Starry Group Holdings, Inc.
Starry Group Holdings, Inc. STRY Peers
See (STRY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STRY | $0.01 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TMUS | $237.34 | -1.24% | 269.49B | 23.16 | $10.25 | +1.29% |
| VZA | $25.55 | -0.43% | 241.26B | 3.27 | $7.82 | N/A |
| TBB | $22.27 | -1.24% | 191.94B | 4.35 | $5.12 | +6.03% |
| T | $26.43 | -2.17% | 190.14B | 16.21 | $1.63 | +4.21% |
| TBC | $24.97 | -0.68% | 179.83B | N/A | N/A | +4.22% |
| VZ | $42.62 | -0.90% | 179.68B | 10.15 | $4.20 | +6.31% |
| T-PA | $20.02 | -0.05% | 144.06B | 8.42 | $2.38 | +4.21% |
| T-PC | $19.05 | +0.26% | 137.08B | 8.01 | $2.38 | +4.21% |
| CMCSA | $34.79 | +0.20% | 129.57B | 8.57 | $4.06 | +3.61% |
Stock Comparison
STRY vs TMUS Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, TMUS has a market cap of 269.49B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while TMUS trades at $237.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMUS's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to TMUS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to TMUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs VZA Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.26B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while VZA trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to VZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs TBB Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 191.94B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while TBB trades at $22.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 4.35. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to TBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs T Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, T has a market cap of 190.14B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while T trades at $26.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas T's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs TBC Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, TBC has a market cap of 179.83B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while TBC trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to TBC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to TBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs VZ Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 179.68B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while VZ trades at $42.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to VZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs T-PA Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 144.06B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while T-PA trades at $20.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs T-PC Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 137.08B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while T-PC trades at $19.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs CMCSA Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 129.57B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while CMCSA trades at $34.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs AMOV Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.61B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while AMOV trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs CHTR Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 57.71B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while CHTR trades at $411.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs AMX Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 52.81B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while AMX trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 30.81. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to AMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs CHT Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, CHT has a market cap of 33.16B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while CHT trades at $42.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHT's P/E ratio is 26.07. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to CHT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to CHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs ORAN Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.64B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while ORAN trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs TEF Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 27.40B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while TEF trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -69.36. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to TEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs TU Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 23.73B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while TU trades at $15.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 32.66. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to TU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to TU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs VOD Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 23.26B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while VOD trades at $9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to VOD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to VOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs BCE Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 20.25B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while BCE trades at $21.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 169.00. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to BCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs VIV Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 16.47B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while VIV trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to VIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs TLK Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 15.90B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while TLK trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to TLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs SJR Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.94B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while SJR trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to SJR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs RCI Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 13.95B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while RCI trades at $25.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to RCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs LBRDA Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 13.66B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while LBRDA trades at $94.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs LBRDK Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 13.61B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while LBRDK trades at $95.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs LBRDP Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 13.39B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while LBRDP trades at $24.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs KT Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 9.48B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while KT trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to KT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to KT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs MBT Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.28B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while MBT trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to MBT's ROE of -6.61%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to MBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs FYBR Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.16B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while FYBR trades at $36.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -23.46. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to FYBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs SKM Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 8.71B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while SKM trades at $22.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to SKM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs TIMB Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 8.45B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while TIMB trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs CTDD Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 7.65B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while CTDD trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to CTDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs TIGO Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 5.96B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while TIGO trades at $34.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 23.39. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs TKC Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 5.52B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while TKC trades at $6.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to TKC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs UZE Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 5.12B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while UZE trades at $21.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to UZE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to UZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs UZF Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 5.11B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while UZF trades at $21.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to UZF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to UZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs UZD Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 5.10B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while UZD trades at $23.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to UZD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to UZD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs USM Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 5.09B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while USM trades at $59.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -130.11. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to USM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to USM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs PHI Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 5.04B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while PHI trades at $23.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to PHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs LUMN Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, LUMN has a market cap of 4.51B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while LUMN trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUMN's P/E ratio is -13.73. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to LUMN's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to LUMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs CTBB Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4.51B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while CTBB trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to CTBB's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs LBYKV Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.23B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY and LBYKV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STRY vs SNRE Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 3.70B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while SNRE trades at $53.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs TDS-PV Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while TDS-PV trades at $18.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 21.21. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs TDS-PU Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 3.62B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while TDS-PU trades at $21.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 23.95. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs TDS Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 3.56B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while TDS trades at $33.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is -31.66. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to TDS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to TDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs LBTYA Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while LBTYA trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -14.65. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs LBTYK Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 3.17B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while LBTYK trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -15.03. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs LBTYB Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 3.15B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while LBTYB trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -14.76. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs DISH Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.08B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while DISH trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to DISH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to DISH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs TEO Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 3.07B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while TEO trades at $10.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to TEO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to TEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs IRDM Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while IRDM trades at $25.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 24.44. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs CCOI Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while CCOI trades at $51.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -11.98. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to CCOI's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs GSAT Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 2.39B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while GSAT trades at $18.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -32.07. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs IHS Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 2.03B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while IHS trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to IHS's ROE of +3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to IHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs ASTSW Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs GOGO Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while GOGO trades at $11.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is 118.60. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to GOGO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs RADI Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while RADI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to RADI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs IDT Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while IDT trades at $57.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to IDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs ATUS Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while ATUS trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -12.43. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs LILAK Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 998.52M. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while LILAK trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs LILA Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 978.82M. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while LILA trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to LILA's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to LILA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs CABO Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, CABO has a market cap of 935.73M. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while CABO trades at $166.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CABO's P/E ratio is -46.06. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to CABO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to CABO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs RBBN Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, RBBN has a market cap of 624.97M. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while RBBN trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBBN's P/E ratio is -12.64. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to RBBN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to RBBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs SHEN Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 621.63M. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while SHEN trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -19.27. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs CNSL Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.69M. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while CNSL trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs ATEX Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 527.68M. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while ATEX trades at $28.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is -17.52. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to ATEX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs WOW Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 379.51M. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while WOW trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to WOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs OOMA Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, OOMA has a market cap of 369.04M. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while OOMA trades at $13.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OOMA's P/E ratio is -51.50. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to OOMA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to OOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs SIFY Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 349.55M. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while SIFY trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is 242.00. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs HCHC Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.35M. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while HCHC trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to HCHC's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs FNGR Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, FNGR has a market cap of 250.28M. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while FNGR trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNGR's P/E ratio is -43.80. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to FNGR's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to FNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs ATNI Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 225.97M. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while ATNI trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to ATNI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs RDCM Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 205.98M. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while RDCM trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 29.88. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs TV Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 198.77M. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while TV trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to TV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs CXDO Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 168.67M. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while CXDO trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 96.83. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs VEON Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 144.77M. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while VEON trades at $51.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to VEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs MTSL Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 91.96M. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while MTSL trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs TDI Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, TDI has a market cap of 53.76M. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while TDI trades at $31.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDI's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to TDI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to TDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs KORE Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 39.21M. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while KORE trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to KORE's ROE of +2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to KORE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs ANTE Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, ANTE has a market cap of 13.53M. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while ANTE trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANTE's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to ANTE's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to ANTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs PCLA Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, PCLA has a market cap of 11.23M. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while PCLA trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCLA's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to PCLA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to PCLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs MIMO Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, MIMO has a market cap of 8.43M. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while MIMO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIMO's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to MIMO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to MIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs QTEK Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, QTEK has a market cap of 4.89M. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while QTEK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTEK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to QTEK's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY and QTEK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STRY vs QTEKW Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, QTEKW has a market cap of 4.89M. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while QTEKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTEKW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to QTEKW's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to QTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs UCL Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, UCL has a market cap of 4.82M. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while UCL trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UCL's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to UCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY is less volatile compared to UCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STRY.
STRY vs COMSP Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, COMSP has a market cap of 513.00. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while COMSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to COMSP's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY and COMSP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STRY vs COMSW Comparison
STRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STRY stands at N/A. In comparison, COMSW has a market cap of 257.00. Regarding current trading prices, STRY is priced at $0.01, while COMSW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STRY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STRY's ROE is +6.74%, compared to COMSW's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, STRY and COMSW have similar daily volatility (0.00).