Meyka Pro banner
Aritzia Inc.

Aritzia Inc. (TSX: ATZ.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

See ATZ.TO's competitors and their performance on the TSX and across the wider stock market.

ATZ.TOTSX
Consumer CyclicalApparel - Retail
$135.33
$2.39(1.74%)
Canadian Market opens in 13h 4m

Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry

Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for ATZ.TO and its TSX peers.

SymbolPriceChange %Market CapP/E RatioEPSDividend Yield
ATZ.TOCA$135.33-1.74%13B35.51CA$3.81N/A
LULU.NECA$5.16+0.98%17.8B8.55CA$0.61N/A
ROOT.TOCA$3.35-2.05%131.4M18.61CA$0.18N/A

Stock Comparison

Select a stock to compare (requires JavaScript). Showing default comparison.

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (NEO: LULU.NE)

ATZ.TO vs LULU.NE Comparison July 2026

Aritzia Inc. (TSX: ATZ.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATZ.TO stands at 13B. In comparison, LULU.NE has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATZ.TO is priced at CA$135.33 on the TSX, while LULU.NE trades at CA$5.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATZ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.51, whereas LULU.NE's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, ATZ.TO's ROE is +0.34%, compared to LULU.NE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ATZ.TO is more volatile compared to LULU.NE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATZ.TO.Check LULU.NE's competition here

Stock price comparison of stocks in the Consumer Cyclical Sector

Loading...

Frequently Asked Questions