Lululemon Athletica Inc. (NEO: LULU.NE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (NEO: LULU.NE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LULU.NE stands at 18.1B. In comparison, ATZ.TO has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU.NE is priced at CA$5.32 on the NEO, while ATZ.TO trades at CA$134.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LULU.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas ATZ.TO's P/E ratio is 35.24. In terms of profitability, LULU.NE's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ATZ.TO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU.NE is less volatile compared to ATZ.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.NE.Check ATZ.TO's competition here

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (NEO: LULU.NE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LULU.NE stands at 18.1B. In comparison, GRGD.TO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU.NE is priced at CA$5.32 on the NEO, while GRGD.TO trades at CA$64.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LULU.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas GRGD.TO's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, LULU.NE's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GRGD.TO's ROE of +1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU.NE is less volatile compared to GRGD.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.NE.Check GRGD.TO's competition here

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (NEO: LULU.NE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LULU.NE stands at 18.1B. In comparison, ROOT.TO has a market cap of 159.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU.NE is priced at CA$5.32 on the NEO, while ROOT.TO trades at CA$4.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LULU.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 8.70, whereas ROOT.TO's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, LULU.NE's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ROOT.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU.NE is more volatile compared to ROOT.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.NE.Check ROOT.TO's competition here