Sleep Number Corporation
Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SNBR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNBR | $9.00 | +8.70% | 203.9M | -9.47 | -$0.95 | N/A |
SN | $120.01 | -0.27% | 16.8B | 37.99 | $3.16 | N/A |
TPX | $65.81 | +1.04% | 13.7B | 30.05 | $2.19 | +0.85% |
MHK | $120.00 | -0.74% | 7.5B | 15.94 | $7.53 | N/A |
WHR | $97.91 | -1.83% | 5.4B | 752.77 | $0.13 | +7.18% |
PATK | $99.98 | -0.02% | 3.3B | 24.03 | $4.16 | +1.95% |
LZB | $38.22 | -0.44% | 1.6B | 16.26 | $2.35 | +2.26% |
MBC | $11.68 | -1.60% | 1.5B | 15.18 | $0.77 | N/A |
LEG | $10.25 | -0.77% | 1.4B | -2.74 | -$3.74 | +1.95% |
MLKN | $20.23 | +0.30% | 1.4B | -37.46 | -$0.54 | +3.69% |
Stock Comparison
SNBR vs SN Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, SN has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while SN trades at $120.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas SN's P/E ratio is 37.99. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is more volatile compared to SN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check SN's competition here
SNBR vs TPX Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, TPX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while TPX trades at $65.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas TPX's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TPX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is more volatile compared to TPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check TPX's competition here
SNBR vs MHK Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, MHK has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while MHK trades at $120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas MHK's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MHK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is more volatile compared to MHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check MHK's competition here
SNBR vs WHR Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, WHR has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while WHR trades at $97.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas WHR's P/E ratio is 752.77. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WHR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is more volatile compared to WHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check WHR's competition here
SNBR vs PATK Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, PATK has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while PATK trades at $99.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas PATK's P/E ratio is 24.03. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PATK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is more volatile compared to PATK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check PATK's competition here
SNBR vs LZB Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, LZB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while LZB trades at $38.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas LZB's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LZB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is more volatile compared to LZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check LZB's competition here
SNBR vs MBC Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, MBC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while MBC trades at $11.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas MBC's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MBC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is more volatile compared to MBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check MBC's competition here
SNBR vs LEG Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, LEG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while LEG trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas LEG's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LEG's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is more volatile compared to LEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check LEG's competition here
SNBR vs MLKN Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, MLKN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while MLKN trades at $20.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas MLKN's P/E ratio is -37.46. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MLKN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is more volatile compared to MLKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check MLKN's competition here
SNBR vs TILE Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, TILE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while TILE trades at $20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas TILE's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TILE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is more volatile compared to TILE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check TILE's competition here
SNBR vs AMWD Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, AMWD has a market cap of 804.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while AMWD trades at $55.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas AMWD's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMWD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is more volatile compared to AMWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check AMWD's competition here
SNBR vs ETD Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, ETD has a market cap of 758.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while ETD trades at $29.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas ETD's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ETD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is more volatile compared to ETD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check ETD's competition here
SNBR vs LOVE Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, LOVE has a market cap of 280.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while LOVE trades at $19.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas LOVE's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LOVE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is more volatile compared to LOVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check LOVE's competition here
SNBR vs COOK Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, COOK has a market cap of 241.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while COOK trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas COOK's P/E ratio is -7.42. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to COOK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is more volatile compared to COOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check COOK's competition here
SNBR vs HBB Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, HBB has a market cap of 228.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while HBB trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas HBB's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HBB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is less volatile compared to HBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check HBB's competition here
SNBR vs VIOT Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, VIOT has a market cap of 218.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while VIOT trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas VIOT's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VIOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is more volatile compared to VIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check VIOT's competition here
SNBR vs FLXS Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, FLXS has a market cap of 193.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while FLXS trades at $36.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas FLXS's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FLXS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is more volatile compared to FLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check FLXS's competition here
SNBR vs KEQU Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, KEQU has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while KEQU trades at $57.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas KEQU's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KEQU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is more volatile compared to KEQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check KEQU's competition here
SNBR vs IRBT Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, IRBT has a market cap of 150.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while IRBT trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas IRBT's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IRBT's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is more volatile compared to IRBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check IRBT's competition here
SNBR vs BSET Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, BSET has a market cap of 150.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while BSET trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas BSET's P/E ratio is 61.71. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BSET's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is more volatile compared to BSET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check BSET's competition here
SNBR vs VIRC Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, VIRC has a market cap of 133.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while VIRC trades at $8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas VIRC's P/E ratio is 6.84. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VIRC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is more volatile compared to VIRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check VIRC's competition here
SNBR vs HOFT Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, HOFT has a market cap of 120.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while HOFT trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas HOFT's P/E ratio is -10.30. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HOFT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is more volatile compared to HOFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check HOFT's competition here
SNBR vs PRPL Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, PRPL has a market cap of 108.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while PRPL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas PRPL's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRPL's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is less volatile compared to PRPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check PRPL's competition here
SNBR vs LCUT Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, LCUT has a market cap of 106M. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while LCUT trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas LCUT's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LCUT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is more volatile compared to LCUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check LCUT's competition here
SNBR vs NVFY Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, NVFY has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while NVFY trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas NVFY's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NVFY's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is less volatile compared to NVFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check NVFY's competition here
SNBR vs NTZ Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, NTZ has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while NTZ trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas NTZ's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NTZ's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is more volatile compared to NTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check NTZ's competition here
SNBR vs CRWS Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, CRWS has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while CRWS trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas CRWS's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRWS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is more volatile compared to CRWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check CRWS's competition here
SNBR vs NCL Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, NCL has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while NCL trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas NCL's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NCL's ROE of -3.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is more volatile compared to NCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check NCL's competition here
SNBR vs ATER Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, ATER has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while ATER trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas ATER's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATER's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is more volatile compared to ATER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check ATER's competition here
SNBR vs EFOI Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, EFOI has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while EFOI trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas EFOI's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EFOI's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is less volatile compared to EFOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check EFOI's competition here
SNBR vs FGI Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, FGI has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while FGI trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas FGI's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FGI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is less volatile compared to FGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check FGI's competition here
SNBR vs AUVI Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, AUVI has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while AUVI trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas AUVI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AUVI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is more volatile compared to AUVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check AUVI's competition here
SNBR vs AUVIP Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, AUVIP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while AUVIP trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas AUVIP's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AUVIP's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is less volatile compared to AUVIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check AUVIP's competition here
SNBR vs FGIWW Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, FGIWW has a market cap of 348.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while FGIWW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas FGIWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FGIWW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is less volatile compared to FGIWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check FGIWW's competition here
SNBR vs WEBR Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, WEBR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while WEBR trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas WEBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WEBR's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is more volatile compared to WEBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check WEBR's competition here
SNBR vs KBAL Comparison July 2025
SNBR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNBR stands at 203.9M. In comparison, KBAL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNBR is priced at $9.00, while KBAL trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNBR currently has a P/E ratio of -9.47, whereas KBAL's P/E ratio is -23.21. In terms of profitability, SNBR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KBAL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNBR is more volatile compared to KBAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNBR.Check KBAL's competition here