Grupo Simec, S.A.B. de C.V.
Grupo Simec, S.A.B. de C.V. (SIM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SIM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIM | $30.80 | -5.17% | 5.1B | 25.34 | $1.22 | N/A |
| MT | $67.12 | +2.96% | 51.4B | 16.33 | $4.11 | +0.89% |
| NUE | $175.48 | +0.19% | 40.2B | 23.38 | $7.51 | +1.26% |
| STLD | $191.53 | +0.35% | 28B | 23.94 | $8.00 | +1.04% |
| PKX | $70.55 | +2.07% | 21.4B | 50.44 | $1.40 | +2.38% |
| RS | $316.74 | -0.12% | 16.6B | 23.04 | $13.75 | +1.51% |
| X | $54.84 | +0.00% | 12.4B | 148.22 | $0.37 | +0.09% |
| TX | $43.52 | +1.42% | 8.5B | 15.01 | $2.90 | +6.21% |
| GGB | $4.15 | +1.97% | 8.4B | 14.33 | $0.29 | +2.61% |
| CMC | $74.58 | +0.57% | 8.3B | 19.32 | $3.86 | +0.97% |
Stock Comparison
SIM vs MT Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MT has a market cap of 51.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while MT trades at $67.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas MT's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is more volatile compared to MT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check MT's competition here
SIM vs NUE Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, NUE has a market cap of 40.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while NUE trades at $175.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas NUE's P/E ratio is 23.38. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NUE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is more volatile compared to NUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check NUE's competition here
SIM vs STLD Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, STLD has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while STLD trades at $191.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas STLD's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STLD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is more volatile compared to STLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check STLD's competition here
SIM vs PKX Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, PKX has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while PKX trades at $70.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas PKX's P/E ratio is 50.44. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PKX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is more volatile compared to PKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check PKX's competition here
SIM vs RS Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, RS has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while RS trades at $316.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas RS's P/E ratio is 23.04. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is more volatile compared to RS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check RS's competition here
SIM vs X Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, X has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while X trades at $54.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas X's P/E ratio is 148.22. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to X's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is more volatile compared to X. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check X's competition here
SIM vs TX Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, TX has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while TX trades at $43.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas TX's P/E ratio is 15.01. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is more volatile compared to TX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check TX's competition here
SIM vs GGB Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, GGB has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while GGB trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas GGB's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GGB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is more volatile compared to GGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check GGB's competition here
SIM vs CMC Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CMC has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while CMC trades at $74.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas CMC's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is more volatile compared to CMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check CMC's competition here
SIM vs CLF Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CLF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while CLF trades at $10.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas CLF's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is less volatile compared to CLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check CLF's competition here
SIM vs SID Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SID has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while SID trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas SID's P/E ratio is -7.39. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SID's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is more volatile compared to SID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check SID's competition here
SIM vs WS Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, WS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while WS trades at $43.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas WS's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is more volatile compared to WS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check WS's competition here
SIM vs SCHN Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SCHN has a market cap of 906.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while SCHN trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas SCHN's P/E ratio is 87.37. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SCHN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is more volatile compared to SCHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check SCHN's competition here
SIM vs TMST Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, TMST has a market cap of 895.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while TMST trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas TMST's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TMST's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is more volatile compared to TMST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check TMST's competition here
SIM vs RDUS Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, RDUS has a market cap of 841.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while RDUS trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas RDUS's P/E ratio is -8.36. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RDUS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is more volatile compared to RDUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check RDUS's competition here
SIM vs MTUS Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MTUS has a market cap of 713.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while MTUS trades at $17.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas MTUS's P/E ratio is -95.17. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MTUS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is less volatile compared to MTUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check MTUS's competition here
SIM vs ZEUS Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ZEUS has a market cap of 539M. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while ZEUS trades at $47.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas ZEUS's P/E ratio is 40.91. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ZEUS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is more volatile compared to ZEUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check ZEUS's competition here
SIM vs ASTL Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ASTL has a market cap of 476.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while ASTL trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas ASTL's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ASTL's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is less volatile compared to ASTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check ASTL's competition here
SIM vs USAP Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, USAP has a market cap of 423.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while USAP trades at $44.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas USAP's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to USAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is more volatile compared to USAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check USAP's competition here
SIM vs MSB Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MSB has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while MSB trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas MSB's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MSB's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is more volatile compared to MSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check MSB's competition here
SIM vs ACNT Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 161.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while ACNT trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -53.91. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACNT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is more volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check ACNT's competition here
SIM vs SYNL Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SYNL has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while SYNL trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas SYNL's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SYNL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is more volatile compared to SYNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check SYNL's competition here
SIM vs LUD Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, LUD has a market cap of 143.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while LUD trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas LUD's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LUD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is more volatile compared to LUD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check LUD's competition here
SIM vs FRD Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, FRD has a market cap of 132.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while FRD trades at $18.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas FRD's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FRD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is more volatile compared to FRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check FRD's competition here
SIM vs HLP Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, HLP has a market cap of 77.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while HLP trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas HLP's P/E ratio is 21.10. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HLP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is less volatile compared to HLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check HLP's competition here
SIM vs KBSX Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, KBSX has a market cap of 55.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while KBSX trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas KBSX's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KBSX's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is less volatile compared to KBSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check KBSX's competition here
SIM vs HUDI Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, HUDI has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while HUDI trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas HUDI's P/E ratio is -11.30. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HUDI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is more volatile compared to HUDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check HUDI's competition here
SIM vs ASTLW Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ASTLW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while ASTLW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas ASTLW's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ASTLW's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is less volatile compared to ASTLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check ASTLW's competition here
SIM vs ZKIN Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ZKIN has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while ZKIN trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas ZKIN's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ZKIN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is less volatile compared to ZKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check ZKIN's competition here
SIM vs INHD Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 358.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while INHD trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is less volatile compared to INHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check INHD's competition here
SIM vs MTL-P Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MTL-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while MTL-P trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas MTL-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MTL-P's ROE of -85.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is less volatile compared to MTL-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check MTL-P's competition here
SIM vs MTL Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MTL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while MTL trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas MTL's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is less volatile compared to MTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check MTL's competition here
SIM vs OSN Comparison February 2026
SIM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIM stands at 5.1B. In comparison, OSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SIM is priced at $30.80, while OSN trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIM currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas OSN's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, SIM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SIM is more volatile compared to OSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIM.Check OSN's competition here