Stratos Renewables Corporation

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, JXHLY has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while JXHLY trades at $9.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas JXHLY's P/E ratio is 213.50. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to JXHLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to JXHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check JXHLY's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, JXHGF has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while JXHGF trades at $5.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas JXHGF's P/E ratio is 175.73. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to JXHGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to JXHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check JXHGF's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, NTOIY has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while NTOIY trades at $8.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas NTOIY's P/E ratio is -58.46. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to NTOIY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to NTOIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check NTOIY's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, NTOIF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while NTOIF trades at $16.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas NTOIF's P/E ratio is -57.43. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to NTOIF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to NTOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check NTOIF's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, KLYCY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while KLYCY trades at $10.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas KLYCY's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to KLYCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to KLYCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check KLYCY's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, KUNUF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while KUNUF trades at $0.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas KUNUF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to KUNUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to KUNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check KUNUF's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, SAAFY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while SAAFY trades at $8.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas SAAFY's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to SAAFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to SAAFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check SAAFY's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, IDKOF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while IDKOF trades at $6.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas IDKOF's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to IDKOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to IDKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check IDKOF's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, IDKOY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while IDKOY trades at $12.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas IDKOY's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to IDKOY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW and IDKOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IDKOY's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, DCCPY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while DCCPY trades at $32.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas DCCPY's P/E ratio is 23.41. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to DCCPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to DCCPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check DCCPY's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, DCCPF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while DCCPF trades at $62.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas DCCPF's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to DCCPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to DCCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check DCCPF's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, MOHCY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while MOHCY trades at $13.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas MOHCY's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to MOHCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to MOHCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check MOHCY's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, PKIUF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while PKIUF trades at $28.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas PKIUF's P/E ratio is 35.60. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to PKIUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to PKIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check PKIUF's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, PNADF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while PNADF trades at $4.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas PNADF's P/E ratio is 37.33. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to PNADF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW and PNADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PNADF's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, SHIIY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while SHIIY trades at $18.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas SHIIY's P/E ratio is 35.84. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to SHIIY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to SHIIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check SHIIY's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, CTXAY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while CTXAY trades at $35.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas CTXAY's P/E ratio is 52.27. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to CTXAY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW and CTXAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTXAY's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, CTXAF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while CTXAF trades at $16.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas CTXAF's P/E ratio is 49.39. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to CTXAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to CTXAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check CTXAF's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, RBSFY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while RBSFY trades at $6.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas RBSFY's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to RBSFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to RBSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check RBSFY's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, RUBSF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while RUBSF trades at $32.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas RUBSF's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to RUBSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to RUBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check RUBSF's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, MOHCF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while MOHCF trades at $23.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas MOHCF's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to MOHCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to MOHCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check MOHCF's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, TOIPF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while TOIPF trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas TOIPF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to TOIPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to TOIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check TOIPF's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, TOIPY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while TOIPY trades at $9.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas TOIPY's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to TOIPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to TOIPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check TOIPY's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, PKCPY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while PKCPY trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas PKCPY's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to PKCPY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to PKCPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check PKCPY's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, FJLLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while FJLLF trades at $14.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas FJLLF's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to FJLLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW and FJLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FJLLF's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, OILRF has a market cap of 808.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while OILRF trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas OILRF's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to OILRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW and OILRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OILRF's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, TPHIF has a market cap of 679.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while TPHIF trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas TPHIF's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to TPHIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW and TPHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TPHIF's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, IRPSY has a market cap of 510.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while IRPSY trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas IRPSY's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to IRPSY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to IRPSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check IRPSY's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, CAOLF has a market cap of 474M. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while CAOLF trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas CAOLF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to CAOLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW and CAOLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CAOLF's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, NZRFF has a market cap of 410M. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while NZRFF trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas NZRFF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to NZRFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to NZRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check NZRFF's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, FGPRB has a market cap of 246.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while FGPRB trades at $135.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas FGPRB's P/E ratio is -8.89. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to FGPRB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to FGPRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check FGPRB's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, REGX has a market cap of 152.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while REGX trades at $3.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas REGX's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to REGX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW and REGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check REGX's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, CLSZF has a market cap of 93.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while CLSZF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas CLSZF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to CLSZF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW and CLSZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLSZF's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, FGPR has a market cap of 68.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while FGPR trades at $14.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas FGPR's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to FGPR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to FGPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check FGPR's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, BDCO has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while BDCO trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas BDCO's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to BDCO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to BDCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check BDCO's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, ISRJF has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while ISRJF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas ISRJF's P/E ratio is -7.32. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to ISRJF's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to ISRJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check ISRJF's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, QREE has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while QREE trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas QREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to QREE's ROE of +5.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to QREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check QREE's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, LCNTU has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while LCNTU trades at $460.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas LCNTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to LCNTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to LCNTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check LCNTU's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, WTLC has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while WTLC trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas WTLC's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to WTLC's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW and WTLC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WTLC's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, BERI has a market cap of 146.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while BERI trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas BERI's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to BERI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to BERI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check BERI's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, DVFI has a market cap of 28.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while DVFI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas DVFI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to DVFI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW and DVFI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DVFI's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, IAHL has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while IAHL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas IAHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to IAHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW and IAHL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IAHL's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, ABLE has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while ABLE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas ABLE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to ABLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW is less volatile compared to ABLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRNW.Check ABLE's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, LNKE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while LNKE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas LNKE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to LNKE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW and LNKE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LNKE's competition here

SRNW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRNW stands at 4M. In comparison, TOAOF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRNW is priced at $0.08, while TOAOF trades at $23.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRNW currently has a P/E ratio of -8.10, whereas TOAOF's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, SRNW's ROE is -5.20%, compared to TOAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SRNW and TOAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOAOF's competition here