China Yongda Automobiles Services Holdings Limited
China Yongda Automobiles Services Holdings Limited (CYYHF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CYYHF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYYHF | $0.27 | +0.00% | 498.4M | 6.79 | $0.04 | +7.18% |
| SIEVF | $216.37 | +0.00% | 11.4B | 22.12 | $9.78 | +36.96% |
| SIETY | $97.60 | -7.16% | 10.3B | 19.92 | $4.90 | +37.80% |
| USSJY | $21.68 | +0.00% | 5B | 19.19 | $1.13 | +2.26% |
| ATOGF | $22.30 | +2.53% | 4.9B | 53.10 | $0.42 | N/A |
| IHCPF | $10.95 | +0.00% | 3.9B | 11.29 | $0.97 | +4.00% |
| USSJF | $8.17 | +0.00% | 3.8B | 19.00 | $0.43 | +4.13% |
| ZHSHF | $0.94 | +0.00% | 2.2B | -9.40 | -$0.10 | +9.19% |
| ZSHGY | $9.05 | -4.54% | 2.1B | -8.70 | -$1.04 | +9.52% |
| KMUXF | $12.17 | +0.00% | 485.3M | 24.84 | $0.49 | +0.67% |
Stock Comparison
CYYHF vs SIEVF Comparison May 2026
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 498.4M. In comparison, SIEVF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while SIEVF trades at $216.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas SIEVF's P/E ratio is 22.12. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is -0.54%, compared to SIEVF's ROE of -5.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and SIEVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SIEVF's competition here
CYYHF vs SIETY Comparison May 2026
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 498.4M. In comparison, SIETY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while SIETY trades at $97.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas SIETY's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is -0.54%, compared to SIETY's ROE of -5.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and SIETY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SIETY's competition here
CYYHF vs USSJY Comparison May 2026
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 498.4M. In comparison, USSJY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while USSJY trades at $21.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas USSJY's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is -0.54%, compared to USSJY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF is less volatile compared to USSJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYYHF.Check USSJY's competition here
CYYHF vs ATOGF Comparison May 2026
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 498.4M. In comparison, ATOGF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while ATOGF trades at $22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas ATOGF's P/E ratio is 53.10. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is -0.54%, compared to ATOGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and ATOGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATOGF's competition here
CYYHF vs IHCPF Comparison May 2026
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 498.4M. In comparison, IHCPF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while IHCPF trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas IHCPF's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is -0.54%, compared to IHCPF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF is less volatile compared to IHCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYYHF.Check IHCPF's competition here
CYYHF vs USSJF Comparison May 2026
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 498.4M. In comparison, USSJF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while USSJF trades at $8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas USSJF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is -0.54%, compared to USSJF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF is less volatile compared to USSJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYYHF.Check USSJF's competition here
CYYHF vs ZHSHF Comparison May 2026
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 498.4M. In comparison, ZHSHF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while ZHSHF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas ZHSHF's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is -0.54%, compared to ZHSHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF is less volatile compared to ZHSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYYHF.Check ZHSHF's competition here
CYYHF vs ZSHGY Comparison May 2026
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 498.4M. In comparison, ZSHGY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while ZSHGY trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas ZSHGY's P/E ratio is -8.70. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is -0.54%, compared to ZSHGY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and ZSHGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZSHGY's competition here
CYYHF vs KMUXF Comparison May 2026
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 498.4M. In comparison, KMUXF has a market cap of 485.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while KMUXF trades at $12.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas KMUXF's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is -0.54%, compared to KMUXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and KMUXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KMUXF's competition here
CYYHF vs PDGNF Comparison May 2026
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 498.4M. In comparison, PDGNF has a market cap of 389.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while PDGNF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas PDGNF's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is -0.54%, compared to PDGNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and PDGNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PDGNF's competition here
CYYHF vs AOCIF Comparison May 2026
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 498.4M. In comparison, AOCIF has a market cap of 389M. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while AOCIF trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas AOCIF's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is -0.54%, compared to AOCIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF is less volatile compared to AOCIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYYHF.Check AOCIF's competition here
CYYHF vs LKKRF Comparison May 2026
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 498.4M. In comparison, LKKRF has a market cap of 308.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while LKKRF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas LKKRF's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is -0.54%, compared to LKKRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and LKKRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LKKRF's competition here
CYYHF vs VTMTF Comparison May 2026
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 498.4M. In comparison, VTMTF has a market cap of 256.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while VTMTF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas VTMTF's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is -0.54%, compared to VTMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and VTMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTMTF's competition here
CYYHF vs MVXM Comparison May 2026
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 498.4M. In comparison, MVXM has a market cap of 218.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while MVXM trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas MVXM's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is -0.54%, compared to MVXM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and MVXM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MVXM's competition here
CYYHF vs CMEIF Comparison May 2026
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 498.4M. In comparison, CMEIF has a market cap of 214.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while CMEIF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas CMEIF's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is -0.54%, compared to CMEIF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and CMEIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMEIF's competition here
CYYHF vs NWAU Comparison May 2026
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 498.4M. In comparison, NWAU has a market cap of 175M. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while NWAU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas NWAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is -0.54%, compared to NWAU's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and NWAU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NWAU's competition here
CYYHF vs MTPTF Comparison May 2026
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 498.4M. In comparison, MTPTF has a market cap of 141.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while MTPTF trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas MTPTF's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is -0.54%, compared to MTPTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF is less volatile compared to MTPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYYHF.Check MTPTF's competition here
CYYHF vs CZASF Comparison May 2026
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 498.4M. In comparison, CZASF has a market cap of 101.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while CZASF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas CZASF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is -0.54%, compared to CZASF's ROE of +23.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and CZASF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CZASF's competition here
CYYHF vs GBXXY Comparison May 2026
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 498.4M. In comparison, GBXXY has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while GBXXY trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas GBXXY's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is -0.54%, compared to GBXXY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and GBXXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBXXY's competition here
CYYHF vs RWGI Comparison May 2026
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 498.4M. In comparison, RWGI has a market cap of 619.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while RWGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas RWGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is -0.54%, compared to RWGI's ROE of +6.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF is less volatile compared to RWGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYYHF.Check RWGI's competition here
CYYHF vs PREC Comparison May 2026
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 498.4M. In comparison, PREC has a market cap of 489.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while PREC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas PREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is -0.54%, compared to PREC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF is less volatile compared to PREC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYYHF.Check PREC's competition here
CYYHF vs LAZYW Comparison May 2026
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 498.4M. In comparison, LAZYW has a market cap of 60.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while LAZYW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas LAZYW's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is -0.54%, compared to LAZYW's ROE of -4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and LAZYW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LAZYW's competition here
CYYHF vs KXINW Comparison May 2026
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 498.4M. In comparison, KXINW has a market cap of 59.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while KXINW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas KXINW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is -0.54%, compared to KXINW's ROE of -4.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF is less volatile compared to KXINW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYYHF.Check KXINW's competition here
CYYHF vs SPMI Comparison May 2026
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 498.4M. In comparison, SPMI has a market cap of 12.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while SPMI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas SPMI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is -0.54%, compared to SPMI's ROE of +47.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and SPMI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPMI's competition here
CYYHF vs MTAM Comparison May 2026
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 498.4M. In comparison, MTAM has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while MTAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas MTAM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is -0.54%, compared to MTAM's ROE of +2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and MTAM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MTAM's competition here
CYYHF vs LASLY Comparison May 2026
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 498.4M. In comparison, LASLY has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while LASLY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas LASLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is -0.54%, compared to LASLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and LASLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LASLY's competition here
CYYHF vs SFTGQ Comparison May 2026
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 498.4M. In comparison, SFTGQ has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while SFTGQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas SFTGQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is -0.54%, compared to SFTGQ's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF is less volatile compared to SFTGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYYHF.Check SFTGQ's competition here
CYYHF vs CALIQ Comparison May 2026
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 498.4M. In comparison, CALIQ has a market cap of 484. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while CALIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas CALIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is -0.54%, compared to CALIQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF is less volatile compared to CALIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYYHF.Check CALIQ's competition here