Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. SMFG Peers
See (SMFG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMFG | $15.02 | -0.60% | 97.4B | 12.08 | $1.25 | +2.12% |
| JPM | $291.66 | +0.60% | 807.2B | 14.25 | $20.38 | +1.74% |
| JPM-PD | $24.75 | +0.71% | 797.1B | 1.84 | $13.48 | +1.74% |
| JPM-PC | $25.41 | +0.79% | 785.4B | 1.88 | $13.48 | +1.74% |
| BAC-PL | $1,203.61 | -0.77% | 454.4B | 343.40 | $3.51 | +2.16% |
| BAC | $48.43 | +2.34% | 362.8B | 14.38 | $3.35 | +2.16% |
| BML-PG | $20.86 | +0.84% | 360.4B | 5.90 | $3.51 | +2.16% |
| BML-PH | $20.15 | +0.70% | 357.5B | 5.74 | $3.51 | +2.16% |
| BML-PL | $20.47 | +1.23% | 357.5B | 5.81 | $3.51 | +2.16% |
| BML-PJ | $21.84 | +0.85% | 356.3B | 6.20 | $3.51 | +2.16% |
Stock Comparison
SMFG vs JPM Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, JPM has a market cap of 807.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while JPM trades at $291.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas JPM's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JPM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to JPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs JPM-PD Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, JPM-PD has a market cap of 797.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while JPM-PD trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas JPM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JPM-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to JPM-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs JPM-PC Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, JPM-PC has a market cap of 785.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while JPM-PC trades at $25.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas JPM-PC's P/E ratio is 1.88. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JPM-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to JPM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs BAC-PL Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, BAC-PL has a market cap of 454.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while BAC-PL trades at $1,203.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas BAC-PL's P/E ratio is 343.40. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAC-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is more volatile compared to BAC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs BAC Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, BAC has a market cap of 362.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while BAC trades at $48.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas BAC's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to BAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs BML-PG Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, BML-PG has a market cap of 360.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while BML-PG trades at $20.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas BML-PG's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BML-PG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to BML-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs BML-PH Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, BML-PH has a market cap of 357.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while BML-PH trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas BML-PH's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BML-PH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is more volatile compared to BML-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs BML-PL Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, BML-PL has a market cap of 357.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while BML-PL trades at $20.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas BML-PL's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BML-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is more volatile compared to BML-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs BML-PJ Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, BML-PJ has a market cap of 356.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while BML-PJ trades at $21.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas BML-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BML-PJ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to BML-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs BAC-PB Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, BAC-PB has a market cap of 348.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while BAC-PB trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas BAC-PB's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAC-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is more volatile compared to BAC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs BAC-PK Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, BAC-PK has a market cap of 344.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while BAC-PK trades at $24.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas BAC-PK's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAC-PK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is more volatile compared to BAC-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs BAC-PE Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, BAC-PE has a market cap of 343.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while BAC-PE trades at $21.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas BAC-PE's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAC-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to BAC-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs WFC Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, WFC has a market cap of 265.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while WFC trades at $81.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas WFC's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to WFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs WFC-PC Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, WFC-PC has a market cap of 258.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while WFC-PC trades at $17.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas WFC-PC's P/E ratio is 61.31. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WFC-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to WFC-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs WFC-PL Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, WFC-PL has a market cap of 257.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while WFC-PL trades at $1,172.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas WFC-PL's P/E ratio is 243.17. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WFC-PL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is more volatile compared to WFC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs HSBC Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, HSBC has a market cap of 210.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while HSBC trades at $60.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas HSBC's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HSBC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to HSBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs WFC-PQ Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, WFC-PQ has a market cap of 200.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while WFC-PQ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas WFC-PQ's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WFC-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is more volatile compared to WFC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs WFC-PY Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, WFC-PY has a market cap of 191.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while WFC-PY trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas WFC-PY's P/E ratio is 4.85. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WFC-PY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to WFC-PY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs RY Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, RY has a market cap of 186.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while RY trades at $131.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas RY's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to RY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs WFC-PR Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, WFC-PR has a market cap of 184.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while WFC-PR trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas WFC-PR's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WFC-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is more volatile compared to WFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs BAC-PM Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, BAC-PM has a market cap of 166.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while BAC-PM trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas BAC-PM's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAC-PM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to BAC-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs C Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, C has a market cap of 161.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while C trades at $86.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas C's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to C's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs MUFG Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, MUFG has a market cap of 158B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while MUFG trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas MUFG's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MUFG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to MUFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs BAC-PN Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, BAC-PN has a market cap of 154.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while BAC-PN trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas BAC-PN's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAC-PN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to BAC-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs BAC-PS Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, BAC-PS has a market cap of 147.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while BAC-PS trades at $19.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas BAC-PS's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAC-PS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is more volatile compared to BAC-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs BAC-PO Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, BAC-PO has a market cap of 136.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while BAC-PO trades at $18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas BAC-PO's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to BAC-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs BAC-PQ Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, BAC-PQ has a market cap of 131.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while BAC-PQ trades at $17.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas BAC-PQ's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAC-PQ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is more volatile compared to BAC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs TD Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, TD has a market cap of 129.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while TD trades at $73.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas TD's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to TD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs BAC-PP Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, BAC-PP has a market cap of 129.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while BAC-PP trades at $17.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas BAC-PP's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAC-PP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is more volatile compared to BAC-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs SAN Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, SAN has a market cap of 122.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while SAN trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas SAN's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SAN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to SAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs C-PJ Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, C-PJ has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while C-PJ trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas C-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to C-PJ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is more volatile compared to C-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs UBS Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, UBS has a market cap of 107.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while UBS trades at $34.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas UBS's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UBS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to UBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs RY-PT Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, RY-PT has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while RY-PT trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas RY-PT's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RY-PT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is more volatile compared to RY-PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs BBVA Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, BBVA has a market cap of 87.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while BBVA trades at $15.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas BBVA's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBVA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to BBVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs BMO Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, BMO has a market cap of 80.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while BMO trades at $111.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas BMO's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BMO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to BMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs BNS Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, BNS has a market cap of 69.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while BNS trades at $54.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas BNS's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BNS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to BNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs ING Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, ING has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while ING trades at $22.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas ING's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ING's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to ING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs CM Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, CM has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while CM trades at $71.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas CM's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to CM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs NU Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, NU has a market cap of 65.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while NU trades at $13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas NU's P/E ratio is 30.99. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NU's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to NU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs BCS Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, BCS has a market cap of 64.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while BCS trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas BCS's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to BCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs WFC-PZ Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, WFC-PZ has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while WFC-PZ trades at $19.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas WFC-PZ's P/E ratio is 3.98. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WFC-PZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to WFC-PZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs WFC-PA Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, WFC-PA has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while WFC-PA trades at $19.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas WFC-PA's P/E ratio is 3.95. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WFC-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to WFC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs JPM-PJ Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, JPM-PJ has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while JPM-PJ trades at $20.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas JPM-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.52. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JPM-PJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to JPM-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs WFC-PD Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, WFC-PD has a market cap of 56.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while WFC-PD trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas WFC-PD's P/E ratio is 3.61. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WFC-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to WFC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs JPM-PL Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, JPM-PL has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while JPM-PL trades at $19.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas JPM-PL's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JPM-PL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is more volatile compared to JPM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs JPM-PK Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, JPM-PK has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while JPM-PK trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas JPM-PK's P/E ratio is 1.44. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JPM-PK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to JPM-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs JPM-PM Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, JPM-PM has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while JPM-PM trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas JPM-PM's P/E ratio is 1.35. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JPM-PM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to JPM-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs C-PK Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, C-PK has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while C-PK trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas C-PK's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to C-PK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is more volatile compared to C-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs NWG Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, NWG has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while NWG trades at $13.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas NWG's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NWG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to NWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs EWBC Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, EWBC has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while EWBC trades at $106.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas EWBC's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EWBC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to EWBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs CS Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, CS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while CS trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas CS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to CS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs NTB Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, NTB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while NTB trades at $45.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas NTB's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NTB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to NTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs TANNL Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, TANNL has a market cap of 989.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while TANNL trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas TANNL's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TANNL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is more volatile compared to TANNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs FRC-PL Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, FRC-PL has a market cap of 312.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while FRC-PL trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas FRC-PL's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FRC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to FRC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.
SMFG vs WBK Comparison
SMFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMFG stands at 97.4B. In comparison, WBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMFG is priced at $15.02, while WBK trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMFG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.08, whereas WBK's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, SMFG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WBK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMFG is less volatile compared to WBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMFG.