China ZhengTong Auto Services Holdings Limited
China ZhengTong Auto Services Holdings Limited (CZASF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CZASF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZASF | $0.01 | +0.00% | 101.2M | -0.17 | -$0.06 | N/A |
| SIEVF | $216.37 | +0.00% | 11.4B | 22.12 | $9.78 | +36.96% |
| SIETY | $97.60 | -7.16% | 10.3B | 19.92 | $4.90 | +37.80% |
| USSJY | $21.68 | +0.00% | 5B | 19.19 | $1.13 | +2.26% |
| ATOGF | $22.30 | +2.53% | 4.9B | 53.10 | $0.42 | N/A |
| IHCPF | $10.95 | +0.00% | 3.9B | 11.29 | $0.97 | +4.00% |
| USSJF | $8.17 | +0.00% | 3.8B | 19.00 | $0.43 | +4.13% |
| ZHSHF | $0.94 | +0.00% | 2.2B | -9.40 | -$0.10 | +9.19% |
| ZSHGY | $9.05 | -4.54% | 2.1B | -8.70 | -$1.04 | +9.52% |
| CYYHF | $0.27 | +0.00% | 498.4M | 6.79 | $0.04 | +7.18% |
Stock Comparison
CZASF vs SIEVF Comparison May 2026
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, SIEVF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while SIEVF trades at $216.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SIEVF's P/E ratio is 22.12. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is +23.33%, compared to SIEVF's ROE of -5.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF and SIEVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SIEVF's competition here
CZASF vs SIETY Comparison May 2026
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, SIETY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while SIETY trades at $97.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SIETY's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is +23.33%, compared to SIETY's ROE of -5.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF and SIETY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SIETY's competition here
CZASF vs USSJY Comparison May 2026
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, USSJY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while USSJY trades at $21.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas USSJY's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is +23.33%, compared to USSJY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is less volatile compared to USSJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check USSJY's competition here
CZASF vs ATOGF Comparison May 2026
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, ATOGF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while ATOGF trades at $22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ATOGF's P/E ratio is 53.10. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is +23.33%, compared to ATOGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF and ATOGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATOGF's competition here
CZASF vs IHCPF Comparison May 2026
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, IHCPF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while IHCPF trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas IHCPF's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is +23.33%, compared to IHCPF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is less volatile compared to IHCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check IHCPF's competition here
CZASF vs USSJF Comparison May 2026
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, USSJF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while USSJF trades at $8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas USSJF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is +23.33%, compared to USSJF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is less volatile compared to USSJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check USSJF's competition here
CZASF vs ZHSHF Comparison May 2026
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, ZHSHF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while ZHSHF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ZHSHF's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is +23.33%, compared to ZHSHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is less volatile compared to ZHSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check ZHSHF's competition here
CZASF vs ZSHGY Comparison May 2026
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, ZSHGY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while ZSHGY trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ZSHGY's P/E ratio is -8.70. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is +23.33%, compared to ZSHGY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF and ZSHGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZSHGY's competition here
CZASF vs CYYHF Comparison May 2026
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, CYYHF has a market cap of 498.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while CYYHF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CYYHF's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is +23.33%, compared to CYYHF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF and CYYHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYYHF's competition here
CZASF vs KMUXF Comparison May 2026
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, KMUXF has a market cap of 485.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while KMUXF trades at $12.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas KMUXF's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is +23.33%, compared to KMUXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF and KMUXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KMUXF's competition here
CZASF vs PDGNF Comparison May 2026
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, PDGNF has a market cap of 389.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while PDGNF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas PDGNF's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is +23.33%, compared to PDGNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF and PDGNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PDGNF's competition here
CZASF vs AOCIF Comparison May 2026
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, AOCIF has a market cap of 389M. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while AOCIF trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas AOCIF's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is +23.33%, compared to AOCIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is less volatile compared to AOCIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check AOCIF's competition here
CZASF vs LKKRF Comparison May 2026
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, LKKRF has a market cap of 308.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while LKKRF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas LKKRF's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is +23.33%, compared to LKKRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF and LKKRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LKKRF's competition here
CZASF vs VTMTF Comparison May 2026
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, VTMTF has a market cap of 256.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while VTMTF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas VTMTF's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is +23.33%, compared to VTMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF and VTMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTMTF's competition here
CZASF vs MVXM Comparison May 2026
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, MVXM has a market cap of 218.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while MVXM trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas MVXM's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is +23.33%, compared to MVXM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF and MVXM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MVXM's competition here
CZASF vs CMEIF Comparison May 2026
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, CMEIF has a market cap of 214.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while CMEIF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CMEIF's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is +23.33%, compared to CMEIF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF and CMEIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMEIF's competition here
CZASF vs NWAU Comparison May 2026
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, NWAU has a market cap of 175M. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while NWAU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas NWAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is +23.33%, compared to NWAU's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF and NWAU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NWAU's competition here
CZASF vs MTPTF Comparison May 2026
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, MTPTF has a market cap of 141.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while MTPTF trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas MTPTF's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is +23.33%, compared to MTPTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is less volatile compared to MTPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check MTPTF's competition here
CZASF vs GBXXY Comparison May 2026
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, GBXXY has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while GBXXY trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas GBXXY's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is +23.33%, compared to GBXXY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF and GBXXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBXXY's competition here
CZASF vs RWGI Comparison May 2026
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, RWGI has a market cap of 619.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while RWGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas RWGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is +23.33%, compared to RWGI's ROE of +6.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is less volatile compared to RWGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check RWGI's competition here
CZASF vs PREC Comparison May 2026
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, PREC has a market cap of 489.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while PREC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas PREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is +23.33%, compared to PREC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is less volatile compared to PREC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check PREC's competition here
CZASF vs LAZYW Comparison May 2026
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, LAZYW has a market cap of 60.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while LAZYW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas LAZYW's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is +23.33%, compared to LAZYW's ROE of -4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF and LAZYW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LAZYW's competition here
CZASF vs KXINW Comparison May 2026
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, KXINW has a market cap of 59.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while KXINW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas KXINW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is +23.33%, compared to KXINW's ROE of -4.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is less volatile compared to KXINW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check KXINW's competition here
CZASF vs SPMI Comparison May 2026
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, SPMI has a market cap of 12.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while SPMI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SPMI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is +23.33%, compared to SPMI's ROE of +47.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF and SPMI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPMI's competition here
CZASF vs MTAM Comparison May 2026
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, MTAM has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while MTAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas MTAM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is +23.33%, compared to MTAM's ROE of +2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF and MTAM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MTAM's competition here
CZASF vs LASLY Comparison May 2026
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, LASLY has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while LASLY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas LASLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is +23.33%, compared to LASLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF and LASLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LASLY's competition here
CZASF vs SFTGQ Comparison May 2026
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, SFTGQ has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while SFTGQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SFTGQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is +23.33%, compared to SFTGQ's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is less volatile compared to SFTGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check SFTGQ's competition here
CZASF vs CALIQ Comparison May 2026
CZASF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZASF stands at 101.2M. In comparison, CALIQ has a market cap of 484. Regarding current trading prices, CZASF is priced at $0.01, while CALIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZASF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CALIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZASF's ROE is +23.33%, compared to CALIQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CZASF is less volatile compared to CALIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZASF.Check CALIQ's competition here