Lookers plc
Lookers plc (LKKRF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LKKRF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LKKRF | $0.70 | -6.67% | 308.1M | 3.18 | $0.22 | N/A |
| SIEVF | $216.37 | +0.00% | 11.4B | 22.12 | $9.78 | +36.96% |
| SIETY | $97.60 | -7.16% | 10.3B | 19.92 | $4.90 | +37.80% |
| USSJY | $21.68 | +0.00% | 5B | 19.19 | $1.13 | +2.26% |
| ATOGF | $22.30 | +2.53% | 4.9B | 53.10 | $0.42 | N/A |
| IHCPF | $10.95 | +0.00% | 3.9B | 11.29 | $0.97 | +4.00% |
| USSJF | $8.17 | +0.00% | 3.8B | 19.00 | $0.43 | +4.13% |
| ZHSHF | $0.94 | +0.00% | 2.2B | -9.40 | -$0.10 | +9.19% |
| ZSHGY | $9.05 | -4.54% | 2.1B | -8.70 | -$1.04 | +9.52% |
| CYYHF | $0.27 | +0.00% | 498.4M | 6.79 | $0.04 | +7.18% |
Stock Comparison
LKKRF vs SIEVF Comparison May 2026
LKKRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKKRF stands at 308.1M. In comparison, SIEVF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LKKRF is priced at $0.70, while SIEVF trades at $216.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKKRF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.18, whereas SIEVF's P/E ratio is 22.12. In terms of profitability, LKKRF's ROE is N/A, compared to SIEVF's ROE of -5.97%. Regarding short-term risk, LKKRF and SIEVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SIEVF's competition here
LKKRF vs SIETY Comparison May 2026
LKKRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKKRF stands at 308.1M. In comparison, SIETY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LKKRF is priced at $0.70, while SIETY trades at $97.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKKRF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.18, whereas SIETY's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, LKKRF's ROE is N/A, compared to SIETY's ROE of -5.95%. Regarding short-term risk, LKKRF and SIETY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SIETY's competition here
LKKRF vs USSJY Comparison May 2026
LKKRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKKRF stands at 308.1M. In comparison, USSJY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LKKRF is priced at $0.70, while USSJY trades at $21.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKKRF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.18, whereas USSJY's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, LKKRF's ROE is N/A, compared to USSJY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LKKRF is less volatile compared to USSJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKKRF.Check USSJY's competition here
LKKRF vs ATOGF Comparison May 2026
LKKRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKKRF stands at 308.1M. In comparison, ATOGF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LKKRF is priced at $0.70, while ATOGF trades at $22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKKRF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.18, whereas ATOGF's P/E ratio is 53.10. In terms of profitability, LKKRF's ROE is N/A, compared to ATOGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LKKRF and ATOGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATOGF's competition here
LKKRF vs IHCPF Comparison May 2026
LKKRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKKRF stands at 308.1M. In comparison, IHCPF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LKKRF is priced at $0.70, while IHCPF trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKKRF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.18, whereas IHCPF's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, LKKRF's ROE is N/A, compared to IHCPF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LKKRF is less volatile compared to IHCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKKRF.Check IHCPF's competition here
LKKRF vs USSJF Comparison May 2026
LKKRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKKRF stands at 308.1M. In comparison, USSJF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LKKRF is priced at $0.70, while USSJF trades at $8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKKRF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.18, whereas USSJF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, LKKRF's ROE is N/A, compared to USSJF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LKKRF is less volatile compared to USSJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKKRF.Check USSJF's competition here
LKKRF vs ZHSHF Comparison May 2026
LKKRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKKRF stands at 308.1M. In comparison, ZHSHF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LKKRF is priced at $0.70, while ZHSHF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKKRF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.18, whereas ZHSHF's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, LKKRF's ROE is N/A, compared to ZHSHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LKKRF is less volatile compared to ZHSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKKRF.Check ZHSHF's competition here
LKKRF vs ZSHGY Comparison May 2026
LKKRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKKRF stands at 308.1M. In comparison, ZSHGY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LKKRF is priced at $0.70, while ZSHGY trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKKRF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.18, whereas ZSHGY's P/E ratio is -8.70. In terms of profitability, LKKRF's ROE is N/A, compared to ZSHGY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LKKRF and ZSHGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZSHGY's competition here
LKKRF vs CYYHF Comparison May 2026
LKKRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKKRF stands at 308.1M. In comparison, CYYHF has a market cap of 498.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LKKRF is priced at $0.70, while CYYHF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKKRF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.18, whereas CYYHF's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, LKKRF's ROE is N/A, compared to CYYHF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LKKRF and CYYHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYYHF's competition here
LKKRF vs KMUXF Comparison May 2026
LKKRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKKRF stands at 308.1M. In comparison, KMUXF has a market cap of 485.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LKKRF is priced at $0.70, while KMUXF trades at $12.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKKRF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.18, whereas KMUXF's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, LKKRF's ROE is N/A, compared to KMUXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LKKRF and KMUXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KMUXF's competition here
LKKRF vs PDGNF Comparison May 2026
LKKRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKKRF stands at 308.1M. In comparison, PDGNF has a market cap of 389.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LKKRF is priced at $0.70, while PDGNF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKKRF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.18, whereas PDGNF's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, LKKRF's ROE is N/A, compared to PDGNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LKKRF and PDGNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PDGNF's competition here
LKKRF vs AOCIF Comparison May 2026
LKKRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKKRF stands at 308.1M. In comparison, AOCIF has a market cap of 389M. Regarding current trading prices, LKKRF is priced at $0.70, while AOCIF trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKKRF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.18, whereas AOCIF's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, LKKRF's ROE is N/A, compared to AOCIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LKKRF is less volatile compared to AOCIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKKRF.Check AOCIF's competition here
LKKRF vs VTMTF Comparison May 2026
LKKRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKKRF stands at 308.1M. In comparison, VTMTF has a market cap of 256.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LKKRF is priced at $0.70, while VTMTF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKKRF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.18, whereas VTMTF's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, LKKRF's ROE is N/A, compared to VTMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LKKRF and VTMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTMTF's competition here
LKKRF vs MVXM Comparison May 2026
LKKRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKKRF stands at 308.1M. In comparison, MVXM has a market cap of 218.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LKKRF is priced at $0.70, while MVXM trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKKRF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.18, whereas MVXM's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, LKKRF's ROE is N/A, compared to MVXM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LKKRF and MVXM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MVXM's competition here
LKKRF vs CMEIF Comparison May 2026
LKKRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKKRF stands at 308.1M. In comparison, CMEIF has a market cap of 214.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LKKRF is priced at $0.70, while CMEIF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKKRF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.18, whereas CMEIF's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, LKKRF's ROE is N/A, compared to CMEIF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LKKRF and CMEIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMEIF's competition here
LKKRF vs NWAU Comparison May 2026
LKKRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKKRF stands at 308.1M. In comparison, NWAU has a market cap of 175M. Regarding current trading prices, LKKRF is priced at $0.70, while NWAU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKKRF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.18, whereas NWAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKKRF's ROE is N/A, compared to NWAU's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LKKRF and NWAU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NWAU's competition here
LKKRF vs MTPTF Comparison May 2026
LKKRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKKRF stands at 308.1M. In comparison, MTPTF has a market cap of 141.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LKKRF is priced at $0.70, while MTPTF trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKKRF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.18, whereas MTPTF's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, LKKRF's ROE is N/A, compared to MTPTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LKKRF is less volatile compared to MTPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKKRF.Check MTPTF's competition here
LKKRF vs CZASF Comparison May 2026
LKKRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKKRF stands at 308.1M. In comparison, CZASF has a market cap of 101.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LKKRF is priced at $0.70, while CZASF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKKRF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.18, whereas CZASF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LKKRF's ROE is N/A, compared to CZASF's ROE of +23.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LKKRF and CZASF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CZASF's competition here
LKKRF vs GBXXY Comparison May 2026
LKKRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKKRF stands at 308.1M. In comparison, GBXXY has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LKKRF is priced at $0.70, while GBXXY trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKKRF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.18, whereas GBXXY's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, LKKRF's ROE is N/A, compared to GBXXY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LKKRF and GBXXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBXXY's competition here
LKKRF vs RWGI Comparison May 2026
LKKRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKKRF stands at 308.1M. In comparison, RWGI has a market cap of 619.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LKKRF is priced at $0.70, while RWGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKKRF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.18, whereas RWGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKKRF's ROE is N/A, compared to RWGI's ROE of +6.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LKKRF is less volatile compared to RWGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKKRF.Check RWGI's competition here
LKKRF vs PREC Comparison May 2026
LKKRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKKRF stands at 308.1M. In comparison, PREC has a market cap of 489.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LKKRF is priced at $0.70, while PREC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKKRF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.18, whereas PREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKKRF's ROE is N/A, compared to PREC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LKKRF is less volatile compared to PREC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKKRF.Check PREC's competition here
LKKRF vs LAZYW Comparison May 2026
LKKRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKKRF stands at 308.1M. In comparison, LAZYW has a market cap of 60.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LKKRF is priced at $0.70, while LAZYW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKKRF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.18, whereas LAZYW's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LKKRF's ROE is N/A, compared to LAZYW's ROE of -4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LKKRF and LAZYW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LAZYW's competition here
LKKRF vs KXINW Comparison May 2026
LKKRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKKRF stands at 308.1M. In comparison, KXINW has a market cap of 59.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LKKRF is priced at $0.70, while KXINW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKKRF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.18, whereas KXINW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LKKRF's ROE is N/A, compared to KXINW's ROE of -4.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LKKRF is less volatile compared to KXINW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKKRF.Check KXINW's competition here
LKKRF vs SPMI Comparison May 2026
LKKRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKKRF stands at 308.1M. In comparison, SPMI has a market cap of 12.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LKKRF is priced at $0.70, while SPMI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKKRF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.18, whereas SPMI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKKRF's ROE is N/A, compared to SPMI's ROE of +47.84%. Regarding short-term risk, LKKRF and SPMI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPMI's competition here
LKKRF vs MTAM Comparison May 2026
LKKRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKKRF stands at 308.1M. In comparison, MTAM has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, LKKRF is priced at $0.70, while MTAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKKRF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.18, whereas MTAM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LKKRF's ROE is N/A, compared to MTAM's ROE of +2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LKKRF and MTAM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MTAM's competition here
LKKRF vs LASLY Comparison May 2026
LKKRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKKRF stands at 308.1M. In comparison, LASLY has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LKKRF is priced at $0.70, while LASLY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKKRF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.18, whereas LASLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKKRF's ROE is N/A, compared to LASLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LKKRF and LASLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LASLY's competition here
LKKRF vs SFTGQ Comparison May 2026
LKKRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKKRF stands at 308.1M. In comparison, SFTGQ has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LKKRF is priced at $0.70, while SFTGQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKKRF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.18, whereas SFTGQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LKKRF's ROE is N/A, compared to SFTGQ's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LKKRF is less volatile compared to SFTGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKKRF.Check SFTGQ's competition here
LKKRF vs CALIQ Comparison May 2026
LKKRF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKKRF stands at 308.1M. In comparison, CALIQ has a market cap of 484. Regarding current trading prices, LKKRF is priced at $0.70, while CALIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKKRF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.18, whereas CALIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKKRF's ROE is N/A, compared to CALIQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LKKRF is less volatile compared to CALIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKKRF.Check CALIQ's competition here