Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SHIP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHIP | $13.55 | -1.88% | 286.1M | 18.07 | $0.75 | +2.38% |
| KEX | $128.48 | -1.88% | 7.2B | 20.30 | $6.33 | N/A |
| MATX | $164.29 | -2.06% | 5.1B | 12.56 | $13.08 | +0.85% |
| HAFN | $7.27 | -0.78% | 3.6B | 11.92 | $0.61 | +5.46% |
| ZIM | $28.67 | -2.05% | 3.5B | 3.45 | $8.31 | +14.74% |
| CMRE-PC | $26.90 | -0.37% | 3B | 7.24 | $3.72 | +2.66% |
| CMBT | $14.17 | +1.36% | 2.9B | 17.07 | $0.83 | +0.50% |
| SBLK | $25.24 | -0.04% | 2.9B | 53.70 | $0.47 | +1.19% |
| SB-PD | $26.25 | -1.13% | 2.7B | 17.41 | $1.51 | +3.26% |
| SB-PC | $26.16 | N/A | 2.7B | 17.35 | $1.51 | +3.26% |
Stock Comparison
SHIP vs KEX Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, KEX has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while KEX trades at $128.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas KEX's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KEX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to KEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check KEX's competition here
SHIP vs MATX Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, MATX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while MATX trades at $164.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas MATX's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MATX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to MATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check MATX's competition here
SHIP vs HAFN Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, HAFN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while HAFN trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas HAFN's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAFN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to HAFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check HAFN's competition here
SHIP vs ZIM Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, ZIM has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while ZIM trades at $28.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas ZIM's P/E ratio is 3.45. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZIM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to ZIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check ZIM's competition here
SHIP vs CMRE-PC Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, CMRE-PC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while CMRE-PC trades at $26.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas CMRE-PC's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMRE-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to CMRE-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check CMRE-PC's competition here
SHIP vs CMBT Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, CMBT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while CMBT trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas CMBT's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMBT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to CMBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check CMBT's competition here
SHIP vs SBLK Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, SBLK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while SBLK trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas SBLK's P/E ratio is 53.70. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBLK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to SBLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check SBLK's competition here
SHIP vs SB-PD Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, SB-PD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while SB-PD trades at $26.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas SB-PD's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SB-PD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to SB-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check SB-PD's competition here
SHIP vs SB-PC Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, SB-PC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while SB-PC trades at $26.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas SB-PC's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SB-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to SB-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check SB-PC's competition here
SHIP vs BWLP Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, BWLP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while BWLP trades at $17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas BWLP's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BWLP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to BWLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check BWLP's competition here
SHIP vs CDLR Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, CDLR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while CDLR trades at $25.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas CDLR's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CDLR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to CDLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check CDLR's competition here
SHIP vs CMRE Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, CMRE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while CMRE trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas CMRE's P/E ratio is 6.69. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMRE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to CMRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check CMRE's competition here
SHIP vs NMM Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, NMM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while NMM trades at $68.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas NMM's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NMM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to NMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check NMM's competition here
SHIP vs DAC Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, DAC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while DAC trades at $108.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas DAC's P/E ratio is 4.31. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DAC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to DAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check DAC's competition here
SHIP vs ECO Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, ECO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while ECO trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas ECO's P/E ratio is 21.01. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ECO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to ECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check ECO's competition here
SHIP vs GOGL Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, GOGL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while GOGL trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas GOGL's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GOGL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to GOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check GOGL's competition here
SHIP vs SFL Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, SFL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while SFL trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas SFL's P/E ratio is -53.62. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SFL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to SFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check SFL's competition here
SHIP vs GSL Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, GSL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while GSL trades at $39.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas GSL's P/E ratio is 4.19. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GSL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to GSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check GSL's competition here
SHIP vs CMRE-PD Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, CMRE-PD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while CMRE-PD trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas CMRE-PD's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMRE-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to CMRE-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check CMRE-PD's competition here
SHIP vs CCEC Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, CCEC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while CCEC trades at $23.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas CCEC's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCEC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to CCEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check CCEC's competition here
SHIP vs CMRE-PB Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, CMRE-PB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while CMRE-PB trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas CMRE-PB's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMRE-PB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to CMRE-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check CMRE-PB's competition here
SHIP vs SBBA Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, SBBA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while SBBA trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas SBBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBBA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to SBBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check SBBA's competition here
SHIP vs NAT Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, NAT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while NAT trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas NAT's P/E ratio is 70.36. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NAT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to NAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check NAT's competition here
SHIP vs GNK Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, GNK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while GNK trades at $23.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas GNK's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GNK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to GNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check GNK's competition here
SHIP vs CMRE-PE Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, CMRE-PE has a market cap of 983.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while CMRE-PE trades at $42.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas CMRE-PE's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMRE-PE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to CMRE-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check CMRE-PE's competition here
SHIP vs CPLP Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, CPLP has a market cap of 979.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while CPLP trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas CPLP's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPLP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to CPLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check CPLP's competition here
SHIP vs GSL-PB Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, GSL-PB has a market cap of 964.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while GSL-PB trades at $26.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas GSL-PB's P/E ratio is 4.31. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GSL-PB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to GSL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check GSL-PB's competition here
SHIP vs HSHP Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, HSHP has a market cap of 646.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while HSHP trades at $13.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas HSHP's P/E ratio is 36.49. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HSHP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to HSHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check HSHP's competition here
SHIP vs SB Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, SB has a market cap of 631.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while SB trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas SB's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to SB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check SB's competition here
SHIP vs ASC Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, ASC has a market cap of 609.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while ASC trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas ASC's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to ASC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check ASC's competition here
SHIP vs PANL Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, PANL has a market cap of 595.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while PANL trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas PANL's P/E ratio is 30.57. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PANL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to PANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check PANL's competition here
SHIP vs CLCO Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, CLCO has a market cap of 511.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while CLCO trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas CLCO's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLCO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to CLCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check CLCO's competition here
SHIP vs NETI Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, NETI has a market cap of 437.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while NETI trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas NETI's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NETI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to NETI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check NETI's competition here
SHIP vs CMDB Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, CMDB has a market cap of 437.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while CMDB trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas CMDB's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMDB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to CMDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check CMDB's competition here
SHIP vs ESEA Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, ESEA has a market cap of 427.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while ESEA trades at $61.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas ESEA's P/E ratio is 3.51. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ESEA's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to ESEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check ESEA's competition here
SHIP vs KNOP Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, KNOP has a market cap of 351M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while KNOP trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas KNOP's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KNOP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to KNOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check KNOP's competition here
SHIP vs GASS Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, GASS has a market cap of 306.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while GASS trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas GASS's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GASS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to GASS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check GASS's competition here
SHIP vs DSX Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, DSX has a market cap of 301M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while DSX trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas DSX's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DSX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to DSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check DSX's competition here
SHIP vs SMHI Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, SMHI has a market cap of 209.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while SMHI trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas SMHI's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMHI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is less volatile compared to SMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check SMHI's competition here
SHIP vs ESEAV Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, ESEAV has a market cap of 194.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while ESEAV trades at $27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas ESEAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ESEAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to ESEAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check ESEAV's competition here
SHIP vs DSX-PB Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, DSX-PB has a market cap of 187.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while DSX-PB trades at $26.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas DSX-PB's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DSX-PB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to DSX-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check DSX-PB's competition here
SHIP vs TORO Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, TORO has a market cap of 62.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while TORO trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas TORO's P/E ratio is -117.33. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TORO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is less volatile compared to TORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check TORO's competition here
SHIP vs EDRY Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, EDRY has a market cap of 56.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while EDRY trades at $19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas EDRY's P/E ratio is -3.98. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EDRY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to EDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check EDRY's competition here
SHIP vs HMR Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, HMR has a market cap of 52.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while HMR trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas HMR's P/E ratio is -9.01. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HMR's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to HMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check HMR's competition here
SHIP vs NM Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, NM has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while NM trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas NM's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NM's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to NM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check NM's competition here
SHIP vs NM-PH Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, NM-PH has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while NM-PH trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas NM-PH's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NM-PH's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to NM-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check NM-PH's competition here
SHIP vs HTCO Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, HTCO has a market cap of 51.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while HTCO trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas HTCO's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HTCO's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to HTCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check HTCO's competition here
SHIP vs PXSAP Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, PXSAP has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while PXSAP trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas PXSAP's P/E ratio is -16.95. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PXSAP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to PXSAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check PXSAP's competition here
SHIP vs EHLDV Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, EHLDV has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while EHLDV trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas EHLDV's P/E ratio is 224.29. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EHLDV's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is less volatile compared to EHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check EHLDV's competition here
SHIP vs GLBS Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, GLBS has a market cap of 42.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while GLBS trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas GLBS's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLBS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is less volatile compared to GLBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check GLBS's competition here
SHIP vs PXS Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, PXS has a market cap of 40.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while PXS trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas PXS's P/E ratio is -16.61. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is less volatile compared to PXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check PXS's competition here
SHIP vs UFG Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, UFG has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while UFG trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas UFG's P/E ratio is 111.50. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UFG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is less volatile compared to UFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check UFG's competition here
SHIP vs NM-PG Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, NM-PG has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while NM-PG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas NM-PG's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NM-PG's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is less volatile compared to NM-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check NM-PG's competition here
SHIP vs TOROV Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, TOROV has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while TOROV trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas TOROV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TOROV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is less volatile compared to TOROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check TOROV's competition here
SHIP vs VNTG Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, VNTG has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while VNTG trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas VNTG's P/E ratio is 42.50. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VNTG's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to VNTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check VNTG's competition here
SHIP vs PSHG Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, PSHG has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while PSHG trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas PSHG's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PSHG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is less volatile compared to PSHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check PSHG's competition here
SHIP vs CACO Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, CACO has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while CACO trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas CACO's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CACO's ROE of +21.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is less volatile compared to CACO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check CACO's competition here
SHIP vs CTRM Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, CTRM has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while CTRM trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas CTRM's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CTRM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to CTRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check CTRM's competition here
SHIP vs TOPS Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, TOPS has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while TOPS trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas TOPS's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TOPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is less volatile compared to TOPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check TOPS's competition here
SHIP vs EHLD Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, EHLD has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while EHLD trades at $6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas EHLD's P/E ratio is 1.52. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EHLD's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to EHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check EHLD's competition here
SHIP vs USEA Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, USEA has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while USEA trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas USEA's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USEA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to USEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check USEA's competition here
SHIP vs OP Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, OP has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while OP trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas OP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OP's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to OP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check OP's competition here
SHIP vs SVRN Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, SVRN has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while SVRN trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas SVRN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SVRN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is less volatile compared to SVRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check SVRN's competition here
SHIP vs NCT Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, NCT has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while NCT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas NCT's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NCT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is less volatile compared to NCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check NCT's competition here
SHIP vs CISS Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, CISS has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while CISS trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas CISS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CISS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is less volatile compared to CISS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check CISS's competition here
SHIP vs RUBI Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, RUBI has a market cap of 612.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while RUBI trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas RUBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RUBI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is less volatile compared to RUBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check RUBI's competition here
SHIP vs ICON Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, ICON has a market cap of 597.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while ICON trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas ICON's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ICON's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is less volatile compared to ICON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check ICON's competition here
SHIP vs PXSAW Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, PXSAW has a market cap of 217.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while PXSAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas PXSAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PXSAW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is less volatile compared to PXSAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check PXSAW's competition here
SHIP vs SHIPW Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, SHIPW has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while SHIPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas SHIPW's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHIPW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is less volatile compared to SHIPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check SHIPW's competition here
SHIP vs SHIPZ Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, SHIPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while SHIPZ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas SHIPZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHIPZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is less volatile compared to SHIPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check SHIPZ's competition here
SHIP vs SBLKZ Comparison February 2026
SHIP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHIP stands at 286.1M. In comparison, SBLKZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SHIP is priced at $13.55, while SBLKZ trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHIP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.07, whereas SBLKZ's P/E ratio is 104.92. In terms of profitability, SHIP's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBLKZ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHIP is more volatile compared to SBLKZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHIP.Check SBLKZ's competition here