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to MGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check MGA's competition here
SUP vs APTV Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, APTV has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while APTV trades at $80.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas APTV's P/E ratio is 106.07. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to APTV's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to APTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check APTV's competition here
SUP vs BWA Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, BWA has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while BWA trades at $60.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BWA's P/E ratio is 46.03. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to BWA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to BWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check BWA's competition here
SUP vs MOD Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while MOD trades at $218.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 123.69. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to MOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check MOD's competition here
SUP vs ALSN Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ALSN has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while ALSN trades at $117.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ALSN's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ALSN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to ALSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check ALSN's competition here
SUP vs ALV Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ALV has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while ALV trades at $123.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ALV's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ALV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to ALV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check ALV's competition here
SUP vs LKQ Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, LKQ has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while LKQ trades at $33.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas LKQ's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to LKQ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to LKQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check LKQ's competition here
SUP vs MBLY Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, MBLY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while MBLY trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MBLY's P/E ratio is -18.85. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to MBLY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to MBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check MBLY's competition here
SUP vs LEA Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, LEA has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while LEA trades at $134.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas LEA's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to LEA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to LEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check LEA's competition here
SUP vs GNTX Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, GNTX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while GNTX trades at $23.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas GNTX's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to GNTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to GNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check GNTX's competition here
SUP vs DAN Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, DAN has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while DAN trades at $34.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas DAN's P/E ratio is 77.86. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to DAN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to DAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check DAN's competition here
SUP vs BC-PA Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, BC-PA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while BC-PA trades at $74.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BC-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to BC-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to BC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check BC-PA's competition here
SUP vs TMH Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, TMH has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while TMH trades at $64.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas TMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to TMH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to TMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check TMH's competition here
SUP vs QS Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, QS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while QS trades at $7.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas QS's P/E ratio is -9.05. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to QS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to QS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check QS's competition here
SUP vs DORM Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, DORM has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while DORM trades at $127.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas DORM's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to DORM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to DORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check DORM's competition here
SUP vs GTX Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, GTX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while GTX trades at $19.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas GTX's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to GTX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to GTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check GTX's competition here
SUP vs BC-PB Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, BC-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while BC-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BC-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to BC-PB's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to BC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check BC-PB's competition here
SUP vs HSAI Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, HSAI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while HSAI trades at $28.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas HSAI's P/E ratio is 59.06. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to HSAI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to HSAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check HSAI's competition here
SUP vs PHIN Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, PHIN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while PHIN trades at $75.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas PHIN's P/E ratio is 23.44. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to PHIN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to PHIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check PHIN's competition here
SUP vs GT Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, GT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while GT trades at $8.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas GT's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to GT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to GT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check GT's competition here
SUP vs VC Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, VC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while VC trades at $93.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas VC's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to VC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to VC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check VC's competition here
SUP vs ADNT Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ADNT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while ADNT trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ADNT's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ADNT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to ADNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check ADNT's competition here
SUP vs XPEL Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, XPEL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while XPEL trades at $50.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas XPEL's P/E ratio is 31.41. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to XPEL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to XPEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check XPEL's competition here
SUP vs THRM Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, THRM has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while THRM trades at $31.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas THRM's P/E ratio is 34.45. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to THRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to THRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check THRM's competition here
SUP vs AXL Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, AXL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while AXL trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas AXL's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to AXL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to AXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check AXL's competition here
SUP vs PLOW Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 985.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while PLOW trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 24.59. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check PLOW's competition here
SUP vs SMP Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, SMP has a market cap of 981.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while SMP trades at $44.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SMP's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to SMP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to SMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check SMP's competition here
SUP vs FOXF Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, FOXF has a market cap of 824.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while FOXF trades at $19.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas FOXF's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to FOXF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to FOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check FOXF's competition here
SUP vs AEVA Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 753.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while AEVA trades at $12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -4.45. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -7.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check AEVA's competition here
SUP vs CPS Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, CPS has a market cap of 696.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while CPS trades at $39.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CPS's P/E ratio is -171.70. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to CPS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to CPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check CPS's competition here
SUP vs MNRO Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, MNRO has a market cap of 684.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while MNRO trades at $22.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MNRO's P/E ratio is -47.48. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to MNRO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to MNRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check MNRO's competition here
SUP vs SES Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, SES has a market cap of 598.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while SES trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SES's P/E ratio is -5.95. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to SES's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to SES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check SES's competition here
SUP vs ECX Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ECX has a market cap of 560.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while ECX trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ECX's P/E ratio is -4.03. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ECX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to ECX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check ECX's competition here
SUP vs GTXAP Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, GTXAP has a market cap of 557.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while GTXAP trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas GTXAP's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to GTXAP's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to GTXAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check GTXAP's competition here
SUP vs HLLY Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, HLLY has a market cap of 511.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while HLLY trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas HLLY's P/E ratio is -20.40. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to HLLY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to HLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check HLLY's competition here
SUP vs MLR Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, MLR has a market cap of 498M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while MLR trades at $42.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MLR's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to MLR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to MLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check MLR's competition here
SUP vs ALLG Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ALLG has a market cap of 496.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while ALLG trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ALLG's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ALLG's ROE of +4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to ALLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check ALLG's competition here
SUP vs STRT Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, STRT has a market cap of 375.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while STRT trades at $90.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas STRT's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to STRT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to STRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check STRT's competition here
SUP vs HYLN Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, HYLN has a market cap of 355.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while HYLN trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas HYLN's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to HYLN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to HYLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check HYLN's competition here
SUP vs SRI Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, SRI has a market cap of 237.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while SRI trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SRI's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to SRI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to SRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check SRI's competition here
SUP vs MPAA Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, MPAA has a market cap of 208.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while MPAA trades at $10.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MPAA's P/E ratio is 118.22. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to MPAA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to MPAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check MPAA's competition here
SUP vs INVZ Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, INVZ has a market cap of 196.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while INVZ trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas INVZ's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to INVZ's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to INVZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check INVZ's competition here
SUP vs XL Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, XL has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while XL trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas XL's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to XL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to XL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check XL's competition here
SUP vs CAAS Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, CAAS has a market cap of 132.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while CAAS trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CAAS's P/E ratio is 3.95. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to CAAS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to CAAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check CAAS's competition here
SUP vs KNDI Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, KNDI has a market cap of 90.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while KNDI trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas KNDI's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to KNDI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to KNDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check KNDI's competition here
SUP vs LIDR Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, LIDR has a market cap of 74.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while LIDR trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas LIDR's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to LIDR's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to LIDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check LIDR's competition here
SUP vs SYPR Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, SYPR has a market cap of 71.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while SYPR trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SYPR's P/E ratio is -28.18. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to SYPR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to SYPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check SYPR's competition here
SUP vs CVGI Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, CVGI has a market cap of 63.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while CVGI trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CVGI's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to CVGI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to CVGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check CVGI's competition here
SUP vs GGR Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, GGR has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while GGR trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas GGR's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to GGR's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to GGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check GGR's competition here
SUP vs WPRT Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, WPRT has a market cap of 35.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while WPRT trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas WPRT's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to WPRT's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to WPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check WPRT's competition here
SUP vs AIIO Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, AIIO has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while AIIO trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas AIIO's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to AIIO's ROE of -160.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to AIIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check AIIO's competition here
SUP vs NCNC Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, NCNC has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while NCNC trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas NCNC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to NCNC's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to NCNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check NCNC's competition here
SUP vs NCNCW Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, NCNCW has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while NCNCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas NCNCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to NCNCW's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to NCNCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check NCNCW's competition here
SUP vs AMV Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, AMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while AMV trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas AMV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to AMV's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to AMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check AMV's competition here
SUP vs HLLY-WT Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, HLLY-WT has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while HLLY-WT trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas HLLY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to HLLY-WT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to HLLY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check HLLY-WT's competition here
SUP vs ECXWW Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ECXWW has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while ECXWW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ECXWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ECXWW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to ECXWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check ECXWW's competition here
SUP vs FRSX Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, FRSX has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while FRSX trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas FRSX's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to FRSX's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to FRSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check FRSX's competition here
SUP vs MKDW Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, MKDW has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while MKDW trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MKDW's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to MKDW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to MKDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check MKDW's competition here
SUP vs SAG Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, SAG has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while SAG trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SAG's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to SAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to SAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check SAG's competition here
SUP vs WKSP Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, WKSP has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while WKSP trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas WKSP's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to WKSP's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to WKSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check WKSP's competition here
SUP vs INEO Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, INEO has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while INEO trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas INEO's P/E ratio is -5.89. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to INEO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to INEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check INEO's competition here
SUP vs LIDRW Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, LIDRW has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while LIDRW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas LIDRW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to LIDRW's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to LIDRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check LIDRW's competition here
SUP vs UFAB Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, UFAB has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while UFAB trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas UFAB's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to UFAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to UFAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check UFAB's competition here
SUP vs INVZW Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, INVZW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while INVZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas INVZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to INVZW's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to INVZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check INVZW's competition here
SUP vs MKDWW Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, MKDWW has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while MKDWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MKDWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to MKDWW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to MKDWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check MKDWW's competition here
SUP vs CREV Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, CREV has a market cap of 775.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while CREV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CREV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to CREV's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to CREV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check CREV's competition here
SUP vs WKSPW Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, WKSPW has a market cap of 575.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while WKSPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas WKSPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to WKSPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to WKSPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check WKSPW's competition here
SUP vs GGROW Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, GGROW has a market cap of 115.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while GGROW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas GGROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to GGROW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to GGROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check GGROW's competition here
SUP vs HYZNW Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, HYZNW has a market cap of 16.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while HYZNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas HYZNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to HYZNW's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to HYZNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check HYZNW's competition here
SUP vs CREVW Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, CREVW has a market cap of 6.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while CREVW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CREVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to CREVW's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to CREVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check CREVW's competition here
SUP vs VNE Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, VNE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while VNE trades at $36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas VNE's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to VNE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to VNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check VNE's competition here
SUP vs MTOR Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, MTOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while MTOR trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MTOR's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to MTOR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to MTOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check MTOR's competition here
SUP vs HZN Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, HZN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while HZN trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas HZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to HZN's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to HZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check HZN's competition here
SUP vs RMO Comparison February 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, RMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while RMO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas RMO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to RMO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to RMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check RMO's competition here