Sintex Plastics Technology Limited
Sintex Plastics Technology Limited (SPTL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SPTL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPTL.NS | ₹1.06 | +0.00% | 674.3M | -0.16 | -₹6.60 | N/A |
| MOTHERSON.NS | ₹131.49 | +2.13% | 1.4T | 40.71 | ₹3.23 | +0.44% |
| MOTHERSON.BO | ₹131.45 | +2.18% | 1.4T | 40.57 | ₹3.24 | +0.44% |
| BOSCHLTD.NS | ₹37,130.00 | -0.07% | 1.1T | 39.66 | ₹936.31 | +1.38% |
| BOSCHLTD.BO | ₹37,101.65 | -0.15% | 1.1T | 40.77 | ₹910.02 | +1.38% |
| BHARATFORG.NS | ₹1,857.30 | -1.78% | 888B | 82.29 | ₹22.57 | +0.43% |
| BHARATFORG.BO | ₹1,854.35 | -1.95% | 886.5B | 82.01 | ₹22.61 | +0.43% |
| SCHAEFFLER.BO | ₹3,992.30 | +0.30% | 624B | 51.35 | ₹77.75 | +0.88% |
| SCHAEFFLER.NS | ₹3,987.80 | +0.34% | 623.3B | 51.28 | ₹77.77 | +0.88% |
| UNOMINDA.NS | ₹1,051.90 | -1.49% | 607.4B | 50.77 | ₹20.72 | +0.23% |
Stock Comparison
SPTL.NS vs MOTHERSON.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, MOTHERSON.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while MOTHERSON.NS trades at ₹131.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas MOTHERSON.NS's P/E ratio is 40.71. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MOTHERSON.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to MOTHERSON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check MOTHERSON.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs MOTHERSON.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, MOTHERSON.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while MOTHERSON.BO trades at ₹131.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas MOTHERSON.BO's P/E ratio is 40.57. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MOTHERSON.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to MOTHERSON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check MOTHERSON.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs BOSCHLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, BOSCHLTD.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while BOSCHLTD.NS trades at ₹37,130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas BOSCHLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 39.66. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BOSCHLTD.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to BOSCHLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check BOSCHLTD.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs BOSCHLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, BOSCHLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while BOSCHLTD.BO trades at ₹37,101.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas BOSCHLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 40.77. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BOSCHLTD.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to BOSCHLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check BOSCHLTD.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs BHARATFORG.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, BHARATFORG.NS has a market cap of 888B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while BHARATFORG.NS trades at ₹1,857.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas BHARATFORG.NS's P/E ratio is 82.29. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BHARATFORG.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATFORG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check BHARATFORG.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs BHARATFORG.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, BHARATFORG.BO has a market cap of 886.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while BHARATFORG.BO trades at ₹1,854.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas BHARATFORG.BO's P/E ratio is 82.01. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BHARATFORG.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATFORG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check BHARATFORG.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs SCHAEFFLER.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, SCHAEFFLER.BO has a market cap of 624B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while SCHAEFFLER.BO trades at ₹3,992.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas SCHAEFFLER.BO's P/E ratio is 51.35. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SCHAEFFLER.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to SCHAEFFLER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check SCHAEFFLER.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs SCHAEFFLER.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, SCHAEFFLER.NS has a market cap of 623.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while SCHAEFFLER.NS trades at ₹3,987.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas SCHAEFFLER.NS's P/E ratio is 51.28. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SCHAEFFLER.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to SCHAEFFLER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check SCHAEFFLER.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs UNOMINDA.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, UNOMINDA.NS has a market cap of 607.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while UNOMINDA.NS trades at ₹1,051.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas UNOMINDA.NS's P/E ratio is 50.77. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to UNOMINDA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to UNOMINDA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check UNOMINDA.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs UNOMINDA.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, UNOMINDA.BO has a market cap of 606.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while UNOMINDA.BO trades at ₹1,050.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas UNOMINDA.BO's P/E ratio is 53.19. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to UNOMINDA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to UNOMINDA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check UNOMINDA.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs MRF.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, MRF.NS has a market cap of 537.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while MRF.NS trades at ₹126,730.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas MRF.NS's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MRF.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to MRF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check MRF.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs MRF.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, MRF.BO has a market cap of 537.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while MRF.BO trades at ₹126,674.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas MRF.BO's P/E ratio is 29.02. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MRF.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to MRF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check MRF.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs BALKRISIND.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, BALKRISIND.BO has a market cap of 411.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while BALKRISIND.BO trades at ₹2,130.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas BALKRISIND.BO's P/E ratio is 31.42. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BALKRISIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to BALKRISIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check BALKRISIND.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs BALKRISIND.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, BALKRISIND.NS has a market cap of 411.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while BALKRISIND.NS trades at ₹2,128.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas BALKRISIND.NS's P/E ratio is 33.13. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BALKRISIND.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to BALKRISIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check BALKRISIND.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs SONACOMS.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, SONACOMS.NS has a market cap of 360.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while SONACOMS.NS trades at ₹579.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas SONACOMS.NS's P/E ratio is 58.74. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SONACOMS.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to SONACOMS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check SONACOMS.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs SONACOMS.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, SONACOMS.BO has a market cap of 360.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while SONACOMS.BO trades at ₹579.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas SONACOMS.BO's P/E ratio is 58.71. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SONACOMS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to SONACOMS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check SONACOMS.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs ENDURANCE.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, ENDURANCE.BO has a market cap of 358.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while ENDURANCE.BO trades at ₹2,546.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas ENDURANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 37.60. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ENDURANCE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to ENDURANCE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check ENDURANCE.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs ENDURANCE.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, ENDURANCE.NS has a market cap of 358B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while ENDURANCE.NS trades at ₹2,545.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas ENDURANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 37.58. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ENDURANCE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to ENDURANCE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check ENDURANCE.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs EXIDEIND.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, EXIDEIND.BO has a market cap of 293B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while EXIDEIND.BO trades at ₹344.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas EXIDEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 35.39. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EXIDEIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to EXIDEIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check EXIDEIND.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs EXIDEIND.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, EXIDEIND.NS has a market cap of 293B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while EXIDEIND.NS trades at ₹344.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas EXIDEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 34.29. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EXIDEIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to EXIDEIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check EXIDEIND.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs ZFCVINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, ZFCVINDIA.NS has a market cap of 271.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while ZFCVINDIA.NS trades at ₹14,325.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas ZFCVINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 52.49. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to ZFCVINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check ZFCVINDIA.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs ZFCVINDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, ZFCVINDIA.BO has a market cap of 271.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while ZFCVINDIA.BO trades at ₹14,323.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas ZFCVINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 52.51. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ZFCVINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to ZFCVINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check ZFCVINDIA.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs TVSHLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, TVSHLTD.BO has a market cap of 271.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while TVSHLTD.BO trades at ₹13,422.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas TVSHLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TVSHLTD.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to TVSHLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check TVSHLTD.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs TVSHLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, TVSHLTD.NS has a market cap of 271.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while TVSHLTD.NS trades at ₹13,409.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas TVSHLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TVSHLTD.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to TVSHLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check TVSHLTD.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs MSUMI.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, MSUMI.NS has a market cap of 261.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while MSUMI.NS trades at ₹39.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas MSUMI.NS's P/E ratio is 41.90. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MSUMI.NS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to MSUMI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check MSUMI.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs MSUMI.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, MSUMI.BO has a market cap of 261.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while MSUMI.BO trades at ₹39.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas MSUMI.BO's P/E ratio is 41.90. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MSUMI.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to MSUMI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check MSUMI.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs APOLLOTYRE.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, APOLLOTYRE.BO has a market cap of 236.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while APOLLOTYRE.BO trades at ₹372.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas APOLLOTYRE.BO's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to APOLLOTYRE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to APOLLOTYRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check APOLLOTYRE.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs APOLLOTYRE.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, APOLLOTYRE.NS has a market cap of 236.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while APOLLOTYRE.NS trades at ₹371.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas APOLLOTYRE.NS's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to APOLLOTYRE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to APOLLOTYRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check APOLLOTYRE.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs ASAHIINDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, ASAHIINDIA.BO has a market cap of 213.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while ASAHIINDIA.BO trades at ₹837.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas ASAHIINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 69.13. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ASAHIINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to ASAHIINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check ASAHIINDIA.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs ASAHIINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, ASAHIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 213.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while ASAHIINDIA.NS trades at ₹837.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas ASAHIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 69.12. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ASAHIINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to ASAHIINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check ASAHIINDIA.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs CRAFTSMAN.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, CRAFTSMAN.NS has a market cap of 203.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while CRAFTSMAN.NS trades at ₹8,536.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas CRAFTSMAN.NS's P/E ratio is 53.09. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check CRAFTSMAN.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs CRAFTSMAN.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, CRAFTSMAN.BO has a market cap of 203.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while CRAFTSMAN.BO trades at ₹8,529.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas CRAFTSMAN.BO's P/E ratio is 53.05. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CRAFTSMAN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to CRAFTSMAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check CRAFTSMAN.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs MAHINDCIE.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, MAHINDCIE.NS has a market cap of 194.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while MAHINDCIE.NS trades at ₹512.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas MAHINDCIE.NS's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MAHINDCIE.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to MAHINDCIE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check MAHINDCIE.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs BELRISE.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, BELRISE.BO has a market cap of 186.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while BELRISE.BO trades at ₹209.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas BELRISE.BO's P/E ratio is 39.10. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BELRISE.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to BELRISE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check BELRISE.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs BELRISE.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, BELRISE.NS has a market cap of 186.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while BELRISE.NS trades at ₹209.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas BELRISE.NS's P/E ratio is 39.04. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BELRISE.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to BELRISE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check BELRISE.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs SUNDRMFAST.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, SUNDRMFAST.NS has a market cap of 178.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while SUNDRMFAST.NS trades at ₹851.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas SUNDRMFAST.NS's P/E ratio is 30.29. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SUNDRMFAST.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to SUNDRMFAST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check SUNDRMFAST.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs SUNDRMFAST.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, SUNDRMFAST.BO has a market cap of 178.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while SUNDRMFAST.BO trades at ₹850.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas SUNDRMFAST.BO's P/E ratio is 32.24. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SUNDRMFAST.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to SUNDRMFAST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check SUNDRMFAST.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs CIEINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, CIEINDIA.NS has a market cap of 176.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while CIEINDIA.NS trades at ₹464.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas CIEINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CIEINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to CIEINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check CIEINDIA.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs CIEINDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, CIEINDIA.BO has a market cap of 176.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while CIEINDIA.BO trades at ₹464.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas CIEINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CIEINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to CIEINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check CIEINDIA.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs GABRIEL.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, GABRIEL.BO has a market cap of 157.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while GABRIEL.BO trades at ₹1,095.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas GABRIEL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GABRIEL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to GABRIEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check GABRIEL.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs GABRIEL.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, GABRIEL.NS has a market cap of 157.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while GABRIEL.NS trades at ₹1,095.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas GABRIEL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GABRIEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to GABRIEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check GABRIEL.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs JBMA.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, JBMA.BO has a market cap of 147.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while JBMA.BO trades at ₹623.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas JBMA.BO's P/E ratio is 192.44. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to JBMA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to JBMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check JBMA.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs JBMA.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, JBMA.NS has a market cap of 147.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while JBMA.NS trades at ₹622.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas JBMA.NS's P/E ratio is 67.42. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to JBMA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to JBMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check JBMA.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs SHRIPISTON.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, SHRIPISTON.NS has a market cap of 146.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while SHRIPISTON.NS trades at ₹3,316.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas SHRIPISTON.NS's P/E ratio is 26.44. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SHRIPISTON.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to SHRIPISTON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check SHRIPISTON.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs MAHSCOOTER.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, MAHSCOOTER.BO has a market cap of 131.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while MAHSCOOTER.BO trades at ₹11,515.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas MAHSCOOTER.BO's P/E ratio is 36.82. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MAHSCOOTER.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to MAHSCOOTER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check MAHSCOOTER.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs MAHSCOOTER.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, MAHSCOOTER.NS has a market cap of 131.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while MAHSCOOTER.NS trades at ₹11,507.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas MAHSCOOTER.NS's P/E ratio is 42.44. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MAHSCOOTER.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to MAHSCOOTER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check MAHSCOOTER.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs CEATLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, CEATLTD.BO has a market cap of 128B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while CEATLTD.BO trades at ₹3,163.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas CEATLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CEATLTD.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to CEATLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check CEATLTD.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs CEATLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, CEATLTD.NS has a market cap of 127.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while CEATLTD.NS trades at ₹3,162.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas CEATLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CEATLTD.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to CEATLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check CEATLTD.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs MINDACORP.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, MINDACORP.BO has a market cap of 122.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while MINDACORP.BO trades at ₹520.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas MINDACORP.BO's P/E ratio is 43.18. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MINDACORP.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to MINDACORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check MINDACORP.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs MINDACORP.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, MINDACORP.NS has a market cap of 122.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while MINDACORP.NS trades at ₹520.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas MINDACORP.NS's P/E ratio is 43.24. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MINDACORP.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to MINDACORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check MINDACORP.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs LUMAXTECH.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, LUMAXTECH.BO has a market cap of 110.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while LUMAXTECH.BO trades at ₹1,626.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas LUMAXTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 52.33. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LUMAXTECH.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to LUMAXTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check LUMAXTECH.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs LUMAXTECH.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, LUMAXTECH.NS has a market cap of 110.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while LUMAXTECH.NS trades at ₹1,626.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas LUMAXTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 44.56. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LUMAXTECH.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to LUMAXTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check LUMAXTECH.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs SUNCLAYLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, SUNCLAYLTD.NS has a market cap of 109.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while SUNCLAYLTD.NS trades at ₹5,426.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas SUNCLAYLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SUNCLAYLTD.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to SUNCLAYLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check SUNCLAYLTD.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs JKTYRE.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, JKTYRE.NS has a market cap of 106.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while JKTYRE.NS trades at ₹368.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas JKTYRE.NS's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to JKTYRE.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to JKTYRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check JKTYRE.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs JKTYRE.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, JKTYRE.BO has a market cap of 106.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while JKTYRE.BO trades at ₹368.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas JKTYRE.BO's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to JKTYRE.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to JKTYRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check JKTYRE.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs ASKAUTOLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, ASKAUTOLTD.NS has a market cap of 89.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while ASKAUTOLTD.NS trades at ₹455.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas ASKAUTOLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 31.70. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ASKAUTOLTD.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to ASKAUTOLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check ASKAUTOLTD.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs ASKAUTOLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, ASKAUTOLTD.BO has a market cap of 89.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while ASKAUTOLTD.BO trades at ₹455.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas ASKAUTOLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 31.70. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ASKAUTOLTD.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to ASKAUTOLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check ASKAUTOLTD.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs VARROC.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, VARROC.NS has a market cap of 85.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while VARROC.NS trades at ₹560.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas VARROC.NS's P/E ratio is 48.52. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VARROC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to VARROC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check VARROC.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs VARROC.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, VARROC.BO has a market cap of 85.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while VARROC.BO trades at ₹559.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas VARROC.BO's P/E ratio is 48.45. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VARROC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to VARROC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check VARROC.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs BANCOINDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, BANCOINDIA.BO has a market cap of 84.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while BANCOINDIA.BO trades at ₹590.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas BANCOINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 37.42. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BANCOINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to BANCOINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check BANCOINDIA.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs BANCOINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, BANCOINDIA.NS has a market cap of 84.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while BANCOINDIA.NS trades at ₹590.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas BANCOINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BANCOINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to BANCOINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check BANCOINDIA.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs DYNAMATECH.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.NS has a market cap of 73.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while DYNAMATECH.NS trades at ₹10,864.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas DYNAMATECH.NS's P/E ratio is 204.71. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DYNAMATECH.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check DYNAMATECH.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs DYNAMATECH.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.BO has a market cap of 73.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while DYNAMATECH.BO trades at ₹10,861.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas DYNAMATECH.BO's P/E ratio is 204.69. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DYNAMATECH.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check DYNAMATECH.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs BENGALASM.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, BENGALASM.BO has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while BENGALASM.BO trades at ₹6,200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas BENGALASM.BO's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BENGALASM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to BENGALASM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check BENGALASM.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs PRICOLLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, PRICOLLTD.BO has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while PRICOLLTD.BO trades at ₹544.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas PRICOLLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 26.52. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PRICOLLTD.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to PRICOLLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check PRICOLLTD.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs PRICOLLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, PRICOLLTD.NS has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while PRICOLLTD.NS trades at ₹544.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas PRICOLLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 26.46. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PRICOLLTD.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to PRICOLLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check PRICOLLTD.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs SJS.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, SJS.BO has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while SJS.BO trades at ₹1,987.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas SJS.BO's P/E ratio is 38.97. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SJS.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to SJS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check SJS.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs SJS.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, SJS.NS has a market cap of 63.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while SJS.NS trades at ₹1,982.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas SJS.NS's P/E ratio is 38.88. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SJS.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to SJS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check SJS.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs SUPRAJIT.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, SUPRAJIT.BO has a market cap of 57.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while SUPRAJIT.BO trades at ₹417.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas SUPRAJIT.BO's P/E ratio is 36.01. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SUPRAJIT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to SUPRAJIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check SUPRAJIT.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs FIEMIND.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, FIEMIND.BO has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while FIEMIND.BO trades at ₹2,173.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas FIEMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 25.19. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FIEMIND.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to FIEMIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check FIEMIND.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs FIEMIND.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, FIEMIND.NS has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while FIEMIND.NS trades at ₹2,169.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas FIEMIND.NS's P/E ratio is 23.44. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FIEMIND.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to FIEMIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check FIEMIND.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs SUPRAJIT.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, SUPRAJIT.NS has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while SUPRAJIT.NS trades at ₹416.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas SUPRAJIT.NS's P/E ratio is 41.20. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SUPRAJIT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to SUPRAJIT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check SUPRAJIT.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs SHARDAMOTR.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, SHARDAMOTR.BO has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while SHARDAMOTR.BO trades at ₹885.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas SHARDAMOTR.BO's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SHARDAMOTR.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to SHARDAMOTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check SHARDAMOTR.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs SHARDAMOTR.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, SHARDAMOTR.NS has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while SHARDAMOTR.NS trades at ₹882.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas SHARDAMOTR.NS's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SHARDAMOTR.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to SHARDAMOTR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check SHARDAMOTR.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs LGBBROSLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, LGBBROSLTD.BO has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while LGBBROSLTD.BO trades at ₹1,557.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas LGBBROSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LGBBROSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to LGBBROSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check LGBBROSLTD.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs LGBBROSLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, LGBBROSLTD.NS has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while LGBBROSLTD.NS trades at ₹1,556.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas LGBBROSLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LGBBROSLTD.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to LGBBROSLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check LGBBROSLTD.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs LUMAXIND.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, LUMAXIND.BO has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while LUMAXIND.BO trades at ₹5,269.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas LUMAXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 30.36. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LUMAXIND.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to LUMAXIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check LUMAXIND.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs LUMAXIND.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, LUMAXIND.NS has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while LUMAXIND.NS trades at ₹5,257.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas LUMAXIND.NS's P/E ratio is 30.26. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LUMAXIND.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to LUMAXIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check LUMAXIND.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs SUBROS.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, SUBROS.BO has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while SUBROS.BO trades at ₹732.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas SUBROS.BO's P/E ratio is 29.44. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SUBROS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to SUBROS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check SUBROS.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs SUBROS.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, SUBROS.NS has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while SUBROS.NS trades at ₹732.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas SUBROS.NS's P/E ratio is 29.37. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SUBROS.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to SUBROS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check SUBROS.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs SWARAJENG.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, SWARAJENG.BO has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while SWARAJENG.BO trades at ₹3,720.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas SWARAJENG.BO's P/E ratio is 24.12. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SWARAJENG.BO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to SWARAJENG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check SWARAJENG.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs JAMNAAUTO.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, JAMNAAUTO.BO has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while JAMNAAUTO.BO trades at ₹112.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas JAMNAAUTO.BO's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to JAMNAAUTO.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to JAMNAAUTO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check JAMNAAUTO.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs SWARAJENG.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, SWARAJENG.NS has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while SWARAJENG.NS trades at ₹3,711.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas SWARAJENG.NS's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SWARAJENG.NS's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to SWARAJENG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check SWARAJENG.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs JAMNAAUTO.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, JAMNAAUTO.NS has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while JAMNAAUTO.NS trades at ₹112.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas JAMNAAUTO.NS's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to JAMNAAUTO.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to JAMNAAUTO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check JAMNAAUTO.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs WHEELS.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, WHEELS.NS has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while WHEELS.NS trades at ₹1,564.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas WHEELS.NS's P/E ratio is 28.26. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to WHEELS.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to WHEELS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check WHEELS.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs WHEELS.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, WHEELS.BO has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while WHEELS.BO trades at ₹1,563.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas WHEELS.BO's P/E ratio is 28.28. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to WHEELS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to WHEELS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check WHEELS.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs JTEKTINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, JTEKTINDIA.NS has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while JTEKTINDIA.NS trades at ₹128.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas JTEKTINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 46.35. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to JTEKTINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to JTEKTINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check JTEKTINDIA.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs JTEKTINDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, JTEKTINDIA.BO has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while JTEKTINDIA.BO trades at ₹128.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas JTEKTINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 46.26. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to JTEKTINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to JTEKTINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check JTEKTINDIA.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs NRBBEARING.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, NRBBEARING.NS has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while NRBBEARING.NS trades at ₹356.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas NRBBEARING.NS's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NRBBEARING.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to NRBBEARING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check NRBBEARING.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs NRBBEARING.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, NRBBEARING.BO has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while NRBBEARING.BO trades at ₹356.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas NRBBEARING.BO's P/E ratio is 37.54. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NRBBEARING.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to NRBBEARING.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check NRBBEARING.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs SSWL.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, SSWL.BO has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while SSWL.BO trades at ₹210.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas SSWL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SSWL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to SSWL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check SSWL.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs SSWL.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, SSWL.NS has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while SSWL.NS trades at ₹210.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas SSWL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SSWL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to SSWL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check SSWL.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs CARRARO.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, CARRARO.NS has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while CARRARO.NS trades at ₹551.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas CARRARO.NS's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CARRARO.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to CARRARO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check CARRARO.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs SANDHAR.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, SANDHAR.NS has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while SANDHAR.NS trades at ₹511.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas SANDHAR.NS's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SANDHAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to SANDHAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check SANDHAR.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs SANDHAR.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, SANDHAR.BO has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while SANDHAR.BO trades at ₹510.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas SANDHAR.BO's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SANDHAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to SANDHAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check SANDHAR.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs TVSSRICHAK.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, TVSSRICHAK.NS has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while TVSSRICHAK.NS trades at ₹3,610.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas TVSSRICHAK.NS's P/E ratio is 61.74. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TVSSRICHAK.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to TVSSRICHAK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check TVSSRICHAK.NS's competition here
SPTL.NS vs TVSSRICHAK.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, TVSSRICHAK.BO has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while TVSSRICHAK.BO trades at ₹3,603.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas TVSSRICHAK.BO's P/E ratio is 61.73. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TVSSRICHAK.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to TVSSRICHAK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check TVSSRICHAK.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs AUTOAXLES.BO Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, AUTOAXLES.BO has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while AUTOAXLES.BO trades at ₹1,698.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas AUTOAXLES.BO's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AUTOAXLES.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to AUTOAXLES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check AUTOAXLES.BO's competition here
SPTL.NS vs AUTOAXLES.NS Comparison May 2026
SPTL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPTL.NS stands at 674.3M. In comparison, AUTOAXLES.NS has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPTL.NS is priced at ₹1.06, while AUTOAXLES.NS trades at ₹1,692.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPTL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas AUTOAXLES.NS's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, SPTL.NS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AUTOAXLES.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPTL.NS is less volatile compared to AUTOAXLES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPTL.NS.Check AUTOAXLES.NS's competition here