NuScale Power Corporation
NuScale Power Corporation SMR-WT Peers
See (SMR-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMR-WT | $0.58 | -0.25% | 2.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| GEV | $505.07 | +0.00% | 141.1B | 74.50 | $6.94 | +0.05% |
| CEG | $306.63 | +0.00% | 97.5B | 32.77 | $9.49 | +0.48% |
| AQNU | $19.34 | +2.00% | 13.3B | 37.48 | $0.52 | +4.62% |
| SMR | $35.21 | +0.00% | 10.6B | -26.16 | -$1.37 | N/A |
| BEP-PA | $17.70 | +0.00% | 7.6B | -35.46 | -$0.51 | +5.45% |
| BEP | $26.02 | +0.00% | 7.6B | -26.43 | -$1.01 | +5.45% |
| CWEN-A | $30.24 | +0.00% | 6.5B | 38.42 | $0.80 | +5.24% |
| CWEN | $31.97 | +0.00% | 6.5B | 40.80 | $0.80 | +5.24% |
| ORA | $84.64 | +0.00% | 5.3B | 42.58 | $2.06 | +0.55% |
Stock Comparison
SMR-WT vs GEV Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GEV has a market cap of 141.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while GEV trades at $505.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEV's P/E ratio is 74.50. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GEV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is more volatile compared to GEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs CEG Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CEG has a market cap of 97.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while CEG trades at $306.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEG's P/E ratio is 32.77. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CEG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is more volatile compared to CEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs AQNU Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AQNU has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while AQNU trades at $19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AQNU's P/E ratio is 37.48. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AQNU's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is less volatile compared to AQNU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs SMR Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SMR has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while SMR trades at $35.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMR's P/E ratio is -26.16. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SMR's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is less volatile compared to SMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs BEP-PA Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BEP-PA has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while BEP-PA trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEP-PA's P/E ratio is -35.46. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BEP-PA's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is more volatile compared to BEP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs BEP Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BEP has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while BEP trades at $26.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEP's P/E ratio is -26.43. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BEP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is more volatile compared to BEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs CWEN-A Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CWEN-A has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while CWEN-A trades at $30.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWEN-A's P/E ratio is 38.42. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CWEN-A's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is more volatile compared to CWEN-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs CWEN Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CWEN has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while CWEN trades at $31.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWEN's P/E ratio is 40.80. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CWEN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is more volatile compared to CWEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs ORA Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ORA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while ORA trades at $84.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORA's P/E ratio is 42.58. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ORA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is more volatile compared to ORA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs BEPC Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BEPC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while BEPC trades at $33.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEPC's P/E ratio is -24.48. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BEPC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is more volatile compared to BEPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs AQN Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AQN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while AQN trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AQN's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AQN's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is more volatile compared to AQN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs EE Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while EE trades at $28.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EE's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to EE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is less volatile compared to EE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs ENLT Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ENLT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while ENLT trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENLT's P/E ratio is 25.96. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ENLT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is more volatile compared to ENLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs RNW Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RNW has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while RNW trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNW's P/E ratio is 63.75. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RNW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is more volatile compared to RNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs AY Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while AY trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AY's P/E ratio is 87.96. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is more volatile compared to AY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs RNWWW Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RNWWW has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while RNWWW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNWWW's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RNWWW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is more volatile compared to RNWWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs FLNC Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FLNC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while FLNC trades at $7.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLNC's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FLNC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is less volatile compared to FLNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs NEP Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NEP has a market cap of 985.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while NEP trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEP's P/E ratio is -105.40. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NEP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is less volatile compared to NEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs AMPS Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AMPS has a market cap of 800.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while AMPS trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMPS's P/E ratio is 499.00. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AMPS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is more volatile compared to AMPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs NXXT Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NXXT has a market cap of 326.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while NXXT trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXXT's P/E ratio is -13.45. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NXXT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is less volatile compared to NXXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs ELLO Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ELLO has a market cap of 225.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while ELLO trades at $17.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELLO's P/E ratio is 36.52. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ELLO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is more volatile compared to ELLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs VGAS Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VGAS has a market cap of 162.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while VGAS trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGAS's P/E ratio is -7.58. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to VGAS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is less volatile compared to VGAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs NRGV Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NRGV has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while NRGV trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRGV's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NRGV's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is less volatile compared to NRGV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs AZRE Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AZRE has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while AZRE trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZRE's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AZRE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is less volatile compared to AZRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs SUUN Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SUUN has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while SUUN trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUUN's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SUUN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is less volatile compared to SUUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs BNRG Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BNRG has a market cap of 29.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while BNRG trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNRG's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BNRG's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is less volatile compared to BNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs RAIN Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RAIN has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while RAIN trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAIN's P/E ratio is -4.23. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RAIN's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is less volatile compared to RAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs HLGN-WT Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HLGN-WT has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while HLGN-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLGN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HLGN-WT's ROE of -4.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is more volatile compared to HLGN-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs HLGN Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HLGN has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while HLGN trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLGN's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HLGN's ROE of -4.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is more volatile compared to HLGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs CREG Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CREG has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while CREG trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CREG's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CREG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is less volatile compared to CREG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs ADN Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ADN has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while ADN trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADN's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ADN's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is less volatile compared to ADN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs WAVE Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, WAVE has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while WAVE trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WAVE's P/E ratio is -17.72. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to WAVE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is more volatile compared to WAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs HTOO Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HTOO has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while HTOO trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTOO's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HTOO's ROE of -5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is less volatile compared to HTOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs HTOOW Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HTOOW has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while HTOOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTOOW's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HTOOW's ROE of -5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is more volatile compared to HTOOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs ALCE Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ALCE has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while ALCE trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ALCE's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is less volatile compared to ALCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs ELIQ Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ELIQ has a market cap of 709.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while ELIQ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELIQ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ELIQ's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is less volatile compared to ELIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs ADNWW Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ADNWW has a market cap of 15K. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while ADNWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADNWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ADNWW's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is less volatile compared to ADNWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.
SMR-WT vs LFG Comparison
SMR-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR-WT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, LFG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMR-WT is priced at $0.58, while LFG trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMR-WT's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LFG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMR-WT is more volatile compared to LFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR-WT.