Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MT has a market cap of 51.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while MT trades at $67.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas MT's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is more volatile compared to MT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check MT's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NUE has a market cap of 40.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while NUE trades at $175.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas NUE's P/E ratio is 23.38. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NUE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is more volatile compared to NUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check NUE's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, STLD has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while STLD trades at $191.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas STLD's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to STLD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is more volatile compared to STLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check STLD's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PKX has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while PKX trades at $70.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas PKX's P/E ratio is 50.44. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PKX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is more volatile compared to PKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check PKX's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RS has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while RS trades at $316.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas RS's P/E ratio is 23.04. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is more volatile compared to RS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check RS's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, X has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while X trades at $54.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas X's P/E ratio is 148.22. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to X's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is more volatile compared to X. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check X's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TX has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while TX trades at $43.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas TX's P/E ratio is 15.01. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is less volatile compared to TX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check TX's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GGB has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while GGB trades at $4.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas GGB's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GGB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is less volatile compared to GGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check GGB's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CMC has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while CMC trades at $74.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas CMC's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CMC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is more volatile compared to CMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check CMC's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CLF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while CLF trades at $10.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas CLF's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CLF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is less volatile compared to CLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check CLF's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SIM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while SIM trades at $30.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas SIM's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SIM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is less volatile compared to SIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check SIM's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, WS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while WS trades at $43.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas WS's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is less volatile compared to WS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check WS's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SCHN has a market cap of 906.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while SCHN trades at $33.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas SCHN's P/E ratio is 87.37. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SCHN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is more volatile compared to SCHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check SCHN's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TMST has a market cap of 895.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while TMST trades at $20.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas TMST's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TMST's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is less volatile compared to TMST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check TMST's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RDUS has a market cap of 841.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while RDUS trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas RDUS's P/E ratio is -8.36. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RDUS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is more volatile compared to RDUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check RDUS's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MTUS has a market cap of 713.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while MTUS trades at $17.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas MTUS's P/E ratio is -95.17. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MTUS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is less volatile compared to MTUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check MTUS's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ZEUS has a market cap of 539M. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while ZEUS trades at $47.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas ZEUS's P/E ratio is 40.91. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ZEUS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is more volatile compared to ZEUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check ZEUS's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ASTL has a market cap of 476.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while ASTL trades at $4.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas ASTL's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ASTL's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is less volatile compared to ASTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check ASTL's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, USAP has a market cap of 423.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while USAP trades at $44.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas USAP's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to USAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is more volatile compared to USAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check USAP's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MSB has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while MSB trades at $31.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas MSB's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MSB's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is less volatile compared to MSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check MSB's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 161.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while ACNT trades at $17.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -53.91. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ACNT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is more volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check ACNT's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SYNL has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while SYNL trades at $15.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas SYNL's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SYNL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is less volatile compared to SYNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check SYNL's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, LUD has a market cap of 143.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while LUD trades at $6.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas LUD's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LUD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is more volatile compared to LUD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check LUD's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FRD has a market cap of 132.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while FRD trades at $18.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas FRD's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FRD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is less volatile compared to FRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check FRD's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, HLP has a market cap of 77.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while HLP trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas HLP's P/E ratio is 21.10. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HLP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is less volatile compared to HLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check HLP's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, KBSX has a market cap of 55.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while KBSX trades at $1.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas KBSX's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to KBSX's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is less volatile compared to KBSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check KBSX's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, HUDI has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while HUDI trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas HUDI's P/E ratio is -11.30. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HUDI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is less volatile compared to HUDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check HUDI's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ASTLW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while ASTLW trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas ASTLW's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ASTLW's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is less volatile compared to ASTLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check ASTLW's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ZKIN has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while ZKIN trades at $1.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas ZKIN's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ZKIN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is more volatile compared to ZKIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check ZKIN's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 358.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while INHD trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is less volatile compared to INHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check INHD's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MTL-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while MTL-P trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas MTL-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MTL-P's ROE of -85.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is less volatile compared to MTL-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check MTL-P's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MTL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while MTL trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas MTL's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is less volatile compared to MTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check MTL's competition here

SID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SID stands at 2.3B. In comparison, OSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SID is priced at $1.70, while OSN trades at $5.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SID currently has a P/E ratio of -7.39, whereas OSN's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, SID's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SID is more volatile compared to OSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SID.Check OSN's competition here