D'Ieteren Group SA

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 58.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while CPRT trades at $61.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 40.97. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, PAG has a market cap of 10.43B. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while PAG trades at $156.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas PAG's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PAG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to PAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 10.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while KMX trades at $66.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, SIEVF has a market cap of 8.96B. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while SIEVF trades at $168.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas SIEVF's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SIEVF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to SIEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, LAD has a market cap of 7.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while LAD trades at $298.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas LAD's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LAD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to LAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 6.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while AN trades at $175.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, ZHSHF has a market cap of 6.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while ZHSHF trades at $2.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas ZHSHF's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ZHSHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and ZHSHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 5.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while GPI trades at $411.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to GPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, ATOGF has a market cap of 4.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while ATOGF trades at $21.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas ATOGF's P/E ratio is 212.80. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ATOGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to ATOGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 4.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while ABG trades at $220.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, RUSHA has a market cap of 3.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while RUSHA trades at $48.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas RUSHA's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RUSHA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to RUSHA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, RUSHB has a market cap of 3.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while RUSHB trades at $54.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas RUSHB's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RUSHB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to RUSHB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, USSJF has a market cap of 3.90B. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while USSJF trades at $8.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas USSJF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to USSJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and USSJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, ZSHGY has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while ZSHGY trades at $15.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas ZSHGY's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ZSHGY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to ZSHGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, IHCPF has a market cap of 3.54B. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while IHCPF trades at $9.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas IHCPF's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IHCPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to IHCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while DRVN trades at $17.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is -9.52. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DRVN's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 2.76B. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while ACVA trades at $15.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is -32.02. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, USSJY has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while USSJY trades at $19.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas USSJY's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to USSJY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to USSJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while SAH trades at $62.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to SAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while KAR trades at $19.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 42.58. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to KAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 872.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while CWH trades at $13.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is -27.90. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CWH's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, CARS has a market cap of 746.45M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while CARS trades at $11.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas CARS's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CARS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to CARS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, CYYHF has a market cap of 508.21M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while CYYHF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas CYYHF's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CYYHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and CYYHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, KMUXF has a market cap of 485.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while KMUXF trades at $12.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas KMUXF's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KMUXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and KMUXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, CMEIF has a market cap of 432.95M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while CMEIF trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas CMEIF's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CMEIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and CMEIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 420.34M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while CANG trades at $4.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CANG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 395.99M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while CRMT trades at $47.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is 47.46. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CRMT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, PDGNF has a market cap of 389.23M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while PDGNF trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas PDGNF's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PDGNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and PDGNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, LKKRF has a market cap of 308.09M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while LKKRF trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas LKKRF's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LKKRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and LKKRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 295.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while SDA trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -3.89. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SDA's ROE of -4.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, VTMTF has a market cap of 281.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while VTMTF trades at $0.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas VTMTF's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VTMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to VTMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, AOCIF has a market cap of 273.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while AOCIF trades at $11.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas AOCIF's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AOCIF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to AOCIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 246.18M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while KFS trades at $8.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -26.29. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, MVXM has a market cap of 218.08M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while MVXM trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas MVXM's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MVXM's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and MVXM have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, NWAU has a market cap of 175.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while NWAU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas NWAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NWAU's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and NWAU have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, MTPTF has a market cap of 151.14M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while MTPTF trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas MTPTF's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MTPTF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to MTPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 141.98M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while AZI trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AZI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 111.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while NWTN trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 104.73M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while RMBL trades at $2.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.11M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while LAZY trades at $5.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, CZASF has a market cap of 33.80M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while CZASF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas CZASF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CZASF's ROE of -15.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to CZASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while CZOO trades at $6.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CZOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, GBXXY has a market cap of 26.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while GBXXY trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas GBXXY's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GBXXY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and GBXXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 25.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while JZXN trades at $2.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 20.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while GORV trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GORV's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 13.65M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while UCAR trades at $3.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 9.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while KXIN trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 9.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while VRM trades at $5.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VRM's ROE of -8.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 5.88M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while NWTNW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 4.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while CTNT trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 3.21M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while UXIN trades at $5.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while SFT trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, LMPX has a market cap of 1.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while LMPX trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas LMPX's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LMPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to LMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, PREC has a market cap of 247505.00. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while PREC trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas PREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PREC's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to PREC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, KXINW has a market cap of 59137.00. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while KXINW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas KXINW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KXINW's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to KXINW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, RWGI has a market cap of 24797.00. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while RWGI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas RWGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RWGI's ROE of -3.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and RWGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, SPMI has a market cap of 12766.00. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while SPMI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas SPMI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SPMI's ROE of +2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and SPMI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, MTAM has a market cap of 4995.00. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while MTAM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas MTAM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MTAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and MTAM have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, LASLY has a market cap of 3257.00. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while LASLY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas LASLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LASLY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and LASLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, SFTGQ has a market cap of 1700.00. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while SFTGQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas SFTGQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SFTGQ's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to SFTGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, CALIQ has a market cap of 484.00. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while CALIQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas CALIQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CALIQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to CALIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, LOTZW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.

SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.44B. In comparison, LOTZ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $88.90, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 23.96, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.