What are the top competitors of Lululemon Athletica Inc. in Consumer Cyclical sector?

The top competitors of Lululemon Athletica Inc. in the Consumer Cyclical sector are: Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO), Roots Corporation (ROOT.TO).

Which has better valuations & earnings, Lululemon Athletica Inc. or its competitors?

Lululemon Athletica Inc. has a market cap of 16.8B and a Dividend Yield of N/A compared to its competitors.

Which stock is more profitable: Lululemon Athletica Inc. or its competitors?

Lululemon Athletica Inc. has an EPS of $0.61, while ATZ.TO has an EPS of $3.27. So, Lululemon Athletica Inc. is more profitable compared to ATZ.TO.

What is Lululemon Athletica Inc. stock volatility and risk in terms of investment?

Lululemon Athletica Inc. has daily volatility of 1.64% as compared to its competitor ATZ.TO which is 2.49%. Lululemon Athletica Inc. is less volatile as compared to competitors and has low risk.

Is Lululemon Athletica Inc. stock profitable?

Lululemon Athletica Inc. has a Return on Equity (ROE) of 0.32%. So, Lululemon Athletica Inc. is more profitable.

What is Lululemon Athletica Inc. stock’s 52 weeks high and low?

Lululemon Athletica Inc. stock has a 52-week high of ($18.74) and a low of ($4.85).

What was the average volume of Lululemon Athletica Inc. stock?

The average volume of Lululemon Athletica Inc. is (266.8K) in terms of investment.

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU.NE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

See (LULU.NE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.

LULU.NE●NEO

Consumer CyclicalApparel - Retail

$4.93

$0.04(0.80%)

Canadian Market opens in 11h 8m

Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry

Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.

Symbol	Price	Change %	Market Cap	P/E Ratio	EPS	Dividend Yield
LULU.NE	CA$5.07	+3.47%	17.2B	8.29	CA$0.61	N/A
ATZ.TO	CA$158.22	+0.96%	15.2B	48.40	CA$3.27	N/A
ROOT.TO	CA$4.05	-0.98%	158.8M	22.94	CA$0.18	N/A

Stock Comparison

Select a stock to compare (requires JavaScript). Showing default comparison.

LULU.NE vs ATZ.TO Comparison July 2026

LULU.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LULU.NE stands at 17.2B. In comparison, ATZ.TO has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU.NE is priced at CA$5.07, while ATZ.TO trades at CA$158.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LULU.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.29, whereas ATZ.TO's P/E ratio is 48.40. In terms of profitability, LULU.NE's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ATZ.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU.NE is more volatile compared to ATZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.NE.Check ATZ.TO's competition here