Saraswati Saree Depot Ltd.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for SSDL.NS
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for SSDL.NS
Saraswati Saree Depot Ltd. (SSDL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SSDL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSDL.NS | ₹55.56 | +1.33% | 2.2B | 8.03 | ₹6.92 | +2.73% |
| TRENT.BO | ₹3,553.50 | +0.80% | 1.3T | 77.00 | ₹46.15 | +0.14% |
| TRENT.NS | ₹3,550.60 | +0.68% | 1.3T | 76.95 | ₹46.14 | +0.14% |
| METROBRAND.BO | ₹938.60 | +2.26% | 255.7B | 65.96 | ₹14.23 | +0.59% |
| ABLBL.NS | ₹93.47 | -0.05% | 113.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MANYAVAR.NS | ₹369.00 | -1.43% | 89.7B | 24.73 | ₹14.92 | +2.17% |
| V2RETAIL.BO | ₹191.75 | +1.21% | 69.9B | 44.59 | ₹4.30 | N/A |
| V2RETAIL.NS | ₹191.71 | +1.21% | 69.9B | 44.69 | ₹4.29 | N/A |
| STYLEBAAZA.NS | ₹301.50 | +2.39% | 22.5B | 34.22 | ₹8.81 | N/A |
| GOCOLORS.BO | ₹273.15 | +2.48% | 14.8B | 20.74 | ₹13.17 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SSDL.NS vs TRENT.BO Comparison April 2026
SSDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSDL.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TRENT.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, SSDL.NS is priced at ₹55.56, while TRENT.BO trades at ₹3,553.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas TRENT.BO's P/E ratio is 77.00. In terms of profitability, SSDL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRENT.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SSDL.NS is more volatile compared to TRENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSDL.NS.Check TRENT.BO's competition here
SSDL.NS vs TRENT.NS Comparison April 2026
SSDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSDL.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TRENT.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, SSDL.NS is priced at ₹55.56, while TRENT.NS trades at ₹3,550.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas TRENT.NS's P/E ratio is 76.95. In terms of profitability, SSDL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRENT.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SSDL.NS is more volatile compared to TRENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSDL.NS.Check TRENT.NS's competition here
SSDL.NS vs METROBRAND.BO Comparison April 2026
SSDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSDL.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, METROBRAND.BO has a market cap of 255.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SSDL.NS is priced at ₹55.56, while METROBRAND.BO trades at ₹938.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas METROBRAND.BO's P/E ratio is 65.96. In terms of profitability, SSDL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to METROBRAND.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SSDL.NS is more volatile compared to METROBRAND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSDL.NS.Check METROBRAND.BO's competition here
SSDL.NS vs ABLBL.NS Comparison April 2026
SSDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSDL.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ABLBL.NS has a market cap of 113.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SSDL.NS is priced at ₹55.56, while ABLBL.NS trades at ₹93.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas ABLBL.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSDL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABLBL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SSDL.NS is more volatile compared to ABLBL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSDL.NS.Check ABLBL.NS's competition here
SSDL.NS vs MANYAVAR.NS Comparison April 2026
SSDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSDL.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MANYAVAR.NS has a market cap of 89.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SSDL.NS is priced at ₹55.56, while MANYAVAR.NS trades at ₹369.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas MANYAVAR.NS's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, SSDL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MANYAVAR.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SSDL.NS is more volatile compared to MANYAVAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSDL.NS.Check MANYAVAR.NS's competition here
SSDL.NS vs V2RETAIL.BO Comparison April 2026
SSDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSDL.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, V2RETAIL.BO has a market cap of 69.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SSDL.NS is priced at ₹55.56, while V2RETAIL.BO trades at ₹191.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas V2RETAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 44.59. In terms of profitability, SSDL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to V2RETAIL.BO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SSDL.NS is less volatile compared to V2RETAIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSDL.NS.Check V2RETAIL.BO's competition here
SSDL.NS vs V2RETAIL.NS Comparison April 2026
SSDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSDL.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, V2RETAIL.NS has a market cap of 69.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SSDL.NS is priced at ₹55.56, while V2RETAIL.NS trades at ₹191.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas V2RETAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 44.69. In terms of profitability, SSDL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to V2RETAIL.NS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SSDL.NS is less volatile compared to V2RETAIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSDL.NS.Check V2RETAIL.NS's competition here
SSDL.NS vs STYLEBAAZA.NS Comparison April 2026
SSDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSDL.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, STYLEBAAZA.NS has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SSDL.NS is priced at ₹55.56, while STYLEBAAZA.NS trades at ₹301.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas STYLEBAAZA.NS's P/E ratio is 34.22. In terms of profitability, SSDL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STYLEBAAZA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SSDL.NS is more volatile compared to STYLEBAAZA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSDL.NS.Check STYLEBAAZA.NS's competition here
SSDL.NS vs GOCOLORS.BO Comparison April 2026
SSDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSDL.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GOCOLORS.BO has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SSDL.NS is priced at ₹55.56, while GOCOLORS.BO trades at ₹273.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas GOCOLORS.BO's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, SSDL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOCOLORS.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SSDL.NS is less volatile compared to GOCOLORS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSDL.NS.Check GOCOLORS.BO's competition here
SSDL.NS vs KALAMANDIR.NS Comparison April 2026
SSDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSDL.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, KALAMANDIR.NS has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SSDL.NS is priced at ₹55.56, while KALAMANDIR.NS trades at ₹95.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas KALAMANDIR.NS's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, SSDL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KALAMANDIR.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SSDL.NS is more volatile compared to KALAMANDIR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSDL.NS.Check KALAMANDIR.NS's competition here
SSDL.NS vs KALAMANDIR.BO Comparison April 2026
SSDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSDL.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, KALAMANDIR.BO has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SSDL.NS is priced at ₹55.56, while KALAMANDIR.BO trades at ₹95.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas KALAMANDIR.BO's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, SSDL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KALAMANDIR.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SSDL.NS is more volatile compared to KALAMANDIR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSDL.NS.Check KALAMANDIR.BO's competition here
SSDL.NS vs MUFTI.NS Comparison April 2026
SSDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSDL.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MUFTI.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SSDL.NS is priced at ₹55.56, while MUFTI.NS trades at ₹72.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas MUFTI.NS's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, SSDL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MUFTI.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SSDL.NS is less volatile compared to MUFTI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSDL.NS.Check MUFTI.NS's competition here
SSDL.NS vs GTNTEX.NS Comparison April 2026
SSDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSDL.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GTNTEX.NS has a market cap of 227M. Regarding current trading prices, SSDL.NS is priced at ₹55.56, while GTNTEX.NS trades at ₹19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas GTNTEX.NS's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, SSDL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GTNTEX.NS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SSDL.NS is more volatile compared to GTNTEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSDL.NS.Check GTNTEX.NS's competition here
SSDL.NS vs HEADSUP.NS Comparison April 2026
SSDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSDL.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, HEADSUP.NS has a market cap of 153.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SSDL.NS is priced at ₹55.56, while HEADSUP.NS trades at ₹6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas HEADSUP.NS's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, SSDL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HEADSUP.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SSDL.NS is less volatile compared to HEADSUP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSDL.NS.Check HEADSUP.NS's competition here
SSDL.NS vs HEADSUP.BO Comparison April 2026
SSDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSDL.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, HEADSUP.BO has a market cap of 149.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SSDL.NS is priced at ₹55.56, while HEADSUP.BO trades at ₹6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas HEADSUP.BO's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, SSDL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HEADSUP.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SSDL.NS is less volatile compared to HEADSUP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSDL.NS.Check HEADSUP.BO's competition here
SSDL.NS vs SUULD.NS Comparison April 2026
SSDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSDL.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SUULD.NS has a market cap of 105.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SSDL.NS is priced at ₹55.56, while SUULD.NS trades at ₹1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas SUULD.NS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SSDL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUULD.NS's ROE of -3.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SSDL.NS is less volatile compared to SUULD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSDL.NS.Check SUULD.NS's competition here
SSDL.NS vs MAFIA.BO Comparison April 2026
SSDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSDL.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MAFIA.BO has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SSDL.NS is priced at ₹55.56, while MAFIA.BO trades at ₹7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas MAFIA.BO's P/E ratio is 4.36. In terms of profitability, SSDL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MAFIA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SSDL.NS is less volatile compared to MAFIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSDL.NS.Check MAFIA.BO's competition here
SSDL.NS vs TMRVL.NS Comparison April 2026
SSDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSDL.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TMRVL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SSDL.NS is priced at ₹55.56, while TMRVL.NS trades at ₹14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas TMRVL.NS's P/E ratio is -5.82. In terms of profitability, SSDL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TMRVL.NS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SSDL.NS is less volatile compared to TMRVL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSDL.NS.Check TMRVL.NS's competition here