Sumit Woods Limited
Sumit Woods Limited (SUMIT.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SUMIT.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Development Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUMIT.NS | ₹58.57 | +4.37% | 2.7B | 27.37 | ₹2.14 | N/A |
| DLF.BO | ₹607.70 | +1.99% | 1.5T | 34.01 | ₹17.87 | +1.01% |
| DLF.NS | ₹607.55 | +1.87% | 1.5T | 34.00 | ₹17.87 | +1.01% |
| LODHA.BO | ₹875.75 | +2.33% | 874.8B | 26.17 | ₹33.47 | +0.50% |
| LODHA.NS | ₹875.70 | +2.24% | 874.7B | 26.20 | ₹33.42 | +0.50% |
| OBEROIRLTY.BO | ₹1,724.10 | +1.29% | 626.9B | 28.01 | ₹61.56 | +0.47% |
| OBEROIRLTY.NS | ₹1,723.90 | +1.71% | 626.8B | 27.99 | ₹61.58 | +0.47% |
| GODREJPROP.BO | ₹1,805.05 | +2.62% | 543.7B | 35.00 | ₹51.57 | N/A |
| GODREJPROP.NS | ₹1,805.00 | +2.57% | 543.7B | 34.32 | ₹52.59 | N/A |
| BRIGADE.BO | ₹790.35 | +1.84% | 193.3B | 25.85 | ₹30.58 | +0.32% |
Stock Comparison
SUMIT.NS vs DLF.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DLF.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while DLF.BO trades at ₹607.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas DLF.BO's P/E ratio is 34.01. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DLF.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to DLF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check DLF.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs DLF.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DLF.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while DLF.NS trades at ₹607.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas DLF.NS's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DLF.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to DLF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check DLF.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs LODHA.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, LODHA.BO has a market cap of 874.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while LODHA.BO trades at ₹875.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas LODHA.BO's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LODHA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to LODHA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check LODHA.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs LODHA.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, LODHA.NS has a market cap of 874.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while LODHA.NS trades at ₹875.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas LODHA.NS's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LODHA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to LODHA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check LODHA.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs OBEROIRLTY.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, OBEROIRLTY.BO has a market cap of 626.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while OBEROIRLTY.BO trades at ₹1,724.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas OBEROIRLTY.BO's P/E ratio is 28.01. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OBEROIRLTY.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to OBEROIRLTY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check OBEROIRLTY.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs OBEROIRLTY.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, OBEROIRLTY.NS has a market cap of 626.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while OBEROIRLTY.NS trades at ₹1,723.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas OBEROIRLTY.NS's P/E ratio is 27.99. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OBEROIRLTY.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to OBEROIRLTY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check OBEROIRLTY.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs GODREJPROP.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GODREJPROP.BO has a market cap of 543.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while GODREJPROP.BO trades at ₹1,805.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas GODREJPROP.BO's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GODREJPROP.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to GODREJPROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check GODREJPROP.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs GODREJPROP.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GODREJPROP.NS has a market cap of 543.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while GODREJPROP.NS trades at ₹1,805.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas GODREJPROP.NS's P/E ratio is 34.32. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GODREJPROP.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to GODREJPROP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check GODREJPROP.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs BRIGADE.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BRIGADE.BO has a market cap of 193.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while BRIGADE.BO trades at ₹790.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas BRIGADE.BO's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRIGADE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to BRIGADE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check BRIGADE.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs BRIGADE.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BRIGADE.NS has a market cap of 193.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while BRIGADE.NS trades at ₹790.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas BRIGADE.NS's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRIGADE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to BRIGADE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check BRIGADE.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs ANANTRAJ.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ANANTRAJ.BO has a market cap of 185.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while ANANTRAJ.BO trades at ₹514.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas ANANTRAJ.BO's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANANTRAJ.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to ANANTRAJ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check ANANTRAJ.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs ANANTRAJ.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ANANTRAJ.NS has a market cap of 185.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while ANANTRAJ.NS trades at ₹514.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas ANANTRAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 33.84. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANANTRAJ.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to ANANTRAJ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check ANANTRAJ.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs SOBHA.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SOBHA.NS has a market cap of 146.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while SOBHA.NS trades at ₹1,370.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas SOBHA.NS's P/E ratio is 102.41. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SOBHA.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is less volatile compared to SOBHA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check SOBHA.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs SOBHA.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SOBHA.BO has a market cap of 146.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while SOBHA.BO trades at ₹1,369.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas SOBHA.BO's P/E ratio is 102.39. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SOBHA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is less volatile compared to SOBHA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check SOBHA.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs SIGNATURE.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SIGNATURE.NS has a market cap of 120.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while SIGNATURE.NS trades at ₹859.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas SIGNATURE.NS's P/E ratio is 3436.60. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SIGNATURE.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to SIGNATURE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check SIGNATURE.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs SIGNATURE.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SIGNATURE.BO has a market cap of 120.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while SIGNATURE.BO trades at ₹858.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas SIGNATURE.BO's P/E ratio is 3577.92. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SIGNATURE.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to SIGNATURE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check SIGNATURE.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs IBREALEST.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, IBREALEST.BO has a market cap of 95.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while IBREALEST.BO trades at ₹150.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas IBREALEST.BO's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IBREALEST.BO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to IBREALEST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check IBREALEST.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs IBREALEST.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, IBREALEST.NS has a market cap of 83.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while IBREALEST.NS trades at ₹131.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas IBREALEST.NS's P/E ratio is -6.85. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IBREALEST.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to IBREALEST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check IBREALEST.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs MAHLIFE.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MAHLIFE.BO has a market cap of 69.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while MAHLIFE.BO trades at ₹323.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas MAHLIFE.BO's P/E ratio is 21.01. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MAHLIFE.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to MAHLIFE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check MAHLIFE.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs MAHLIFE.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MAHLIFE.NS has a market cap of 69.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while MAHLIFE.NS trades at ₹323.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas MAHLIFE.NS's P/E ratio is 21.01. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MAHLIFE.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to MAHLIFE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check MAHLIFE.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs KALPATARU.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KALPATARU.NS has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while KALPATARU.NS trades at ₹328.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas KALPATARU.NS's P/E ratio is -65.47. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KALPATARU.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to KALPATARU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check KALPATARU.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs MAXESTATES.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MAXESTATES.NS has a market cap of 63.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while MAXESTATES.NS trades at ₹389.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas MAXESTATES.NS's P/E ratio is 128.71. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MAXESTATES.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to MAXESTATES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check MAXESTATES.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs MAXESTATES.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MAXESTATES.BO has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while MAXESTATES.BO trades at ₹389.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas MAXESTATES.BO's P/E ratio is 127.98. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MAXESTATES.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to MAXESTATES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check MAXESTATES.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs DBREALTY.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DBREALTY.NS has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while DBREALTY.NS trades at ₹107.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas DBREALTY.NS's P/E ratio is 55.61. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DBREALTY.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to DBREALTY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check DBREALTY.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs DBREALTY.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DBREALTY.BO has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while DBREALTY.BO trades at ₹107.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas DBREALTY.BO's P/E ratio is 55.61. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DBREALTY.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to DBREALTY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check DBREALTY.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs GANESHHOU.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GANESHHOU.BO has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while GANESHHOU.BO trades at ₹642.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas GANESHHOU.BO's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GANESHHOU.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to GANESHHOU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check GANESHHOU.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs GANESHHOU.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GANESHHOU.NS has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while GANESHHOU.NS trades at ₹642.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas GANESHHOU.NS's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GANESHHOU.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to GANESHHOU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check GANESHHOU.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs GANESHHOUC.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GANESHHOUC.BO has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while GANESHHOUC.BO trades at ₹640.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas GANESHHOUC.BO's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GANESHHOUC.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to GANESHHOUC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check GANESHHOUC.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs PURVA.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PURVA.NS has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while PURVA.NS trades at ₹221.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas PURVA.NS's P/E ratio is -38.80. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PURVA.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to PURVA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check PURVA.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs PURVA.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PURVA.BO has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while PURVA.BO trades at ₹220.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas PURVA.BO's P/E ratio is -38.72. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PURVA.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to PURVA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check PURVA.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs RUSTOMJEE.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RUSTOMJEE.BO has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while RUSTOMJEE.BO trades at ₹404.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas RUSTOMJEE.BO's P/E ratio is 56.22. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RUSTOMJEE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to RUSTOMJEE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check RUSTOMJEE.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs RUSTOMJEE.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RUSTOMJEE.NS has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while RUSTOMJEE.NS trades at ₹401.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas RUSTOMJEE.NS's P/E ratio is 55.80. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RUSTOMJEE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to RUSTOMJEE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check RUSTOMJEE.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs SUNTECK.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SUNTECK.BO has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while SUNTECK.BO trades at ₹341.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas SUNTECK.BO's P/E ratio is 26.18. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUNTECK.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is less volatile compared to SUNTECK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check SUNTECK.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs SUNTECK.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SUNTECK.NS has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while SUNTECK.NS trades at ₹341.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas SUNTECK.NS's P/E ratio is 26.18. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUNTECK.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is less volatile compared to SUNTECK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check SUNTECK.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs NIRLON.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NIRLON.BO has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while NIRLON.BO trades at ₹544.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas NIRLON.BO's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NIRLON.BO's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to NIRLON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check NIRLON.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs GANESHHOUC.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GANESHHOUC.NS has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while GANESHHOUC.NS trades at ₹584.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas GANESHHOUC.NS's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GANESHHOUC.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to GANESHHOUC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check GANESHHOUC.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs AGIIL.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AGIIL.NS has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while AGIIL.NS trades at ₹365.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas AGIIL.NS's P/E ratio is 53.42. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AGIIL.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is less volatile compared to AGIIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check AGIIL.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs TARC.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TARC.BO has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while TARC.BO trades at ₹138.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas TARC.BO's P/E ratio is -46.72. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TARC.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to TARC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check TARC.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs TARC.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TARC.NS has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while TARC.NS trades at ₹137.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas TARC.NS's P/E ratio is -46.67. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TARC.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to TARC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check TARC.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs IBULLSLTD.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, IBULLSLTD.BO has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while IBULLSLTD.BO trades at ₹17.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas IBULLSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IBULLSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to IBULLSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check IBULLSLTD.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs IBULLSLTD.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, IBULLSLTD.NS has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while IBULLSLTD.NS trades at ₹17.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas IBULLSLTD.NS's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IBULLSLTD.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is less volatile compared to IBULLSLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check IBULLSLTD.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs KESAR.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KESAR.BO has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while KESAR.BO trades at ₹1,254.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas KESAR.BO's P/E ratio is 124.90. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KESAR.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to KESAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check KESAR.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs KOLTEPATIL.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KOLTEPATIL.NS has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while KOLTEPATIL.NS trades at ₹400.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas KOLTEPATIL.NS's P/E ratio is 68.64. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KOLTEPATIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to KOLTEPATIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check KOLTEPATIL.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs KOLTEPATIL.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KOLTEPATIL.BO has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while KOLTEPATIL.BO trades at ₹400.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas KOLTEPATIL.BO's P/E ratio is 68.35. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KOLTEPATIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to KOLTEPATIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check KOLTEPATIL.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs ASHIANA.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ASHIANA.BO has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while ASHIANA.BO trades at ₹334.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas ASHIANA.BO's P/E ratio is 28.21. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASHIANA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to ASHIANA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check ASHIANA.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs ASHIANA.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ASHIANA.NS has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while ASHIANA.NS trades at ₹333.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas ASHIANA.NS's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASHIANA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to ASHIANA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check ASHIANA.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs MARATHON.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MARATHON.BO has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while MARATHON.BO trades at ₹488.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas MARATHON.BO's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MARATHON.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to MARATHON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check MARATHON.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs MARATHON.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MARATHON.NS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while MARATHON.NS trades at ₹487.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas MARATHON.NS's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MARATHON.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to MARATHON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check MARATHON.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs HUBTOWN.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HUBTOWN.BO has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while HUBTOWN.BO trades at ₹216.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas HUBTOWN.BO's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HUBTOWN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to HUBTOWN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check HUBTOWN.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs HUBTOWN.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HUBTOWN.NS has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while HUBTOWN.NS trades at ₹216.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas HUBTOWN.NS's P/E ratio is 24.17. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HUBTOWN.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to HUBTOWN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check HUBTOWN.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs NATIONSTD.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NATIONSTD.BO has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while NATIONSTD.BO trades at ₹1,443.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas NATIONSTD.BO's P/E ratio is 298.93. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NATIONSTD.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to NATIONSTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check NATIONSTD.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs ARVSMART.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ARVSMART.NS has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while ARVSMART.NS trades at ₹592.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas ARVSMART.NS's P/E ratio is 37.20. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARVSMART.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to ARVSMART.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check ARVSMART.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs ARVSMART.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ARVSMART.BO has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while ARVSMART.BO trades at ₹592.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas ARVSMART.BO's P/E ratio is 37.22. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARVSMART.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to ARVSMART.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check ARVSMART.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs AJMERA.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AJMERA.BO has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while AJMERA.BO trades at ₹124.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas AJMERA.BO's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AJMERA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is less volatile compared to AJMERA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check AJMERA.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs AJMERA.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AJMERA.NS has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while AJMERA.NS trades at ₹124.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas AJMERA.NS's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AJMERA.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is less volatile compared to AJMERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check AJMERA.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs ALEMBICLTD.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ALEMBICLTD.BO has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while ALEMBICLTD.BO trades at ₹93.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas ALEMBICLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALEMBICLTD.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to ALEMBICLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check ALEMBICLTD.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs ARKADE.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ARKADE.NS has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while ARKADE.NS trades at ₹115.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas ARKADE.NS's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARKADE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to ARKADE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check ARKADE.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs MIIL.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MIIL.BO has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while MIIL.BO trades at ₹707.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas MIIL.BO's P/E ratio is 1911.62. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MIIL.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is less volatile compared to MIIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check MIIL.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs OMAXE.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, OMAXE.BO has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while OMAXE.BO trades at ₹81.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas OMAXE.BO's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OMAXE.BO's ROE of +3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is less volatile compared to OMAXE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check OMAXE.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs OMAXE.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, OMAXE.NS has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while OMAXE.NS trades at ₹81.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas OMAXE.NS's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OMAXE.NS's ROE of +3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is less volatile compared to OMAXE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check OMAXE.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs SHRIRAMPPS.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SHRIRAMPPS.NS has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while SHRIRAMPPS.NS trades at ₹85.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas SHRIRAMPPS.NS's P/E ratio is 20.72. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHRIRAMPPS.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMPPS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check SHRIRAMPPS.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs SHRIRAMPPS.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SHRIRAMPPS.BO has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while SHRIRAMPPS.BO trades at ₹85.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas SHRIRAMPPS.BO's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHRIRAMPPS.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMPPS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check SHRIRAMPPS.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs ASL.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ASL.BO has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while ASL.BO trades at ₹310.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas ASL.BO's P/E ratio is -1320.85. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is less volatile compared to ASL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check ASL.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs SURAJEST.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SURAJEST.NS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while SURAJEST.NS trades at ₹242.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas SURAJEST.NS's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SURAJEST.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to SURAJEST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check SURAJEST.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs ARIHANTSUP.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ARIHANTSUP.NS has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while ARIHANTSUP.NS trades at ₹265.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas ARIHANTSUP.NS's P/E ratio is 26.73. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARIHANTSUP.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to ARIHANTSUP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check ARIHANTSUP.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs ARIHANTSUP.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ARIHANTSUP.BO has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while ARIHANTSUP.BO trades at ₹265.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas ARIHANTSUP.BO's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARIHANTSUP.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to ARIHANTSUP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check ARIHANTSUP.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs ARIHANT.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ARIHANT.BO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while ARIHANT.BO trades at ₹944.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas ARIHANT.BO's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARIHANT.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is less volatile compared to ARIHANT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check ARIHANT.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs RDBRIL.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RDBRIL.BO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while RDBRIL.BO trades at ₹53.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas RDBRIL.BO's P/E ratio is 213.12. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RDBRIL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is less volatile compared to RDBRIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check RDBRIL.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs MCCHRLS-B.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MCCHRLS-B.BO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while MCCHRLS-B.BO trades at ₹689.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas MCCHRLS-B.BO's P/E ratio is -6.58. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MCCHRLS-B.BO's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to MCCHRLS-B.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check MCCHRLS-B.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs AGIIL.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AGIIL.BO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while AGIIL.BO trades at ₹365.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas AGIIL.BO's P/E ratio is 53.31. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AGIIL.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is less volatile compared to AGIIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check AGIIL.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs ARIHANT.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ARIHANT.NS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while ARIHANT.NS trades at ₹956.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas ARIHANT.NS's P/E ratio is -565.58. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARIHANT.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is less volatile compared to ARIHANT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check ARIHANT.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs PENINLAND.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PENINLAND.BO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while PENINLAND.BO trades at ₹20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas PENINLAND.BO's P/E ratio is -10.80. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PENINLAND.BO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to PENINLAND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check PENINLAND.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs HAZOOR.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HAZOOR.BO has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while HAZOOR.BO trades at ₹29.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas HAZOOR.BO's P/E ratio is 32.12. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HAZOOR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is less volatile compared to HAZOOR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check HAZOOR.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs PENINLAND.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PENINLAND.NS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while PENINLAND.NS trades at ₹20.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas PENINLAND.NS's P/E ratio is -10.79. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PENINLAND.NS's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is less volatile compared to PENINLAND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check PENINLAND.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs MODIS.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MODIS.BO has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while MODIS.BO trades at ₹350.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas MODIS.BO's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MODIS.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to MODIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check MODIS.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs OSWALAGRO.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, OSWALAGRO.BO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while OSWALAGRO.BO trades at ₹50.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas OSWALAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OSWALAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is less volatile compared to OSWALAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check OSWALAGRO.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs OSWALAGRO.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, OSWALAGRO.NS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while OSWALAGRO.NS trades at ₹49.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas OSWALAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OSWALAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is less volatile compared to OSWALAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check OSWALAGRO.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs GEECEE.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GEECEE.NS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while GEECEE.NS trades at ₹307.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas GEECEE.NS's P/E ratio is 28.68. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GEECEE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to GEECEE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check GEECEE.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs GEECEE.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GEECEE.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while GEECEE.BO trades at ₹302.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas GEECEE.BO's P/E ratio is 28.17. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GEECEE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to GEECEE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check GEECEE.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs NILASPACES.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NILASPACES.NS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while NILASPACES.NS trades at ₹13.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas NILASPACES.NS's P/E ratio is 22.08. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NILASPACES.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to NILASPACES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check NILASPACES.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs NILASPACES.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NILASPACES.BO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while NILASPACES.BO trades at ₹13.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas NILASPACES.BO's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NILASPACES.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to NILASPACES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check NILASPACES.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs SBGLP.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SBGLP.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while SBGLP.NS trades at ₹28.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas SBGLP.NS's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBGLP.NS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to SBGLP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check SBGLP.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs SBGLP.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SBGLP.BO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while SBGLP.BO trades at ₹28.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas SBGLP.BO's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBGLP.BO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to SBGLP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check SBGLP.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs PANSARI.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PANSARI.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while PANSARI.NS trades at ₹276.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas PANSARI.NS's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PANSARI.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is less volatile compared to PANSARI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check PANSARI.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs YOGI.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, YOGI.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while YOGI.BO trades at ₹160.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas YOGI.BO's P/E ratio is 34.54. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YOGI.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to YOGI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check YOGI.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs PARSVNATH.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PARSVNATH.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while PARSVNATH.NS trades at ₹8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas PARSVNATH.NS's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PARSVNATH.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to PARSVNATH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check PARSVNATH.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs PARSVNATH.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PARSVNATH.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while PARSVNATH.BO trades at ₹8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas PARSVNATH.BO's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PARSVNATH.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to PARSVNATH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check PARSVNATH.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs RATNABHUMI.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RATNABHUMI.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while RATNABHUMI.BO trades at ₹237.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas RATNABHUMI.BO's P/E ratio is 62.12. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RATNABHUMI.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to RATNABHUMI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check RATNABHUMI.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs NILAINFRA.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NILAINFRA.NS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while NILAINFRA.NS trades at ₹8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas NILAINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NILAINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is less volatile compared to NILAINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check NILAINFRA.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs NILAINFRA.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NILAINFRA.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while NILAINFRA.BO trades at ₹8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas NILAINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NILAINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is less volatile compared to NILAINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check NILAINFRA.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs EMAMIREAL.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, EMAMIREAL.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while EMAMIREAL.BO trades at ₹68.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas EMAMIREAL.BO's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EMAMIREAL.BO's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to EMAMIREAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check EMAMIREAL.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs EMAMIREAL.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, EMAMIREAL.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while EMAMIREAL.NS trades at ₹67.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas EMAMIREAL.NS's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EMAMIREAL.NS's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to EMAMIREAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check EMAMIREAL.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs SVGLOBAL.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SVGLOBAL.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while SVGLOBAL.BO trades at ₹147.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas SVGLOBAL.BO's P/E ratio is 45.63. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SVGLOBAL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to SVGLOBAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check SVGLOBAL.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs RVHL.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RVHL.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while RVHL.NS trades at ₹42.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas RVHL.NS's P/E ratio is 5.22. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RVHL.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to RVHL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check RVHL.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs MERCANTILE.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MERCANTILE.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while MERCANTILE.BO trades at ₹22.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas MERCANTILE.BO's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MERCANTILE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is less volatile compared to MERCANTILE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check MERCANTILE.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs RVHL.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RVHL.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while RVHL.BO trades at ₹41.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas RVHL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RVHL.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to RVHL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check RVHL.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs KBCGLOBAL.BO Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KBCGLOBAL.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while KBCGLOBAL.BO trades at ₹0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas KBCGLOBAL.BO's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KBCGLOBAL.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to KBCGLOBAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check KBCGLOBAL.BO's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs KBCGLOBAL.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KBCGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while KBCGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas KBCGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KBCGLOBAL.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is less volatile compared to KBCGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check KBCGLOBAL.NS's competition here
SUMIT.NS vs YAARI.NS Comparison April 2026
SUMIT.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMIT.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, YAARI.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMIT.NS is priced at ₹58.57, while YAARI.NS trades at ₹21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMIT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.37, whereas YAARI.NS's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, SUMIT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YAARI.NS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMIT.NS is more volatile compared to YAARI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMIT.NS.Check YAARI.NS's competition here