Banco Santander, S.A.
Banco Santander, S.A. SAN Peers
See (SAN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAN | $7.45 | +0.61% | 112.69B | 8.18 | $0.91 | +2.57% |
| JPM | $260.08 | +2.77% | 722.79B | 12.76 | $20.38 | +1.94% |
| JPM-PD | $24.29 | +0.08% | 703.91B | 1.80 | $13.48 | +1.94% |
| JPM-PC | $25.01 | +0.04% | 703.61B | 1.86 | $13.48 | +1.94% |
| BAC-PL | $1,180.34 | +0.07% | 444.51B | 335.89 | $3.51 | +2.35% |
| BAC | $43.37 | +3.78% | 326.66B | 12.95 | $3.35 | +2.35% |
| BML-PJ | $22.60 | +0.27% | 316.02B | 6.43 | $3.51 | +2.35% |
| BML-PG | $21.64 | +0.39% | 316.00B | 6.16 | $3.51 | +2.35% |
| BML-PH | $21.48 | +0.05% | 314.90B | 6.11 | $3.51 | +2.35% |
| BAC-PK | $23.84 | +0.17% | 314.76B | 6.78 | $3.51 | +2.35% |
Stock Comparison
SAN vs JPM Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, JPM has a market cap of 722.79B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while JPM trades at $260.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas JPM's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JPM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to JPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs JPM-PD Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, JPM-PD has a market cap of 703.91B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while JPM-PD trades at $24.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas JPM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.80. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JPM-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is more volatile compared to JPM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs JPM-PC Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, JPM-PC has a market cap of 703.61B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while JPM-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas JPM-PC's P/E ratio is 1.86. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JPM-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is more volatile compared to JPM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs BAC-PL Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, BAC-PL has a market cap of 444.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while BAC-PL trades at $1,180.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas BAC-PL's P/E ratio is 335.89. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BAC-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is more volatile compared to BAC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs BAC Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, BAC has a market cap of 326.66B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while BAC trades at $43.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas BAC's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BAC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to BAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs BML-PJ Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, BML-PJ has a market cap of 316.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while BML-PJ trades at $22.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas BML-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BML-PJ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is more volatile compared to BML-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs BML-PG Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, BML-PG has a market cap of 316.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while BML-PG trades at $21.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas BML-PG's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BML-PG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to BML-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs BML-PH Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, BML-PH has a market cap of 314.90B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while BML-PH trades at $21.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas BML-PH's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BML-PH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is more volatile compared to BML-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs BAC-PK Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, BAC-PK has a market cap of 314.76B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while BAC-PK trades at $23.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas BAC-PK's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BAC-PK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is more volatile compared to BAC-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs BML-PL Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, BML-PL has a market cap of 314.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while BML-PL trades at $21.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas BML-PL's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BML-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to BML-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs BAC-PB Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, BAC-PB has a market cap of 313.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while BAC-PB trades at $24.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas BAC-PB's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BAC-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is more volatile compared to BAC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs BAC-PE Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, BAC-PE has a market cap of 313.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while BAC-PE trades at $21.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas BAC-PE's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BAC-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to BAC-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs WFC Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, WFC has a market cap of 243.71B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while WFC trades at $74.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas WFC's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to WFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs WFC-PL Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, WFC-PL has a market cap of 236.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while WFC-PL trades at $1,171.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas WFC-PL's P/E ratio is 242.45. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WFC-PL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is more volatile compared to WFC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs WFC-PC Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, WFC-PC has a market cap of 235.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while WFC-PC trades at $17.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas WFC-PC's P/E ratio is 60.18. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WFC-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to WFC-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs HSBC Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, HSBC has a market cap of 205.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while HSBC trades at $58.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas HSBC's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HSBC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to HSBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs WFC-PQ Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, WFC-PQ has a market cap of 200.85B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while WFC-PQ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas WFC-PQ's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WFC-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is more volatile compared to WFC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs WFC-PY Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, WFC-PY has a market cap of 186.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while WFC-PY trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas WFC-PY's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WFC-PY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to WFC-PY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs WFC-PR Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, WFC-PR has a market cap of 184.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while WFC-PR trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas WFC-PR's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WFC-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is more volatile compared to WFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs RY Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, RY has a market cap of 170.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while RY trades at $120.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas RY's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is more volatile compared to RY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs BAC-PM Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, BAC-PM has a market cap of 163.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while BAC-PM trades at $21.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas BAC-PM's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BAC-PM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to BAC-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs BAC-PN Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, BAC-PN has a market cap of 151.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while BAC-PN trades at $20.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas BAC-PN's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BAC-PN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to BAC-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs MUFG Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, MUFG has a market cap of 150.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while MUFG trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas MUFG's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MUFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to MUFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs BAC-PS Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, BAC-PS has a market cap of 143.03B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while BAC-PS trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas BAC-PS's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BAC-PS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to BAC-PS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs C Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, C has a market cap of 139.95B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while C trades at $74.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas C's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to C's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs BAC-PO Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, BAC-PO has a market cap of 132.08B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while BAC-PO trades at $17.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas BAC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BAC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to BAC-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs BAC-PQ Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, BAC-PQ has a market cap of 127.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while BAC-PQ trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas BAC-PQ's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BAC-PQ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to BAC-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs BAC-PP Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, BAC-PP has a market cap of 124.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while BAC-PP trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas BAC-PP's P/E ratio is 4.70. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BAC-PP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to BAC-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs C-PJ Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, C-PJ has a market cap of 122.21B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while C-PJ trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas C-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to C-PJ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is more volatile compared to C-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs TD Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, TD has a market cap of 110.83B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while TD trades at $63.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas TD's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to TD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs UBS Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, UBS has a market cap of 102.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while UBS trades at $32.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas UBS's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UBS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to UBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs RY-PT Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, RY-PT has a market cap of 98.82B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while RY-PT trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas RY-PT's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RY-PT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is more volatile compared to RY-PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs SMFG Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, SMFG has a market cap of 92.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while SMFG trades at $14.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas SMFG's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SMFG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to SMFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs BBVA Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, BBVA has a market cap of 83.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while BBVA trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas BBVA's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBVA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to BBVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs BMO Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, BMO has a market cap of 73.93B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while BMO trades at $101.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas BMO's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BMO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is more volatile compared to BMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs ING Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, ING has a market cap of 63.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while ING trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas ING's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ING's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is more volatile compared to ING. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs BNS Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, BNS has a market cap of 62.96B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while BNS trades at $50.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas BNS's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to BNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs NU Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, NU has a market cap of 62.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while NU trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas NU's P/E ratio is 32.37. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NU's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to NU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs WFC-PZ Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, WFC-PZ has a market cap of 62.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while WFC-PZ trades at $18.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas WFC-PZ's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WFC-PZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to WFC-PZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs WFC-PA Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, WFC-PA has a market cap of 60.72B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while WFC-PA trades at $18.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas WFC-PA's P/E ratio is 3.86. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WFC-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to WFC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs CM Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, CM has a market cap of 59.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while CM trades at $63.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas CM's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to CM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs BCS Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, BCS has a market cap of 59.60B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while BCS trades at $16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas BCS's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to BCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs JPM-PJ Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, JPM-PJ has a market cap of 55.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while JPM-PJ trades at $19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas JPM-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.48. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JPM-PJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to JPM-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs WFC-PD Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, WFC-PD has a market cap of 55.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while WFC-PD trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas WFC-PD's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WFC-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to WFC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs JPM-PL Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, JPM-PL has a market cap of 53.66B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while JPM-PL trades at $19.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas JPM-PL's P/E ratio is 1.43. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JPM-PL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to JPM-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs JPM-PK Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, JPM-PK has a market cap of 52.54B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while JPM-PK trades at $18.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas JPM-PK's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JPM-PK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to JPM-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs JPM-PM Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, JPM-PM has a market cap of 49.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while JPM-PM trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas JPM-PM's P/E ratio is 1.31. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JPM-PM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to JPM-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs C-PK Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, C-PK has a market cap of 48.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while C-PK trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas C-PK's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to C-PK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is more volatile compared to C-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs NWG Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, NWG has a market cap of 26.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while NWG trades at $12.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas NWG's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NWG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to NWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs EWBC Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, EWBC has a market cap of 13.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while EWBC trades at $95.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas EWBC's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EWBC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to EWBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs CS Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, CS has a market cap of 3.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while CS trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas CS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to CS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs NTB Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, NTB has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while NTB trades at $42.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas NTB's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NTB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to NTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs TANNL Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, TANNL has a market cap of 989.30M. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while TANNL trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas TANNL's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TANNL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is more volatile compared to TANNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.
SAN vs FRC-PL Comparison
SAN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAN stands at 112.69B. In comparison, FRC-PL has a market cap of 312.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SAN is priced at $7.45, while FRC-PL trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.18, whereas FRC-PL's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, SAN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FRC-PL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SAN is less volatile compared to FRC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAN.