Snap-on Incorporated
Snap-on Incorporated SNA Peers
See (SNA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNA | $327.26 | +0.08% | 17.11B | 17.13 | $19.10 | +2.45% |
RBC | $369.65 | +1.48% | 11.62B | 50.71 | $7.29 | N/A |
SWK | $73.80 | +1.75% | 11.42B | 31.27 | $2.36 | +4.50% |
LECO | $195.57 | +0.35% | 10.92B | 24.11 | $8.11 | +1.50% |
ROLLP | $107.15 | -2.99% | 10.13B | 54.95 | $1.95 | N/A |
SWH | $124.86 | +0.22% | 9.13B | 21.57 | $5.79 | +4.50% |
TTC | $75.92 | +0.15% | 7.58B | 19.42 | $3.91 | +1.95% |
ROLL | $212.38 | -3.73% | 6.16B | 105.66 | $2.01 | N/A |
TKR | $73.35 | +0.74% | 5.13B | 15.81 | $4.64 | +1.87% |
RBCP | $123.98 | +0.38% | 3.60B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SNA vs RBC Comparison
SNA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA stands at 17.11B. In comparison, RBC has a market cap of 11.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SNA is priced at $327.26, while RBC trades at $369.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas RBC's P/E ratio is 50.71. In terms of profitability, SNA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RBC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA is less volatile compared to RBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.
SNA vs SWK Comparison
SNA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA stands at 17.11B. In comparison, SWK has a market cap of 11.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SNA is priced at $327.26, while SWK trades at $73.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas SWK's P/E ratio is 31.27. In terms of profitability, SNA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SWK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA is less volatile compared to SWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.
SNA vs LECO Comparison
SNA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA stands at 17.11B. In comparison, LECO has a market cap of 10.92B. Regarding current trading prices, SNA is priced at $327.26, while LECO trades at $195.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas LECO's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, SNA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LECO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA is more volatile compared to LECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.
SNA vs ROLLP Comparison
SNA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA stands at 17.11B. In comparison, ROLLP has a market cap of 10.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SNA is priced at $327.26, while ROLLP trades at $107.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas ROLLP's P/E ratio is 54.95. In terms of profitability, SNA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ROLLP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA is more volatile compared to ROLLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.
SNA vs SWH Comparison
SNA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA stands at 17.11B. In comparison, SWH has a market cap of 9.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SNA is priced at $327.26, while SWH trades at $124.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas SWH's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, SNA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SWH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA is less volatile compared to SWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.
SNA vs TTC Comparison
SNA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA stands at 17.11B. In comparison, TTC has a market cap of 7.58B. Regarding current trading prices, SNA is priced at $327.26, while TTC trades at $75.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas TTC's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, SNA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA is more volatile compared to TTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.
SNA vs ROLL Comparison
SNA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA stands at 17.11B. In comparison, ROLL has a market cap of 6.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SNA is priced at $327.26, while ROLL trades at $212.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas ROLL's P/E ratio is 105.66. In terms of profitability, SNA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ROLL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA is less volatile compared to ROLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.
SNA vs TKR Comparison
SNA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA stands at 17.11B. In comparison, TKR has a market cap of 5.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SNA is priced at $327.26, while TKR trades at $73.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas TKR's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, SNA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TKR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA is more volatile compared to TKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.
SNA vs RBCP Comparison
SNA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA stands at 17.11B. In comparison, RBCP has a market cap of 3.60B. Regarding current trading prices, SNA is priced at $327.26, while RBCP trades at $123.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas RBCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RBCP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA is more volatile compared to RBCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.
SNA vs KMT Comparison
SNA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA stands at 17.11B. In comparison, KMT has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SNA is priced at $327.26, while KMT trades at $22.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas KMT's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, SNA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA is less volatile compared to KMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.
SNA vs HLMN Comparison
SNA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA stands at 17.11B. In comparison, HLMN has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SNA is priced at $327.26, while HLMN trades at $8.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas HLMN's P/E ratio is 83.60. In terms of profitability, SNA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HLMN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA is more volatile compared to HLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.
SNA vs EML Comparison
SNA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA stands at 17.11B. In comparison, EML has a market cap of 146.29M. Regarding current trading prices, SNA is priced at $327.26, while EML trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas EML's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, SNA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EML's ROE of -119761.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA is less volatile compared to EML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.
SNA vs SCX Comparison
SNA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA stands at 17.11B. In comparison, SCX has a market cap of 113.38M. Regarding current trading prices, SNA is priced at $327.26, while SCX trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas SCX's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, SNA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SCX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA is more volatile compared to SCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.
SNA vs PFIN Comparison
SNA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA stands at 17.11B. In comparison, PFIN has a market cap of 41.52M. Regarding current trading prices, SNA is priced at $327.26, while PFIN trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas PFIN's P/E ratio is -56.50. In terms of profitability, SNA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PFIN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA is more volatile compared to PFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.
SNA vs CVR Comparison
SNA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA stands at 17.11B. In comparison, CVR has a market cap of 10.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SNA is priced at $327.26, while CVR trades at $11.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas CVR's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, SNA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CVR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA is more volatile compared to CVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.
SNA vs TBLT Comparison
SNA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA stands at 17.11B. In comparison, TBLT has a market cap of 2.38M. Regarding current trading prices, SNA is priced at $327.26, while TBLT trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.13, whereas TBLT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TBLT's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA is more volatile compared to TBLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.