Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. RS Peers
See (RS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RS | $343.66 | +1.02% | 18.1B | 24.46 | $14.07 | +1.35% |
| NUE | $145.00 | +0.86% | 33.5B | 25.63 | $5.66 | +1.51% |
| MT | $34.78 | +1.58% | 26.5B | 22.16 | $1.57 | +1.39% |
| STLD | $130.72 | -1.15% | 19.4B | 18.97 | $6.89 | +1.46% |
| PKX | $61.15 | +3.56% | 18.5B | 31.18 | $1.96 | +2.33% |
| X | $54.84 | +0.00% | 12.4B | 148.22 | $0.37 | +0.36% |
| TX | $31.84 | +0.63% | 6.3B | -17.69 | -$1.80 | +8.50% |
| CMC | $54.23 | +0.97% | 6.1B | 180.80 | $0.30 | +1.33% |
| GGB | $3.11 | +2.98% | 5.9B | 11.09 | $0.28 | +3.41% |
| CLF | $11.27 | -0.44% | 5.6B | -3.30 | -$3.41 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RS vs NUE Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, NUE has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while NUE trades at $145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas NUE's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NUE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is more volatile compared to NUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs MT Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, MT has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while MT trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas MT's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is less volatile compared to MT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs STLD Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, STLD has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while STLD trades at $130.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas STLD's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STLD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is less volatile compared to STLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs PKX Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, PKX has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while PKX trades at $61.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas PKX's P/E ratio is 31.18. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PKX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is more volatile compared to PKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs X Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, X has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while X trades at $54.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas X's P/E ratio is 148.22. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to X's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is more volatile compared to X. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs TX Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, TX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while TX trades at $31.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas TX's P/E ratio is -17.69. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is less volatile compared to TX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs CMC Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, CMC has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while CMC trades at $54.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas CMC's P/E ratio is 180.80. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is more volatile compared to CMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs GGB Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, GGB has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while GGB trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas GGB's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GGB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is less volatile compared to GGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs CLF Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, CLF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while CLF trades at $11.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas CLF's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is less volatile compared to CLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs SID Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, SID has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while SID trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas SID's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SID's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is less volatile compared to SID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs WS Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, WS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while WS trades at $33.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas WS's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is less volatile compared to WS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs SIM Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, SIM has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while SIM trades at $27.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas SIM's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SIM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is more volatile compared to SIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs SCHN Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, SCHN has a market cap of 906.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while SCHN trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas SCHN's P/E ratio is 87.37. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCHN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is less volatile compared to SCHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs TMST Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, TMST has a market cap of 895.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while TMST trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas TMST's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TMST's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is less volatile compared to TMST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs RDUS Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, RDUS has a market cap of 841.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while RDUS trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas RDUS's P/E ratio is -8.36. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RDUS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is more volatile compared to RDUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs MTUS Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, MTUS has a market cap of 746.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while MTUS trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas MTUS's P/E ratio is -36.24. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTUS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is less volatile compared to MTUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs ASTL Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, ASTL has a market cap of 710.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while ASTL trades at $6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas ASTL's P/E ratio is -6.39. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASTL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is less volatile compared to ASTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs USAP Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, USAP has a market cap of 423.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while USAP trades at $44.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas USAP's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USAP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is more volatile compared to USAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs ZEUS Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, ZEUS has a market cap of 395.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while ZEUS trades at $35.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas ZEUS's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZEUS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is less volatile compared to ZEUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs MSB Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, MSB has a market cap of 366.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while MSB trades at $27.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas MSB's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MSB's ROE of +2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is less volatile compared to MSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs SYNL Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, SYNL has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while SYNL trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas SYNL's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SYNL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is less volatile compared to SYNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs LUD Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, LUD has a market cap of 148.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while LUD trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas LUD's P/E ratio is -327.55. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LUD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is less volatile compared to LUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs ACNT Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 137.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while ACNT trades at $13.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -15.62. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACNT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is more volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs FRD Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, FRD has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while FRD trades at $16.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas FRD's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is less volatile compared to FRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs KBSX Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, KBSX has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while KBSX trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas KBSX's P/E ratio is -24.57. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KBSX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is less volatile compared to KBSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs HLP Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, HLP has a market cap of 46.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while HLP trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas HLP's P/E ratio is -5.73. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is less volatile compared to HLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs ASTLW Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, ASTLW has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while ASTLW trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas ASTLW's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASTLW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is less volatile compared to ASTLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs HUDI Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, HUDI has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while HUDI trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas HUDI's P/E ratio is 135.11. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HUDI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is less volatile compared to HUDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs ZKIN Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, ZKIN has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while ZKIN trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas ZKIN's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZKIN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is less volatile compared to ZKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs INHD Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while INHD trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is less volatile compared to INHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs OSN Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, OSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while OSN trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas OSN's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is more volatile compared to OSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs MTL Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, MTL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while MTL trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas MTL's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is less volatile compared to MTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.
RS vs MTL-P Comparison
RS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RS stands at 18.1B. In comparison, MTL-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RS is priced at $343.66, while MTL-P trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.46, whereas MTL-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTL-P's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RS is less volatile compared to MTL-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RS.