What are the top competitors of Roots Corporation in Consumer Cyclical sector?

The top competitors of Roots Corporation in the Consumer Cyclical sector are: Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU.NE), Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO).

Which has better valuations & earnings, Roots Corporation or its competitors?

Roots Corporation has a market cap of 150.2M and a Dividend Yield of N/A compared to its competitors.

Which stock is more profitable: Roots Corporation or its competitors?

Roots Corporation has an EPS of $0.18, while LULU.NE has an EPS of $0.61. So, Roots Corporation is more profitable compared to LULU.NE.

What is Roots Corporation stock volatility and risk in terms of investment?

Roots Corporation has daily volatility of 5.09% as compared to its competitor LULU.NE which is 1.64%. Roots Corporation is more volatile as compared to competitors and has high risk.

Is Roots Corporation stock profitable?

Roots Corporation has a Return on Equity (ROE) of 0.02%. So, Roots Corporation is more profitable.

What is Roots Corporation stock’s 52 weeks high and low?

Roots Corporation stock has a 52-week high of ($4.7) and a low of ($2.78).

What was the average volume of Roots Corporation stock?

The average volume of Roots Corporation is (13.1K) in terms of investment.

Roots Corporation (ROOT.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

See (ROOT.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.

ROOT.TO●TSX

Consumer CyclicalApparel - Retail

$3.83

$0.26(6.36%)

Canadian Market opens in 11h 10m

Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry

Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.

Symbol	Price	Change %	Market Cap	P/E Ratio	EPS	Dividend Yield
ROOT.TO	CA$3.83	-6.36%	150.2M	21.69	CA$0.18	N/A
LULU.NE	CA$4.93	-0.80%	16.8B	8.06	CA$0.61	N/A
ATZ.TO	CA$156.39	+1.80%	15.1B	47.84	CA$3.27	N/A

Stock Comparison

Select a stock to compare (requires JavaScript). Showing default comparison.

ROOT.TO vs LULU.NE Comparison July 2026

ROOT.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROOT.TO stands at 150.2M. In comparison, LULU.NE has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROOT.TO is priced at CA$3.83, while LULU.NE trades at CA$4.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROOT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.69, whereas LULU.NE's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, ROOT.TO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LULU.NE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ROOT.TO is more volatile compared to LULU.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROOT.TO.Check LULU.NE's competition here