D'Ieteren Group SA
D'Ieteren Group SA (SIETY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SIETY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIETY | $92.01 | +1.66% | 9.9B | 18.78 | $4.90 | +45.04% |
| SIEVF | $188.00 | +0.00% | 10B | 19.22 | $9.78 | +42.53% |
| USSJY | $20.89 | +0.00% | 4.8B | 19.90 | $1.05 | +2.88% |
| ATOGF | $17.60 | +0.00% | 3.9B | 42.93 | $0.41 | N/A |
| USSJF | $8.17 | +0.00% | 3.8B | 19.00 | $0.43 | +4.29% |
| ZHSHF | $1.49 | +0.00% | 3.5B | 9.33 | $0.16 | +5.79% |
| IHCPF | $9.80 | +0.00% | 3.5B | 10.43 | $0.94 | +3.63% |
| ZSHGY | $10.54 | +12.73% | 2.5B | -10.23 | -$1.03 | +8.18% |
| CYYHF | $0.27 | +0.00% | 499.3M | 6.79 | $0.04 | +7.16% |
| KMUXF | $12.17 | +0.00% | 485.3M | 24.84 | $0.49 | +0.67% |
Stock Comparison
SIETY vs SIEVF Comparison April 2026
SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SIEVF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $92.01, while SIEVF trades at $188.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas SIEVF's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is -5.95%, compared to SIEVF's ROE of -5.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and SIEVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SIEVF's competition here
SIETY vs USSJY Comparison April 2026
SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.9B. In comparison, USSJY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $92.01, while USSJY trades at $20.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas USSJY's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is -5.95%, compared to USSJY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to USSJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.Check USSJY's competition here
SIETY vs ATOGF Comparison April 2026
SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ATOGF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $92.01, while ATOGF trades at $17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas ATOGF's P/E ratio is 42.93. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is -5.95%, compared to ATOGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and ATOGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATOGF's competition here
SIETY vs USSJF Comparison April 2026
SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.9B. In comparison, USSJF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $92.01, while USSJF trades at $8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas USSJF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is -5.95%, compared to USSJF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to USSJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.Check USSJF's competition here
SIETY vs ZHSHF Comparison April 2026
SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ZHSHF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $92.01, while ZHSHF trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas ZHSHF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is -5.95%, compared to ZHSHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to ZHSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.Check ZHSHF's competition here
SIETY vs IHCPF Comparison April 2026
SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.9B. In comparison, IHCPF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $92.01, while IHCPF trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas IHCPF's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is -5.95%, compared to IHCPF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to IHCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.Check IHCPF's competition here
SIETY vs ZSHGY Comparison April 2026
SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ZSHGY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $92.01, while ZSHGY trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas ZSHGY's P/E ratio is -10.23. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is -5.95%, compared to ZSHGY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to ZSHGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.Check ZSHGY's competition here
SIETY vs CYYHF Comparison April 2026
SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CYYHF has a market cap of 499.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $92.01, while CYYHF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas CYYHF's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is -5.95%, compared to CYYHF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and CYYHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYYHF's competition here
SIETY vs KMUXF Comparison April 2026
SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.9B. In comparison, KMUXF has a market cap of 485.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $92.01, while KMUXF trades at $12.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas KMUXF's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is -5.95%, compared to KMUXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and KMUXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KMUXF's competition here
SIETY vs PDGNF Comparison April 2026
SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PDGNF has a market cap of 389.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $92.01, while PDGNF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas PDGNF's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is -5.95%, compared to PDGNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and PDGNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PDGNF's competition here
SIETY vs AOCIF Comparison April 2026
SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.9B. In comparison, AOCIF has a market cap of 339.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $92.01, while AOCIF trades at $14.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas AOCIF's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is -5.95%, compared to AOCIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and AOCIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AOCIF's competition here
SIETY vs LKKRF Comparison April 2026
SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.9B. In comparison, LKKRF has a market cap of 308.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $92.01, while LKKRF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas LKKRF's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is -5.95%, compared to LKKRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and LKKRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LKKRF's competition here
SIETY vs VTMTF Comparison April 2026
SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.9B. In comparison, VTMTF has a market cap of 256.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $92.01, while VTMTF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas VTMTF's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is -5.95%, compared to VTMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and VTMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTMTF's competition here
SIETY vs MVXM Comparison April 2026
SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.9B. In comparison, MVXM has a market cap of 218.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $92.01, while MVXM trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas MVXM's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is -5.95%, compared to MVXM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and MVXM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MVXM's competition here
SIETY vs CMEIF Comparison April 2026
SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CMEIF has a market cap of 214.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $92.01, while CMEIF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas CMEIF's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is -5.95%, compared to CMEIF's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and CMEIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMEIF's competition here
SIETY vs NWAU Comparison April 2026
SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.9B. In comparison, NWAU has a market cap of 175M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $92.01, while NWAU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas NWAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is -5.95%, compared to NWAU's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and NWAU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NWAU's competition here
SIETY vs MTPTF Comparison April 2026
SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.9B. In comparison, MTPTF has a market cap of 141.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $92.01, while MTPTF trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas MTPTF's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is -5.95%, compared to MTPTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to MTPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.Check MTPTF's competition here
SIETY vs CZASF Comparison April 2026
SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CZASF has a market cap of 101.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $92.01, while CZASF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas CZASF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is -5.95%, compared to CZASF's ROE of +8.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and CZASF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CZASF's competition here
SIETY vs GBXXY Comparison April 2026
SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.9B. In comparison, GBXXY has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $92.01, while GBXXY trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas GBXXY's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is -5.95%, compared to GBXXY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and GBXXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBXXY's competition here
SIETY vs RWGI Comparison April 2026
SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.9B. In comparison, RWGI has a market cap of 929.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $92.01, while RWGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas RWGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is -5.95%, compared to RWGI's ROE of +6.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to RWGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.Check RWGI's competition here
SIETY vs PREC Comparison April 2026
SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PREC has a market cap of 186.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $92.01, while PREC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas PREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is -5.95%, compared to PREC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and PREC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PREC's competition here
SIETY vs LAZYW Comparison April 2026
SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.9B. In comparison, LAZYW has a market cap of 60.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $92.01, while LAZYW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas LAZYW's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is -5.95%, compared to LAZYW's ROE of -4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and LAZYW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LAZYW's competition here
SIETY vs KXINW Comparison April 2026
SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.9B. In comparison, KXINW has a market cap of 59.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $92.01, while KXINW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas KXINW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is -5.95%, compared to KXINW's ROE of -5.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to KXINW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.Check KXINW's competition here
SIETY vs SPMI Comparison April 2026
SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SPMI has a market cap of 12.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $92.01, while SPMI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas SPMI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is -5.95%, compared to SPMI's ROE of +47.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and SPMI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPMI's competition here
SIETY vs MTAM Comparison April 2026
SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.9B. In comparison, MTAM has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $92.01, while MTAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas MTAM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is -5.95%, compared to MTAM's ROE of +2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and MTAM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MTAM's competition here
SIETY vs LASLY Comparison April 2026
SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.9B. In comparison, LASLY has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $92.01, while LASLY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas LASLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is -5.95%, compared to LASLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY and LASLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LASLY's competition here
SIETY vs SFTGQ Comparison April 2026
SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SFTGQ has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $92.01, while SFTGQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas SFTGQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is -5.95%, compared to SFTGQ's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to SFTGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.Check SFTGQ's competition here
SIETY vs CALIQ Comparison April 2026
SIETY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIETY stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CALIQ has a market cap of 484. Regarding current trading prices, SIETY is priced at $92.01, while CALIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIETY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas CALIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIETY's ROE is -5.95%, compared to CALIQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SIETY is less volatile compared to CALIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIETY.Check CALIQ's competition here