Summer Infant, Inc.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, PG has a market cap of 371.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while PG trades at $158.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas PG's P/E ratio is 25.14. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to PG's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, LRLCY has a market cap of 225.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while LRLCY trades at $84.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas LRLCY's P/E ratio is 31.30. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to LRLCY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to LRLCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, LRLCF has a market cap of 221.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while LRLCF trades at $413.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas LRLCF's P/E ratio is 30.60. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to LRLCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to LRLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, UL has a market cap of 156.54B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while UL trades at $62.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas UL's P/E ratio is 25.04. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to UL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to UL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, UNLYF has a market cap of 150.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while UNLYF trades at $60.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas UNLYF's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to UNLYF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to UNLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, CL has a market cap of 73.61B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while CL trades at $90.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas CL's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to CL's ROE of +10.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to CL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, KVUE has a market cap of 46.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while KVUE trades at $24.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas KVUE's P/E ratio is 44.56. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to KVUE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to KVUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, RBGPF has a market cap of 44.85B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while RBGPF trades at $65.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas RBGPF's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to RBGPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to RBGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, RBGLY has a market cap of 44.43B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while RBGLY trades at $13.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas RBGLY's P/E ratio is 24.17. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to RBGLY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to RBGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, KMB has a market cap of 44.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while KMB trades at $133.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas KMB's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to KMB's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to KMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, HELKF has a market cap of 31.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while HELKF trades at $72.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas HELKF's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to HELKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to HELKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, BDRFF has a market cap of 30.91B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while BDRFF trades at $138.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas BDRFF's P/E ratio is 30.23. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to BDRFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to BDRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, HENOF has a market cap of 30.76B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while HENOF trades at $77.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas HENOF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to HENOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to HENOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, HENOY has a market cap of 30.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while HENOY trades at $19.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas HENOY's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to HENOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to HENOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, HENKY has a market cap of 30.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while HENKY trades at $17.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas HENKY's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to HENKY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to HENKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, BDRFY has a market cap of 30.27B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while BDRFY trades at $27.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas BDRFY's P/E ratio is 29.41. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to BDRFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to BDRFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, CHD has a market cap of 22.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while CHD trades at $92.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas CHD's P/E ratio is 39.57. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to CHD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to CHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, EL has a market cap of 22.04B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while EL trades at $61.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas EL's P/E ratio is -31.58. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to EL's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to EL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, KAOOY has a market cap of 20.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while KAOOY trades at $8.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas KAOOY's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to KAOOY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to KAOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, KAOCF has a market cap of 20.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while KAOCF trades at $43.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas KAOCF's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to KAOCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to KAOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, ETTYF has a market cap of 19.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while ETTYF trades at $27.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas ETTYF's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to ETTYF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to ETTYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, CLX has a market cap of 16.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while CLX trades at $137.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas CLX's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to CLX's ROE of +7.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to CLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, UNICY has a market cap of 15.84B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while UNICY trades at $4.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas UNICY's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to UNICY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to UNICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, UNCHF has a market cap of 15.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while UNCHF trades at $8.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas UNCHF's P/E ratio is 27.09. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to UNCHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to UNCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 13.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while SGI trades at $62.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 29.02. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to SGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, HIMS has a market cap of 11.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while HIMS trades at $51.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas HIMS's P/E ratio is 75.54. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to HIMS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to HIMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, LCCTF has a market cap of 6.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while LCCTF trades at $4.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas LCCTF's P/E ratio is 63.57. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to LCCTF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to LCCTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, SSDOY has a market cap of 6.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while SSDOY trades at $16.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas SSDOY's P/E ratio is -85.79. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SSDOY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to SSDOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, SSDOF has a market cap of 5.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while SSDOF trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas SSDOF's P/E ratio is -78.95. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SSDOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to SSDOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, KCDMF has a market cap of 5.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while KCDMF trades at $1.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas KCDMF's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to KCDMF's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to KCDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, LIOPY has a market cap of 5.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while LIOPY trades at $19.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas LIOPY's P/E ratio is 26.49. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to LIOPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to LIOPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, KCDMY has a market cap of 5.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while KCDMY trades at $9.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas KCDMY's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to KCDMY's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to KCDMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, BICEY has a market cap of 5.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while BICEY trades at $31.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas BICEY's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to BICEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to BICEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, RPHCF has a market cap of 4.58B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while RPHCF trades at $20.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas RPHCF's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to RPHCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to RPHCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, NTCO has a market cap of 4.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while NTCO trades at $6.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas NTCO's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to NTCO's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to NTCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, COTY has a market cap of 4.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while COTY trades at $4.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas COTY's P/E ratio is -10.24. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to COTY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to COTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, NTCOY has a market cap of 3.85B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while NTCOY trades at $5.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas NTCOY's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to NTCOY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to NTCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, IPAR has a market cap of 3.85B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while IPAR trades at $119.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas IPAR's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to IPAR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to IPAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, ELF has a market cap of 3.83B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while ELF trades at $67.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas ELF's P/E ratio is 40.65. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to ELF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to ELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, UNLRF has a market cap of 3.81B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while UNLRF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas UNLRF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to UNLRF's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to UNLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, UNLRY has a market cap of 3.66B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while UNLRY trades at $1.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas UNLRY's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to UNLRY's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to UNLRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, VDAHF has a market cap of 3.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while VDAHF trades at $2.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas VDAHF's P/E ratio is 99.00. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to VDAHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to VDAHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, HEGIY has a market cap of 3.24B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while HEGIY trades at $14.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas HEGIY's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to HEGIY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to HEGIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, HEGIF has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while HEGIF trades at $2.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas HEGIF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to HEGIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to HEGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, VDAHY has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while VDAHY trades at $21.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas VDAHY's P/E ratio is 108.35. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to VDAHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to VDAHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, KBYPF has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while KBYPF trades at $37.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas KBYPF's P/E ratio is 42.06. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to KBYPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to KBYPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, BICEF has a market cap of 2.64B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while BICEF trades at $64.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas BICEF's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to BICEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to BICEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, KOSCF has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while KOSCF trades at $45.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas KOSCF's P/E ratio is 48.92. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to KOSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to KOSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, LIOPF has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while LIOPF trades at $9.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas LIOPF's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to LIOPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to LIOPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, KSRYY has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while KSRYY trades at $8.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas KSRYY's P/E ratio is 47.50. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to KSRYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to KSRYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, FACYF has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while FACYF trades at $17.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas FACYF's P/E ratio is 34.22. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to FACYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to FACYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, PORBF has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while PORBF trades at $9.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas PORBF's P/E ratio is 45.23. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to PORBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to PORBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, NWL has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while NWL trades at $5.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas NWL's P/E ratio is -8.92. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to NWL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to NWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, MIOFF has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while MIOFF trades at $52.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas MIOFF's P/E ratio is 40.46. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to MIOFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to MIOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, SPB has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while SPB trades at $64.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas SPB's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SPB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to SPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, BLUMY has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while BLUMY trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas BLUMY's P/E ratio is -66.00. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to BLUMY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to BLUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, ONXYY has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while ONXYY trades at $4.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas ONXYY's P/E ratio is 32.86. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to ONXYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to ONXYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, PGENY has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while PGENY trades at $3.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas PGENY's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to PGENY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to PGENY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, PIGEF has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while PIGEF trades at $11.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas PIGEF's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to PIGEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to PIGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, EPC has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while EPC trades at $27.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas EPC's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to EPC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to EPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, OLVI has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while OLVI trades at $2.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas OLVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to OLVI's ROE of -3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to OLVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, SRTSF has a market cap of 890.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while SRTSF trades at $13.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas SRTSF's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SRTSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to SRTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, DUNIY has a market cap of 691.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while DUNIY trades at $29.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas DUNIY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to DUNIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to DUNIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, ONXXF has a market cap of 673.02M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while ONXXF trades at $8.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas ONXXF's P/E ratio is 30.74. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to ONXXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to ONXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, HELE has a market cap of 613.49M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while HELE trades at $26.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas HELE's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to HELE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to HELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, MDOMF has a market cap of 530.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while MDOMF trades at $11.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas MDOMF's P/E ratio is 130.56. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to MDOMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to MDOMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, WPNTF has a market cap of 500.88M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while WPNTF trades at $6.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas WPNTF's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to WPNTF's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to WPNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, YAMNF has a market cap of 464.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while YAMNF trades at $8.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas YAMNF's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to YAMNF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to YAMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, PZCUY has a market cap of 445.99M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while PZCUY trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas PZCUY's P/E ratio is -35.50. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to PZCUY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to PZCUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, PHH has a market cap of 383.09M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while PHH trades at $14.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas PHH's P/E ratio is 726.25. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to PHH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to PHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, NUS has a market cap of 303.87M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while NUS trades at $6.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas NUS's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to NUS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to NUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, MCBRF has a market cap of 220.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while MCBRF trades at $1.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas MCBRF's P/E ratio is 4.23. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to MCBRF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to MCBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, EWCZ has a market cap of 199.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while EWCZ trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas EWCZ's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to EWCZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to EWCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, UNHLF has a market cap of 196.39M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while UNHLF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas UNHLF's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to UNHLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to UNHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, ACU has a market cap of 141.96M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while ACU trades at $37.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas ACU's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to ACU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to ACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, KITAF has a market cap of 130.66M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while KITAF trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas KITAF's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to KITAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to KITAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, NBBTF has a market cap of 116.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while NBBTF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas NBBTF's P/E ratio is -5.80. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to NBBTF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to NBBTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, SKIN has a market cap of 107.70M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while SKIN trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas SKIN's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SKIN's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to SKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, RVIV has a market cap of 79.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while RVIV trades at $13.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas RVIV's P/E ratio is 64.29. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to RVIV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to RVIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, KPTSF has a market cap of 58.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while KPTSF trades at $5.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas KPTSF's P/E ratio is 34.53. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to KPTSF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to KPTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, GROV has a market cap of 47.18M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while GROV trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas GROV's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to GROV's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to GROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, UG has a market cap of 36.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while UG trades at $8.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas UG's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to UG's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to UG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, PRFUF has a market cap of 26.66M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while PRFUF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas PRFUF's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to PRFUF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to PRFUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, MTEX has a market cap of 19.01M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while MTEX trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas MTEX's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to MTEX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to MTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 18.49M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while RAY trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to RAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, DQWS has a market cap of 18.21M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while DQWS trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas DQWS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to DQWS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to DQWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, SNBH has a market cap of 9.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while SNBH trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas SNBH's P/E ratio is -4.23. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SNBH's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to SNBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, BRSH has a market cap of 8.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while BRSH trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas BRSH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to BRSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to BRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, DSY has a market cap of 7.60M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while DSY trades at $1.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas DSY's P/E ratio is 152.00. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to DSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to DSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, MIMNF has a market cap of 6.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while MIMNF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas MIMNF's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to MIMNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to MIMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, PURE has a market cap of 6.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while PURE trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas PURE's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to PURE's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to PURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, CAWW has a market cap of 6.41M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while CAWW trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas CAWW's P/E ratio is -5.73. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to CAWW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to CAWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, ZOONF has a market cap of 5.33M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while ZOONF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas ZOONF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to ZOONF's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to ZOONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, MAVBF has a market cap of 4.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while MAVBF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas MAVBF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to MAVBF's ROE of -2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to MAVBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, FDOGF has a market cap of 4.20M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while FDOGF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas FDOGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to FDOGF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to FDOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, REVRQ has a market cap of 3.80M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while REVRQ trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas REVRQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to REVRQ's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to REVRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, SPCO has a market cap of 3.24M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while SPCO trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas SPCO's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SPCO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to SPCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, SKVI has a market cap of 2.84M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while SKVI trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas SKVI's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SKVI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to SKVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, TANH has a market cap of 2.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while TANH trades at $2.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas TANH's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to TANH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to TANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, ZRVT has a market cap of 2.34M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while ZRVT trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas ZRVT's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to ZRVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to ZRVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, NUVI has a market cap of 2.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while NUVI trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas NUVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to NUVI's ROE of +9.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to NUVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, TKLF has a market cap of 1.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while TKLF trades at $3.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas TKLF's P/E ratio is 2.13. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to TKLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to TKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, CLGOF has a market cap of 1.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while CLGOF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas CLGOF's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to CLGOF's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to CLGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, SLGD has a market cap of 812885.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while SLGD trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas SLGD's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SLGD's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to SLGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, NASO has a market cap of 688514.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while NASO trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas NASO's P/E ratio is -80.00. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to NASO's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to NASO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, PYCT has a market cap of 553705.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while PYCT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas PYCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to PYCT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to PYCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, PHLI has a market cap of 438307.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while PHLI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas PHLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to PHLI's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to PHLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, WNBD has a market cap of 349998.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while WNBD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas WNBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to WNBD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to WNBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, HRSR has a market cap of 185621.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while HRSR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas HRSR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to HRSR's ROE of +65.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to HRSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, TVOG has a market cap of 105898.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while TVOG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas TVOG's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to TVOG's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to TVOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, EESO has a market cap of 72920.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while EESO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas EESO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to EESO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to EESO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, EOSS has a market cap of 60478.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while EOSS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas EOSS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to EOSS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to EOSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, BRSHF has a market cap of 46880.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while BRSHF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas BRSHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to BRSHF's ROE of +14.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to BRSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, QNTA has a market cap of 40659.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while QNTA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas QNTA's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to QNTA's ROE of +2.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to QNTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, SYHO has a market cap of 39592.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while SYHO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas SYHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SYHO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to SYHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, GRBG has a market cap of 38971.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while GRBG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas GRBG's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to GRBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to GRBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, JOEY has a market cap of 28244.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while JOEY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas JOEY's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to JOEY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to JOEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, SNST has a market cap of 26592.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while SNST trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas SNST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SNST's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to SNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, INBI has a market cap of 18146.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while INBI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas INBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to INBI's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to INBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, HPTN has a market cap of 17808.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while HPTN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas HPTN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to HPTN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to HPTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, GYSN has a market cap of 13983.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while GYSN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas GYSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to GYSN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to GYSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, KPOC has a market cap of 13743.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while KPOC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas KPOC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to KPOC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to KPOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, NUUU has a market cap of 11776.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while NUUU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas NUUU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to NUUU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to NUUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, EMPO has a market cap of 6279.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while EMPO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas EMPO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to EMPO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to EMPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, BRSHW has a market cap of 6147.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while BRSHW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas BRSHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to BRSHW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to BRSHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, BEUT has a market cap of 3192.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while BEUT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas BEUT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to BEUT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to BEUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, NCDP has a market cap of 1848.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while NCDP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas NCDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to NCDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to NCDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, MDAV has a market cap of 1424.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while MDAV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas MDAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to MDAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to MDAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, PCGR has a market cap of 785.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while PCGR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas PCGR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to PCGR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to PCGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, RBCL has a market cap of 221.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while RBCL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas RBCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to RBCL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to RBCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, SOYO has a market cap of 62.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while SOYO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas SOYO's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SOYO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to SOYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, BMXC has a market cap of 1.00. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while BMXC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas BMXC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to BMXC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to BMXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, BWXXF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while BWXXF trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas BWXXF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to BWXXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is more volatile compared to BWXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, SLSN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while SLSN trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas SLSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to SLSN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SUMR has daily volatility of 0.17 and SLSN has daily volatility of N/A.

SUMR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SUMR stands at N/A. In comparison, REV comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SUMR is priced at $11.99, while REV trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SUMR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.66, whereas REV's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, SUMR's ROE is -0.75%, compared to REV's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMR is less volatile compared to REV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMR.