What are the top competitors of Aritzia Inc. in Consumer Cyclical sector?

The top competitors of Aritzia Inc. in the Consumer Cyclical sector are: Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU.NE), Roots Corporation (ROOT.TO).

Which has better valuations & earnings, Aritzia Inc. or its competitors?

Aritzia Inc. has a market cap of 15.1B and a Dividend Yield of N/A compared to its competitors.

Which stock is more profitable: Aritzia Inc. or its competitors?

Aritzia Inc. has an EPS of $3.27, while LULU.NE has an EPS of $0.61. So, Aritzia Inc. is more profitable compared to LULU.NE.

What is Aritzia Inc. stock volatility and risk in terms of investment?

Aritzia Inc. has daily volatility of 4.04% as compared to its competitor LULU.NE which is 1.64%. Aritzia Inc. is more volatile as compared to competitors and has high risk.

Is Aritzia Inc. stock profitable?

Aritzia Inc. has a Return on Equity (ROE) of 0.30%. So, Aritzia Inc. is more profitable.

What is Aritzia Inc. stock’s 52 weeks high and low?

Aritzia Inc. stock has a 52-week high of ($174.52) and a low of ($69.08).

What was the average volume of Aritzia Inc. stock?

The average volume of Aritzia Inc. is (672.5K) in terms of investment.

Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

See (ATZ.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.

ATZ.TO●TSX

Consumer CyclicalApparel - Retail

$156.39

$2.76(1.80%)

Canadian Market opens in 12h 19m

Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry

Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.

Symbol	Price	Change %	Market Cap	P/E Ratio	EPS	Dividend Yield
ATZ.TO	CA$156.39	+1.80%	15.1B	47.84	CA$3.27	N/A
LULU.NE	CA$4.93	-0.80%	16.8B	8.06	CA$0.61	N/A
ROOT.TO	CA$3.83	-6.36%	150.2M	21.69	CA$0.18	N/A

Stock Comparison

Select a stock to compare (requires JavaScript). Showing default comparison.

ATZ.TO vs LULU.NE Comparison July 2026

ATZ.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ATZ.TO stands at 15.1B. In comparison, LULU.NE has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATZ.TO is priced at CA$156.39, while LULU.NE trades at CA$4.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ATZ.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 47.84, whereas LULU.NE's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, ATZ.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LULU.NE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ATZ.TO is more volatile compared to LULU.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATZ.TO.Check LULU.NE's competition here