Steel Partners Holdings L.P.
Steel Partners Holdings L.P. SPLP Peers
See (SPLP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPLP | $38.50 | +11.45% | 737.30M | 3.38 | $11.38 | N/A |
| HON | $222.88 | +0.27% | 143.24B | 25.59 | $8.71 | +2.01% |
| MMM | $153.10 | +2.93% | 82.40B | 19.07 | $8.03 | +1.85% |
| VMI | $325.82 | +1.99% | 6.54B | 18.97 | $17.18 | +0.76% |
| IEP | $9.75 | +0.83% | 5.32B | -5.95 | -$1.64 | +30.67% |
| MDU | $17.43 | +1.07% | 3.56B | 19.15 | $0.91 | +2.63% |
| GFF | $73.41 | +0.85% | 3.45B | 15.20 | $4.83 | +0.90% |
| SEB | $2,470.02 | -1.12% | 2.40B | 24.45 | $101.03 | +0.37% |
| VRTV | $169.99 | +0.02% | 2.31B | 8.58 | $19.82 | N/A |
| BBU | $25.54 | -0.27% | 2.28B | -72.97 | -$0.35 | +0.97% |
Stock Comparison
SPLP vs HON Comparison
SPLP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPLP stands at 737.30M. In comparison, HON has a market cap of 143.24B. Regarding current trading prices, SPLP is priced at $38.50, while HON trades at $222.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPLP currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas HON's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, SPLP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HON's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SPLP is more volatile compared to HON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPLP.
SPLP vs MMM Comparison
SPLP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPLP stands at 737.30M. In comparison, MMM has a market cap of 82.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SPLP is priced at $38.50, while MMM trades at $153.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPLP currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas MMM's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, SPLP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MMM's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPLP is more volatile compared to MMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPLP.
SPLP vs VMI Comparison
SPLP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPLP stands at 737.30M. In comparison, VMI has a market cap of 6.54B. Regarding current trading prices, SPLP is priced at $38.50, while VMI trades at $325.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPLP currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas VMI's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, SPLP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SPLP is more volatile compared to VMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPLP.
SPLP vs IEP Comparison
SPLP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPLP stands at 737.30M. In comparison, IEP has a market cap of 5.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SPLP is priced at $38.50, while IEP trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPLP currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas IEP's P/E ratio is -5.95. In terms of profitability, SPLP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IEP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SPLP is more volatile compared to IEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPLP.
SPLP vs MDU Comparison
SPLP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPLP stands at 737.30M. In comparison, MDU has a market cap of 3.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SPLP is priced at $38.50, while MDU trades at $17.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPLP currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas MDU's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, SPLP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MDU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPLP is more volatile compared to MDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPLP.
SPLP vs GFF Comparison
SPLP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPLP stands at 737.30M. In comparison, GFF has a market cap of 3.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SPLP is priced at $38.50, while GFF trades at $73.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPLP currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas GFF's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, SPLP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GFF's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPLP is more volatile compared to GFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPLP.
SPLP vs SEB Comparison
SPLP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPLP stands at 737.30M. In comparison, SEB has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SPLP is priced at $38.50, while SEB trades at $2,470.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPLP currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas SEB's P/E ratio is 24.45. In terms of profitability, SPLP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SEB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SPLP is more volatile compared to SEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPLP.
SPLP vs VRTV Comparison
SPLP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPLP stands at 737.30M. In comparison, VRTV has a market cap of 2.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SPLP is priced at $38.50, while VRTV trades at $169.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPLP currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas VRTV's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, SPLP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VRTV's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SPLP is more volatile compared to VRTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPLP.
SPLP vs BBU Comparison
SPLP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPLP stands at 737.30M. In comparison, BBU has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, SPLP is priced at $38.50, while BBU trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPLP currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas BBU's P/E ratio is -72.97. In terms of profitability, SPLP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BBU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPLP is more volatile compared to BBU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPLP.
SPLP vs CODI-PC Comparison
SPLP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPLP stands at 737.30M. In comparison, CODI-PC has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, SPLP is priced at $38.50, while CODI-PC trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPLP currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas CODI-PC's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, SPLP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CODI-PC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPLP is more volatile compared to CODI-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPLP.
SPLP vs CRESY Comparison
SPLP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPLP stands at 737.30M. In comparison, CRESY has a market cap of 685.46M. Regarding current trading prices, SPLP is priced at $38.50, while CRESY trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPLP currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas CRESY's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, SPLP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CRESY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPLP is more volatile compared to CRESY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPLP.
SPLP vs MATW Comparison
SPLP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPLP stands at 737.30M. In comparison, MATW has a market cap of 649.01M. Regarding current trading prices, SPLP is priced at $38.50, while MATW trades at $20.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPLP currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas MATW's P/E ratio is -10.62. In terms of profitability, SPLP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MATW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SPLP is more volatile compared to MATW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPLP.
SPLP vs CODI-PB Comparison
SPLP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPLP stands at 737.30M. In comparison, CODI-PB has a market cap of 607.60M. Regarding current trading prices, SPLP is priced at $38.50, while CODI-PB trades at $16.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPLP currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas CODI-PB's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, SPLP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CODI-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPLP is more volatile compared to CODI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPLP.
SPLP vs CODI Comparison
SPLP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPLP stands at 737.30M. In comparison, CODI has a market cap of 594.74M. Regarding current trading prices, SPLP is priced at $38.50, while CODI trades at $7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPLP currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas CODI's P/E ratio is -6.32. In terms of profitability, SPLP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CODI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPLP is more volatile compared to CODI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPLP.
SPLP vs FIP Comparison
SPLP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPLP stands at 737.30M. In comparison, FIP has a market cap of 589.87M. Regarding current trading prices, SPLP is priced at $38.50, while FIP trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPLP currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas FIP's P/E ratio is -3.98. In terms of profitability, SPLP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FIP's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPLP is more volatile compared to FIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPLP.
SPLP vs CODI-PA Comparison
SPLP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPLP stands at 737.30M. In comparison, CODI-PA has a market cap of 576.84M. Regarding current trading prices, SPLP is priced at $38.50, while CODI-PA trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPLP currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas CODI-PA's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, SPLP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CODI-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPLP is more volatile compared to CODI-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPLP.
SPLP vs CRESW Comparison
SPLP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPLP stands at 737.30M. In comparison, CRESW has a market cap of 544.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SPLP is priced at $38.50, while CRESW trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPLP currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas CRESW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPLP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CRESW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPLP is less volatile compared to CRESW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPLP.
SPLP vs TRC Comparison
SPLP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPLP stands at 737.30M. In comparison, TRC has a market cap of 446.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SPLP is priced at $38.50, while TRC trades at $16.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPLP currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas TRC's P/E ratio is 207.69. In terms of profitability, SPLP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TRC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPLP is more volatile compared to TRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPLP.
SPLP vs SPLP-PA Comparison
SPLP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPLP stands at 737.30M. In comparison, SPLP-PA has a market cap of 369.78M. Regarding current trading prices, SPLP is priced at $38.50, while SPLP-PA trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPLP currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas SPLP-PA's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, SPLP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SPLP-PA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SPLP is more volatile compared to SPLP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPLP.
SPLP vs FIPWV Comparison
SPLP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPLP stands at 737.30M. In comparison, FIPWV has a market cap of 328.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SPLP is priced at $38.50, while FIPWV trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPLP currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas FIPWV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPLP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FIPWV's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPLP is less volatile compared to FIPWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPLP.
SPLP vs FBYD Comparison
SPLP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPLP stands at 737.30M. In comparison, FBYD has a market cap of 264.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SPLP is priced at $38.50, while FBYD trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPLP currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas FBYD's P/E ratio is 5.04. In terms of profitability, SPLP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FBYD's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPLP is more volatile compared to FBYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPLP.
SPLP vs RCMT Comparison
SPLP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPLP stands at 737.30M. In comparison, RCMT has a market cap of 168.80M. Regarding current trading prices, SPLP is priced at $38.50, while RCMT trades at $22.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPLP currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas RCMT's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, SPLP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RCMT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SPLP is more volatile compared to RCMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPLP.
SPLP vs TUSK Comparison
SPLP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPLP stands at 737.30M. In comparison, TUSK has a market cap of 118.39M. Regarding current trading prices, SPLP is priced at $38.50, while TUSK trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPLP currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas TUSK's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, SPLP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TUSK's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SPLP is more volatile compared to TUSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPLP.
SPLP vs NNBR Comparison
SPLP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPLP stands at 737.30M. In comparison, NNBR has a market cap of 118.05M. Regarding current trading prices, SPLP is priced at $38.50, while NNBR trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPLP currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas NNBR's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, SPLP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NNBR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SPLP is more volatile compared to NNBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPLP.
SPLP vs IRS Comparison
SPLP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPLP stands at 737.30M. In comparison, IRS has a market cap of 113.21M. Regarding current trading prices, SPLP is priced at $38.50, while IRS trades at $15.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPLP currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas IRS's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, SPLP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IRS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SPLP is more volatile compared to IRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPLP.
SPLP vs FBYDW Comparison
SPLP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPLP stands at 737.30M. In comparison, FBYDW has a market cap of 28.08M. Regarding current trading prices, SPLP is priced at $38.50, while FBYDW trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPLP currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas FBYDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPLP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FBYDW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPLP is more volatile compared to FBYDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPLP.
SPLP vs IGC Comparison
SPLP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPLP stands at 737.30M. In comparison, IGC has a market cap of 24.06M. Regarding current trading prices, SPLP is priced at $38.50, while IGC trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPLP currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas IGC's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, SPLP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IGC's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SPLP is more volatile compared to IGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPLP.
SPLP vs EFSH Comparison
SPLP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPLP stands at 737.30M. In comparison, EFSH has a market cap of 1.88M. Regarding current trading prices, SPLP is priced at $38.50, while EFSH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPLP currently has a P/E ratio of 3.38, whereas EFSH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SPLP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EFSH's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SPLP is less volatile compared to EFSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPLP.