SFL Corporation Ltd.
SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SFL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFL | $10.72 | +2.29% | 1.4B | -53.67 | -$0.20 | +8.78% |
| KEX | $129.35 | +0.79% | 7.3B | 20.69 | $6.33 | N/A |
| MATX | $164.04 | -0.37% | 5.2B | 12.83 | $13.07 | +0.85% |
| HAFN | $7.29 | +1.96% | 3.7B | 11.63 | $0.63 | +5.46% |
| ZIM | $28.64 | -1.85% | 3.5B | 3.53 | $8.31 | +14.74% |
| CMRE-PC | $26.81 | -0.04% | 3B | 7.24 | $3.72 | +2.66% |
| SBLK | $25.14 | +0.58% | 2.9B | 53.70 | $0.47 | +1.19% |
| CMBT | $14.10 | +3.18% | 2.9B | 16.84 | $0.83 | +0.50% |
| SB-PD | $26.25 | -0.98% | 2.7B | 17.61 | $1.51 | +3.26% |
| BWLP | $17.32 | +0.93% | 2.7B | 16.15 | $1.11 | +7.36% |
Stock Comparison
SFL vs KEX Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, KEX has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while KEX trades at $129.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas KEX's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KEX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to KEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check KEX's competition here
SFL vs MATX Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MATX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while MATX trades at $164.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas MATX's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MATX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to MATX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check MATX's competition here
SFL vs HAFN Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HAFN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while HAFN trades at $7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas HAFN's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HAFN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to HAFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check HAFN's competition here
SFL vs ZIM Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ZIM has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while ZIM trades at $28.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas ZIM's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ZIM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to ZIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check ZIM's competition here
SFL vs CMRE-PC Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CMRE-PC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while CMRE-PC trades at $26.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas CMRE-PC's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CMRE-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to CMRE-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CMRE-PC's competition here
SFL vs SBLK Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SBLK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while SBLK trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas SBLK's P/E ratio is 53.70. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SBLK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to SBLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SBLK's competition here
SFL vs CMBT Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CMBT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while CMBT trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas CMBT's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CMBT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to CMBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CMBT's competition here
SFL vs SB-PD Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SB-PD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while SB-PD trades at $26.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas SB-PD's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SB-PD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to SB-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SB-PD's competition here
SFL vs BWLP Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BWLP has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while BWLP trades at $17.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas BWLP's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BWLP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to BWLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check BWLP's competition here
SFL vs SB-PC Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SB-PC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while SB-PC trades at $26.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas SB-PC's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SB-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to SB-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SB-PC's competition here
SFL vs CDLR Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CDLR has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while CDLR trades at $25.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas CDLR's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CDLR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to CDLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CDLR's competition here
SFL vs CMRE Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CMRE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while CMRE trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas CMRE's P/E ratio is 6.84. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CMRE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to CMRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CMRE's competition here
SFL vs DAC Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DAC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while DAC trades at $108.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas DAC's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DAC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to DAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check DAC's competition here
SFL vs NMM Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NMM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while NMM trades at $68.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas NMM's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NMM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to NMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check NMM's competition here
SFL vs ECO Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ECO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while ECO trades at $49.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas ECO's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ECO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to ECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check ECO's competition here
SFL vs GOGL Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GOGL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while GOGL trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas GOGL's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GOGL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to GOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check GOGL's competition here
SFL vs GSL Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GSL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while GSL trades at $39.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas GSL's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GSL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to GSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check GSL's competition here
SFL vs CMRE-PD Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CMRE-PD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while CMRE-PD trades at $28.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas CMRE-PD's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CMRE-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to CMRE-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CMRE-PD's competition here
SFL vs CCEC Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CCEC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while CCEC trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas CCEC's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CCEC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to CCEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CCEC's competition here
SFL vs CMRE-PB Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CMRE-PB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while CMRE-PB trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas CMRE-PB's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CMRE-PB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to CMRE-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CMRE-PB's competition here
SFL vs SBBA Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SBBA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while SBBA trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas SBBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SBBA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to SBBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SBBA's competition here
SFL vs NAT Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NAT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while NAT trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas NAT's P/E ratio is 70.36. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NAT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to NAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check NAT's competition here
SFL vs GNK Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GNK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while GNK trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas GNK's P/E ratio is -140.94. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GNK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to GNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check GNK's competition here
SFL vs CMRE-PE Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CMRE-PE has a market cap of 983.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while CMRE-PE trades at $42.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas CMRE-PE's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CMRE-PE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to CMRE-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CMRE-PE's competition here
SFL vs CPLP Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CPLP has a market cap of 979.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while CPLP trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas CPLP's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CPLP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to CPLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CPLP's competition here
SFL vs GSL-PB Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GSL-PB has a market cap of 971.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while GSL-PB trades at $26.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas GSL-PB's P/E ratio is 4.34. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GSL-PB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to GSL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check GSL-PB's competition here
SFL vs HSHP Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HSHP has a market cap of 657.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while HSHP trades at $13.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas HSHP's P/E ratio is 37.08. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HSHP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to HSHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check HSHP's competition here
SFL vs SB Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SB has a market cap of 627.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while SB trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas SB's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to SB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SB's competition here
SFL vs ASC Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ASC has a market cap of 616.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while ASC trades at $14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas ASC's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ASC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to ASC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check ASC's competition here
SFL vs PANL Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PANL has a market cap of 604.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while PANL trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas PANL's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PANL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to PANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check PANL's competition here
SFL vs CLCO Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CLCO has a market cap of 511.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while CLCO trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas CLCO's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CLCO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to CLCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CLCO's competition here
SFL vs CMDB Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CMDB has a market cap of 451.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while CMDB trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas CMDB's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CMDB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to CMDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CMDB's competition here
SFL vs NETI Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NETI has a market cap of 437.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while NETI trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas NETI's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NETI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to NETI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check NETI's competition here
SFL vs ESEA Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ESEA has a market cap of 426.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while ESEA trades at $60.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas ESEA's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ESEA's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to ESEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check ESEA's competition here
SFL vs KNOP Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, KNOP has a market cap of 353M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while KNOP trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas KNOP's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KNOP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to KNOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check KNOP's competition here
SFL vs GASS Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GASS has a market cap of 309.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while GASS trades at $8.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas GASS's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GASS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to GASS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check GASS's competition here
SFL vs DSX Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DSX has a market cap of 298.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while DSX trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas DSX's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DSX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to DSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check DSX's competition here
SFL vs SHIP Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SHIP has a market cap of 291.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while SHIP trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas SHIP's P/E ratio is 18.41. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SHIP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to SHIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SHIP's competition here
SFL vs SMHI Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SMHI has a market cap of 211M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while SMHI trades at $7.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas SMHI's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SMHI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to SMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SMHI's competition here
SFL vs ESEAV Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ESEAV has a market cap of 194.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while ESEAV trades at $27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas ESEAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ESEAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to ESEAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check ESEAV's competition here
SFL vs DSX-PB Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DSX-PB has a market cap of 186M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while DSX-PB trades at $26.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas DSX-PB's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DSX-PB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to DSX-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check DSX-PB's competition here
SFL vs TORO Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TORO has a market cap of 63.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while TORO trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas TORO's P/E ratio is -120.00. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TORO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to TORO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check TORO's competition here
SFL vs HMR Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HMR has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while HMR trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas HMR's P/E ratio is -9.29. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HMR's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to HMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check HMR's competition here
SFL vs EDRY Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EDRY has a market cap of 52.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while EDRY trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas EDRY's P/E ratio is -3.71. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EDRY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to EDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check EDRY's competition here
SFL vs NM Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NM has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while NM trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas NM's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NM's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to NM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check NM's competition here
SFL vs NM-PH Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NM-PH has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while NM-PH trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas NM-PH's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NM-PH's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to NM-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check NM-PH's competition here
SFL vs HTCO Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HTCO has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while HTCO trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas HTCO's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HTCO's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to HTCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check HTCO's competition here
SFL vs PXSAP Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PXSAP has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while PXSAP trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas PXSAP's P/E ratio is -16.95. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PXSAP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to PXSAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check PXSAP's competition here
SFL vs EHLDV Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EHLDV has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while EHLDV trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas EHLDV's P/E ratio is 224.29. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EHLDV's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to EHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check EHLDV's competition here
SFL vs GLBS Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GLBS has a market cap of 39.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while GLBS trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas GLBS's P/E ratio is -8.39. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GLBS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to GLBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check GLBS's competition here
SFL vs PXS Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PXS has a market cap of 37.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while PXS trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas PXS's P/E ratio is -15.43. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to PXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check PXS's competition here
SFL vs UFG Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, UFG has a market cap of 36.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while UFG trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas UFG's P/E ratio is 117.50. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to UFG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to UFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check UFG's competition here
SFL vs NM-PG Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NM-PG has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while NM-PG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas NM-PG's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NM-PG's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to NM-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check NM-PG's competition here
SFL vs TOROV Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TOROV has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while TOROV trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas TOROV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TOROV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to TOROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check TOROV's competition here
SFL vs PSHG Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PSHG has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while PSHG trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas PSHG's P/E ratio is 1.68. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PSHG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to PSHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check PSHG's competition here
SFL vs VNTG Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VNTG has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while VNTG trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas VNTG's P/E ratio is 41.75. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VNTG's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to VNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check VNTG's competition here
SFL vs CACO Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CACO has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while CACO trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas CACO's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CACO's ROE of +21.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to CACO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CACO's competition here
SFL vs TOPS Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TOPS has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while TOPS trades at $4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas TOPS's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TOPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to TOPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check TOPS's competition here
SFL vs CTRM Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CTRM has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while CTRM trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas CTRM's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CTRM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to CTRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CTRM's competition here
SFL vs EHLD Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EHLD has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while EHLD trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas EHLD's P/E ratio is 1.52. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EHLD's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to EHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check EHLD's competition here
SFL vs USEA Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, USEA has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while USEA trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas USEA's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to USEA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to USEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check USEA's competition here
SFL vs SVRN Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SVRN has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while SVRN trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas SVRN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SVRN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to SVRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SVRN's competition here
SFL vs OP Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, OP has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while OP trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas OP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OP's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to OP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check OP's competition here
SFL vs NCT Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NCT has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while NCT trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas NCT's P/E ratio is 1.97. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NCT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to NCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check NCT's competition here
SFL vs CISS Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CISS has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while CISS trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas CISS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CISS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to CISS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CISS's competition here
SFL vs RUBI Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, RUBI has a market cap of 673.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while RUBI trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas RUBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RUBI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to RUBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check RUBI's competition here
SFL vs ICON Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ICON has a market cap of 642.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while ICON trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas ICON's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ICON's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to ICON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check ICON's competition here
SFL vs PXSAW Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PXSAW has a market cap of 217.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while PXSAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas PXSAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PXSAW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to PXSAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check PXSAW's competition here
SFL vs SHIPW Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SHIPW has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while SHIPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas SHIPW's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SHIPW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to SHIPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SHIPW's competition here
SFL vs SBLKZ Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SBLKZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while SBLKZ trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas SBLKZ's P/E ratio is 104.92. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SBLKZ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to SBLKZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SBLKZ's competition here
SFL vs SHIPZ Comparison February 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SHIPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.72, while SHIPZ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of -53.67, whereas SHIPZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SHIPZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to SHIPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SHIPZ's competition here