Pendragon PLC

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, SIEVF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while SIEVF trades at $216.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas SIEVF's P/E ratio is 22.12. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SIEVF's ROE of -5.97%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and SIEVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SIEVF's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, SIETY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while SIETY trades at $97.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas SIETY's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SIETY's ROE of -5.95%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and SIETY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SIETY's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, USSJY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while USSJY trades at $21.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas USSJY's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USSJY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF is less volatile compared to USSJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDGNF.Check USSJY's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, ATOGF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while ATOGF trades at $22.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas ATOGF's P/E ratio is 53.10. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATOGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and ATOGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATOGF's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, IHCPF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while IHCPF trades at $10.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas IHCPF's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IHCPF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF is less volatile compared to IHCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDGNF.Check IHCPF's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, USSJF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while USSJF trades at $8.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas USSJF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USSJF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF is less volatile compared to USSJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDGNF.Check USSJF's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, ZHSHF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while ZHSHF trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas ZHSHF's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZHSHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF is less volatile compared to ZHSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDGNF.Check ZHSHF's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, ZSHGY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while ZSHGY trades at $9.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas ZSHGY's P/E ratio is -8.70. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZSHGY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and ZSHGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZSHGY's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, CYYHF has a market cap of 498.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while CYYHF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas CYYHF's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CYYHF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and CYYHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYYHF's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, KMUXF has a market cap of 485.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while KMUXF trades at $12.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas KMUXF's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KMUXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and KMUXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KMUXF's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, AOCIF has a market cap of 389M. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while AOCIF trades at $16.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas AOCIF's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AOCIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF is less volatile compared to AOCIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDGNF.Check AOCIF's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, LKKRF has a market cap of 308.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while LKKRF trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas LKKRF's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LKKRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and LKKRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LKKRF's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, VTMTF has a market cap of 256.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while VTMTF trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas VTMTF's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and VTMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTMTF's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, MVXM has a market cap of 218.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while MVXM trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas MVXM's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MVXM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and MVXM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MVXM's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, CMEIF has a market cap of 214.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while CMEIF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas CMEIF's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMEIF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and CMEIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMEIF's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, NWAU has a market cap of 175M. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while NWAU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas NWAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWAU's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and NWAU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NWAU's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, MTPTF has a market cap of 141.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while MTPTF trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas MTPTF's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTPTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF is less volatile compared to MTPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDGNF.Check MTPTF's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, CZASF has a market cap of 101.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while CZASF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas CZASF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CZASF's ROE of +23.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and CZASF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CZASF's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, GBXXY has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while GBXXY trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas GBXXY's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBXXY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and GBXXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBXXY's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, RWGI has a market cap of 619.9K. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while RWGI trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas RWGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RWGI's ROE of +6.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF is less volatile compared to RWGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDGNF.Check RWGI's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, PREC has a market cap of 489.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while PREC trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas PREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PREC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF is less volatile compared to PREC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDGNF.Check PREC's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, LAZYW has a market cap of 60.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while LAZYW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas LAZYW's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LAZYW's ROE of -4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and LAZYW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LAZYW's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, KXINW has a market cap of 59.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while KXINW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas KXINW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KXINW's ROE of -4.98%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF is less volatile compared to KXINW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDGNF.Check KXINW's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, SPMI has a market cap of 12.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while SPMI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas SPMI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPMI's ROE of +47.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and SPMI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPMI's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, MTAM has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while MTAM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas MTAM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTAM's ROE of +2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and MTAM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MTAM's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, LASLY has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while LASLY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas LASLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LASLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF and LASLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LASLY's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, SFTGQ has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while SFTGQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas SFTGQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFTGQ's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF is less volatile compared to SFTGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDGNF.Check SFTGQ's competition here

PDGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PDGNF stands at 389.2M. In comparison, CALIQ has a market cap of 484. Regarding current trading prices, PDGNF is priced at $4.50, while CALIQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PDGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.77, whereas CALIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDGNF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CALIQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PDGNF is less volatile compared to CALIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDGNF.Check CALIQ's competition here