Sportking India Limited

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, PAGEIND.NS has a market cap of 365.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while PAGEIND.NS trades at ₹32,595.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas PAGEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 48.92. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAGEIND.NS's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to PAGEIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check PAGEIND.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, PAGEIND.BO has a market cap of 365.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while PAGEIND.BO trades at ₹32,642.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas PAGEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 48.89. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAGEIND.BO's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to PAGEIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check PAGEIND.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, KPRMILL.NS has a market cap of 319.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while KPRMILL.NS trades at ₹911.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas KPRMILL.NS's P/E ratio is 37.82. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KPRMILL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to KPRMILL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check KPRMILL.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, KPRMILL.BO has a market cap of 318.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while KPRMILL.BO trades at ₹910.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas KPRMILL.BO's P/E ratio is 37.76. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KPRMILL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to KPRMILL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check KPRMILL.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, ALOKTEXT.BO has a market cap of 161.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while ALOKTEXT.BO trades at ₹37.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas ALOKTEXT.BO's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALOKTEXT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is less volatile compared to ALOKTEXT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check ALOKTEXT.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, VTL.BO has a market cap of 155.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while VTL.BO trades at ₹523.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas VTL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.14. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is less volatile compared to VTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check VTL.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, VTL.NS has a market cap of 155.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while VTL.NS trades at ₹522.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas VTL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.14. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is less volatile compared to VTL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check VTL.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, WELSPUNIND.NS has a market cap of 153B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while WELSPUNIND.NS trades at ₹159.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas WELSPUNIND.NS's P/E ratio is 29.39. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WELSPUNIND.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to WELSPUNIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check WELSPUNIND.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, WELSPUNLIV.BO has a market cap of 131B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while WELSPUNLIV.BO trades at ₹137.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas WELSPUNLIV.BO's P/E ratio is 55.96. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WELSPUNLIV.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to WELSPUNLIV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check WELSPUNLIV.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, WELSPUNLIV.NS has a market cap of 130.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while WELSPUNLIV.NS trades at ₹137.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas WELSPUNLIV.NS's P/E ratio is 55.83. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WELSPUNLIV.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to WELSPUNLIV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check WELSPUNLIV.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, TRIDENT.BO has a market cap of 130.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while TRIDENT.BO trades at ₹25.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas TRIDENT.BO's P/E ratio is 31.92. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRIDENT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to TRIDENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check TRIDENT.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, TRIDENT.NS has a market cap of 130.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while TRIDENT.NS trades at ₹25.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas TRIDENT.NS's P/E ratio is 31.91. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRIDENT.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to TRIDENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check TRIDENT.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, SWANENERGY.BO has a market cap of 128.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while SWANENERGY.BO trades at ₹403.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas SWANENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWANENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to SWANENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check SWANENERGY.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, SWANENERGY.NS has a market cap of 127.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while SWANENERGY.NS trades at ₹404.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas SWANENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWANENERGY.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to SWANENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check SWANENERGY.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, MANYAVAR.BO has a market cap of 103.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while MANYAVAR.BO trades at ₹426.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas MANYAVAR.BO's P/E ratio is 28.54. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MANYAVAR.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to MANYAVAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check MANYAVAR.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, ARVIND.NS has a market cap of 96.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while ARVIND.NS trades at ₹365.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas ARVIND.NS's P/E ratio is 23.78. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARVIND.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to ARVIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check ARVIND.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, ARVIND.BO has a market cap of 96.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while ARVIND.BO trades at ₹365.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas ARVIND.BO's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARVIND.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to ARVIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check ARVIND.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, ABFRL.NS has a market cap of 85B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while ABFRL.NS trades at ₹70.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas ABFRL.NS's P/E ratio is -10.01. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABFRL.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to ABFRL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check ABFRL.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, ABFRL.BO has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while ABFRL.BO trades at ₹70.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas ABFRL.BO's P/E ratio is -10.01. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABFRL.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to ABFRL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check ABFRL.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, ALOKINDS.NS has a market cap of 73.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while ALOKINDS.NS trades at ₹14.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas ALOKINDS.NS's P/E ratio is -11.68. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALOKINDS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to ALOKINDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check ALOKINDS.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, PGIL.BO has a market cap of 71.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while PGIL.BO trades at ₹1,557.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas PGIL.BO's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PGIL.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to PGIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check PGIL.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, PGIL.NS has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while PGIL.NS trades at ₹1,555.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas PGIL.NS's P/E ratio is 27.20. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PGIL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to PGIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check PGIL.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, GARFIBRES.BO has a market cap of 65.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while GARFIBRES.BO trades at ₹660.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas GARFIBRES.BO's P/E ratio is 30.79. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GARFIBRES.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to GARFIBRES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check GARFIBRES.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, GARFIBRES.NS has a market cap of 65.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while GARFIBRES.NS trades at ₹661.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas GARFIBRES.NS's P/E ratio is 30.80. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GARFIBRES.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to GARFIBRES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check GARFIBRES.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, ARVINDFASN.NS has a market cap of 60.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while ARVINDFASN.NS trades at ₹468.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas ARVINDFASN.NS's P/E ratio is -362.20. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARVINDFASN.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to ARVINDFASN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check ARVINDFASN.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, ARVINDFASN.BO has a market cap of 60.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while ARVINDFASN.BO trades at ₹468.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas ARVINDFASN.BO's P/E ratio is -362.08. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARVINDFASN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to ARVINDFASN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check ARVINDFASN.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, ICIL.BO has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while ICIL.BO trades at ₹295.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas ICIL.BO's P/E ratio is 35.17. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ICIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to ICIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check ICIL.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, ICIL.NS has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while ICIL.NS trades at ₹296.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas ICIL.NS's P/E ratio is 48.61. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ICIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to ICIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check ICIL.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, GOKEX.NS has a market cap of 57.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while GOKEX.NS trades at ₹776.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas GOKEX.NS's P/E ratio is 50.72. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GOKEX.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to GOKEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check GOKEX.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, GOKEX.BO has a market cap of 57.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while GOKEX.BO trades at ₹775.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas GOKEX.BO's P/E ratio is 50.52. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GOKEX.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to GOKEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check GOKEX.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, RAYMONDLSL.BO has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while RAYMONDLSL.BO trades at ₹921.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas RAYMONDLSL.BO's P/E ratio is 103.77. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RAYMONDLSL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to RAYMONDLSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check RAYMONDLSL.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, RAYMONDLSL.NS has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while RAYMONDLSL.NS trades at ₹921.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas RAYMONDLSL.NS's P/E ratio is 103.63. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RAYMONDLSL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to RAYMONDLSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check RAYMONDLSL.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, GBGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while GBGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹930.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas GBGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBGLOBAL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is less volatile compared to GBGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check GBGLOBAL.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, KITEX.BO has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while KITEX.BO trades at ₹190.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas KITEX.BO's P/E ratio is -22.02. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KITEX.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to KITEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check KITEX.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, KITEX.NS has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while KITEX.NS trades at ₹190.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas KITEX.NS's P/E ratio is -22.04. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KITEX.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to KITEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check KITEX.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, TCNSBRANDS.BO has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while TCNSBRANDS.BO trades at ₹584.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas TCNSBRANDS.BO's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TCNSBRANDS.BO's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to TCNSBRANDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check TCNSBRANDS.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, TCNSBRANDS.NS has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while TCNSBRANDS.NS trades at ₹583.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas TCNSBRANDS.NS's P/E ratio is -11.85. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TCNSBRANDS.NS's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to TCNSBRANDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check TCNSBRANDS.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, KKCL.NS has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while KKCL.NS trades at ₹518.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas KKCL.NS's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KKCL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to KKCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check KKCL.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, KKCL.BO has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while KKCL.BO trades at ₹517.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas KKCL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KKCL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to KKCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check KKCL.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, LUXIND.NS has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while LUXIND.NS trades at ₹950.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas LUXIND.NS's P/E ratio is 22.08. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LUXIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to LUXIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check LUXIND.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, LUXIND.BO has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while LUXIND.BO trades at ₹949.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas LUXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LUXIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to LUXIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check LUXIND.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, RAYMOND.NS has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while RAYMOND.NS trades at ₹394.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas RAYMOND.NS's P/E ratio is 50.64. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RAYMOND.NS's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to RAYMOND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check RAYMOND.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, RAYMOND.BO has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while RAYMOND.BO trades at ₹393.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas RAYMOND.BO's P/E ratio is 50.67. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RAYMOND.BO's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to RAYMOND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check RAYMOND.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, JINDWORLD.BO has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while JINDWORLD.BO trades at ₹26.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas JINDWORLD.BO's P/E ratio is 36.69. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JINDWORLD.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to JINDWORLD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check JINDWORLD.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, JINDWORLD.NS has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while JINDWORLD.NS trades at ₹26.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas JINDWORLD.NS's P/E ratio is 36.61. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JINDWORLD.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to JINDWORLD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check JINDWORLD.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, SIYSIL.NS has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while SIYSIL.NS trades at ₹548.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas SIYSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SIYSIL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to SIYSIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check SIYSIL.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, SIYSIL.BO has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while SIYSIL.BO trades at ₹547.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas SIYSIL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SIYSIL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to SIYSIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check SIYSIL.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, MAYURUNIQ.NS has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while MAYURUNIQ.NS trades at ₹570.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas MAYURUNIQ.NS's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAYURUNIQ.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to MAYURUNIQ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check MAYURUNIQ.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, MAYURUNIQ.BO has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while MAYURUNIQ.BO trades at ₹569.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas MAYURUNIQ.BO's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAYURUNIQ.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to MAYURUNIQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check MAYURUNIQ.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, CANTABIL.BO has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while CANTABIL.BO trades at ₹282.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas CANTABIL.BO's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CANTABIL.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to CANTABIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check CANTABIL.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, BOMDYEING.NS has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while BOMDYEING.NS trades at ₹116.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas BOMDYEING.NS's P/E ratio is 137.39. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOMDYEING.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to BOMDYEING.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check BOMDYEING.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, BOMDYEING.BO has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while BOMDYEING.BO trades at ₹116.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas BOMDYEING.BO's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOMDYEING.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to BOMDYEING.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check BOMDYEING.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, CANTABIL.NS has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while CANTABIL.NS trades at ₹281.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas CANTABIL.NS's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CANTABIL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to CANTABIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check CANTABIL.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, SANGAMIND.BO has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while SANGAMIND.BO trades at ₹466.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas SANGAMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 39.58. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SANGAMIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to SANGAMIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check SANGAMIND.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, SANGAMIND.NS has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while SANGAMIND.NS trades at ₹468.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas SANGAMIND.NS's P/E ratio is 39.55. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SANGAMIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to SANGAMIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check SANGAMIND.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, NITINSPIN.BO has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while NITINSPIN.BO trades at ₹378.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas NITINSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NITINSPIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is less volatile compared to NITINSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check NITINSPIN.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, NITINSPIN.NS has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while NITINSPIN.NS trades at ₹376.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas NITINSPIN.NS's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NITINSPIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is less volatile compared to NITINSPIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check NITINSPIN.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, FILATEX.NS has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while FILATEX.NS trades at ₹46.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas FILATEX.NS's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FILATEX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to FILATEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check FILATEX.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, FILATEX.BO has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while FILATEX.BO trades at ₹46.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas FILATEX.BO's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FILATEX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to FILATEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check FILATEX.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, GANECOS.NS has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while GANECOS.NS trades at ₹752.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas GANECOS.NS's P/E ratio is 49.87. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GANECOS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is less volatile compared to GANECOS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check GANECOS.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, GANECOS.BO has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while GANECOS.BO trades at ₹750.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas GANECOS.BO's P/E ratio is 49.93. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GANECOS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO and GANECOS.BO have similar daily volatility (5.45).Check GANECOS.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, SPAL.BO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while SPAL.BO trades at ₹729.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas SPAL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPAL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to SPAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check SPAL.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, SPAL.NS has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while SPAL.NS trades at ₹732.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas SPAL.NS's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPAL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to SPAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check SPAL.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, GOCOLORS.NS has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while GOCOLORS.NS trades at ₹347.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas GOCOLORS.NS's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GOCOLORS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to GOCOLORS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check GOCOLORS.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, DOLLAR.BO has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while DOLLAR.BO trades at ₹303.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas DOLLAR.BO's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DOLLAR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to DOLLAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check DOLLAR.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, DOLLAR.NS has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while DOLLAR.NS trades at ₹304.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas DOLLAR.NS's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DOLLAR.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to DOLLAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check DOLLAR.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, SPORTKING.NS has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while SPORTKING.NS trades at ₹119.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas SPORTKING.NS's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPORTKING.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to SPORTKING.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check SPORTKING.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, FAZE3Q.NS has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while FAZE3Q.NS trades at ₹558.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas FAZE3Q.NS's P/E ratio is 42.65. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FAZE3Q.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is less volatile compared to FAZE3Q.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check FAZE3Q.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, HIMATSEIDE.NS has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while HIMATSEIDE.NS trades at ₹107.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas HIMATSEIDE.NS's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to HIMATSEIDE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check HIMATSEIDE.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, HIMATSEIDE.BO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while HIMATSEIDE.BO trades at ₹107.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas HIMATSEIDE.BO's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HIMATSEIDE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to HIMATSEIDE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check HIMATSEIDE.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, FAZE3Q.BO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while FAZE3Q.BO trades at ₹560.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas FAZE3Q.BO's P/E ratio is 42.66. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FAZE3Q.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is less volatile compared to FAZE3Q.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check FAZE3Q.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, RAJRILTD.NS has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while RAJRILTD.NS trades at ₹23.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas RAJRILTD.NS's P/E ratio is 57.07. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RAJRILTD.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to RAJRILTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check RAJRILTD.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, SUMEETINDS.NS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while SUMEETINDS.NS trades at ₹23.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas SUMEETINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUMEETINDS.NS's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is less volatile compared to SUMEETINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check SUMEETINDS.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, MONTECARLO.BO has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while MONTECARLO.BO trades at ₹574.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas MONTECARLO.BO's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MONTECARLO.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to MONTECARLO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check MONTECARLO.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, MONTECARLO.NS has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while MONTECARLO.NS trades at ₹575.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas MONTECARLO.NS's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MONTECARLO.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to MONTECARLO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check MONTECARLO.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, RUPA.BO has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while RUPA.BO trades at ₹143.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas RUPA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RUPA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to RUPA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check RUPA.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, RUPA.NS has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while RUPA.NS trades at ₹143.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas RUPA.NS's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RUPA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to RUPA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check RUPA.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, AYMSYNTEX.BO has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while AYMSYNTEX.BO trades at ₹199.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas AYMSYNTEX.BO's P/E ratio is 881.36. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AYMSYNTEX.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is less volatile compared to AYMSYNTEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check AYMSYNTEX.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, AYMSYNTEX.NS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while AYMSYNTEX.NS trades at ₹197.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas AYMSYNTEX.NS's P/E ratio is 805.29. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AYMSYNTEX.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is less volatile compared to AYMSYNTEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check AYMSYNTEX.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, CENTENKA.BO has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while CENTENKA.BO trades at ₹444.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas CENTENKA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CENTENKA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to CENTENKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check CENTENKA.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, CENTENKA.NS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while CENTENKA.NS trades at ₹444.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas CENTENKA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CENTENKA.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to CENTENKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check CENTENKA.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, INDORAMA.NS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while INDORAMA.NS trades at ₹36.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas INDORAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INDORAMA.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to INDORAMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check INDORAMA.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, INDORAMA.BO has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while INDORAMA.BO trades at ₹36.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas INDORAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INDORAMA.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to INDORAMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check INDORAMA.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, AMBIKCO.BO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while AMBIKCO.BO trades at ₹1,348.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas AMBIKCO.BO's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMBIKCO.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to AMBIKCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check AMBIKCO.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, AMBIKCO.NS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while AMBIKCO.NS trades at ₹1,349.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas AMBIKCO.NS's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMBIKCO.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to AMBIKCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check AMBIKCO.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, GHCLTEXTIL.NS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while GHCLTEXTIL.NS trades at ₹80.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas GHCLTEXTIL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GHCLTEXTIL.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is less volatile compared to GHCLTEXTIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check GHCLTEXTIL.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, GHCLTEXTIL.BO has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while GHCLTEXTIL.BO trades at ₹81.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas GHCLTEXTIL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GHCLTEXTIL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is less volatile compared to GHCLTEXTIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check GHCLTEXTIL.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, NAHARSPING.BO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while NAHARSPING.BO trades at ₹207.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas NAHARSPING.BO's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NAHARSPING.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to NAHARSPING.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check NAHARSPING.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, NAHARSPING.NS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while NAHARSPING.NS trades at ₹208.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas NAHARSPING.NS's P/E ratio is 39.06. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NAHARSPING.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to NAHARSPING.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check NAHARSPING.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, RSWM.BO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while RSWM.BO trades at ₹153.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas RSWM.BO's P/E ratio is 91.44. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RSWM.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to RSWM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check RSWM.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, DIGJAMLTD.NS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while DIGJAMLTD.NS trades at ₹82.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas DIGJAMLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DIGJAMLTD.NS's ROE of +1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is less volatile compared to DIGJAMLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check DIGJAMLTD.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, RSWM.NS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while RSWM.NS trades at ₹153.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas RSWM.NS's P/E ratio is 89.88. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RSWM.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to RSWM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check RSWM.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, SARLAPOLY.NS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while SARLAPOLY.NS trades at ₹83.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas SARLAPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SARLAPOLY.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to SARLAPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check SARLAPOLY.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, SARLAPOLY.BO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while SARLAPOLY.BO trades at ₹83.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas SARLAPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SARLAPOLY.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to SARLAPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check SARLAPOLY.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, RUBYMILLS.BO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while RUBYMILLS.BO trades at ₹197.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas RUBYMILLS.BO's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RUBYMILLS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to RUBYMILLS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check RUBYMILLS.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, RUBYMILLS.NS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while RUBYMILLS.NS trades at ₹200.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas RUBYMILLS.NS's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RUBYMILLS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to RUBYMILLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check RUBYMILLS.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, CHEVIOT.NS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while CHEVIOT.NS trades at ₹1,069.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas CHEVIOT.NS's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHEVIOT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to CHEVIOT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check CHEVIOT.NS's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, CHEVIOT.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while CHEVIOT.BO trades at ₹1,073.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas CHEVIOT.BO's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHEVIOT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to CHEVIOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check CHEVIOT.BO's competition here

SPORTKING.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.BO stands at 15B. In comparison, PRECOT.NS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.BO is priced at ₹119.49, while PRECOT.NS trades at ₹483.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPORTKING.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.74, whereas PRECOT.NS's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRECOT.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.BO is more volatile compared to PRECOT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.BO.Check PRECOT.NS's competition here